|
|
How can I sing the Lord's praises if I feel fat...forever?
|
by Christodolous Moraitis
27 July 2002
I don't know about you, but I don't like my body.
I've gotten used to it because it gets me around places, but overall,
I could do without it. I am fat. Not obese or anything, but I am
certainly not thin, or anywhere close to that. My best years were
quite some time ago, when a week of working out actually produced
some glimmer of hope. Nowadays, after having turned thirty a couple
years ago, my metabolism has slowed even more, so I feel even fatter.
Excuse me for a minute while I eat a couple cookies to get over
it.
When we're teenagers, our awkwardness was Painfully Obvious, especially
when we looked at the ease by which the popular kids gelled their
hair and looked kick-ass in their expensive clothes. For me, a lot
of it was the dawning horror that my baby fat was still clinging
to me like a security blanket, refusing to go away. I started getting
larger shirt sizes because the ones I normally wore were highlighting
my inelegant adolescent fatness like a neon sign. I wasn't the 98-pound
weakling: I was the 198-pound endomorphic fool with little girl
breasts and a stomach best suited for the widescreen presentation
of "How the West Was Won."
Okay, a little bit of hyperbole but you get the point. Most of
us deal with our less-than-perfect bodies as we get older -- especially
when we get into our thirties and slip into real people's bodies
and don't mind getting larger pant sizes at Eddie Bauer.
But a few years ago, I came across a very weird
book called "The
Physics of Immortality," by Frank Tipler. It was a book
about resurrection...and the physicist author's proof that we will
all be resurrected at some point (called the Omega Point) in the
future. And that's when it struck me: you mean I have to spend eternity
in a body that I never really liked while on earth?
Homer described the deathless gods often in terms
of their beauty, and the denizens of Olympus were indeed, eternally
youthful requiring nothing but ambrosia. But when we think of resurrection
and eternity, do we consider what our bodies are going to be like?
We assume that physical resurrection means a body free from blemishes
or defects, but as someone who has never had a physical ailment
and have never possessed a frame that I've been comfortable with,
what does this actually mean for me? Will I get to choose what kind
of body I'd prefer to spend eternity in, or is what I dragged around
earth the only option?
A popular answer might be that it just won't matter:
i.e., those earthly concerns about my physical self have no place
in a heavenly realm. But if I'm lucky enough to get there and we
spend day and night in the celestial temple of the Lord, shouldn't
I look my best?
What exactly is the point of resurrection? What
purpose does it possibly serve, if most people's religious beliefs
like to picture an afterlife where we are with friends and family
(unless you're Southern Baptist, where eternity is laughing endlessly
at the pain of the damned, which is just about everybody who isn't
Southern Baptist). Or that we are going to be re-united with God.
Or that we will just generally in a perpetual state of bliss --
provided, of course, that we merit this bliss in the first place.
So many of the world's religious beliefs center
around a person's soul. In the West, we talk about the "spirit
and the flesh" as two entities locked in combat with one another,
with the spirit being the more superior aspect. We talk about meeting
soul mates, kindred spirits and psychic connections with one another,
and consider those bonds inherently better descriptions of how we
feel internally. We talk about "being spiritual," which
for many of us is a way out of following religious rituals but staking
out enough of a claim just in case. Even then, we consider being
spiritual as more valuable since it enables us to experience the
divine in myriad ways without needing to convert.
So if the spirit is eternal and indestructible,
what is the need for a physical resurrection of the flesh? To be
sure, even if we conceive of an afterlife, we picture ourselves
as we are now, in our bodies being with loved ones, but it's doubtful
that many of us actually ask, what do we do before a physical resurrection?
If we have an idea of a spiritual afterlife, what can more can resurrection
accomplish? To demonstrate how perfection could be on the temporal
plane that we just exited? For those with a belief in "the
world to come," this temporal plane is imperfect: what purpose
is temporal perfection via resurrection if we believe that our souls
are going to be at play in Elysium?
Tipler in his book worked from the perspective
that a universal resurrection is a fact that will definitely occur,
and that prompts us to ask: so what happens in between the moment
of death and resurrection? He states that we are, for all purposes,
in a state of sleep, so that the soul that dies could have experienced
death thousands of years ago or just minutes before a universal
resurrection. But he never explains why a resurrection is necessary
in the first place, and so many of our popularly held religious
views fail to explain it also.
Especially for those of us duly unimpressed with
what we're stuck with on earth.
|