<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/DTDs/Podcast-1.0.dtd">
	<channel>
<title>the speed at which we travel</title><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html</link><description>Todd Wold Blog RSS Feed</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:rights>Copyright 2005-2006</dc:rights><dc:date>2008-08-18T21:51:49-05:00</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.realmacsoftware.com/" />
<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:woldcreative@mac.com" /><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:56:28 -0600</lastBuildDate><item><title>Hiatus</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2008-08-18T21:51:49-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-899</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-899</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve checked at all lately, you&#8217;ll notice that the pace of my posting has slowed way down.  Way down.  Here&#8217;s the thing: In the process of finishing my project, I&#8217;ve decided to move toward another blog that is fully devoted to the topic of commercial media communication and the church.  There&#8217;s a lot to look at and discuss in this arena, and I think I&#8217;m better off separating this from my lighter personal and tech fare.  In addition, I&#8217;m finding less time available to post personal and tech writing&#8212;and I feel strongly about redirecting my writing energies (now that the academic project is near complete) toward a new, more focused site.

That said, there is much to do in going to a new blog&#8212;and I&#8217;m hoping to up the ante by changing software platforms.  That, in itself, may take a few months of work.  In the mean time, the TSAWWT will stay live right here in case anyone is interested in archived posts, and I may post sporadically if needed&#8212;if anything to keep folks abreast of the progress toward the new site.  As a parting shot that will be featured here for a few months, I will close out with a post on a concept that I think needs increased attention: Externality.  I've had this in my head for a while, so it's nice to get it posted.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The commercial church and externality</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-08-18T21:36:12-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-898</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-898</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I came to this idea last year in the midst of my grad-level organizational communication class....  The purpose of this post is to walk through this line of thinking more thoroughly.

But first, I have to define the first phrase in this post&#8217;s title: &#8220;the commercial church.&#8221;  This phrase was coined to identify churches that have embraced an advertising and marketing approach to their mediated, public communication.

It helps to identify this specifically in order to avoid generalizing churches that fall into other descriptive categories because of size or organizational structure (for example, megachurches, mainline churches, etc.).  In short, any church could be considered a commercial church if its mediated communication appeals to people as consumers and the message is centered on the church and/or God as a competing life solution for individuals in a crowded marketplace of commercial culture.  Certain churches may be more prone to commercial communication methods than others, but this has more to do with the people communicating than it does size or affiliation.

That brings us to the idea of &#8220;externality&#8221; as it pertains to the mediated, public communication of the church.  To properly define this in the church context, the linked clip below provides the classic definition from Nobel laureate Milton Friedman.  <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aCGTD5Bn1m0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aCGTD5Bn1m0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="250" height="203"></embed></object>

&#8220;An externality is the effect of a transaction between two individuals on a third party who has not consented to or played any role in the carrying out of that transaction.&#8221;

...At first blush, using this line of reasoning to evaluate church communication might seem like a stretch.  But it&#8217;s appropriate to apply the concept of externality to the church because the very idea of embracing an advertising and marketing approach to evangelism and church growth is borrowed from the business world....  What is the externality of how the church is communicating?  What are the externalities of commercial communication when the message is the Gospel and the communicators represent The Church?

It&#8217;s all too easy to view all media as neutral conduits for our messages.  But as has been posted here before, media are far from neutral conduits.  Advertising in particular has a specific ideology that thoroughly contextualizes messages.

...Externality, in the sense I am using the word, is the effect of this type of communication on those whom don&#8217;t respond as customers/converts.  Apart from the ones who are won over, who are the ones who are disillusioned, confused, offended, or driven further away?

...To take the business analogy a little further, the church tends to only report new sales, while it avoids dwelling too much on attrition and doesn&#8217;t even think to measure campaigns in terms of lost prospects.

...While we know not everyone will choose to believe the message of the Kingdom and become followers of Jesus, this truth is not a blanket exemption from being responsible for the externalities of how we choose to communicate.

Exxon, for example, cannot morally ignore the tragic externality of environmental pollution after an oil spill like the Valdez just because it is achieving record profits for its shareholders.

While the truth of scripture is eternal, how we choose to communicate can be fallible and corruptible (read: counterproductive).  If commercial methods of communication serve to further pollute the social environment we inhabit, it is appropriate to consider whether we&#8217;ve moved two steps forward and three steps backward in advancing the Kingdom.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>No surprise: Disappointed in Rick Warren&#x2019;s politics forum</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-08-17T21:29:36-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-897</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-897</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I had issues with this whole event in terms of the church context and politics.  Those (major) issues aside, I was completely disappointed by the questions that Rick Warren asked Sunday.  This Washington Post commentary by David Waters really sums that all up for me.  Since TSAWWT is going on hiatus, I&#8217;ll depart from my usual policy of not doing political posts.  Follow the link and read the piece to understand what follows:

If David Waters&#8217; set of questions seem to have a certain bias, congratulate yourself for recognizing the obvious.  The fact is, both Warren&#8217;s and Waters&#8217; questions reek of bias.  But Warren&#8217;s claim to provide a fair and equal forum on faith issues ignores this reality.

<div class="image-right"></divWhat was asked and how the questions were played off of by the candidates provides a clear example of a profound bias in question selection.  If McCain had been asked to write his own &#8220;faith-based&#8221; questions, they would have been the same ones that were asked.  I doubt the same could be said for Obama.  And it is question bias that serves as the subtext for the inflated controversy over the &#8220;cone of silence.&#8221;  McCain didn&#8217;t need to listen in beforehand.  These were the questions he and his staff knew (hoped) were coming because they had done their homework.  They shouldn&#8217;t be faulted for that.

So, what is the bias in Warren&#8217;s case?  He asked the questions that he thought most evangelicals would want to hear answers to.  He didn&#8217;t necessarily ask questions that all evangelicals need to hear answers to.  There&#8217;s a difference.

Do I show my own bias by really wanting to hear both candidates' answers to David Waters&#8217; questions too&#8212;important questions of faith that will now go unanswered?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>So what&#x27;s your story?</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-08-16T21:27:38-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-896</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-896</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[&#8220;&#8230;the way the gospel is known is by one person being for another person the story of Jesus.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Waxing algorithmic</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2008-08-15T21:23:45-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-895</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/index.html#unique-entry-id-895</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divWant to know when a past pop/entertainment culture is so old that it&#8217;s new again?  Here&#8217;s a hint: The new X-Files movie should have waited until 2018 to debut.  Charting the right time to dust off an old cultural icon in order to cash in on the latent nostalgia is serious business if you&#8217;re from Hollywood.  Everything from board games to The Smurf&#8217;s are headed to the big screen, for better or worse.

This tongue-in-cheek article from Wired explores the mathematical formulae of cultural nostalgia.  In all seriousness, this works out pretty well to help explain the popularity of the new Doctor Who (BBC) and BattleStar Galactica (SciFi), which saw their highest ratings a generation ago in the 70s.  At this rate, we should see a new version of Firefly in about 20 years.

As for the new X-Files, does anyone care?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I left my Bible in the cloud</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2008-07-22T21:06:41-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-36.html#unique-entry-id-894</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-36.html#unique-entry-id-894</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This post is a mea culpa of sorts.  Since I posted rather critically about LifeChurch.tv&#8217;s virtual megachurch foray into Second Life (from a media ecology and cultural perspective), I thought a post was in order on something the same organization produced that I think is fantastic (my first impression).

I downloaded the YouVersion Bible reader from the iTunes App Store for my iPod Touch 2.0 a week ago. And I used it in church this Sunday (upon discovering the WiFi reaches into the auditorium at WHC).  All I can say is: I love it.  And thank you.  Check out the video for a tour.  <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tRuzijwyfr4&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tRuzijwyfr4&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object>

The text is beautiful and the page turning is smoothly touch-based.  Several major translations are available, including three in Espa&#241;ol.  I&#8217;m just happy to know I have TNIV at my fingertips.  Plus, there are all kinds of social networking features centered on the text.  Check that out on their web site for more details.  This is Web 2.0 ministry innovation that I can get excited about.  Virtual reality megachurch campuses?  Not so much.

Did I mention it&#8217;s free?  That&#8217;s the perfect price for the Bible.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Diagnosing the cost disease</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-07-22T21:02:31-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-36.html#unique-entry-id-893</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-36.html#unique-entry-id-893</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I was tipped off to this article from the Strib that ran in the Saturday paper.  It&#8217;s worth a critical read.  More worth reading are the reader comments because they speak to some the "externalities" of the megachurch and the ministry marketing paradigm&#8212;something I&#8217;ll define in a future post.

As for this post, I was following reporter Jeff Strickler along as he discovered all the effort and angst that goes into &#8220;one hour on a Sunday&#8221; at Eagle Brook Church in White Bear Lake and other venues (yeah, the one that installed the cupholders in their theater-style seats), when an innocent observation he made reached out and hit me on the head.  He had done his homework and landed an interview with Scott Thumma, one of my research sources on megachurch stats.  The conversation got into church giving trends and growth trends, and there it was:

&#8220;Another myth about megachurches, according to researcher Thumma, is that they spend a lot of time begging for money.  In fact, most take a rather relaxed approach.  That includes Eagle Brook, despite an annual budget nearing $10 million.  Like a big-box mega-store that holds down prices with volume, Eagle Brook's continuous growth means they don't have to lean on members to dig deep; an ever-increasing number of hands slip cash into offering baskets.&#8221;

Strickler connected the dots&#8212;all the more remarkable because his article does not reflect any sort of critical or biased tone (In fact, I&#8217;m sure Eagle Brook would read this piece as good PR).  As the excerpt above explains, Megachurches operate on an economy of scale financial model, whether they know it or not.  The conclusions drawn by Mark Chaves in his 2006 article (I blogged about this well-researched article in March) are largely confirmed by the above observation.  A major growth factor in megachurches during an era of flat growth in the church overall has to do with Baumol&#8217;s Cost Disease.  (Baumol is pictured.)

<div class="image-right"></divChurches must achieve scale in order to provide the &#8220;services&#8221; people (read: consumers) expect.  Since the 1970s, giving levels per family unit haven&#8217;t sustained smaller churches&#8212;especially as they tended flocks that were increasingly straying toward the capabilities of larger churches.

Currently, we find polar opposites emerging, with simple/house/missional churches on one end of the spectrum and so-called &#8216;gigachurches&#8217; emerging on the other.  There still churches of every size imaginable on our spectrum, but your 50 to 500 size congregations are increasingly coming under financial strain regardless of whether they try to compete with the giants or intentionally attempt to stay smaller.  Compete or die has become the operative norm, leading some churches to the ministry marketing paradigm, and others into the strange, new world of church mergers and video venues.

Rather than offer deeper reflection on the some of the more telling quotes in the piece, Achievable Ends has done it better here.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>This is my last post about how awful Windows Vista is&#x2026;</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2008-07-22T20:45:31-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-36.html#unique-entry-id-892</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-36.html#unique-entry-id-892</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[In truth, I haven&#8217;t posted about the age-old question for quite some time.  Part of that has been the resurgence of the Mac (now the number three computer company in the world), which has been widely covered elsewhere.  If you&#8217;ve missed it, just google &#8220;Mac market share&#8221; and bone up on it through recent news articles.

In many ways the question has been answered by most tech writers out there today....  I know of a few people that are perfectly happy on Vista (just a few) and they really don&#8217;t know what they are missing, or why Vista has such a bad rep.

...Use what works and don&#8217;t worry about it.  But if you are interested in what all the fuss is about, this recent piece in the New York Times lays out the issues for Microsoft very well.  If there is any empathy for a huge company like Microsoft, this may be the appropriate place for it.  Getting to a version of Windows that is on par (under the hood) with Mac OS X will require enormous effort:

<div class="image-right"></divWindows has put on a lot of weight over the years.  Beginning as a thin veneer for older software code, it has become an obese monolith built on an ancient frame.  Adding features, plugging security holes, fixing bugs, fixing the fixes that never worked properly, all while maintaining compatibility with older software and hardware&#8212;is there anything Windows doesn&#8217;t try to do?

Painfully visible are the inherent design deficiencies of a foundation that was never intended to support such weight.  Windows seems to move an inch for every time that Mac OS X or Linux laps it.

Speed and performance are now the real differentiators between Mac and Windows&#8212;not of the hardware, but the software.  People will need significantly higher-end hardware to get the most out of Vista&#8212;or for Microsoft to add features that Mac OS offers without a noticeable performance hit.  The price point debate on Macs versus Windows now has a new wrinkle.  How much computing muscle do you have to buy to get close to parity with a Mac?

...Overcoming the gap will require a complete rewrite of Windows, as the NYT article explores.  However doing so would pose great financial and brand risk to Microsoft&#8212;a catch 22 that could further alienate customers and drive more people from the platform.

There may come a day when a new Windows overcomes its past and works as well or better than other systems....  But as former Apple software architect Avadis Tevanian told the Times, the question is whether Microsoft &#8220;has the intestinal fortitude&#8221; to pull it off.

With Bill Gates now officially retired, the future of Windows is anything but secure.  I hear they are readying a huge Ad campaign to go after Apple's Ads....  But I think $100 million would be better spent in an R&D lab figuring out what to do about Vista's present and future speed issues.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Show me the money</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Film</category><dc:date>2008-07-22T20:39:20-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-36.html#unique-entry-id-891</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-36.html#unique-entry-id-891</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[With my project focusing on film industry marketing to churches, I ran across this little info-gem last week and thought I would pass it along.  It's an interactive timeline infographic that charts Hollywood films and their gross earnings from 1986 to 2008.  The portion below includes Jerry McGuire, just for the sake of my clever headline.

What makes this so cool is that the entire thing is interactive.  If you click on a region of the graph, it pops-up a message with the movie&#8217;s gross receipts and a link to a synopsis.  It represents both an elegant and engaging way to present numeric data, along with the hyperlinked power of the Web.  This is one of the finest examples of useful interactive and linky web media I've ever seen.

Check out some of your favorite movies over the past 20 years (requires flash 9 in your browser).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 11</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-05-16T22:05:24-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-890</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-890</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The starting point for my MA project has really been about viewing church congregations as advertising audiences (a thoroughly objectified state).  From that perspective, one can begin to understand how the media industry is shifting its resources toward reaching such audiences (in the context of the church culture) in an era where their traditional mediums, such as television, are providing an increasingly less reliable audience commodity value.

<div class="image-right"></divI recently downloaded and listened to a lecture by Sut Jhally, media communication professor at The University of Massachusetts (located here).  In the presentation, Jhally makes emphatic and compelling arguments that the time people spending watching television is a real and quantifiable expenditure of work time....  This is largely consistent with what Dallas Smythe observed in the 70s, and has been largely accepted as a practical reality.

...Because what Jhally doesn&#8217;t address in his 2007 speech is what is happening to the media consciousness industry in the Web 2.0 world.  He makes some general comments about the commodification process extending to new media, but doesn&#8217;t deal with the way this commodity value (for advertisers) is beginning to be redirected (by audiences) toward participatory media activity.  And this is key, because it shifts the whole concept of audience commodity value away from the media industry and advertisers toward the audience.

This idea became clear to me after viewing the O&#8217;Reilly Web 2.0 Expo Conference presentation by Clay Shirky of NYU&#8217;s Tisch ITP program....  <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://blip.tv/scripts/flash/showplayer.swf?enablejs=true&feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fweb2expo%2Eblip%2Etv%2Frss&file=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Frss%2Fflash%2F862384%3Freferrer%3Dblip%2Etv%26source%3D1&showplayerpath=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Fscripts%2Fflash%2Fshowplayer%2Eswf" width="250" height="203" allowfullscreen="true" id="showplayer"><param name="movie" value="http://blip.tv/scripts/flash/showplayer.swf?enablejs=true&feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fweb2expo%2Eblip%2Etv%2Frss&file=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Frss%2Fflash%2F862384%3Freferrer%3Dblip%2Etv%26source%3D1&showplayerpath=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Fscripts%2Fflash%2Fshowplayer%2Eswf" /><param name="quality" value="best" /><embed src="http://blip.tv/scripts/flash/showplayer.swf?enablejs=true&feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fweb2expo%2Eblip%2Etv%2Frss&file=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Frss%2Fflash%2F862384%3Freferrer%3Dblip%2Etv%26source%3D1&showplayerpath=http%3A%2F%2Fblip%2Etv%2Fscripts%2Fflash%2Fshowplayer%2Eswf" quality="best" width="250" height="203" name="showplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object>

What is happening, according to Shirky, is that this &#8220;cognitive surplus&#8221; value of television watching is slowly being redirected toward more meaningful activities&#8212;participatory Web media being a chief beneficiary.  Fellow NYU colleague, Jay Rosen, offered a few summation points on Shirky&#8217;s presentation (the full post can be found here):

&#8220;A cognitive surplus means the total amount of unoccupied free time available (think of it as &#8220;screen hours&#8221;) after the basic needs of society have been met.

...&#8220;[Shirky] figures it took 100 million hours of people around the world writing, checking, editing, gathering, and talking it over (and fighting!)...  Therefore if 99 percent of the TV watching in the US remained as is, and we broke off just one percent for the information commons and other cool stuff we could have 100 Wikipedia-[sized] projects per year.&#8221;

&#8220;[Shirky] thinks we can reverse the time sink for people once marooned on the receiving end of a one-way system that didn&#8217;t care what you thought or brought to it, since it couldn&#8217;t afford the costs of interacting with you."

<div class="image-right"></divShirky also drew an intriguing historical analogy: Gin was to the industrial revolution as the sit-com was to the post-WW2 consumer age.

...And just as gin producers quickly developed an industry to monetize people&#8217;s need to cope with dramatic social changes, the media industry quickly developed a capacity to monetize people&#8217;s free time via television technology and advertising.

As Jhally pointed out in his 2007 lecture, initially, radio and television programs were created to provide programming that would entice people to purchase radios and televisions.  Once people had made those technology investments, the model shifted from primarily relying on static product revenue to relying on advertising revenue tied to audiences that seemed to have continual growth potential.

Today, of course, it is the overall loss of audience commodity value that is pushing the media industry and advertisers toward new venues like the church.

...One the one hand, economic and consumeristic forces are driving the growth of megachurches (see my post from March referencing Mark Chaves&#8217; article and his take on the economics affecting churches)....  Here Bill Kinnon and others see an exciting parallel with emerging, missional expressions of the church in Shirky&#8217;s presentation.

The media industry, along with church growth marketing agencies that have a vested financial interest in advancing an advertising and marketing evangelism paradigm with churches, are increasingly targeting megachurches, their satellites and like-minded church plants because of the quality of the audience commodity and their economies of scale for reaching them.

...There is a path that leads toward further commercialization of time, and another that leads toward the de-commercialization of time.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Getting The Weepies on the road</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2008-05-16T21:50:14-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-889</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-889</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I have a tradition of buying a new record when I go on a road trip.  Provided I&#8217;m not engrossed in conversation with fellow travelers or competing with the squealing of my brood of children (3 under the age of 10 right now), traveling allows me to really immerse myself in the music&#8212;a rare pleasure these days.

<div class="image-right"></divRecently I squeezed in enough time to download The Weepies before hitting the road with the fam to endure the straight and flat monotony of Mpls to Omaha via I-35 and I-80 at roughly 70 mph.  While not an optimal music experience, I was able to catch some good listening time during the enevitable napping (when little E and middle E nap at the same time, its like the stars align and a new age of world peace has dawned).  The Weepies are my new favorite band.

So take this as an endorsement.  Check them out on the Web and MySpace.  Far from inducing the tears their name suggests, The Weepies helped me regain some serenity amid one of our more chaotic family trips.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Get your sell detector</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2008-05-16T21:37:01-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-888</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-888</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divMore and more I&#8217;m recognizing the presence of stealth advertising.  It may be product placement in a movie, or a supposed news interview with a celebrity that has a new movie or book coming out.  I&#8217;ll be watching something or reading something, connect the dots to a stealth sales pitch, and almost uncontrollably blurt out: &#8220;I&#8217;ve just been advertised to.&#8221;  It&#8217;s as if I&#8217;ve developed a form of advertising radar.

It can be annoying&#8212;more so for the people in my life.  But I think it&#8217;s a good thing.  The truth is, more and more of our public discourse is being orchestrated to accommodate ubiquitous commercial messages.  My hope is that I can infect more people with the same sensibility.

After all, as G.I.  Joe once aptly said, &#8220;knowing is half the battle.&#8221;  (Of course, the other half of the battle includes the violence and the killing, which is totally not my point here.)]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>WWDC 2008: A shiny new thing</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2008-05-16T21:21:51-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-887</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-887</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I really have one prediction for this year&#8217;s WWDC Stevenote, and I may be very wrong.  But I think I&#8217;m just may be right&#8212;even when Intel and others are trying to poo-poo any rumors to this effect.

<div class="image-right"></divOn June 9 Steve Jobs will have &#8220;one more thing&#8221; to talk about after he opines on the 3G iPhone, OS X Leopard and new MacBook designs.  That thing will be a multi-touch OS X slate computer with an intel processor and a host of WiFi and cell-based internet capabilities (like video chat and a touch browser).  It will not be a phone.  It will not be a PDA.  It will not be a laptop.  It will not be an iPod.  It will do everything these devices do&#8212;but in a new way.  All by touching, tapping, pinching and gesturing.

While Microsoft thinks itself innovative by showing off a concept &#8220;table&#8221; the size of a 80s-era Galaga machine, Apple will have all that and a bag of chips in your mobile hands by the end of this year.  Of course, if you do eat chips you may want to wash your hands before getting your MacTouch all greasy.

If you think the MacBook Air was thin, what &#8216;til you see this.  The multi-touch revolution is on!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 10</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-05-06T20:53:20-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-886</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-886</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Can I get a witness?

<div class="image-right"></divAs has been said here before (by whom, I have no idea): What you win them with, you win them to.  In one way my entire project is about this.  Yet, it is always good to get confirmation from someone who knows.  That's exactly what I believe the excerpt below accomplishes.  Shane Hipps recently responded to a question on his Third Way Faith blog that I have to share.  Hipps is a former advertising executive who left the ad game to attend seminary and become a Mennonite pastor.  His recent book (in my library links) shines the exposing light of 60s and 70s communication sage, Marshall McLuhan on the relationship between spirituality and electronic culture in the digital age.

Hipps responds to a question about whether he can apply skills or approaches from his advertising career to his job as a pastor.  His response:

"...the primary task of my previous life was to try and highjack your imagination, brand your brain with a Porsche logo, and then feed you opinions you thought were your own.  I can't think of a method more opposed to the process of deepening and evolving the spiritual life.  So I'm very aware of intentionally not translating or using these methods.

In my experience, the best thing I can do to lead people spiritually is to show them love.  At the heart of love is making space, honoring the free will of the other.  This requires that I intentionally divest myself of their outcomes, decisions, and conclusions.  Sounds counter-intuitive, but then again, most things in the life of faith are.  When someone senses that I need them to grow to validate myself, it usually hinders their growth.  When they sense that I love them and have no need for them to take my advice, they're more free to do so if they choose.  This I've found to be the most fertile soil for spiritual evolution.  And it is diametrically opposed to the tasks of advertising and marketing, which are driven entirely by outcomes."]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Serenity now&#x21;</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Film</category><dc:date>2008-05-04T21:06:47-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-885</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-885</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I rented the movie, Serenity a few months ago, which is the feature film installment of the cancelled yet renowned TV show, Firefly.  While I didn&#8217;t expect all that much going into it cold, I was starved for some sci-fi.  As it turned out, I was pleasantly surprised.  Serenity was different&#8212;way different.  And different is good.

<div class="image-right"></divThis led me to borrow the complete series from a friend at my office.  In the interim between finishing* Doctor Who season 3 and getting my hands on BSG season 3 after a long wait and vigilant spoiler avoidance, Firefly (2002) has been exactly what I needed.  To get the lowdown on the series, read the wiki.  It&#8217;s a Joss Whedon series, so that should tell you a little but about why it&#8217;s different.

*We have a cable-free house and traditionally wait for our favorite shows on DVD via Netflix.  The upside is watching the shows on our schedule while avoiding cable fees.  The down side is waiting out a full season and avoiding spoilers.

You'll find the back story on this series from the wiki entry and how 20th century fox cancelled it before the end of the first season.  It continues to amaze me how the really interesting and promising shows can get killed off by short-sighted TV execs who can&#8217;t see the potential of anything beyond weekly ratings.  Firefly has sold a boatload of DVDs and spawned a pretty good motion picture.  Not bad for a cancelled show.  As I have worked my way through the episodes, I am simultaneously enjoying this great show/cast, and saddened that the story won&#8217;t go on.

Aside from BSG and Doctor Who imports, is there anything else on SciFi worth watching?  Last time I checked, there isn&#8217;t.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Donna Martin graduates&#x21;</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2008-05-04T21:00:54-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-884</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-34.html#unique-entry-id-884</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[And so will I.  I&#8217;ve been staring down the barrel of a deadline this past month, which I hope explains why I haven&#8217;t posted.  Every shred of writing time has been devoted to full drafts of my thesis chapters 1, 2 & 3.

With that overblown deadline behind me, I&#8217;m pleased to announce I have been &#8220;approved to walk,&#8221; which is the graduate school lingo for being allowed to participate in commencement and receive my M.A. in Communication (actually, I receive an empty decorative folder&#8212;the diploma is issued once I complete and defend my thesis).

Saturday, May 24, I get hooded like a proper master.  And at some point after that, my family gets a full-time dad back.

So grab picket sign and march, people!  Donna Martin graduates!  <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iunYmHH0UNI&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iunYmHH0UNI&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 9</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-03-28T21:51:32-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-883</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-883</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[While there may be some truth in both of those statements, the disease hypothesis is not original to me--and it is not meant to be pejorative.  It was something I came across in my research yesterday that I think is worthy of some reflection.  As far as I can google, it has only been blogged about one other place (here), so this post should almost double its exposure.

...of Religion) penned a cover story for Christian Century that plumbed the depths of the available quantitative and qualitative research to uncover the driving forces behind the rise of megachurches in America since 1970.

...For the past decade or more there has been an argument in evangelicalism&#8212;one I&#8217;ve participated in from my own small corner of limited influence.  The argument has been over whether megachurches are successful (by the numbers of people attending them) because of their ability to attract the unchurched through innovative outreach methods involving marketing, a consumer experience orientation and large gatherings with the high production values of entertainment media.  Critics have argued that overall church attendance in America is not growing, but has stagnated:

&#8220;It sometimes is said that the secret to megachurch success is that megachurches have figured out how to attract the unchurched....  The only study I know of that compares very large churches with smaller churches concludes that there is no difference between the two in the percentage of new members who were not previously involved with a church.  So the increasing concentration of people in the very largest churches is not a consequence of megachurches tapping into a previously uninvolved population.  Increased concentration is occurring mainly because people are shifting from smaller to larger churches, not because people are shifting from uninvolvement to involvement in big churches.&#8221;

So what is the impetus for all this megachurch growth&#8212;this concentration of more people into larger congregations&#8212;which has been accelerating since the 1970s?...  informed by research, offers an increasingly plausible explanation: It&#8217;s the economy, stupid:

&#8220;&#8230;the increased concentration of people in the very largest churches is caused in part by rising costs that make it more and more difficult to run a church at a customary level of programming and quality.

...The basic idea is simple: if there is increasing productivity and efficiency in some sectors of the economy, and if wages increase in those sectors, then wages also will increase in other sectors, or else talent will move to the sectors in which wages are increasing.&#8221;

Professional church workers (pastors, staff) require ongoing wage and benefit increases to keep pace with life in the U.S. economy.

...&#8220;&#8230;churches face ever-rising real costs with no significant opportunities to reduce those costs by becoming more efficient.  The only options in such a situation are to sacrifice quality or increase revenue.&#8221;

It&#8217;s no coincidence that revenues (via giving) for churches have not kept pace since the 1970s, when the evangelical megachurch trend began.

&#8220;&#8230;increases in donations are not often compared to the rate at which the costs of running a church have increased.  Beginning in about 1970 the rate at which donations increased stopped keeping pace with the rate at which the costs of running a church increased.&#8221;

<div class="image-right"></divMegachurches offer better economies of scale, and their growth is directly correlated to their ability to provide more people with the (customer) services no longer available from smaller churches due to rising costs for operations and labor.  The cold, calculated truth is that megachurch growth is being driven mostly by Christians shopping for better service at a cheaper price&#8212;the Wal-Mart phenomenon in more ways that one.

Chaves offers a theory that, rather than reassuring me in the thought that megachurches have a kingdom impact (I think some do), convinces me that the commodification of the church is far more entrenched in American Christianity than I dared assume.  And as it turns out, the church is being commodified by the consumer before the church returns the favor and commodifies the audience and the message.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 8</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-03-18T22:45:58-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-882</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-882</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Continuing with my last post in the &#8220;Commodify me, oh Lord&#8221; series, I came across this quote from Noami Klein taken from an online interview for the 2004 PBS Frontline report, The Persuaders.  She again mentions Disney&#8217;s Celebration community like she did in her No Logo documentary, but then adds this additional point:

&#8220;It&#8217;s one of the ironies of our branded age, that unbranded space.  Public space, or pseudo-public space, is now a luxury item that is only really available to the very rich.  Once you move up the class hierarchy, things get a lot more tranquil and quiet, and you sort of pay not to be marketed to....  When rich people get together, they want to be protected from the brands that they got rich creating.&#8221;

Consider what this implies: Given the means, people will pay a premium to avoid advertising.  Aside from being further evidence that people prefer not to be constantly sold to, this is the reason that advertisers are looking for ways to fuse product pitches with entertainment.  For my own graduate project, it&#8217;s one of the reasons the film industry is creating Christian teaching materials to get their promotional product (movies) messages into churches.  It&#8217;s hard to avoid an ad when you don&#8217;t know it&#8217;s there.

...What propaganda has always wanted to do is not simply to suffuse the atmosphere, but to become the atmosphere....  It wants us not to be able to find a way outside of the world that it creates for us.&#8221;

...This is the hot strategy of today&#8217;s marketing strategists in terms of the multi-billion dollar evangelical Christian market.  It is being played out every time a &#8220;faith and values&#8221; movie, Christian book or major label worship artist recording is released.

The bottom line is that some pastors and church leaders are now looking to these media to co-create the culture of the church community.  There is a complicit effort to incorporate these marking messages into church teaching and worship because they allow pastors to leverage the powerful narratives of popular culture, or provide appealing and popular music for worship leaders....  The audience/congregation pays the cost for these goodies by lending their attention to the subtle, hidden promotional message.

...But are we to the point where people may begin paying not to be marketed to in the church they attend?  By paying, I mean going elsewhere, driving farther, giving up other perceived social and spiritual benefits, or quitting church altogether.  I don&#8217;t think we are all the way there yet&#8212;although I personally arrived at this juncture two years ago. What is much more likely at the present is that the pervasive &#8220;sell&#8221; of today&#8217;s church culture has become a primary deterrent to reaching those who would otherwise be compelled by the radical, counter-cultural story of the Kingdom.

While Klein makes the comment below based on her concerns about society and culture in general, let&#8217;s apply it directly to the context of the church.

...&#8220;&#8230;they've done our market research for us and proven that we actually really do want more than we're getting from our culture, which would mean that we have our marching orders.  There are these desires that are being expressed in ways that they're not actually being met through shopping, and it's a challenge to try to meet them in other ways.&#8221;

I submit that helping meet the deeper spiritual needs of people (in contrast to their felt social-consumer needs) cannot be done by creating and presenting a sanitized facsimile of consumer culture, or by employing an advertising and marketing paradigm to communicate and engage them.  People will pay not to listen&#8212;in more ways than one.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Losing face on the mean streets of NYC</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2008-03-18T22:40:50-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-881</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-881</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[We tuned into Charlie Rose last night to get the Wall Street back story on the Bear Stearns bailout from NYT&#8217;s Andrew Ross Sorkin.  (An extraordinary story, by the way.  You may not realize how close the U.S. economy came to a depression-style bank run over the weekend.)

Of course, we immediately noticed that Charlie had been assaulted by someone or something recently (see inset picture).

<div class="image-right"></divIt turns out Charlie took a face-plant early yesterday while walking the streets of New York.  He apparently tripped while shuffling along with his MacBook Air, and sacrificed his distinguished good looks for the sake of rescuing the world&#8217;s thinnest laptop from an almost certain deadly fate.

Charlie is awesome&#8212;don&#8217;t get me wrong.  But does he really need to show off by putting on airs?  Sorry.  Couldn&#8217;t resist that one.

In hindsight, we suggest a nice laptop backpack, providing both MacBook protection and hands-free operation for safer pedestrian endeavors.  It may help him save face in the future.  Please, somebody stop this post.  TSAWWT Bookmarks: <a href="javascript:location.href='http://del.icio.us/post?v=2;url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+';title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)"class="bookmarklet-image"> del.icio.us</a> | <a href="javascript:location.href='http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+';title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)"class="bookmarklet-image"> Digg</a> | <a href="javascript:void(document.location='http://www.technorati.com/faves?add='+escape(document.location))"> Technorati</a><br />]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Touch the third great platform</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2008-03-18T22:38:23-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-880</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-880</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Last week Apple introduced its SDK for the iPhone/iPod Touch.  Whereas often Apple can be accused of over promising (or over hyping) and under delivering, this presentation was a case where they exceeded the conventional expectations of most tech heads.  Yes, you&#8217;ll need to get the new goodies (starting in June) from the iTunes Appstore exclusively.  But the announcement makes it clear that this is a mobile computing platform with the potential for a new kind of software application.

<div class="image-right"></divIn short, the coolest stuff you&#8217;ll see on an iPhone or iPod Touch hasn&#8217;t been coded yet.  The sky is the limit.  Plus, a $100 million venture capital fund for software endeavors targeting the touch platform, and a strong enterprise push via compatibility with Microsoft Exchange and Outlook, along with Lotus Notes, and the future looks quite exciting.  Check out some of the demos they included in Thursday&#8217;s presentation.

John Doerr, a partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the Silicon Valley venture capital firm partnering with Apple, sees the iPhone and iPod Touch emerging as the &#8220;third great platform&#8221; for software makers after the personal computer and the worldwide web.  Here&#8217;s Doerr quoted in the London Financial Times:

&#8220;In your pocket, you have something that&#8217;s broadband and connected all the time.  It knows who you are and where you are.  That&#8217;s a big deal.  It&#8217;s bigger than the personal computer.&#8221;

Will it be bigger than the PC?  Wait and see.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 7</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-03-04T19:08:20-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-879</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-879</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Most recently I watched Naomi Klein&#8217;s No Logo (2003), which focuses on the negative effects of brand globalization on culture and workers across the globe.  There was one instance among many that really stood out to me&#8212;and it promises to be the primary example in my closing argument for a commercial free faith movement.  Since I was able to obtain the No Logo transcript from the MEF, I&#8217;ll paste the specific quote from Klein about branding here, and follow it with comments on what her example means from my perspective:

<div class="image-left"></divBecause Disney has been at this for so much longer than most companies, they have gone further.  &#8230;in a sense they&#8217;ve reached brand nirvana, they have built a Disney town called Celebration, Florida.  You can live your whole life inside the brand and that&#8217;s what thousands of families have done, they&#8217;ve packed up the kids and moved into the Disney brand full-time, they send their kids to the Disney school, and they elect representatives to the Disney council, so it&#8217;s a fully privatized life.  What&#8217;s interesting about the world&#8217;s first branded town is that there are no brands there.  If you go to Celebration, Florida you will see not a franchise, no McDonalds, you won&#8217;t see any billboards, you&#8217;ll see lots of green spaces and parks and kids riding around on bicycles.  And Disney says that this is because they built Celebration, Florida as a monument to the ideal of the American town, of public space....  Now that may be true but there&#8217;s another aspect of it as well and that aspect is that when you have finally reached your absolute brand nirvana where you have built the dream world in three dimensions and you actually have people living there full-time, the first thing you want to is you want to slam the door behind you.  And you want to make sure that there aren&#8217;t any competing messages that are in any way interrupting with this perfect synergized, cross-promoted marketing moment.

While many churches that subscribe to an advertising and marketing paradigm of evangelism may be trying to learn the finer points of branding and marketing from media giants like Disney, Klein&#8217;s example of Disney&#8217;s Celebration community in Florida has a great deal more to tell us. Although totally unintended on their part, Disney&#8217;s strategic approach with Celebration teaches us two critical things about the commercial media saturation that people live with in today&#8217;s culture: First, the fact that there are no brands and overt advertising in Celebration indicates that Disney knows people, given a choice, would not choose to be inundated with marketing and advertising.  Advertising overload is ugly, noisy and does nothing but detract from the idyllic community Disney wants Celebration to embody....  Even Disney tones down its own branding as the people living in Celebration have totally immersed themselves in a single brand environment.  Second, Disney knows that any competition for people&#8217;s attention is counter productive to the environment it wants to create and provide....  Why would you want anything interfering with your customer&#8217;s brand experience if you could control it?

...<div class="image-right"></divWhat is instructive for The Church about Disney&#8217;s Celebration community from a commercial-free faith standpoint?  It has nothing to do with branding a church or enveloping people in a 360-degree brand experience for one hour on a Sunday....  If people, given the choice, would rather be free of the constant cacophony of selling and marketing, where can they go to find an even temporary refuge?  Assuming most people won&#8217;t or can&#8217;t move to Celebration, The Church should be expressed in terms of local communities that are intentional in maintaining a commercial free context for people.  This context, if I&#8217;m right about cultural trends, could become more compelling to those outside of the faith over time as the volume level of promotional communication in our consumer culture continues to rise to new heights.

Disney&#8217;s approach also supports the argument that allowing outside brands and marketing dilutes the community experience they are trying to maintain.  Transfer that logic to the local church, where we have an established culture of faith.  The entrance of commercial media into this context, through disguised movie, music, publishing and product promotion, can only serve to dilute the relational aspects of church culture by orienting more of the communication in the community toward things, as opposed to persons&#8212;orienting people more toward consumption of products, as opposed to encounter with God and others.  Since we have an opportunity to defend the sanctuary of our community from the siege of commercial media, why shouldn&#8217;t we do exactly what Disney has done?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Steampunk that Mac</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2008-03-04T18:49:57-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-878</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-32.html#unique-entry-id-878</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[For those unfamiliar with steampunk as a fantasy genre of literature, animation and film, see this wiki.  Until yesterday, I had no idea this was also a genre of computer modding.  Indeed, it elevates modding to an artistic craft.

<div class="image-right"></divThe amazing inset pictures are of a steampunk conversion of a Mac Mini.  While this type of thing is pretty &#8220;out there,&#8221; you have to admire the vision and skill that must have gone into this.  The keyboard alone is extremely cool.

But the ultimate is the case for the Mini itself.  The hand-painted lettering and artwork (or maybe it&#8217;s decoupage) are amazing.  And while the form factor is the same as before, you can totally believe the resulting object is an antique tin box&#8212;something your grandmother might keep her sewing needles and thread inside of, rather than a 2.3 GHz Intel dual core CPU.

<div class="image-right"></divI&#8217;d go another direction for the monitor, however.  While this one has the appearance of an antique vanity mirror (flat screen), I&#8217;d be more inclined to imagine it as a cinemascope or other period appropriate visual technology held together with some crude brass and machine rivets.  Some kind of crude projector and film screen would be fabulous.

This beautiful ensemble was created as a wedding gift for the bride, so a more feminine approach is totally appropriate.

I'd love to see this done to a current model iMac--exchange the aluminum for some brass and rivets.  Or even my G5 iMac.  It's available for treatment in case any enterprising modder is interested.  Truth be told, the G5 generates so much heat that I'm sure steam power would be a definite possibility.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The gospel according to George Michael</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-02-20T21:51:46-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-877</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-877</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divJust when you think an idea only exists as a hyperbolic and hypothetical absurdity for the sake of discussion, someone somewhere makes it a reality.  That&#8217;s the thought that crossed my mind when I saw a very brief news article on CNN.com (picked up from AP) yesterday morning&#8212;which was booted up to the top of the news list yesterday due to the provocative headline, no doubt.  See the story here on the CBS web with a clip from national TV.

...My critique has nothing to do with the content of the purported sermon series.  I could care less about what this pastor is preaching about with regard to sex....  My concern has everything to do with the advertising and marketing paradigm within The Church and the ideology of the commercial media.  You can&#8217;t get away from this most tried and true fact of American advertising: sex sells&#8212;even if your &#8220;product&#8221; message is aimed at getting more butts in the pews of your church....  And can we account for the true cost to The Church at large when local church marketing gets global attention?

Let&#8217;s consider how this story found its way to CNN.com and my attention.

The almost instant media notoriety is really all about issuing press releases and putting sex and church in the headline.  The same is true for their blog and billboard advertising campaign promoting their 30-day sex challenge campaign.<div class="image-right"></divHere&#8217;s the news release, blog link and inset picture for a look at their campaign&#8217;s billboard and web ad....  You may also be interested in their the oh-so-hot YouTube trailer here.  It&#8217;s no surprise at all that Relevant Church generated publicity.  The story was picked up by more than 275 major and minor news outlets (globally) by February 20 at my count&#8212;TV, Print, Web, you name it....  If the pastor is truly doing local ministry, why blast a press release (twice) to the international media?

...Getting media attention for this is like shooting fish in a barrel&#8212;for two reasons: First, anything linking sex with the moral compass the church represents is strange enough to get the attention of reporters interested in drawing readers....  Second, most other churches have refrained from stooping this low to promote themselves in the past, making the novelty of the story even more attention-grabbing.  In a journalistic environment driven by the marketability of stories and publications to advertisers, this story gets attention&#8212;just like Linsday Lohan&#8217;s nude pics in the New Yorker.

...Contrary to what this church pastor may think, this use of marketing and advertising takes a giant leap toward objectifying sexuality and, by association, the Christian faith.  Simply put, cheap publicity stunts lead to a cheap regard for our message.  In a world torn apart by pain and evil, this is what Relevant Church has to say: "Our religion says you should be having sex everyday and you will be happy.  Join us this Sunday and we will tell you how" (not a real quote--just me interpreting their media).  It&#8217;s the salacious bait-and-switch tactic between the prurient tease derived from broader cultural values and the James 1:2-4 reality of becoming a Jesus follower.  Who wants to suffer and sacrifice when you can be having more sex?

James Twitchell (author of Shopping for God and fan of advertising in general) provides this important observation: &#8220;...when most people consume advertising, they know that they have to filter it because it's not going to be telling them the truth.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 6</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-02-14T22:11:32-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-876</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-876</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[As I have commented on in the past, this is neo denominationalism in an age of non denominational mega-churches.

But the point of this post is not to critique the practice of video venues or mega-church franchises....  My intention here is to demonstrate the advertising and marketing paradigm in the church and its prevailing economic metaphor.  So let&#8217;s look at a specific quote from &#8220;franchise&#8221; pastor Eddie Johnson in the Out of Ur article:

...So what is it about a metaphor like this that should concern us as followers of Jesus?...  Originators of metaphoric analysis and linguistic theorists, George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, suggest that metaphors not only make ideas and concepts more vivid, but that they also structure one&#8217;s perceptions and understanding.  Consider these excerpts from Lakoff and Johnson&#8217;s Metaphors We Live By, published in 1980:

&#8220;&#8230;metaphor is typically viewed as characteristic of language alone, a matter of words rather than thought or action.  &#8230; We have found, on the contrary, that metaphor is pervasive in everyday life, not just in language but in thought and action.

...What this means is that our perceptions and understanding of faith, the church, God, fellow humans and evangelism are unavoidably impacted by the words we use to describe them to ourselves and each other.

&#8220;Our concepts structure what we perceive, how we get around in the world, and how we relate to other people.

...If we take Lakoff and Johnson&#8217;s idea seriously, then we have to look at the prevailing metaphors we use in terms of how they structure and define our relationships with God, other believers and everyone else.  My argument, in this instance, is that a metaphor derived from an advertising and marketing paradigm causes us to relate to people as consumers, our church as a product, God as a vendor, pastors as salespeople, our worship as consumption, etc. If we speak in commercial language, then we will relate to others accordingly.

...I think most believers would agree that there is (or should be) a qualitative difference between a quid pro quo business relationship based on economic gain, and the Kingdom relationships described in so many passages of the New Testament, such as 1 John 3:16-18, based on selfless and sacrificial love.  (&#8220;This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for one another.  If any one of you has material possessions and sees a brother or sister in need but has no pity on them, how can the love of God be in you?

...In the comments section of the Out of Ur post, pastor Eddie Johnson invites readers to his blog where he attempts to defend his Chick-fil-A franchise &#8220;analogy&#8221; and then takes it a few steps further (his post was published on a new church blog as well).

..."...we as a church need to keep open and aggressive in looking for new, exciting and innovative methods to improve our environments and streamline our processes.

..."Excellence and attention to customer service will be our catalyst for getting people to come visit us again and again and again.  Eventually they will 'buy in' with us. And hopefully, they will bring a friend the next time they come."

...We seek to do it by creating helpful, engaging and irresistible environments that help people take that 'next step' towards a small group.  If that 'next step' isn&#8217;t an easy, obvious and strategic step&#8230;then we don&#8217;t take it.  Meaning, our franchise/church is designed to sell 'chicken' (life change) and the best way we think we can do that is by getting you into a small group."

...If the mission is drawing people to a relationship, then a metaphor of selling is its antithesis.

Honestly, I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;ll ever be able to eat a chicken filet sandwich without thinking about this.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Why I want my Apple TV</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2008-02-09T07:36:32-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-875</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-875</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[It's been a while in between tech posts.  Finally, I have something really interesting (at least to me) to share.  If you caught the news from MacWorld last month, you know Apple TV has been updated with a new interface (called Take 2) and movie rentals--even HD versions.  Oh yeah, and they cut $70 dollars off the price.

<div class="image-right"></divWhen I saw this demoed, my reaction was: that's pretty neat.  But will it be able to dethrone Netflix, and would I end up spending more money on movies via the shiny metallic and white box?  This is likely, which concerns me.  At eleven bucks a month I can pretty much devour as many movies in one month as I can find time for through Netflix (plus DVDs of my TV series favorites) At Apple TV prices for standard def, I'd be spending $16 for four movies, or $20 for HD titles.

But there was more to it than just movies.  Of course it moves all my digital media to the big screen TV and audio system and allows me to call up YouTube videos, as well.  That adds to the intrigue, but I'm still reluctant.

Then we see a patent filing that seems to indicate iChat on Apple TV and other Web widget capabilities.  Ars Technica has a good analysis of the patent app specifics.

And there it is.  The killer HDTV app I've been waiting for....  Add a web camera to the Apple TV USB port (what's it there for, anyway?)  and get a video conference going--no waiting.  And with an Apple TV 3rd party software development kit (SDK) possibly on its way allowing for even more Web widgets to enter the Apple TV world, look for Skype and other capabilities to follow.  Folks, Apple TV is a full-on Mac OS X platform, just like the iPhone and iPod touch, just in a different form factor and OS configuration.  More features are just a matter of more software being written, and new ideas being explored.  It's gonna be fun to watch this thing go from a "hobby" to the disruptive tech story of 2008.

Be sure to watch for the iChat Apple TV feature to come out in an official way this year.  I'd also bet on (or hope for) an Apple TV SDK like we see for the iPhone/iPod Touch coming out this month.  Remember that MacWorld promised a year full of great announcements from Apple.  This will be one of them.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Fake band versus real band</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2008-02-07T22:29:47-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-874</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-874</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Can you tell which band is(was) real?  <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bpV5InLw52U&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bpV5InLw52U&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object> <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/A3PTVQ6UJ8U&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/A3PTVQ6UJ8U&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object>

Seriously, you just don't hear progressive rock like this these days.  Darn those major labels!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 5</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-02-05T22:31:57-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-873</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-873</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[A late-modern paraphrase of Mark 4:26-29: This is what the kingdom of God is like: A church scatters an advertisement across various media.  Night and day, whether the church sleeps or wakes, the ad spreads and grows, though they do not know how.  All by itself the ad produces interest&#8212;first a web site visit, then a phone call, then the full-fledge visit to a weekend worship experience.  As soon as a seeker chooses to buy in to a regular weekend service, the church adds them to the headcount and registers a &#8220;conversion,&#8221; because the harvest has come.

<div class="image-right"></divTake a moment to consider whether the above paraphrase disturbs you (and you may want to compare it to the original translation).  If it doesn&#8217;t bother you, then you may be very comfortable with the prevailing metaphor of evangelism and church growth.  But if you are like me, it makes you feel uncomfortable, to say the least.  In Mark&#8217;s account, Jesus was using a simile (a type of metaphor) to liken the kingdom of God to a farmer casting seeds and reaping a harvest (to give a really simple description).  So what happens to the meaning when you exchange one metaphor with another as I have done?

...Economic and marketplace metaphors were even used by Jesus&#8212;and were very appropriate given the culture.  I don't believe, however, that he ever characterized a life of following him in terms of a product.

The issue in today&#8217;s postmodern culture is whether certain metaphors serve our message well or ill. I would argue that there&#8217;s a major difference between being relevant to the culture (by observing and understanding the ideas and trends that are active in society), and adopting the prevailing cultural metaphor to mediate your message to reach an audience.  If my &#8220;paraphrase&#8221; of Mark doesn&#8217;t disturb you, consider these examples from various articles I&#8217;ve come across in doing research:

&#8220;Nearly every pastor is a salesman or a marketer of one kind or another because ......  The best marketers and best salesmen will have more converts, will have more people, will take in more money....  Evangelicals are marketers because they&#8217;re really passionate about their product.&#8221;

&#8220;Marketing and the church, they go hand in hand [because] we're called to bring our message to a community.&#8221;

...Every organization today is having to market because there are thousands of messages bombarding the people&#8230;.

...&#8220;There is a new sense of awareness that marketing can be used effectively with the Christian message.  You have a product in terms of the person of Jesus Christ and the relevancy of what he represents and the difference he can make in a human life.&#8221;

...The truth is we don&#8217;t have a product in &#8220;the person of Jesus Christ.&#8221;...  What we carry is a message about our life &#8220;in&#8221; Jesus.  It&#8217;s our choice of metaphors that correlates this message with an objectified product in the marketplace.

...If we want to inhibit the impact of the advertising and marketing paradigm on our message meaning, we must begin by choosing a better metaphor to describe our mission.  I think we have an excellent one in a King and a Kingdom.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 4</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-02-04T17:35:41-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-872</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-31.html#unique-entry-id-872</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[What is clear from my own experience and research into church planting and megachurch models is the widespread adoption of an advertising and marketing paradigm.  In short, success for a church is predicated on the attractional capabilities you bring to the crowded marketplace for consumer attention.  Church leadership models have been transformed to mirror business structures, and the economic language of marketing has been adopted in the church right along with it.  Over the past half century, this amounts to a paradigm shift in church ministry that has profoundly impacted the Church, leading to a rearrangement of congregations where larger churches with economic resources and compelling marketing have tended to get larger, and smaller churches have tended to get smaller or phase out.

...It is the advertising and marketing paradigm of evangelism that makes the entry of other commercial media into the sacred frame of the church possible&#8212;even attractive to pastors and church leaders.  Taken together, these contribute to the critical theological issue behind marketing and advertising messages invading the church.  Advertising has its own ideology, whether it be used to do outreach, or allowed into the church context in order to underwrite ministry.

...<div class="image-right"></div&#8220;[Advertising] provides a particular vision of the world&#8212;a particular mode of self validation that is integrally connected with what one has rather than what one is&#8212;a distinction often referred to as one between &#8216;having&#8217; and &#8216;being,&#8217; with the latter now being defined through the former.&#8221;

...An advertising and marketing paradigm of evangelism and theology internalizes an exchange mentality in both the evangelist and the target&#8212;one where salvation can be &#8220;obtained.&#8221;...  Not one where people are purchasing an object with money but, rather, one where their payment is in the form of their conscious attention....  In this way, faith is mediated through the advertising and marketing paradigm.

I&#8217;ve often heard the advertising and marketing paradigm vigorously defended by some pastors from the perspective of evangelism and outreach to the lost.  Most recently, it turned up in an article from the Christian Science Monitor, &#8220;Churches seeking marketing-savvy breed of pastors,&#8221; quoting one marketer-turned pastor &#8220;with a heart for marketing&#8221;:

&#8220;It&#8217;s the medium of marketing that&#8217;s used to get a message across [in today&#8217;s culture], whether it&#8217;s an election or you&#8217;re trying to sell a product.  But in this case, we&#8217;re just trying to hear the hope of a new life that is eternal.&#8221;

But what is at issue is the ideology of marketing and advertising in the culture we live in, and how it acts upon the messages it carries because of that ideology.  The &#8220;medium of marketing&#8221; is not a values-neutral conduit in this culture&#8212;it&#8217;s much more than a dumb pipe, to borrow a term from the technology world.

...Here we find that the scripture has much to say that should move us away from an economic metaphor of salvation and the overall advertising and marketing paradigm.  Following Jesus is about finding our identities, and life, &#8220;in&#8221; Him (John 15, and all over the NT).  We are described as His children (Matthew 5, and all over the NT).  The church is described as His bride (Matthew 25, and several other places in the NT).

...How can we evangelize people through mediated messages that objectify them and the Kingdom without recognizing that the result will be groups of people conditioned to view their faith and their formation as something they must obtain and consume?...  Of course, if you want to see this study in full, they would like to sell it to you.

...*Note: I use the term &#8220;late modern&#8221; concerning the advertising and marketing paradigm because I feel it more accurately describes contemporary culture with specific regard to consumerism and mediated consciousness.  This does not mean that I reject the overall notion of postmodernity in terms of the other elements of the socio-cultural shift that it attempts to define.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 3</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2008-01-31T20:32:46-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-871</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-871</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Why sanctuary?

When it comes to exploring how commercial media is entering the sacred frame of the church, the principle concern is the nature of our conscious attention.  As followers of Jesus we should recognize that to what and how we pay attention shapes us (cited below).  John 15 captures this life in the body as abiding &#8220;in&#8221; Jesus.  When we gather together, in whatever expression we manifest, as the Church, we are attending to Jesus and to each other as vine and branches.  Divided attentions lead to stunted growth, slow death.

&#8230;in the image culture, the crisis of the human spirit is the crisis of knowing what things to pay attention to.  In the United States alone, there are thousands of well-paid persons whose constant preoccupation is to orchestrate the attention of the populace.  In clever and subtle ways, these voices can be heard whispering constantly, "Pay attention to this"; "Look, pay attention here"; "No!  This other matter is the one most deserving your attention."  In the face of such pressure-for-attention, religious persons are especially challenged, because religion itself is a way of paying attention to matters not fully perceptible, which is to say that religious attention is a specially heightened, focused attention.  The ultimate attention, from a religious standpoint, is to the presence of God.  Religious people recognize, perhaps instinctively, that what we pay attention to and how we pay attention is what shapes our hearts.

- Michael Warren, author and professor - St.  John's University, New York

As The Church, if we cede the attentions of the body to the objectifying consumption of commercial media messages, we lessen the degree to which we can abide in the transformative life of the vine.  Our very being is diminished.

Rather than the pointless &#8220;fight fire with fire&#8221; approach of co-opting commercial media and marketing practices to achieve cultural relevance and attract consumers to our "services," I suggest we call out the spiritually hungry to the life of abiding in Christ alone&#8212;in a community that is intentionally kept free from the divided attentions that commercial media invite.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Music at a place called vertigo</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2008-01-31T20:26:08-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-870</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-870</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divRegardless of how one feels about U2 (fan or foe), it&#8217;s hard to argue that their manager, Paul McGuinness isn&#8217;t the most successful manager working in the music business today.  He&#8217;s been with them from the start, and is the business brain behind their nearly three decades of success.  For those reasons, it is worth paying attention to what he has to say about the state of the music industry.  He recently gave this speech at MIDEM&#8217;s first International Manager Summit....  <div class="image-right"></divOn U2 and the ownership of their own content&#8230;

U2 own all their masters but these are licensed long term to Universal with whom we enjoy an excellent relationship.  With a couple of minor exceptions they also own all their copyrights, which are also licensed to Universal.  U2 always understood that it would be pathetic to be good at the music and bad at the business, and have always been prepared to invest in their own future.  We were never interested in joining that long humiliating list of miserable artists who made lousy deals, got exploited and ended up broke and with no control over how their life&#8217;s work was used, and no say in how their names and likenesses were bought and sold.

...I love the record business, and though I may be critical of the ways in which the digital space has been faced by the industry I am also genuinely sympathetic and moved by the human fallout, as the companies react to falling revenues by cutting staff and tightening belts.  Many old friends and colleagues have been affected by this.  They have families and it is terrible that a direct effect of piracy and thievery has been the destruction of so many careers.

...Today, there&#8217;s a bigger issue and it&#8217;s about the whole relationship between the music and the technology business.  Network operators, in particular, have for too long had a free ride on music &#8211; on our clients&#8217; content.  It&#8217;s time for a new approach - time for ISPs to start taking responsibility for the content they&#8217;ve profited from for years.  And it&#8217;s time for some visionary new thinking about how the music and technology sectors can work as partners instead of adversaries, leading to a revival of recorded music instead of its destruction.

...I have met Steve Jobs and even done a deal with him face to face in his kitchen in Palo Alto in 2004.  No one there but Steve, Bono, Jimmy Iovine and me, and Lucian Grainge was on the phone.  We made the deal for the U2 iPod and wrote it down in the back of my diary.  We approved the use of the music in TV commercials for iTunes and the iPod and in return got a royalty on the hardware.  Those were the days when iTunes was being talked about as penicillin for the recorded music industry.

I wish he would bring his remarkable set of skills to bear on the problems of recorded music....  He probably doesn&#8217;t realize it but the collapse of the old financial model for recorded music will also mean the end of the songwriter.  We&#8217;ve been used to bands who wrote their own material since the Beatles, but the mechanical royalties that sustain songwriters are drying up.

...I suggest we shift the focus of moral pressure away from the individual P2P file thief and on to the multi billion dollar industries that benefit from these countless tiny crimes &#8211; The ISPs, the telcos, the device makers.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Explain yourself</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2008-01-26T20:28:14-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-869</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-869</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[You may have noticed I took the month of January off from TSAWWT.  Chalk it up to some serious family holiday time, thesis research and the intense preparation process for my comprehensive exams.

With my comps behind me forever (knock on wood: I don&#8217;t yet know if I passed), I&#8217;m moving on with the project full on. Woo-hoo!  While some of the enthusiasm has waned, I&#8217;m happy to report that I&#8217;m still geeking out about what I&#8217;m finding.  There&#8217;s a certain amount of exhilaration to the notion that I&#8217;m truly looking at this issue (marketing and advertising targeting churches) from an unheard perspective.  The more digging I do, the more this is clear to me.

Anyhow, look for more snippets and excerpts from me on this as we push toward the April deadline for my graduation requirement: Three thesis chapters completed to &#8220;get hooded&#8221; as a Master of Communication.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The past crashes into the present</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2008-01-26T19:46:59-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-868</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-868</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Over the past year Dawnshelle and I have been consuming the new Doctor Who series from the BBC via Netflix DVDs.  This past week we completed season 3, which aired in early 2007.  I&#8217;ve often shared with Dawnshelle my childhood affinity for the series, recalling the Doctors I watched growing up via PBS imports.  Given the era in the show&#8217;s history, that means I was thoroughly immersed in the 1970s and 1980s iterations of the show, which mainly featured the fourth and fifth doctors.

<div class="image-right"></divI&#8217;ll stop right here to link to the wiki on this program in order to not have to explain any of the back story to those not familiar with the show.  Suffice it to say, Doctor Who is a time travel science fiction serial.

Moving on, the show went off the air in 1990, and was known for its 26 year run, fantastic sci-fi mythology and generally awful production values.  There was an attempt to revive the series in 1996 with a passable FOX TV movie, but lousy ratings kept that from happening.  (I remember being so bummed out at the time.)

Fast forward to 2004, and the BBC, in conjunction with the Sci-Fi Channel, reinvents the series with wild success.  With a much more gracious production investment, great actors, an appropriate nod to the show&#8217;s past and the right amount of camp, Doctor Who is a UK TV hit once again&#8212;and keeps building in popularity.

<div class="image-right"><object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Um_8unOhPvs&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Um_8unOhPvs&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object></divThat&#8217;s why it was particularly moving for me to see a special short episode, filmed for charity, that brought back my favorite Doctor (#5), Peter Davison, who crashes into current Doctor (#10), David Tennant.  You see, Tennant is my age.  He was a fan of the show when Davison was the Doctor.  And Davison, who was only 29 when he played the part, infused the show with youth, taking over from Tom Baker who, while the definitive Doctor, was just tired out from playing the role for so long. Anyway, if you are at all a fan or just curious, check out &#8220;Time Crash&#8221; on YouTube.  This 8 minute short almost had me tearing up.  (Yes, I&#8217;m that sappy these days.)  I love how this little short slips in some of that cheesy synth-based background music instead of the orchestral stuff they use in the current series.  Brings me back to the 80s.

Now I have to wait a year for season 4 on DVD and the 2007 Xmas special, "Voyage of the Damned."]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Life-long learning anywhere&#x2c; anytime</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2008-01-26T19:42:20-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-867</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-867</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divThis is what I love about iPod and podcasting.  While many think of podcasts as 2005&#8217;s big technology story, it continues to evolve.  This L.A.  Times story is an excellent account of how iTunes University podcasts are bringing high-end lectures from leading professors to the far reaches of the country and beyond.

And even cooler: Bethel University and Seminary content is also available via iTunes (although the link isn't public).  This makes me want to tap into this big time.  I plan to literally load up on any pertinent media communication lectures I can.  Plus, as much free seminary content as I can handle.

In addition, both Woodland Hills and Open Door are now podcasting sermons with video for free.  Wonderful.  I'm now getting in two sermons a week on my bus ride, thanks to my super sweet new iPod Touch.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>There are reasons why&#x2026;</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2008-01-26T19:40:10-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-866</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-30.html#unique-entry-id-866</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></div&#8230;so many things suck.  Take a look at the current issue of Wired for a laundry list of the top things known for suckage: tech support, tomatoes, roads, and even whiteboards.

My favorite is the history of FM radio, and why most of it sucks today.  Think it&#8217;s the iPod or P2P that drove radio into oblivion?  Think again.  If anything, the iPod is saving music from the wasteland that is FM radio today.  I&#8217;ve had this discussion with a few people in the past year, but this article explains well why music stations like 89.3 public radio have shot past their commercial counterparts in listenership.

Reading about something that sucks?  Go out and do something about it.  Becoming a member of public radio is a good place to start.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Join the conspiracy</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-12-08T14:36:32-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-865</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-865</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is seriously a great idea (check out the linked page).  As the Web site defines it, &#8220;Advent Conspiracy is an international movement restoring the scandal of Christmas by worshipping Jesus through compassion, not consumption.&#8221;

One of my suspicions is that churches tend to address consumerism as an individual spiritual malady, without owning up the fact that it is a systemic problem in The Church in the U.S. To put it another way, they blame the audience, and think that a good admonition to curb conspicuous consumption now and then will put good Christians on the path to self sacrificial love and spiritual enlightenment.  But many fail to recognize that what you convert them with, you also convert them to.

That&#8217;s why addressing how churches worship is a key progression in thinking that I&#8217;m excited about.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Beacon shines far beyond Facebook</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-12-08T08:50:20-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-864</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-864</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The flap over Facebook&#8217;s Beacon isn&#8217;t over yet.  New research from CA&#8217;s Threat Research Group reported this week indicates that the service extends further than they initially let on.

<div class="image-right"></div&#8220;Facebook&#8217;s controversial Beacon ad system tracks activities from all users in its third-party partner sites, including from people who have never signed up with Facebook or who have deactivated their accounts,&#8221; said Stefan Berteau, senior research engineer at CA&#8217;s Threat Research Group.

Ultimately this type of tracking information is designed to more effectively commodify the audience for marketers&#8212;which is how Facebook and its investors hope to further monetize the success of the burgeoning social network.  What concerns me, almost more than the privacy issues, is that the awareness of Beacon may be quite low among the mass of Facebook users or non Facebook users who visit and do business with affiliated sites.  So consider this my (tiny) contribution to making sure people know about it.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Target&#x2019;s Rounders outed</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-12-08T08:42:22-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-863</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-863</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Related to my prior post, we&#8217;re now to the point that audiences can work a little harder to extract some perks from advertisers for helping market products to other audience members.  Check out this little Facebook scandal from Target corp.  The very existence of a marketing effort like Rounders is very telling as to just how far Smythe&#8217;s &#8220;audience commodity&#8221; has come in the Web 2.0 age.

<div class="image-right"></divWhat amazes me is that people in the target age demographic (no pun intended) buy into the corporate-hipster speak when it&#8217;s so pathetically contrived&#8211;like the 40-year-old youth worker that tries to be &#8220;relevant&#8221; by using the vernacular of the cool kids.  Of course, the millennials may be gaming &#8220;the system&#8221; to get the rewards.  But at less than $100 in value on average, is becoming a marketing stooge in the eyes of your friends worth it?  If so, I'd like to set up a meeting with you to discuss a business opportunity with Amway.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Social media pokes at Smythe&#x2019;s blindspot</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-12-08T08:37:30-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-862</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-862</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t resist saying I told you so (it may be a little too early for that), but the news about Facebook last week and this week should give social media users pause.

<div class="image-right"></divFacebook has been pressured to (kind of) reverse an earlier decision to use purchasing or commercial activity data to poke (send messages) to member&#8217;s friends about the things they have purchased, etc. (via a technology they call Beacon).  They&#8217;ve added an opt in feature.  The only trouble is that you are asked to opt in every time you make a purchase.  The AdWeek article explains the issue in more detail.

The corresponds very well with communication theorist Dallas Smythe&#8217;s theories of the &#8220;work&#8221; of the audience commodity.  While he had TV, Radio and Newspapers in mind when he wrote about this in the 70s and 80s, his ideas continue to manifest themselves in commercial use of Web 2.0 social media.  Some more from Smythe:

A threadbare myth which is still a part of the propaganda of capitalism is that of consumer sovereignty&#8212;that the consumer is in charge and in fact chooses freely between the many thousands of different commodities daily pressed on him/her.  The people are told they can always &#8220;switch off&#8221; if they do not like a program, newspaper, or magazine.  And the use of &#8220;ratings&#8221; do decide which commercially sponsored programs will be continued and which dropped is sometimes called cultural democracy.  After all, should not the majority rule?  These propaganda themes ring hollow when one realizes that [product marketers] are not throwing their money away when they pay for advertising.  And when one pursues the question, what kind of &#8220;work&#8221; is it which audiences do for advertisers?  What sort of work is it which is not paid money wages, must continue from childhood to death, and must wait for the next hour or day before it is presented to the workers?  The only comparable form of labor is slavery.  It is tempting to think of referring to audience power as mind slavery.  Slavery however, means ownership of the person.  And the term must be rejected as applying to audience members in the core area because they are legally &#8220;free&#8221; to try to control their own lives.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A post for my sports-loving readers</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-12-08T08:23:54-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-861</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-861</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"><object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sfV_paHAtbU&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sfV_paHAtbU&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object></divA couple weeks ago someone forwarded me the Mii Lebowski on YouTube, which is totally not appropriate as a post on my blog.  However, the clip put me on to the viral video trend of combining real-world video and/or audio with video game animation.  One result is a video recut that is sure to warm the hearts of any classic NES playing sports fan (although Red Sox fans may not want to relive this one).  The 1986 World Series, Game 6, as reenacted in RBI Baseball.

(Spoiler alert: the Mets win.)]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Kindle wants to burn a hole in your pocket</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-12-02T09:01:12-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-860</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-860</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Services we don&#8217;t need, so people can charge us fees we can&#8217;t afford: That&#8217;s how I sum up the Amazon Kindle.  Here&#8217;s what I mean.

You may have seen this week&#8217;s Newsweek cover story on Amazon&#8217;s new Kindle book reader and platform.  Okay, it won&#8217;t fit in your pocket, but excuse the metaphor in my headline.  Besides being a downright fugly-looking machine, it seems Jeff Bezos can join the ranks of other CEOs that think consumers are just waiting to fork over more of their money given the right P.T....  He&#8217;s wrong.

<div class="image-right"></divWalt Mossberg gives it a fair review over at the WSJ.  Here&#8217;s what uncle Walt didn&#8217;t cover in much detail.  That cell network the Kindle is tethered to costs money.  And since it isn&#8217;t a cell phone, you don&#8217;t pay for it in a talk time plan.  Here&#8217;s what they expect people to pay for (besides the obvious price for book downloads): While you can subscribe to newspapers, periodicals and blogs, getting them on the Kindle will cost anywhere from 99 cents to $14 per month.  And no, you can&#8217;t just use a web browser on the Kindle to get to them.  Plus, if you want to move a personal document to the Kindle, Amazon will charge you a fee to do it....  No sync.

Instead of coupling the device to the PC and allowing people to freely sync data and move their owned media freely across platforms, Bezos decides to fly in the face of more than 100 million iPod sales and make the Kindle a standalone wireless access reader that charges the user for everything you could possibly think of.

Try again, Bezos.  And this time, put the consumer higher on your list of priorities.  Shareholders may have been excited last week (no doubt with those dollar signs dancing in their heads), but don&#8217;t expect them be giddy when they realize nobody&#8217;s going to buy this thing.

Why would anyone need to buy a book on the fly so often that an expensive cellular delivery approach is the only option?  Books take time to read.  I have no issues with browsing my book purchase on Amazon via my Mac, iPod Touch or BBerry; downloading it (which provides a backup, by the way) and then syncing a reader device (like Sony&#8217;s).  But that&#8217;s not how the Kindle works.  To Kindle, PCs and the real internet don&#8217;t really exist apart from Amazon&#8217;s messed up version.

I really like this concept and the digital paper technology going on here, but apart from that, the only thing about the Kindle that works well is the online store for purchasing books, according to Mossberg.  And that&#8217;s just not enough when the object you are holding in your hand is clunky, ugly and exists mostly to find ways to empty your wallet.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 2</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-12-01T23:51:04-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-859</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-859</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[According to the Global Entertainment and Media Outlook: 2006-2010 issued by global accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers, worldwide advertising spending was $385 billion in 2006.

...Depending on whose research you believe, it&#8217;s something like 300 to 3,000 advertising messages per day.

...It boggles the mind to think that for every person on the planet, a total of $64 per year is spent just to advertise to them.  But if you get more creative (and realistic) about the ad spend, its likely that at least 1/3 of that spend is targeted at the U.S. Doing the simple math (which is all I am competent to do), that works out to $426 of ad spend per citizen based on 300 million people.

...In terms of my own experience, I often compare the commercial onslaught of today&#8217;s culture with my formative years in the 70s.  From this vantage point, the ramp up and expansion of commercial messages is staggering&#8212;infiltrating nearly every public space and media form in our culture....  The impetus for my project is too look at how these messages of commercialization are entering the sacred frame of our church communities, and evaluate specific commercial media that are targeting the church audience: movies, music, books and consumer products

Far from advocating dropping out of the capitalist system we are a part of, I&#8217;m looking toward an emerging opportunity for communities of faith: Embracing the alien culture of the Kingdom of God as communities that offer people sanctuary from commercial media, rather than deepening the syncretism with commercial enterprise, and cooption of entertainment media to achieve cultural relevance in our mission.

...The enormous mass of advertisements and other mass media content which bombards the individual in the advanced capitalist state from all the mass media has the systemic effect of a barrage of noise which effectively exhausts the time and energies of the population.

...<div class="image-right"></divGiven the weariness of &#8220;being sold to&#8221; and &#8220;selling&#8221; that some in American consumer culture may be experiencing, my theory is that there is a growing opportunity for The Church to play a brave new role in America (or return to an old role, perhaps).  As a countercultural movement, we can offer real sanctuary from commercialization and commodification in our communities of faith.  Restated in the terms of Smythe, The Church can provide a sanctuary for people to rest from the constant, incessant &#8220;work&#8221; of the commercial audience.

...Sadly, most of the American Church has become so enamored with the power of consumer marketing, that commercial media forms have become unchallenged and essential ingredients in &#8220;success.&#8221;  The trouble is that, by most measures (Barna, Pew, etc.), these approaches haven&#8217;t made a dent in terms of adding souls to The Kingdom.  Let me take a moment to delineate where I think the Church lost site of its role regarding commercial media and communication:

...Most often the church has offered its moral critique on media content, while at the same time trying to harness the communicative power of the context.

...It&#8217;s not a question of avoiding certain media content to keep pure or separate from a moral standpoint.  While I don&#8217;t discount the need to consider content on moral grounds, there is a deeper moral question at stake with context.

...As some recent books are now exploring (Paul Metzger), both The Church and the Gospel message are being commodified quite readily in American culture through the marketing and branding of churches, evangelism via marketing tactics, and the transformation of our messages into entertainment and self-help forms, etc. What hasn&#8217;t been discussed as much is what the effects are&#8212;why this is a truly problem.  Most people don&#8217;t think there is a problem, although some in emergent circles do recognize the issue.

...In short, both The Church and The Word (both living entities, I would argue) risk being objectified when subject to or coupled with commercial communication approaches.  This objectification, or &#8220;fetishization&#8221; as it is referred to by media theorists such as Sut Jhally, is what creates identity and meaning for consumers.  The commodification of sacred messages, which are placed at the mercy of a consumer marketplace when contextualized as commercial media, become elements in a transaction, which are consumed (not in the sense of spiritual nourishment, but as objects to satiate people&#8217;s needs and desires&#8212;needs and desires that have been engineered by commercial media forms from birth.  In that sense, the objects are emptied of their intrinsic meanings and given new meanings by the commercialization and consumption process.

Seen through a spiritual lens, the objectified Word no longer gives and sustains life eternal and sacred, but only perpetuates life temporal and secular.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Thank you Sara Groves</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-12-01T15:22:36-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-858</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-858</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[For another gift of beautiful songs.  (This is worth seeing full size).  Support artists like Sara.  <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OSdP6PqsbJY&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OSdP6PqsbJY&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Absolutely loving this record</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-12-01T14:58:02-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-857</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-857</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divI missed this record when it debuted in April, but still had to get a post written on it.  I became a fan of Maria McKee in the late 80s when she fronted Lone Justice.  After that, I lost sight of her artistic visions in the 90s.  This new project, called Late December, while markedly different than everything else that comes before it, fully showcases her greatest assets: her powerful voice, and her inventive approach to melody.

While it&#8217;s not the return to the belfry-rattling power cow-punk of Lone Justice I would have loved to hear, it&#8217;s a refreshing turn from an artist that continues to evolve.

I can't find a video off the new project, but here's a classic live cut: Wheels, circa 1986.  <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0TaTfFqSy2c&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0TaTfFqSy2c&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I&#x2019;m going to eat this book up</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Books</category><dc:date>2007-12-01T14:55:02-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-856</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-29.html#unique-entry-id-856</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divWhile I do plan to get McLaren&#8217;s new book, Everything Must Change, I&#8217;m really more excited about this one: Consuming Jesus, by Paul Metzger.

I read some reviews online (Jesus Creed), and really think this will be helpful to my project.  While it focuses on how consumer churchianity diasbles multi-ethnic congregations (an incredibly important observation), It looks like it will translate well to other issues, as well.

Thanks to Derek for referring.  Consider it on my Christmas list, bro.  That, and the iPod touch 16 Gb.  See my wife to contribute : )]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Hippies &#x26; Pomos: Thinking on Christian community a generation apart</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-11-21T13:19:46-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-28.html#unique-entry-id-855</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-28.html#unique-entry-id-855</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[My pal David had sent me a link a while back about the remastering and re-release of the original Phil Keaggy tour de force, The Master and The Musician from 1977.  This wonderful landmark in instrumental music is available here.  Do yourself a favor and get a copy.

<div class="image-right"></divIn the course of looking over his web site, I ran across a detailed history of the project, which included a fair amount of detail about the Christian community Keaggy was a part of in the early 70s leading up to and shaping the project (Love Inn, which is now represented by this very modest church web site).

While I don&#8217;t have a thoroughly researched hypothesis on this, I can recall several other Christian communities that produced Christian artists and sounded like similarly structured communities (Servant, Resurrection Band, to name a couple others I'm aware of).  It seems this was a pretty common alternative expression of the church in that era&#8212;consistent with aspects of the counter-culture that the Jesus People movement reflected.

From reading Keaggy&#8217;s commentary I get the feeling that such an experience didn&#8217;t end well for him.  What I&#8217;m wondering outloud is what is different today about how Christians view community, simple church, house churches, etc., versus the experience of those who lived in these 70s-era Christian communities or communes.  (A offshoot question could be how these respective generations view music ministry.)  I can see an earnest attempt to reclaim a truer New Testament expression of the church in both eras.

My snap judgment is that there was probably a little too much unhealthy paternalism and legalism wrapped up in the community approach of the 70s, and perhaps a little too much individualism in today&#8217;s mindset.  Is this just a pendulum swinging past the ideal?  I really have no business writing about this, but I do tend to get sidetracked.  I find the Christian Hippie scene of the 70s fascinating.

Other speculation?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Today&#x2019;s news from tiny minds</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-11-21T12:55:39-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-28.html#unique-entry-id-854</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-28.html#unique-entry-id-854</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divIn my PR work I ran across a wire news release for the The Itty Bitty Bible.  This company has miniaturized the entire Bible onto a wallet-sized card, only readable via a microscope.  They&#8217;re even giving away 5,000 copies to our troops for the holidays.  Such a thoughtful gesture on their part.  I can see a brave soldier, hunkered down in an armored vehicle, perhaps under enemy fire, pulling out a microscope so she can read her Bible.  Thanks Amazing Faith, for the best idea since Testamints&#8212;evangelism that freshens your breath.

Here&#8217;s hoping their profits are as tiny as their thinking.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Vinyl Christianity</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-11-21T12:51:25-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-28.html#unique-entry-id-853</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-28.html#unique-entry-id-853</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I love a good metaphor.  This one struck me while reading a piece in Wired on the resurgence of vinyl media for music

<div class="image-right"></divWhen we allow the pattern of Christ to be reproduced in the grooves of our being, we can more fully express the depth of His love and His Kingdom.  The CD and its MP3 offspring are symbolic of modernity&#8217;s promise.  All of the digital information&#8212;the data to reproduce the Kingdom is encoded exactly on the medium, but somehow the warmth and presence suffers when it is played back.  All of the information about Jesus and His radical, beautiful, scandalous love for us can be encoded in our minds, but until we &#8220;put on love&#8221;&#8212;live in it and act in it&#8212;we&#8217;re just a cold, digital facsimile.

I&#8217;m probably recycling a metaphor someone else already thought of, but I thought it was a cool way to think about it.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Where have you been?</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2007-11-11T21:19:08-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-28.html#unique-entry-id-852</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-28.html#unique-entry-id-852</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Apologies.  Keeping up with my posts has been more of a challenge in the past two weeks.  I&#8217;ve been ratcheting up my thesis research&#8212;finding a bunch of new sources, along with an increase in overall busy-ness.  Plus, I&#8217;ve been more prone to relax or sleep rather than post in my down time.

You may see me post in more bursts, rather than a regular pace.  Hope this is okay for the time being.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Getting more focused</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-10-27T11:05:51-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-851</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-851</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Thoughts on thesis, part 7 Posts in a series of commentaries on my thesis project for the Master of Arts in Communication.

I haven&#8217;t posted about my thesis in a while, so here is a summary proposal of what it looks like now.  I will be meeting with my advisor, and this will likely get curtailed a bit&#8212;but I wanted to map out the possibilities on all the ground it could cover.

<div class="image-right"></divBut first, a fun fact from my research: Rocky punches out his message to churches.

...Personally, I&#8217;m waiting for the Saw IV evangelism kit to come out.

...Overall the project idea is to investigate how The Church is becoming a commodified audience for commercial media: Movies, Music, Books and consumer products.  The project would seek create a program of media literacy for churches specific to audience commodification, as well as advocate churches adopting a posture of resistance to commercialization within the church community.

While this is not an outline of the project/thesis per se, it is helpful to break this down into all of the (potential) parts.  Some of these may be omitted or combined in the final written paper.

...This portion of the project paper would cite examples of churches that are in some kind of partnership with commercial enterprise, whereby the community becomes a target market for both spiritual goods, but consumer goods at the same time (most specifically commercial media: movies, books, music and consumer products).  These could be handled like case studies in a journalistic fashion using personal interviews, published articles, etc. to provide examples in the different areas of commercial media.

Part 2: Review of literature A - Works critical of the commercialization of the Church.  There are several works in my initial prospectus that are critical of the commercialization of the church.  These would be drawn upon for this portion.

Part 3: Review of literature B - Communication theory related to audience commodification through advertising.  This would draw upon Sut Jhally, Dallas Smythe, and other communication theorists.  Relevant Marxist and postmodern criticism could be incorporated, as well as audience-centered mass communication theorists.

Part 4: Review of literature C - Explore works of theory and research related to communication ethics, advertising ethics and media literacy approaches.

Part 5: Biblical and Theological reflection on the cross purposes of the kingdom of God and the kingdom of capitalism.  This is where we exegete the scripture relevant to the mission of the church, the nature of the kingdom and places where scripture--and Christ--make references to money, capitalism, marketplace, trade, economics, etc.  In all, the complete review of literature and the theological portion would provide a basis for part 6 and 7

Part 6: A theoretical and theological basis for resisting the commercialization and commodification of the church.  Formal covenant commitments for church leaders to create, preserve and expand communities of faith as &#8220;sanctuaries from commercialization and commodification.&#8221;

Part 7: A proposed group study curriculum for commercial media awareness, literacy and ethics for church leadership and laity.  This would focus on commercial entertainment media and product marketing.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Commodify me&#x2c; oh Lord&#x2c; part 1</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-10-26T18:30:43-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-850</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-850</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[When giving my elevator speech on my thesis topic, I&#8217;m sure to get this question: What do you mean when you say audience commodification?  So, I thought I&#8217;d post about it to answer the question and thereby help me get my thoughts together in cogent form.  After all, from a communication theory standpoint, this is the crux of my project.

The most common way this has been understood is by considering the Television audience.  Television is an entertainment medium that is driven (largely) by commercials.  Whether it be 30 second spots, product placement or infomercials, the audience is a product that content creators (TV networks) sell to product marketers.  The value of this audience is measured by TV ratings and priced by what the market will bear.  So, as a monitored and measured audience sitting in front of the boob tube for an average number of hours each day, we are transformed into a commodity sold in an economic transaction.  We are the end product that networks sell.

This idea translates to other mediums.  Newspapers and magazines commodify their readers for advertisers, as well.  As does radio with music.

<div class="image-right"></divAs an avowed capitalist, audience commodification isn&#8217;t necessarily a moral evil.  The audience gets an entertainment product in exchange.  In a consumer society, this has been how media has functioned successfully and evolved in the past 50 years&#8212;farther back if you consider radio and print media.  Its wild success in growing American consumerism is why we&#8217;re exposed to more than 3,000 advertising messages a day.

But my focus is not on audiences in a personal entertainment context, but on participants in a religious context.  Specifically, I&#8217;m investigating how this process of commodification has shifted (or expanded) from living rooms to churches in the past few years, as commercial entertainment media has sought to get their messages into the Christian context by facilitating sermons, music and outreach.  It seems the film industry in particular has fed us the notion that current movie tie-ins are the table stakes for cultural relevance in church ministry.

Unlike evaluating audience commodification purely on economic grounds, the work screaming to be done (in my opinion) is to look at this phenomenon from a Kingdom perspective.  The conflict of interest is found at the crossroads of commercial media interests and the mission of the church.  This is a story of two kingdoms with competing goals.

Next, in part 2, the Quasimodo factor&#8230;.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Leopard leaps ahead</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-10-26T17:27:45-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-849</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-849</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divI&#8217;m just full of Microsoft criticism today.  But I can&#8217;t help myself.  With Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard shipping as of tonight, I had to include this video clip of Walt Mossberg at the WSJ highlighting the most significant features, along with clearly proclaiming its superiority over Windows Vista.  And for all those who may make the (sometimes valid) economic argument, please note this fact: Leopard, priced at $129 for everyone, bests Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate Edition, priced at $319 (price from Amazon.com).  (Pictured: Mossberg w/Gates and Jobs.)  Enjoy uncle Walt&#8217;s highlights:  <embed src="http://services.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/452319854" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=1269157495&playerId=452319854&viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://services.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&domain=embed&autoStart=false&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="350" height="288" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ads in your face</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-10-26T17:20:31-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-848</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-848</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Color me cynical, but I&#8217;ve never thought there was a long future in the walled garden social media approach of Facebook and Myspace.  I&#8217;ve always been irked by visiting personal websites that require registration or membership to experience fully.  This bias has kept me out of the game and out in the wilds of the Internet with my own site.  At the same time, I totally get the excitement over what these platforms offer and how people use them.  But the big business question has always been, how do you monetize it?  This leads to a theory of mine about social media: The more you monetize it, the less people like it.

<div class="image-right"></divYesterday it was announced that Facebook cut a deal with Microsoft, accepting a cash infusion/investment of $240 million to carry it into the glorious future of profit.  This deal, while not an acquisition, is significant in the battle to monetize (read: profit from) facebook, with Microsoft outbidding Google for access to the faces of Facebook.

As Google&#8217;s market cap approaches Microsoft&#8217;s, this deal makes social media the battleground in internet technology.  News Corp&#8217;s acquisition of MySpace and Google&#8217;s grab of YouTube, both in big money deals, had put Facebook on the watch list.  While CEO Mark Zuckerberg may think a less audacious investment deal allows Facebook to retain its autonomy, we&#8217;re talking about Microsoft.  Don&#8217;t count on it.

As the monetization of social media commences in earnest, I&#8217;d be interested in hearing how users react over time.  Like my Thesis is investigating, this is the first steps in audience commodification in the Web 2.0 context.  With the boundaries of personal privacy so fluid in the Facebook world, it&#8217;s hard to predict how deeply impacted the audience will be, and how they will react.  Here&#8217;s a great quote from the San Jose Mercury News story:

&#8220;To meet Microsoft's lofty expectations, Facebook must not only expand its audience but also change the nature of the site, said Keith Benjamin, managing director at the venture firm Levensohn Venture Partners.  People today go to social-network sites to catch up with friends and keep track of events - not to buy products, he noted.&#8221;

In other media coverage, I&#8217;ve found reports that most Facebook users drop out of the network once college is over.  What will Microsoft&#8217;s investment be netting when the party&#8217;s over&#8212;or shifts to the next new thing?

Will the walled gardens become more like virtual ghettos of targeted marketing, will most users simply adjust and cope, or will a backlash take hold?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>You can skype if you want to.</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-10-13T11:50:33-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-847</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-847</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divIt&#8217;s true.  I&#8217;ve had issue getting video chats to work via iChat, and I think this has to do with my home network setup (which needs an overhaul).  But I can&#8217;t wait to fix that, so I&#8217;m trying skype just to see if it works.  If you have skype and video capabilities, look me up and let&#8217;s test it out.  Someday I hope to do video chats like a real grownup techno geek.  (Although I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s more exciting for me than it is for anyone else that will see my mug online).  You can now see my skype status in the sidebar.

Get your skype here.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Stealing music from Jesus</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-10-12T22:59:35-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-846</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-846</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The thought occurred to me after reading an excellent feature in BusinessWeek by Justin Bachman that the woes of the music industry haven&#8217;t necessarily been visited on the genre of Christian worship music.

<div class="image-right"></divWith Radiohead&#8217;s name-your-price direct release of their new record, along with a landmark $200,000+ legal judgment against a low income, single mom for stealing music last week (nice PR move, RIAA), the recording industry has been abuzz over the digital shift.

...Well, mostly that the lion share of the Christian music business has gravitated to a worship music orientation....  Along with getting sued by the RIAA, there&#8217;s the Ten Commandments, of course, and the ongoing guilt of worshipping with stolen art.

Of course, I have no stats on this, so I am just making a broad supposition.  But let&#8217;s grant this assumption for the moment: most Christians don&#8217;t steal their worship music.

<div class="image-right"></divThis would leave the entire burgeoning genre, which generates a good deal of revenue for the big four record labels, as the sole survivor of the old label paradigm.  (How long did we suffer paying $18 for CDs at Christian bookstores when secular music was competing for dwindling market share at Target, Best Buy and Walmart at around $12.)

...But Christian worship music, because of the ethical standards of its audience, currently stands as an anachronism in the music business.  Here are my thoughts about how this works, and they way it may change:

I&#8217;ve written about this a little in the past, but I&#8217;ll cover some of my assumptions again to set up my hypothesis.  Today, CCLI creates a de facto ratings and revenue system in worship music, akin to radio airplay.  This keeps the royalty engine flowing for record labels every weekend&#8212;something radio, with its limited commercial reach in Christian music, could never accomplish consistently.

<div class="image-right"></divThere are a few reasons why CCLI can create a conflict of interest for the church, but let&#8217;s focus on how digital music and participatory technologies could disrupt this tidy arrangement, and subsequently end major label dominance over the worship music market.  In other words, the labels may see Worship music as a boon&#8212;and drive even more marketing resources to squeeze more commercial revenue from the old model.  But they should be looking ahead to what&#8217;s happening in The Church.

...If we take new church models seriously at all (House, Simple, Cell, New Monastic, Community, etc.), you have to think about more and more worship music moving into smaller and smaller contexts.  That means informal small groups playing worship tunes with no CCLI reporting and, therefore, no revenue drivers (is this stealing?).  Add to this the movement to create and share original music in these church communities, and you can see where this is headed.

Connect these trends to digital sharing and creation of new music across small church communities online, and you have even more music being used and created off the label grid....  It works against the very things the big labels are good at&#8212;large scale distribution, promotion and mass royalty generation.

While the megachurch movement has driven the old label model to new heights in worship music, the micro church slowly chips away at the foundation.  The strongest market demographic for worship music is, to a large extent, the same people at the forefront of re-imagining the church&#8212;and worship music along with it.

It&#8217;s clear from the BusinessWeek article that the labels are looking for new and innovative ways for their marketing engine to make the music business profitable again.  They should not be under the delusion that their Christian worship music "industry" will forever be a mighty fortress of steady revenue in the digital, participatory technology age.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Touching off the podcomputer revolution</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-10-09T20:48:57-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-845</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-845</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The iPod moment.  Sounds a little pretentious, I know.  But bear with me.  As a student of communication and journalism, this is a fascinating time for media.  So pardon the commercial--because it's really more about what it is changing in media.

I recently got my hands on my nephew&#8217;s new iPod Touch.  Getting it functional required upgrading his long-in-the-tooth eMac running 10.3 to a current 10.4.10.  Mission accomplished.  This allowed me to spend some time with the Touch.

<div class="image-left"></divNow, I&#8217;ve used Palms and Blackberries.  And I would define them as computers.  But comparing these to an iPod Touch or iPhone is like comparing a desk calculator to a PC.  Both are computers with screens, but they are worlds apart.

Holding the iPod Touch in my hands and navigating its functions made me realize that the &#8220;real&#8221; podcomputer had indeed arrived.  And it&#8217;s going to change everything for traditional media.  I&#8217;m not alone in this realization.

The linked article by Jeff Jarvis, writing in The Guardian, gets at the media implications of this new class of devices: &#8220;These new devices represent the next generation of the computer: small, sleek, powerful, portable.  Everything that the computer, the web, and the browser have done to content - enabling it to become infinite but personal; instantaneous yet permanent; unrestricted by medium because it offers all media; and enriched by the conversation around it - is now in the palm of your hand.&#8221;

To that, I would only add, everything is now at your fingertips.  The implications for newspapers and TV are enormous.  As an editor of The Guardian newspaper (UK) is quoted as saying of the impending &#8216;iPod moment&#8217; for his medium, &#8220;the world of newspapers will shudder on its axis.&#8221;

I highly recommend the whole article.  Jarvis is a professor of journalism at City University in New York.  He blogs here.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>How do you do this live?</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-10-07T21:38:29-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-844</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-844</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Okay, I've seen the video (which is amazing).  But how do you pull this off live (although, I know it's not really live)?  Mute Math on Jimmy Kimmel:  <object width="350" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TbTsz7dcryo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TbTsz7dcryo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="350" height="288"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Songs of mass destruction found</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-10-07T21:21:58-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-843</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-27.html#unique-entry-id-843</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I've missed Annie Lennox.

<div class="image-right"></divSo glad she's back--back in an explosive way.  To be honest, this is a perfect time for me to show my egalitarian cards.  How could anyone forsake the artistry and power feminism of Ms. Lennox?  While some anger management drop-out nut jobs from rainy Microsoft land may rant and rave like men's men to keep "women in their place," Annie L.  is locked and loaded.  Sing it, sister!

This record is another amazing chapter in an already amazing lexicon.  I've lifted a video from her new single, as well as one just especially for complementarians.  Peace out.  <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qCFbKEVzlOo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qCFbKEVzlOo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object> <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j4tkOJYWPW0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j4tkOJYWPW0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object>

Feel free to flame me for what I said up there in para.  1.  I totally deserve it.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>What am I becoming?</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2007-09-29T08:14:09-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-842</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-842</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Pulled this out of a recent post from Greg Boyd&#8217;s blog.  It bears repeating, as I am continually coming to terms with what disciplines I need to embrace in my life, and why I need to embrace them: &#8220;&#8230;each act of violence we engage in, however small, dulls our capacity to experience and appreciate the sacredness of life, while each act of self-sacrificial love, however small, increases our capacity to experience and appreciate this sacredness.  This, I believe, is the true meaning of ethics.  It's not that we are tallying up an account of good deeds verses bad deeds, as though God were some sort of ethical ledger-keeper.  Rather, the importance of ethics is that each one of our behaviors (which, remember, includes each of our thoughts) moves us forward in becoming a certain kind of person.  God wants us to experience abundant life, and each act we engage in either increases, or diminishes, our capacity to do this.&#8221;  Here&#8217;s the link to the post, which is really a movie review/reflection.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Why I quit the worship team part 2</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-09-29T08:05:50-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-841</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-841</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been going through a four-part series on worship at our church that has really helped re-engage and reorient me on what worship is, corporately and individually.  It&#8217;s been incredibly refreshing and liberating for me, as a refugee from the worship industry (highlight in the video I linked to a couple weeks ago).  I&#8217;ve posted a bit about this before&#8212;about how my participation in the machinery of church worship music (where musical performance is treated as consumable product and marketing evangelism tool) led to my thorough disillusionment with it.  As I left the mega-church consumer mentality outright, I also dropped out of &#8220;doing&#8221; worship music formally (as a church musician) and, instead, chose to redefine what worship is and means&#8212;its role in the life of a Christ follower and as part of His church....  But I also needed to strip off what I used to believe about it so that I could rediscover it authentically for myself.

...What the recent teaching series has solidified for me the most has been two powerful principles.  One is the spiritual warfare element of all acts of worship (verbal, physical, musical, service, giving, etc.).  This reaches back into my Pentecostal roots, but has been given a refreshing theological currency in my recent learning.  Two is the importance of diversity in worship expression, and the triumph of creative beauty in all expressions of worship over consumerist and individualistic style preferences.  I have learned to embrace &#8220;the other&#8221; in the body of Christ through sharing in their unique and creative ways of worshipping.

Instead of indulging my musical taste and aesthetic preferences, I have traveled farther down the road of true worship.  Subsequently, I don&#8217;t &#8220;consume&#8221; worship music like I do music entertainment....  I&#8217;m not saying that doing that is bad&#8212;just that I don&#8217;t want to do that right now.

...All this is to set up a few select quotes and a link to a lengthy article on this topic published on the Allelon site, written by Sally Morgenthaller, author of the book, Worship Evangelism.  Her journey through the evangelical church worship landscape over the past two decades captures some of my issues with worship music in the church today.

Morganthaller recounts a shift in her perspective that began when she met with a colleague and he mentioned issues he had with her book.  He explained that churches had produced what he called a "worship-driven subculture&#8221; constituting &#8220;a sizeable part of the contemporary church that had just been waiting for an excuse not to do the hard work of real outreach.

...<div class="image-right"></divAs Morgenthaller visited more churches, she started to understand his concerns: &#8220;Too many times, I came away with an unnamed, uneasy feeling....  Then there were the services when the pathology my friend talked about came right over the platform and hit me in the face.  It was unabashed self-absorption, a worship culture that screamed, &#8216;It's all about us&#8217; so loudly that I wondered how any visitor could stand to endure the rest of the hour.&#8221;

&#8220;By 2002 a few pastors of praise and worship churches began admitting to me that they weren't making much of a dent in the surrounding non-Christian population, even though their services were packed and they were known for the best worship production in town.  &#8230;when I visited their congregations, it wasn't hard to see that the biggest barrier to reaching the unchurched had little to do with worship technique or style.  It had to do with isolation and the faux-worship that isolation inevitably creates.&#8221;

&#8220;In 2001 a worship-driven congregation in my area finally did a survey as to who they were really reaching, and they were shocked.  They'd thought their congregation was at least 50 percent unchurched.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>You can do anything</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-09-29T08:00:43-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-840</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I finally found the answer I've been looking for to all of life's questions.  Please, just visit this web site.  And help spread the word--don't keep something this amazing to yourself.  You can do anything.  The only limit is yourself.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Jesus on the D list</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-09-21T06:19:26-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-839</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-839</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[[UPDATED 9-21-07] So, Kathy Griffin wins an Emmy and promptly blasphemes the name of Jesus on national television.

...<div class="image-right"></divWhat continues to amaze me is the extent some within the church will go to proclaim judgment over the actions of those outside of the faith&#8212;as if Jesus was a helpless kid that needed a big brother to stick up for him.

...That&#8217;s what The Miracle Theater Christian drama troupe of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee felt the need to do on Monday, spending $90,440 to run a full page national advert in USA Today to denounce the D-list comic-turned-reality-show star.

...<div class="image-right"></divSpending $90,440 dollars to make a point is just beyond reason.  They could have spent $440 to issue a national press release on the newswires with the same exact statement.  No one would have paid attention, true, but they would have had more than $90,000 to spend on real ministry, instead of the Branson-style musical fare they specialize in. Maybe they could have used it to shelter several homeless people, or fund a missionary family for a few years.  Miracle Theater&#8217;s so-called family values need a serious dose of Kingdom perspective.

This is pharisaical judgmentalism run amok&#8212;and more mud on the face of the church.  In the end, it&#8217;s just more material for comics like Griffin to skewer the church with.  Of course, the national press includes the amount spent on the advert.  That&#8217;s in paragraph two of the story.

As cynical as this may sound, the $90,440 is probably the best advertising money this &#8220;entertainment ministry&#8221; could ever spend.  Sadly, this is a publicity stunt, pure and simple.  The advert even looks more like an ad for their show.  I can imagine that they&#8217;ll have much more market awareness now for their entertainment "ministry" among like-minded churches.  It's not hard to think that they may have made a deal Griffin to get first dibs on denouncing her.  (You have to watch the video on their website.  They market exclusively to the church).

I&#8217;m not disturbed or surprised by non Christian behavior.  What drives me crazy is the amount some Christians are willing to spend to publicize their retaliatory righteous judgment.  Someone show me an example of Jesus ever doing this?  Of course, I'm no longer surprised when this self-righteous behavior dovetails with the business objectives of "Christian Entertainers."

...As for Jesus on the D list, He&#8217;s been hanging out there all along.  He can take the verbal punches just fine.  He&#8217;s heard much worse, thank God.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Sound a Trumpet for OTR</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-09-16T21:44:04-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-838</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-838</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The long awaited album from Over The Rhine has arrived: The Trumpet Child.

<div class="image-right"></divThis is music for lovers, as romantic and (dare I say it) sultry as I've ever heard them.  Bravo.

A friend of mine commented on continual growth of Detweiler and Bergquist's songcraft.  I very much agree.  They are true artists.  Their songwriting continues to ascend the heights.  I can only say, thank you, once again.

Enjoy.  The recent live/radio studio performance video features a tune from the new project: "On A Roll"]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Damascus road vs. any road</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-09-16T20:10:12-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-837</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-837</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Joe, from my MA Communication cohort, gave me permission to post this (and the portion below penned by his Wife).  It has to do with youth that grow up in the church, and what we as adults, teachers, pastors, youth leaders, etc. tell them about their life "calling" in Christ.

<div class="image-right"></divI think what we refer to as God's "calling" is, in reality, as individual and unique as people are.

Some will spend their lives following Jesus by making decisions that correspond with their love for Him and their love for people.  They'll look at their talents and dreams, and then look for a way to follow Jesus using the resources God gave or grew within them.  In addition, there is plenty written in the scriptures about life in Christ to constitute enough divine "calling" for several lifetimes.

...Others (enter the Biblical giants like Moses, Paul, etc.) will have God directly and visibly intervene in their "calling" with audible voices, burning bushes, etc. I believe in a God that also does this at times, but I think His reasons have more to do with individuals and His specific purposes.

...The trouble is that the standard approach of many well-meaning youth ministers and adults pushes youth away from embracing the former to seek the latter, leaving many in a holding pattern that robs them of their calling in the end.  Many kids wait for a word on what to do--literally stuck, while obvious open doors are left unentered because they don't have the certainty of spiritual experience that constitutes a calling.

...Give this real-life example a read, and let me know what you think.  As a parent, I'm starting to think about these issues concerning my children more and more.  And will what I teach them at home line up with what they are told at church?

...We tell our young people to find out what God is calling them to be, which is to find out what God is "calling" them to do....  They are waiting for lightning to strike and the voice to call from heaven&#8230;"THIS IS MY BELOVED&#8230;" We are convinced and we convince our kids that they dare not follow their dreams and desires since their dreams and desires probably don't correspond with "God's will."

...I have a beautiful sixteen year old daughter who has been given a tremendous singing voice and a desire to build meaningful friendships.  Her capacity to understand literature, speak foreign languages, and excel in all she does is far beyond the abilities of her parents.  Yet, she trembles in fear because she doesn't know what she is "called" to do....  Her passion for Christ would shine through in her work and she would be an effective minister....  She loves God and loves people and seeks to be HIS in the world in which He has placed HER.<br><br>

She expressed to me her fears of never finding her calling, much as her dad has never found his....  I explained how many well-intentioned preachers and teachers had encouraged her dad to "feel called."  He was not passionate about pastoral ministry but one day experienced an emotional "call to ministry."...  I wondered out loud what would have happened if he had been encouraged to follow what he enjoyed and then let life take him where it took him.<br><br>

...I told her to use the freedom she has been given in Christ and explore what might open up before her.<br><br>

...Isn't our calling to be close to Christ and follow him with all our hearts, no matter what we do?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>iShock and awe</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-09-07T18:53:56-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-836</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-836</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[If you were anywhere on planet earth this week, you already know about Apple's big iPod day Sept. 5.  Equally notable was the massive price drop on the iPhone--by $200 bucks.  Much has already been blogged about this, and how Apple's most faithful early adopters got screwed.  Well, Steve Jobs extended an olive branch Thursday by offering all 8 Gb iPhone owners $100 store credit to make nice about it.  I'm not going to comment, since I can see both ends of this--plus, I didn't happen to be an iPhone early adopter (thanks to my long-lived 2G iPod and a 2-year Verizon contract to wait out).  However, Robert X Cringley's column has go to be some of the best insight into the possible thinking of Mr. Jobs on this--and he even throws in a bit from Mr. Gates' perspective.

All that's left now is to decide which one of these babies I want for Christmas.  There are Apple keynotes that are underwhelming.  And then there are Apple keynotes that deliver on every rumor, and then some.  Wednesday was the latter.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Mae in August this year</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-09-04T21:44:07-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-835</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-835</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></div

I waited a really long time for this record, and it finally hit the digital shelves in iTunes.  Now another vigil begins--to see them play live.  I missed a pretty big opportunity to do just that when they were touring their first record, Destination Beautiful.  But the record that hooked me was their second: The Everglow.  Nothing like a really meaty and far out concept record to breathe some life into album rock in a digital single world.  And now Singularity carries Mae into scary major label land.  Here's a prayer that they survive and thrive.

I have to say, I think the linked video is a little silly--silly in a different way from Eisley's "invasion."  I'm not sure what it takes to create music video art these days that is worthy of the music it attempts to visualize.  I'm no director, mind you.  Just wondering outloud.  Any thoughts on that after seeing these music videos?  I'd love to hear what ya'll think.  I hope I didn't bias you in my comment.  Try to cleanse your palate before viewing.  On the right is a little documentary episode about the new project.  <object width="250" height=203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5mcT3ZXr8zc"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5mcT3ZXr8zc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object>  <object width="250" height=203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0hGP4P_kUww"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0hGP4P_kUww" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height=203"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Why I quit the worship team</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-09-01T09:35:53-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-834</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-26.html#unique-entry-id-834</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Okay, so that was a couple years ago now--not at the church I go to now.  But this sums up why I just couldn't do it anymore.  Sorry.  I had to find another way.

Brian McClaren on the Worship music industry and how it is affecting the church.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Post and response on LC.tv</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-08-31T08:04:09-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-833</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-833</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The poster made a really good point that I am responding to at length in this post, instead of cramming it all into a comment post.

...The Comment: The amazing thing is, though, LifeChurch has seen dozens of salvations of Second Life that ARE real and have been followed up in Real Life.  So I agree that missionaries should not jump on some kind of bandwagon, but at the same time churches and people that have the resources should definitely meet people where they are, even if it means creating an avatar to do so.

The Response (which is more like a discussion): It's good to hear that the SL effort is being fruitful on the offline world for LC.tv....  I do still think we can raise and discuss questions about LC.tv&#8217;s approach.

...My contention is that building a virtual megachurch may not be the way to go in SL--that it may undermine real relationships in the long run because of the very underlying idea that makes SL successful as a social network.  That's why I think other ideas like the confessional may be valid approaches to explore (although I have no research to back that up&#8212;obviously much more research is needed).

...This isn't really a question about whether LC.tv is doing something wrong--but rather, what is the best evangelistic approach to take given the context of masked people within what I would consider a new type of culture?...  Looking at hard, ethical questions of missiology and cross-cultural communication in a web 2.0 world is a valid pursuit.  I'm also advocating exploring approaches that seek to understand the epistemological and spiritual reality of a given medium and culture (in this case, the virtual reality world of SL), and respond accordingly.

...If we don't come to understand why this is the case, I think more marketing-oriented evangelism approaches may share the same fate.  Now, I'm not fan of commercial marketing to advance evangelism--I'll be clear on this--I'm very biased.  And, I want to admit to my bias that I&#8217;m not a fan of LC.tv&#8217;s offline ministry model....  Clearly, Paul's hyperbolic charge to "become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some."  [1 Corinthians 9:22 TNIV] shouldn't be used as an excuse to justify anything and everything with no regard for a medium&#8217;s effects on the message.

...Here&#8217;s another question to consider: why &#8220;brand&#8221; the effort in SL with LC.tv?  If Christianity is known for disunity and hypocrisy in the real world by it&#8217;s various &#8220;branded&#8221; identities, why not enter SL without all those labels?...  We can&#8217;t just think about who is converted (praise God for these), but we have to think about those we may alienate....  I&#8217;m talking about resistance to unbiblical elements of church culture we may bring with us online.  (When I say unbiblical, I don&#8217;t mean wrong&#8212;I only mean that these cultural elements aren&#8217;t rooted in the bible or Christ, they&#8217;re just cultural.)  SL has its own unique culture(s), and have we considered the cross-cultural implications of our communication in that medium?

...No way, but neither should we avoid a discussion of the missiological questions that LC.tv in SL raises.  So far, I&#8217;ve not read of these issues being thoroughly discussed in the blogosphere&#8212;but I must admit, I haven&#8217;t done a thorough search for it.  So, as a student of communication, these posts are my effort to get this conversation into the foreground&#8212;moving beyond the easy publicity of being the first megachurch in SL.  Plus, we can credit LC.tv for getting the whole idea of how to approach this type of evangelism on the table in the church.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Eisley&#x27;s new sound combinations</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-08-24T11:39:18-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-832</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-832</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divThe summer music I&#8217;ve been waiting for has arrived, a little late, but oh well.  Honestly, I have to confess a fair amount of talent envy with these Eisley kids.  Every time I hear another brilliant tune by them, I can't help wishing I had five percent of their talents for songwriting and melodic creativity.  Forgive me, for I am a frustrated and mostly washed up musician.  Suffice it to say, these kids are gifted.  No sophomore slump here, my friends.

Here&#8217;s the free video that came with the album, plus another promo with them talking about the record.  Yeah, they're still just kids--and it shows.  But the music is incredible.  <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z1zeQF07EK4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z1zeQF07EK4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object>  <object width="250" height="203"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DBISYNFwwgg"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DBISYNFwwgg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="250" height="203"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Masks and web 2.0</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-08-18T09:26:35-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-831</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-831</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[My post about Lifechurch.tv&#8217;s mission endeavor to Second Life led me back to the ideas presented in TrueFaced, by Thrall, McNicol & Lynch.  This led to a few more thoughts and questions to mull over:

Second Life is all about living out an alternative you in an alternative world.

...In fact, we don&#8217;t really need Second Life to help us wear masks.

...&#8220;I heard the sound of You in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid myself,&#8221; replied Adam.

...<div class="image-right"></divCan we be true with ourselves and others in a world that trades on Adam's mask?  Is it even possible to take off the mask I am wearing in the real world through interactions in Second Life&#8217;s alternate reality?

While I think it&#8217;s theoretically possible for someone to be more open, honest and true to themselves in Second Life (people may be more free to speak their minds, for example, or express their true feelings), I can&#8217;t get past the idea that any such perceived freedom requires masked anonymity to be realized.

The question is, can we reach those who are masked by wearing masks ourselves?  Is participation an effective witness or an effective barrier to advancing the kingdom?

...For one thing, no one&#8212;not even those I love&#8212;ever gets to see my face.  &#8230; Worse yet, I never experience the love of others because when I wear a mask, only my mask receives the love.  I sense that I&#8217;m still not loved and self-diagnose that maybe my mask wasn&#8217;t good or tight enough.  &#8230; And if that&#8217;s not painful enough, get this.  I also cannot give love from behind a mask, at least not love from the real me.  The ones I long to love experience the cloying attempts of someone who doesn&#8217;t exist.&#8221;

Maybe it is lifechurch.tv&#8217;s approach of planting a megachurch community in Second Life that needs more thought....  If we cannot love in truth, what kind of gospel can we bring masked others?

Given the power of masked anonymity, perhaps it is the Catholic practice of the confessional that could be more successful.  Instead of trying to simulate an event-driven cyber-church &#8220;experience&#8221; with our best evangelical avatars there to invite the unwashed masses to a rad rockin&#8217; service, why not give the anonymous citizens of Second Life a place to speak to God and the Church with the honesty that their masked anonymity engenders.  They have already chosen to don the masks, but must we?  Or can we imagine an expression of the Church in Second Life that connects confession to redemption?  I don&#8217;t know what that would look like yet, but it has me thinking.

I suspect that LifeChurch.tv could inspire a virtual land grab for missions in and to Second Life, much like it has for business.  My concern is that, like Wired&#8217;s report on the mostly failed commercial forays into this virtual world, Churches and missionaries will spend thousands to create fabulous virtual masks to evangelize no one real.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Amanpour on the Myth</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-08-16T20:52:59-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-828</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-828</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Holy cow.  A couple months ago I remember being told CNN was visiting Woodland Hills&#8212;talking to Greg Boyd about The Myth of Christian Nation and going against the grain of mainstream evangelicalism in America.  Little did I know it was for a segment of God&#8217;s Warriors by Christiane Amanpour, to be aired August 21-23.

If you have cable/sat TV, be sure to catch this fascinating three-night report, along with the extensive companion web site at CNN.com.  As for Boyd, a diary version of his interview with Amanpour is available online, under the link to Christianity/Video Diary/Politics & Faith.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Spoon serves up robotic Grooves</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-08-16T20:48:56-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-829</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-829</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not all that well versed in this band (Spoon), but who am I to keep you from the latest viral video infection.  Dance, Dance!  <object width="350" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nPdP1jBfxzo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nPdP1jBfxzo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="350" height="288"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Let&#x27;s play church</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-08-07T21:04:38-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-827</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-827</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[So, LifeChurch.tv set up a cyber-megachurch in Second Life, complete with a (fake) 16 acre campus.  (More on it here.)

<div class="image-right"></divOh my.

...This news broke earlier this year, but I missed it.  So here&#8217;s a very late post with my very unimportant, snarky and a few serious thoughts on it.

First, here&#8217;s is an alternate communication thesis topic right in front me: Mediated religious communication and expression through Second Life&#8217;s user-generated technology.  I don&#8217;t know what to think of this general idea yet, but I&#8217;m biased by a pretty low opinion (sorry) of LifeChurch.tv&#8217;s media ministry model.  If I don&#8217;t study it, somebody definitely should.

Second, leave it to Madison Avenue to lead uber ambitious Christian media enterprises like LifeChurch.tv around by the nose.  Second Life seems to be a bust for most commercial marketers, according to Wired magazine&#8217;s Frank Rose.  Read his recent take on the millions being spent on the marketing wasteland that is Second Life (thus far).

<div class="image-right"></divConsidering the costs involved in setting up shop (or church) in Second Life (it takes a lot of programming to make cool places in SL), it looks like LifeChurch.tv&#8217;s supposed cutting-edge ministry move into the virtual world may be throwing good money (donated or otherwise) after bad.

There are so many philosophical and theological questions about the validity of evangelism by means of digital avatars, it looks like someone missed a more pragmatic question: If we build it, will they come?  If Wired is right, I seriously doubt it.

LifeChurcher, Bobby Gruenewald even commented in response to Nicholas Carr&#8217;s blog: &#8220;Surprisingly, we actually did think quite a bit about what it means to have a church community in the virtual world.  :) Even with the forethought we still have more questions than answers and hope to use the effort learn a lot more."

...Sorry about gettin' all up in their grill about it (admittedly frank and a tad too judgemental, I agree), but my PR Spidey sense is tingling.  And as far as PR goes, mission accomplished.  Real mission is another matter entirely, and the jury is still out.

Call me a spiritual luddite on this one, but I need to work on advancing the kingdom in the real world before I can give a whit about doing it via avatar.  I could be wrong, of course.  This could be the most important &#8220;church plant&#8221; of my generation.  But somehow a LifeChurch.tv outpost in Second Life seems about as far away from a "truefaced" commercial-free faith as one could get.  That's my snap judgement on it.

More on this in a future post.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>New fruit</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-08-07T20:51:49-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-826</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-826</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divFinally, after all the iPhone, iTunes and iPod mania has settled down, new Macs.  I post with mixed emotions as I type this on my now obsoleted iMac G5.  Sure, my CPU was obsolete with the Intel transition, but the hardware design remained the same (plus, I still run a fair amount of PowerPC native apps).  But today, I no longer have the freshest Apple on the block.  Behold, the new iMac line.

It will probably be two years or more before I move on to this model and cascade what I&#8217;m using today to the family.  But at least I have a new reason to visit the Apple store (my only refuge when the kids talk me into going to the MOA).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Wii will get in shape</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-08-07T20:37:35-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-825</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-25.html#unique-entry-id-825</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[That&#8217;s what I keep saying to myself (since my great diet of 2000-2001).  If anything has the potential to help me (or Mii) get in shape, it could be this.  This new Wii controller and set of games/exercises should make it state-side next year.  Although, I may decide to join the Y as a supplement to the Wii.  That has a nice ring to it: Y & Wii.  Hmmm.  <object width="350" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NRICE7o0XrU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NRICE7o0XrU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="350" height="288"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Don&#x27;t smoke</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2007-07-31T19:44:49-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-824</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-824</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divCharp sent me more great snaps from my distant past.  This is me (middle), him (left) and Wayne Hanson (right) in Germany doing our best Eurotrash pose.  And It would be pretty cool taking a drag on our fake smokes, if it weren't for the stupid American fanny packs silently screaming "tourist."  I believe Wayne was playing some street music to earn some quick Marks for souvenirs.  This would have been spring of 1990 (May or June)--the NCBC choir trip to Austria, Germany and Hungary.  While not-so-secretly pining for a new girlfriend back home, I think my goal was to play it as cool as possible, and not get swept up in some stupid choir trip fling (like that would ever have happened).  What a geek.  But, then again, I'm just a bigger geek now.  And, I got the girl.  (PS: Bri, made you look at another fake smoke gag - gotcha, pal!)]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Why they call it the Jesus phone</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-07-28T15:40:41-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-823</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-823</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Okay, I promise this will be my last iPhone-related post this month.  But this cracked me up.  David Pogue, technology columnist for the New York Times, does a send-up music video on the iPhone.  Also added to the blogroll, The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs--a super popular blog by one known as "fake Steve Jobs."  Also hilarious.  <object width="350" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vniMR6Ez9cE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vniMR6Ez9cE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>iPhone pwns your PC&#x2c; you just don&#x2019;t know it yet</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-07-27T08:46:34-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-822</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-822</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Seeking Alpha, an investment industry trendspotter, recently published a story by Andrew Melcher that lines up with my longstanding podcomputing predictions&#8212;and generously dishes out some doom and gloom for Microsoft&#8217;s ability to compete.  I would never go this far, but I must admit, reading this makes me a little giddy.  As the computing paradigm begins to shift toward mobility&#8212;and make no mistake, it is shifting&#8212;the old Mac vs. Windows OS battle is back on. This time, Apple has the edge, because size matters, and smaller is better.

&#8220;The smaller Apple OS has a critical advantage here.&#8221;  Writes Melcher.  &#8220;It will be at least another year before flash memory chips are big enough to power a standard Windows bloatware device.  It seems that Windows will be stuck without next year's absolutely-must-have functionality - platform ubiquity.&#8221;

<div class="image-right"></divThen, Melcher moves into nearly insane (or insanely great, depending on your take) territory with this assertion: &#8220;Once a critical mass of people leaves Windows, the only source of power Microsoft ever really had (its user network) will evaporate.  At that point, Apple handhelds stop being a million user curiosity and starts looking like a $600/unit global communication standard/network that will eventually replace nearly a billion desktop computers.&#8221;

Beyond Microsoft, Melcher also predicts doom and gloom for cell phone hardware manufacters: &#8220;The likes of Nokia will simply not be able to create functions valuable enough to compete with &#8230; iPhones that are also dockable Apple computers.  iPhone's offspring could dominate node computing and communication by bridging both ends of the mobility continuum.  After all, if you had a dockable Apple computer in your pocket&#8212;a device that could always access the Internet for free&#8212;would you need another computer, or a cell phone?&#8221;

Think the iPhone is just an overhyped fad?  Maybe so, but the idea behind it isn&#8217;t.  In the near future, computers will look like the iPhone pictured above.  Just dock it to a keyboard, mouse and large screen wherever you have WiFi knocking about.

The desktop or even laptop PC as we know it is a dead man walking.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A reckless and necessary change of course</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-07-27T08:42:05-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-821</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-821</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Thoughts on thesis, part 7 Posts in a series of commentaries on my thesis project for the Master of Arts in Communication.

I&#8217;m taking steps now to change the focus of my thesis at this point.  Proof positive that my blogging has helped me get in touch with what really matters most to me (and hopefully others), I&#8217;m moving away from the idea of doing a rhetorical analysis of church advertising and toward developing a project around commercial media in the church and the notion of sanctuary.  This has been what has resonated the most in my review of literature and is what I consider the most important area for me to concentrate my studies.  You get a good flavor for this from reading my June 2 post, entitled "clarity, at last."

This means throwing out a good chunk of my prospectus which would have eventually made up the theoretical and methodological portions of my Thesis.  But, I feel like this is the right decision&#8212;this is where my heart has been for some time.  While church advertising is more of a tactical issue relating to the syncretism of consumer marketing and evangelism, commodification of the church itself as target market is more about the core of how we define the church and its role in advancing the kingdom.  In addition, I&#8217;ve observed little reflection on this ethical dilemma in my research.

I&#8217;ll keep you posted on where this goes.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Save the dates: June 30 to July 5</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-07-27T08:39:47-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-820</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-820</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[As I am expecting to graduate in May, 2008, I plan to go all out for C-stone in 2008.  Boys, put in for your vacation days and bribe your wives with gifts now, cause we&#8217;re gonna be there.  Oh yes, and Mr. Orvis, you may want to talk to Romantica about getting a booking on the Gallery stage&#8212;you&#8217;re definitely good enough, or better.  Would love to see you there.  You know we&#8217;ll feed the band with Doug&#8217;s famously ginormous burgers.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>We were merely freshman</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2007-07-24T19:44:31-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-819</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-819</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[We can't be held responsible.

<div class="image-right"></divI can be accused of pride at times.  In an effort to keep myself humble, here is a damning photograph of me with a full blown 80s pop music mullet.  I'm accompanied by my NCBC freshmen-in-arms, Christopher Morris Heile (left) and David Charpentier (right).  We haunted the west end of floor 4 - Carlson Hall, and judiciously inflicted our musical sensibilities on the "holy boys" that surrounded us (those legalistic male pastoral majors who dressed for "their best lives now" and felt that listening to Sting, The Beatles, 10,000 Maniacs and a steady supply of U2 was injurious to our eternal souls and theirs).

As is apparent, I am compensating for my lack of guitar skill (something Chris had in spades) buy kissing my fancy hollow body acoustic-electric Kramer.  I figured it was okay if I was a barely functional on the instrument, so long as I loved it that much.  Truth be told, it was the only kiss I could get my freshman year.  And then there was Charp, with his freshly minted Rattle and Hum movie T-shirt.  I wanted that shirt.

Fond memories, culminating in one of the greatest road trips of my lifetime to Charlevoix, MI for Mr. Heile's fantastic wedding.  Good times.  So there's another question for Charp: can you find the videotape we made of that trip?  Thanks for the scans.  So nice to have hair again (on my head).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The aesthetic wisdom of crowds&#xa;</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-07-21T10:57:23-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-818</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-818</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[My other life as a mediocre graphic designer has allowed me to be a part of many leading edge technology trends over the years.  Consider: the Mac GUI, Pagemaker, the laser printer, Zip drives, Photoshop, digital cameras and photos, modems, the world wide web, etc. It&#8217;s been geek heaven.  Yet, sometimes simple things I&#8217;ve stumbled upon as super gnarly for graphic design work, are also part of much larger technological, societal and business trends.  That&#8217;s true of istockphoto.com.

<div class="image-right"></diviStock is one of a few commercially disruptive social networks that harnesses masses of amateur and professional digital photographers to resell their work via the internet on a royalty free, generous usage rights basis.  The Wired article link gives you a better picture of what it is and what it has done to the stock photo world and beyond.  As a designer working for non profit clients on a shoe-strong budget, iStock is fan-freakin&#8217;-tastic.  For professional stock photographers, not so much.

"With microstock, it&#8217;s much more a conversation between the photographers and designers in the audience," Khoi Vinh, design director for NYTimes.com, said.  "It&#8217;s a different kind of marketplace; they [photographers] can adapt much more quickly.  You'll see over time microstock get much more sophisticated and varied, and there&#8217;s going to be a stylistic difference between microstock and big stock houses.  It&#8217;s an entirely different economic gain, so it makes for different creative gain as well."

My personal (and perhaps obvious) observation is that iStock&#8217;s runaway success is the result of a convergence of four distinct technologies and/or trends: 1) Web 2.0 social networking technology, 2) the proliferation of photo media due to wide adoption of digital photography, 3) open source/crowdsourcing, and, of course 4) Photoshop&#8212;the ability to readily manipulate and use disparate graphics and photos to create &#8220;new&#8221; art to suit new purposes.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Lamentation in absentia: Cornerstone 07</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-07-14T10:10:27-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-817</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-817</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divWell, a five year run was broken this year....  My absence can be attributed to a confluence of circumstances: A new baby at home&#8212;making life crazy with three kids, classes for my MA program, the earlier date for the fest, lack of a quorum among my Cornerstone compadres.  But rather than whine about it (too much), I&#8217;ll just post a few tidbits about 2007 acts and speakers I wish I could have seen and heard.  Think of these as notes for next year&#8212;and there will be a next year!

...But I missed new tracks from their next record, The Trumpet Child, and the fine addition of multi-instrumentalist Jacob Bradley, formerly of VOL, on bass, dobro and lap steel.

...Will they be there in 2008 and can Stephen Christian&#8217;s live vocals finally keep up with the band's frenetic rock show?  I guess it rained the evening they played main stage, so maybe this was one to miss.

...And, I understand I missed a huge rock show at the Gallery stage, their preferred venue.

...I always appreciated her contribution to that record, and since she is now a resident of Germany, I doubt I&#8217;ll get many chances to see her play live.

...Missed her in 2006 and really missed her this year.

...Would have like to seen/heard that.

...A fun and quirky folk songstress that I have now managed to miss twice.

...Nothing like saying you saw them first way back when: Eisley in 2002, Robert Randolph and Copeland in 2004, Lovedrug and MuteMath in 2005 (and many more).  For 2007, it is likely that that would have been Tifah, from what I read on the fest blogs.

...In the past, I&#8217;ve been treated to The Alarm, The Prayer Chain, The Choir, Altar Boys, Undercover, Steve Taylor, 77s....  This year we missed a heaven&#8217;s metal bloodbath: Bloodgood, Whitecross, etc. Sigh.

...Really, I&#8217;d like to get in on these as a separate event without feeling conflicted about missing a potentially brilliant music show to sit on my butt and watch films (or vice versa).  I must credit Cornerstone for exposing me to The Ring, Donnie Darko and the concept of film festivals in general (although Cornerstone needs to make some investment in a better viewing venue&#8212;that pole barn is horrible).

...This guy is all about affluence and consumer culture from a critical POV.  I&#8217;ll have to catch up with him in cyberspace.

I'm sure there would have been other discoveries stumbled upon by wandering around the farm in a sweaty, sleep deprived stupor.

How can I replace the experience of cohabitating in tents and trailers with old friends and having a good old-fashioned night terror as my delusional screams rouse us all from peaceful slumber?

...Just for those who don't have a clue why this festival is different from all the others, here's a YouTube overview from their DVD.  It maybe highlights more of the heavy music, but you get the idea if you watch all the clips.  <object width="350" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/H78GiNeUVmM"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/H78GiNeUVmM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="350" height="288"></embed></object> Click for Part 2 Click for Part 3]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Wii love it</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-07-07T11:13:05-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-815</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-815</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Dawnshelle and I decided to get Dad (that&#8217;s me) a Wii for my birthday (recently).  Now, I know what you may be thinking: &#8220;You both decided to get it?  Right, Todd.  Nice way to justify it.&#8221;  Well, we wanted to get the whole family into something more active and group oriented than sitting on the couch playing sedentary console games.  That meant no Xbox 360 or PS3.  Plus, the Wii fascinated both of us based in what we had been reading and seeing in the commercials.

I must say, it&#8217;s been a lot of fun so far.  Of course, my 8-year-old is asking me to play it with her every night (and I&#8217;m very conflicted about this because I have homework to do).  But the great thing is being engaged together in a game like tennis or golf or bowling (all played standing up, swinging your arms).  Now, you can trick the Wii and play this stuff sitting on your butt.  But what for?  Getting up and doing the real deal (in a video game sort of way) is half the fun&#8212;the other half is watching someone else do it.  Downside: Wii doesn&#8217;t play DVD movies, so there isn&#8217;t an opportunity to replace a TV component.

Pictured above is our family Mii&#8217;s (our personal Wii characters, players).  We haven&#8217;t created a Mii for Everett, yet.  And the Mii&#8217;s here are subject to change as we tweak them.  For example, I added a hat last night to hide my sad, balding head.

Last night, Dawni and I even snuck downstairs to bowl a couple games after the kids were in bed.  I never thought I&#8217;d be playing video games with my wife&#8212;but there we were.  Dad Mii bowled a 171 (six spares and two strikes).  &#8220;Nice Throw!&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>On a philosophy kick</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-07-06T11:19:23-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-816</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-24.html#unique-entry-id-816</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been hitting the philosophy pretty hard lately, with my core MA curriculum reaching into the rhetorical traditions of ancient philosophers, and the modern/postmodern aspects of the thesis work.  So, when someone mentioned this old Python sketch, I had to search YouTube to find it.  And there it was.  If you&#8217;re familiar with all or any of these philosophical athletes, you&#8217;ll get some giggles out of this classic soccer match.  Those ancients can bring it!  <object width="350" height="288"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xrShK-NVMIU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xrShK-NVMIU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="350" height="288"></embed></object>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Do you Digg me?</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-06-29T08:58:57-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-814</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-814</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I do get a little carried away with adding new features to my blog.  But remember, one of my goals is to learn how to do some of these things.  So, I've added some social bookmarking links at the end of each post.  Now, if you want to spread the word on a particularly notable, brilliant or, perhaps, insipid post on TSAWWT, you can "Digg" it (or whatever) by clicking your preferred bookmark link and logging in to spread the word.  I'm interesting in the web proliferation factor of blog communication and the mechanisms that make that work.  Instead of adding a whole bunch of them (there are many), I'm going just with Digg, del.icio.us and Technorati for now.  Anyway, if you like something and think it is bookmark-worthy, click the links and give a shout out.  And if you prefer one you don't see, let me know and I'll look for the code to add.  Thanks.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>More on the rise of the podcomputer: YouTube&#x2c; Safari&#x2c; Facebook and iPhone</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-06-23T16:48:04-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-813</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-813</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Okay, so I get all psyched to write this post, and then Cringley basically steals my whole idea.

...For the rest of us, here&#8217;s a little insight on where we are, right this moment, in technology history.  To put it briefly, there&#8217;s a lot of paradigm shifting and disruptive technology emerging this summer&#8212;more than anyone can afford to ignore, because it is likely to affect your future computing life.

...<div class="image-right"></divFirst, let&#8217;s back up to the beginning of the month and recap Apple&#8217;s WWDC.  The biggest news leading up to this event was Apple TV&#8217;s addition of YouTube video access....  First, the iPhone would open up Safari for web application development, meaning that web developers would be able to write web apps for iPhone.  This wasn&#8217;t necessarily the news software developers wanted to hear (they wanted access and an SDK for the iPhone version of OS X), but it was extremely significant nonetheless.  Second, Apple released a beta of its Safari Web browser for Windows XP and Vista.

...<div class="image-right"></divThis past week, Apple announces some significant upgrades to the final iPhone hardware spec, and sneaks in a new application.  And what do you know, it&#8217;s YouTube on the iPhone....  It&#8217;s not hard to imagine this taking web video to a whole new level.  But beyond video fun, Safari for Windows, Google and the iPhone signal a paradigm shift for software.  Web distributed applications are starting to make their play for the mainstream&#8212;and the platform is increasingly mobile....  Apple recognizes that Safari on Windows means more use of distributed applications and web 2.0 application development that will reach beyond the PC to their mobile platform.

<div class="image-right"></divMore evidence of this can be seen outside of Apple and Google.  On May 24, Facebook launched the newest version of the Facebook Platform with APIs and services that allow outside developers to create apps for the burgeoning Facebook social networking site.  Marc Andreesson, original founder of Netscape, posted an excellent look at the new platform on his blog&#8212;recommended reading.  The Facebook platform, like Google&#8217;s distributed apps, represents web-based software in an increasingly web 2.0 world.  Now think about Facebook and Facebook apps on the iPhone.  Safari&#8217;s already there, ready and waiting&#8212;now on both ends of the PC vs. Mac dichotomy.

And as I predicted back in August 2005, prior to iPhone, and again in January of this year, the new mobile platform iPhone represents is evolving toward the podcomputing concept&#8212;and web 2.0 will be the source of the killer apps of tomorrow.

...&#8220;Remember that a key component of iPhone marketing is that the device will run a version of OS X, making it more computer than phone.  When the iPhone finally ships and some techies have voided their warranties and torn the thing apart, they'll probably find it uses a processor running at a gigahertz or more -- by far the fastest processor ever put in a mobile phone -- a processor more powerful than that in my Mom's PC.  With all that power locked inside, of course some users will want to imagine their iPhone AS their PC, which Apple -- at least for now -- would rather not enable because it might hurt Macintosh sales.&#8221;

...My prediction is long enough for the software paradigm to complete its shift.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Classic rock like you&#x2019;ve never heard it before</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-06-22T18:47:03-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-812</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-812</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve laughed as hard at any time in the past few years as I did when I watched a few of these &#8220;Legion of Rock Stars&#8221; videos.  And maybe it&#8217;s just me, but I can&#8217;t help myself.  Here&#8217;s my favorite so far:  <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UJO1K1IguLM"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UJO1K1IguLM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Four others that had me ROTFLMAO: Journey, The Rolling Stones, Jim Croce and Tears for Fears.

I know your probably asking, how&#8217;d they do that?

To really appreciate this, you have to understand the process involved.  A &#8220;super&#8221; group of barely passable musicians get together to play and record a classic rock song live.  They accomplish this by each wearing noise-cancelling headphones that only pipe through the original version of the tune.  So, each performer in the band can&#8217;t hear them self and can&#8217;t hear each other at all.  They call the diabolically ingenious new recording process, "Pure Pleasure."

I think you&#8217;ll agree, some of these songs have never sounded better.  Here&#8217;s a YouTube link to a page full of these musical gems paired with the original band/artist videos.  Thanks to Zack Lind of Finding Rhythm for unearthing this unique new art form.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Nikola Tesla in the home office</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-06-22T18:43:08-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-811</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-811</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divIf you&#8217;ve seen The Prestige, then you&#8217;ve had a fictionalized taste of Nikola Tesla (courtesy of David Bowie).  One of Tesla&#8217;s quests was to transmit electricity via wireless means&#8212;a feat he achieved in a cruder, more dangerous form.  Someday it may be possible to get the earth&#8217;s power completely carbon free by beaming energy to the surface from an array of solar collectors in orbit, thanks to Tesla&#8217;s vision.

Well, this latest advance takes the idea right into your home.  Wireless data transmission meets wireless power transmission in the home office.  Say bye-bye to even more wires.  I, for one, can&#8217;t help but think that lead-lined clothes still might be a good idea.  But who am I to stand in the way of technological progress.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Coming clean on the t-shirt</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2007-06-19T20:48:36-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-810</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-810</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[There are a million t-shirt businesses on the internet these days.  However, I did stumble upon one that had some designs that made me laugh recently.  By popular demand, here is the link to One Horse Shy t-shirts to get your mitts on the "nobody cares about your blog" t-shirt I posted in May.  There are other, more tasteless choices available, so I can't give these folks a full endorsement.  But here are three more of my favorites.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Snappy new blog feature</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-06-17T20:06:10-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-809</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-809</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I've added Snapshots code to my blog entries--after messing around with how to make it work for a few weeks.  You may notice new pop-ups emanating from the links or a little bubble icon next to each link.  Mousing over those will create a popup search engine preview of the linked page, if available.  I hope this is helpful.  I've liked it at a few sites I've seen it, and I'll try to keep the pertinent links to a minimum to avoid it becoming an reader annoyance.  Also note, these are not a form of advertising.  TSAWWT is an Ad free site (except for cool things I want to put an unpaid plug in for).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I&#x27;m so Romantica</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-06-16T14:45:57-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-808</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-808</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divHere's a full endorsement (unpaid).  Pick up a copy of Romantica's new project, America.  If the idea of Jim Orvis (pictured, left) drumming his heart out doesn't convince you, Ben Kyle's (pictured, middle) amazing and sweet songwriting should.  This local act is on the cusp of much-deserved national success.  Get on board for a unique journey in and through America.

The StarTribune's Chris Riemenschneider says, "This is the kind of record I can recommend to everyone.  It's sweet and (truth in advertising) romantic, and the Irish-born Kyle is true to his roots with ample melancholy and poetic license.  Kyle fares best in his most personal tunes, such as the up-tempo waltz 'The National Side,' about his family's migration to America."

Now available on iTunes.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>How a mouse really works</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-06-16T14:43:35-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-807</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-807</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Ever wonder?  This picture should give you an idea of the analog technology underneath the digital marvel that is the PC mouse pointing device.  If you're running Explorer on a PC, this link should take you to a working demo.  Hilarious, yet coded without any thoughts for web standards, which ticks me off to no end.  Sadly, you'll need a PC running Explorer to see this in action.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Clarity&#x2c; at last</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-06-02T16:01:32-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-805</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-805</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I plan to use much of this post for a formal speech in class next week....  He cites Tibor Scitovsky and Dallas Smythe on commodification and consumer culture, paralleling Barry Schwartz&#8217;s Paradox of Choice.

...Scitovsky observed in 1976 that as consumers, human satisfaction is derived from &#8220;novelty and stimulation&#8221; in consumption, which is made into a &#8220;homogenized experience&#8221; to serve capitalistic enterprise.  The comforting experience derived from consumption is addictive, and like many addictions, provides diminishing levels of satisfaction as it ceases to be novel and stimulating.  Adding to this, Smythe said that &#8220;mass media&#8221; produces audiences as commodities for sale to advertisers&#8212;and subsequently to product producers.

...When viewed from this perspective, both the church itself, and the church consumer are commodified.  The church is a product, and the congregation is transformed into a product&#8212;a quantifiable audience that can be delivered to a marketer.

<div class="image-right"></divHollywood is catching on to this in new and ingenious ways.  I recently took a web trip to ArkAlmighty, which is a Craigslist-type localized church charity tie-in to the movie, Evan Almighty.  Now, there seems to be no downside to enlisting Hollywood in the effort to promote acts of kindness and charity throughout the church....  But here&#8217;s the uncomfortable part: This whole endeavor also aims to deliver The Church (God&#8217;s community of people) as a commodified audience for a commercial purpose.  It is ultimately intended to drive tickets sales in the hope of making Bruce Almighty the Billion dollar goldmine that The Passion of the Christ was.

That is what is so hard about deconstructing what is occurring in today&#8217;s church....  Does ArkAlmighty bring enough community benefit that it&#8217;s worth the tradeoff of helping generate publicity for a product (the film)....  Would you put a plasma screen in your lobby with ads for Zondervan bibles if they helped fund for your food shelf ministry?

...It&#8217;s not only the conflicts of interests that may arise between church teachings and the cultures of these commercial yet pseudo ministry enterprises....  They aren&#8217;t part of The Church anymore, they are an &#8220;audience&#8221; with a commercial value....  When the services and ministries of the local church are commodified through marketing and advertising, it&#8217;s just as easy to commodify the congregation.

...There&#8217;s not that much of a difference between the temple environment that enraged Jesus in John 2:13-16, and what is happening in some Evangelical churches today.  It just doesn&#8217;t look like dusty money-changers and merchants selling sacrificial doves and other religious supplies in the temple courts:

...In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money.  So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.

...I strongly believe that our houses and homes of worship must return to the concept of sanctuary, and become places of refuge from commodification, consumerism and competition.  Admittedly this is especially hard to do in a culture that we are called to remain within in response to our missional calling.  Yet, I think there are old and new ways to do so&#8212;and that a new attractiveness of Christianity in today&#8217;s world may be found in helping create a commercial free context where people can rest in God&#8217;s presence, grace and the presence of each other.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I love being right</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-06-02T15:53:43-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-804</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-804</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[It&#8217;s true.  Who doesn&#8217;t?  This week Apple announced two Apple TV enhancements that I predicted in January when the product hit the market.  First, a much larger hard drive option&#8212;allowing people to go to from 40 to 160 Gb.  Second, a software update in June that will bring the entire world of Google&#8217;s YouTube videos to Apple TV.  Trek on over to the January, 2007 TSAWWT archive and read the post entitled Apple TV 1.0 reflections, to see my original prognostication or wish list.

<div class="image-right"></divIf you think of Apple TV as a computer (it has already been hacked by hobbyists to run a full version of OS X), then think of YouTube content integration as Apple TV&#8217;s first killer app. The more I ponder this, the more I&#8217;m convinced.  Most people have 50 to 150 channels of professionally produced television programming (okay, some of it is not quite &#8220;professional&#8217; grade, but you get the point).  At the same time, more and more people are logging into YouTube to watch user-generated content on small little PC screen video players.  YouTube on AppleTV brings user-generated content into the television entertainment context in a big screen way, all navigated via the simple Apple remote.  This will be a catalyst for a whole new TV experience.  It will be huge.

So what was I wrong about?  Two other features that we haven&#8217;t seen&#8230;yet.  The first is a way to rip DVDs to your digital library the way iTunes does for music.  I now doubt this will happen.  Instead, I think Apple is interested in selling media directly through iTunes, since DVD content is less used than music for repeat playback and Apple can&#8217;t monetize DVD media people already own (ouch).  The second is a USB camera with iChat capabilities for Apple TV.  I fully expect this to happen when the time is right.  Wait for it.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>That&#x27;s no moon</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-06-02T15:51:11-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-803</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-803</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[That&#8217;s a space station!  Or rather, it&#8217;s a convention center and hotel complex proposed for UAE, of all places.  I guess it kind of makes sense if you think of OPEC as some Imperial Empire.  Wired.com just published this fascinating real estate news item, but I&#8217;m sure the real, super secret plans have been hidden safely in the memory banks of some R2 unit hoping to find its way to the Rebel alliance.

Sure, it&#8217;ll be a fun place to stay, until some farm kid in a rebel X-Wing fighter blows it to kingdom come.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Mutual admiration society</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-06-02T14:36:18-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-802</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-23.html#unique-entry-id-802</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[It's been a while since these two have done an interview together.  In fact, they haven't appeared together in video form since the 1997 MacWorld when they buried the hatchet on the alleged Microsoft IP theft of MacOS for Windows and Microsoft helped save Apple with a $150 million infusion.  So, here's a bit of Steve and Bill at the WSJ D:5 All Things Digital conference.  Some great reminiscing and fascinating discussion.  <embed src="http://services.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/452319854" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=958475626&playerId=452319854&viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://services.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&domain=embed&autoStart=false&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Tunes on the side</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-05-23T21:20:22-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-801</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-801</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I added an MP3 player to the sidebar, mainly because I wanted to see how hard or easy it could be.  Pretty easy it turns out.  I've turned off the autoplay so as to not offend visitors.  If you want to hear some of what I'm listening to from time to time, give it whirl.

It looks like this (and this one also works).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Repenting of religious illiteracy</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2007-05-21T20:23:12-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-800</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-800</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Religion & Ethics Newsweekly (PBS) included a great segment this week on the sorry state of religious literacy among Americans, featuring Stephen Prothero, the chair of the religion department at Boston University.  Prothero advocates adding classes in the Bible and world religions to required public school curriculums.  There's also a video segment on the subject via the linked R&EN page.

<div class="image-right"></divI agree.  I&#8217;ve always appreciated the high school elective I took on world religions.  It exposed me to a basic understanding of the major world religions (okay, I forgot 70 percent of it) which has served me well into my college education and adulthood.  This is something I never would have learned in a church youth group.

My brother-in-law actually teaches such a class at a local high school (Go Raiders).  And while it is challenging subject matter (and rife with social and political landmines), I applaud his and other teachers' efforts to build wider understanding and trust across faiths in a country where so much misunderstanding and mistrust pervades.  It is a noble cause.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Al Gore&#x2019;s high electricity bills&#x2026;</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-05-21T20:20:20-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-799</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-799</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></div&#8230;could have something to do with his Mac rig (pictured).  Exhibit A is Al&#8217;s three 30-inch displays running in extended desktop mode.  For those unfamiliar with the tech underlying this, it requires an additional video card running in the already high end Mac Pro tower computer to provide a total of three DVI ports, plus the three $1,799 30-inch Apple HD Cinema Displays, each with their own power supplies.

Sure, it&#8217;s a dream rig.  But what is it that Al does with all that screen real-estate (90 inches).  And how many carbon tradeoffs does he need to neutralize all that energy consumption?  Undoubtedly it must have made creating &#8220;An Inconvenient Truth&#8221; a little more convenient.  He&#8217;d better not let Tipper catch him playing World of Warcraft on that thing&#8212;it is a tax-deductible business expense, after all.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Farewell to Paris</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2007-05-18T11:54:57-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-798</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-798</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[At the risk of losing all credibility, I must confess something.  I was a big fan of WB-then-CW show, The Gilmore Girls.  I say was, because, as you may know, the series wrapped this last Tuesday.  No more speed of light wit, lovably strange Stars Hollow characters or clueless estranged lovers.  Luke finally figured it out.  Sigh.

Joy Press of Salon.com has a great retrospective on the show and what went awry in its most recent seasons.  And While I mostly agree that the show changed when Rory went to college, I also think this was when Paris Geller, Rory Gilmore's best friend twice removed, kicked it up a notch.  Nobody did ADD, insane genius and charming OCD like Paris.  Who could forget her stint as editor of the Yale Daily News as she devolved from tyrannical Ivy League newspaper boss to shell-shocked, shanty dweller heating up a can of pork and beans on a hot plate.  She will be missed.  We'll be looking for Liza Weil in future films and TV shows.  A spin off would be too much to ask--but I would watch it.  Here's Paris at her best:  <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Rz3LTvpGKPY"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Rz3LTvpGKPY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Of course, I now get an hour of my life back each week for more important things--like lawn care and vacuuming.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>True</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2007-05-18T11:46:40-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-797</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-797</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This made me laugh (and cry a little on the inside).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Beyond your own personal Jesus</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2007-05-10T22:05:32-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-796</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-796</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Thoughts on thesis, part 5

Posts in a series of commentaries on my thesis project for the Master of Arts in Communication.

My brain has been pretty focused on my Thesis topic as I&#8217;m neck deep in research and writing for my prospectus assignment, so please read this post with that in mind.

Scott McKnight has contributed a superb article for Out of Ur called Getting the Gospel Right.  He posits that many of the church&#8217;s problems stem from a core spiritual problem of how we define the Gospel.  McKnight notes the operational definition he found prevalent among youth raised in Christian homes: &#8220;Jesus came to die for my sins so I could go to heaven.&#8221;  In short, it&#8217;s all about me.  The Gospel is about a personal transaction in a divine economy that revolves around individuals.

<div class="image-right"></divIn my opinion, such individualistic notions of the Gospel seem to parallel the rise of the consumer culture.  The church, perhaps unaware of the influences of commodification, has often been complicit in advancing this rather capitalistic interpretation (how many times in your life have you heard the Gospel defined that way?).  McKnight nails it in his understanding of the state of affairs that has resulted: Church attenders are less committed to their local body, churches remain largely segregated by race, interpersonal relationships among Christians mirror those in the culture at large, and most people do not see their interpersonal relationships as part of their spirituality.

&#8220;How we live reveals the gospel we responded to and the gospel we believe&#8221; (McKnight).

Related to my thesis research, McKnight&#8217;s observations are consistent with those of communication theorists related to the effect of incessant consumer advertising on society.  James D.  Halloran described this in his 1963 book, Control or Consent?:

&#8220;To consume becomes the main principle of life and there is a tendency for emotions and feelings to become more involved with things (goods) than with people.  There is little room for altruism, idealism or unselfishness, and it seems highly probable that this concentration on consumption of material goods will produce attitudes unfavorable to responsibility for others and their needs, a mode of thinking that will habitually suppress large areas of our real relationships (including our dependence on others and a sense of community), and an inward turning on the self, away from matters of dispute and social concern, away from responsibility&#8221; (as cited in Howard & Tinkham, 1971).

A closer reading of Halloran would lead one to predict that a transactional, individualized, materialistic Gospel would result in direct negative effects on the fulfillment of the relational and social responsibilities most important to the Christian mission.  This mission, in simple form, is defined by Jesus in his response to the Pharisees&#8217; question about the greatest commandment in The Gospel of Matthew (22:37-40, TNIV): &#8220;&#8216;Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.&#8217;  This is the first and greatest commandment.  And the second is like it: &#8216;Love your neighbor as yourself.&#8217;  All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.&#8221;  It&#8217;s obvious that Jesus is calling for an outward orientation&#8212;outward toward God and toward others&#8212;rather than the myopic inward orientation that both Halloran and McKnight observe.

More on this thread in the future.  Check out McKnight&#8217;s entire article, and be sure to partake of his uber popular blog, Jesus Creed.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>What ice cap?</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2007-05-04T09:21:32-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-795</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-795</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, for anyone still convinced that global warming is a sham, you now have a definitive deadline to look forward to.  The arctic ocean, the one at the top of the world, could be free or nearly free of summer ice by 2020.  According to the linked article, a new analysis of satellite imagery pegs this much earlier than the computer models had predicted, and holds some ominous consequences for planet Earth.  SPF 60 anyone?  I, for one, am very excited that Santa&#8217;s super secret north pole village will be exposed for all to see.

<div class="image-right"></divIn the meantime, Steve Jobs has issued another open letter&#8212;this time outlining Apple&#8217;s plans to become a greener computer company.  No doubt in response to environmental criticism leveled at them in recent years (visions of 100 million-plus toxic iPods in our landfills someday), his letter discusses Apple&#8217;s current green practices, as well as indicates their green goals going forward.  Perhaps now Greenpeace will lift their boycott on granny smiths.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Getting scrappy</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2007-05-04T09:11:25-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-794</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-794</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Wes Thomsen, former bassist for Pegtop and documentary filmmaker, has a wonderful film on the street (I know this post is really late, as this movie came out last year).  &#8220;Scrapped&#8221; is Thomsen&#8217;s personal foray into the female-dominated world of scrapbooking.  If you have a loved one (like I do) that does the scrapbook thing, and you&#8217;re a man, then this film should be required viewing.  It&#8217;s funny, but very respectful of the hobby at the same time.  Check out the trailer:  <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/51wYM9CYz_A"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/51wYM9CYz_A" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

<div class="image-right"></divAlso notable, a new Mac-based digital scrapbook package just launched this week: iScrapbook 1.0.  It totally integrates with Apple&#8217;s iApps, and seems to have many nice features and art. If you&#8217;ve ever wanted to generate layouts without having to soil your hands with double stick tape, colored pens and cut lettering, this software is for you!  I may give Dawnshelle a run for her money with this thing.  Seems easier than doing layouts in Quark and Photoshop.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Free your mind</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2007-05-04T08:56:25-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-793</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-22.html#unique-entry-id-793</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divGuy Kawasaki recently posted about Professor Carol Dweck and fixed and growth mindsets&#8212;concepts from her recent book, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success.

I&#8217;m not usually interested in personal growth and pop psychology, but this caught my attention.  The linked diagram is the most interesting personal growth chart I&#8217;ve seen in a long time.

It also is an extremely interesting statement on how people may be more predisposed to determinism or free will in their worldview (and theology) based on their overall mindset (see the bottom portion of the chart).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>We want your soul</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-04-25T22:21:34-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-792</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-792</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Thoughts on thesis, part 4

Posts in a series of commentaries on my thesis project for the Master of Arts in Communication.

I was pointed to this clip by a poster on a recent Out of Ur interview with Shane Hipps.  I'm using it for my prospectus presentation to set up the cultural backdrop for my study, which will be centered on competition, consumerism and commodification in church advertising and marketing.  I highly recommend the Out of Ur post and a trip through the comments by readers.  I'm not sure if anyone has seen this video before (it dates to 2003), but I thought it was a great illustration.  <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XvwK-3cQ6gE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XvwK-3cQ6gE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

At this point, I'm planning to look at examples of advertising and marketing materials from churches and apply a media-centered critical methodology rooted in McLuhan's media ecology and Innis' communication bias.  In short, advertising is a non neutral medium, despite the prevailing assumptions of those who use it to promote churches.  Here's one excerpt from my draft prospectus:

According to Vincent Miller, author of Consuming Religion, &#8220;religion is as susceptible to abstraction and reification as other aspects of culture&#8221; (2005, p.  105).  There is no neutral ground in mediated communication if Innis, McLuhan and others are taken seriously.  The forces of consumerism in contemporary culture endanger the message of the church by reducing it to &#8220;abstracted, virtual sentiments that function solely to give flavor to the already established forms of everyday life or to provide compensation for its shortcomings&#8221; (p.  105-106).

Looking back at the video, is the church allowing itself to become just another consumer option vying for brand awareness and patronage?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>J-bro returns</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-04-25T22:17:34-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-791</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-791</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divHuge Jonatha Brooke fan here.  Recently I was able to pull down her latest, Careful What You Wish For, from iTunes.  Have been listening to it on and off for a few days now--and am exceedingly happy.  The tunes are a cut above her last project (which was pretty good), and many have more of a hard edge, without detracting from her ability to craft beautiful melodies and lyrics.

And, she sings one song in French, no less.  C'est magnifique!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I&#x2019;m a quantitative research methods survivor</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2007-04-19T07:48:01-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-790</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-790</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divI just finished up my last project for this class, and can now concentrate completely on my prospectus due in a couple weeks.  Given the fact that I entered the MA Comm program with an exception on the statistics prerequisite, I was a little worried about staying afloat in this class&#8212;where the math really hits the fan, so to speak.  Well, I made it through.  I&#8217;m thinking about planting a tree to commemorate this life event.

I just realized there are five more classes, then comprehensive exams, then two more classes (seminars), the thesis and defense&#8212;and that&#8217;s it!  This is really starting to fly by.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>More on the choice paradox</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2007-04-14T13:30:25-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-789</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-789</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's a 20 minute talk by Barry Schwartz about the central themes of his book, The Paradox of Choice.  <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VO6XEQIsCoM"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VO6XEQIsCoM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

There's so much here to think about.  Like the example he gives on the inverse relationship between more choice and participation.  Does turning church into another consumer decision induce spiritual paralysis in the long run?  Does ostensible church growth via sheer population increase and megachurch methods mask an underlying reality that the truly unchurched in society are actually immobilized by being confronted by more decisions?  I see an impact on existing Christians, as well, with large churches offering increasing levels of choice for spiritual growth opportunities and Christian service.  How much is too much?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The new paradox of church choice</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-04-14T07:26:26-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-788</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-788</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Recently ran across a book and an article about the problem of too much choice.  The hypothesis put forth is that consumer satisfaction degrades when presented with increasing numbers of choices.  While Americans have become a society obsessed with consumer-driven choices (many of us believing more options are always better), the &#8220;piling on&#8221; of decisions is resulting in growing levels of fatigue and buyer&#8217;s remorse.

<div class="image-right"></divRead the article here, and reference the recent book by Barry Schwartz: The Paradox of Choice.

How does this apply to the notion of the church in America today?  A few thoughts that have crossed my mind in the past few days: For the past 100 years or so the number of denominations and sects in the United States as grown to huge numbers (around 30,000 for protestant groups alone).  In addition, large mega churches have become known apart from denominational affiliation in local, regional and even national contexts.  Add to this the multiple service format and venue trend, and you exponentially multiply consumer options.  Simply put, people who may consider attending a church next Sunday face an extraordinary number of choices.  Sure, not every group is represented in every community.  But gone are the days of the Walnut Grove-esque church or the all-American town with just a handful of mainline churches to mull over&#8212;each with little metal signs on the outskirts of town.  Today&#8217;s church shopper has a shopping mall full of options to consider.

<div class="image-right"></divNow, evangelistically oriented people will point out that growing communities need more churches to reach a growing population.  At face value, this is a perfectly reasonable assumption.  But it breaks down when you apply the supermarket analogy.  The article mentions how today&#8217;s supermarket carries more than 30,000 items, and 20,000 new products are introduced each year (most of these fail to catch on).  Because people come to the supermarket to choose from these products, they don&#8217;t consider the impact of a growing population on their ability to choose a product.  They make individual choices facing the same pool of options regardless of how many other people are shopping (even though the store may become more crowded&#8212;but let&#8217;s not take the analogy too far).  The point is, population growth and increased church planting only adds additional choices for people, and these choices are not limited by increased population or actual church capacity in any way.  We may need more churches to accommodate growing communities, but this also unavoidably adds more for people to choose from.

Here&#8217;s the problem: The more attempts that are made to package and expand the church to reach people (new churches, venues, alternative services, more programs, etc.), the more options everyone considering church participation has to choose from.  As the article and the book point out, this leads to people who are &#8220;less satisfied and&#8230;less happy&#8230;with those choices.&#8221;  This presents the new church choice paradox.

Is it any wonder we live in an age of church hoppers and increasingly demanding congregations?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Discover the woeful inadequacy of my education</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Books</category><dc:date>2007-04-14T07:23:19-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-787</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-787</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divMy previous post led me to check out a unique approach to higher learning.  St.  John&#8217;s College in Annapolis and Santa Fe features only one course of study.  No choice of 40 different majors&#8212;just a four year trek through all of the &#8216;significant&#8217; literature of Western civilization.  It&#8217;s hard to look over this reading list and argue that St.  John&#8217;s graduates wouldn&#8217;t emerge as more highly educated and literate thinkers than those earning degrees from the many supermarkets of higher learning across most of the country (that includes me).  Reading their web site makes me want to go there and get a real education (preferably in Santa Fe).

Here&#8217;s a fun little game: How many authors on the St.  John&#8217;s College list have you read?  They need not be the same titles or the complete works of these authors to play.  Shoot me a comment and let me know.

Todd&#8217;s list: Austen, The Bible, Dostoevski, Eliot (George), Tolstoy, Twain and Shakespeare.

Pretty scant.  I credit my college freshman lit. teacher for likely helping me double the size of my list.  I&#8217;m a little shocked at not seeing some big names on the St.  John&#8217;s list&#8212;but with all of Western civilization to get through, I suppose you gotta make some cuts.  Hemingway is probably ticked off.  How did you make out?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ignore this if you&#x2019;re sick of my Mac apologist rantings</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-04-14T07:13:40-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-786</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-786</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[For those that may be interested, another edition&#8212;even when I said I&#8217;d not be doing too much of this in the future.  I lied.

<div class="image-right"></divI&#8217;ve often tried to explain the security difference between Windows and Mac OS X.  It&#8217;s something I&#8217;m asked about fairly often.  Rarely have I been able to provide such a user friendly yet sufficiently explanatory answer as the one provided by Paul Venezia, writing an article for InfoWorld entitled, "The Myth of Apple's Insecurities."  Note, InfoWorld is not a Mac magazine&#8212;not by a long shot.  It is an IT trade publication, and its writers focus mainly on that market, which is dominated by Windows PCs and servers, but also a fair amount of UNIX servers.  So consider the source when reading the quotes below and the linked article.  This is not some Mac PR hack writing.  This is someone who knows what their talking about.  Also, when you read the word &#8220;network,&#8221; remember that the internet is the network that matters.

&#8220;If an OS is built on shaky ground, everything layered on top will suffer.  This is the position that Microsoft is in now.  Apple was in this very position at the end of the last century.  They decided to start over, providing a clear upgrade path and supporting legacy applications on the new platform.&#8221;

&#8220;Apple had to rebuild their entire OS.  They did, with a huge helping of public code [Free BSD UNIX] vetted over the decades and proven secure and reliable.  Microsoft didn't.  They&#8217;re faced with massive-scale exploits like the spreading ANI vulnerability.  That affects every Microsoft OS, server and workstation alike, across the board.  This gives us a glimpse into the code shared between generations of Microsoft OSes, and it's not a pretty view.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Apple and EMI walk the talk</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-04-02T20:19:44-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-784</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-784</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry for the number of posts concerning Apple.  Today was a big day: the beginning of the end for DRM-laden digital music.  Apple and EMI announced DRM-free music via iTunes, plus higher bit-rates for higher quality playback.  A good thing has just begun.  I neglected to post when Steve Jobs posted an open letter on Apple.com February 9 calling for record labels to do away with DRM as bad for music and music fans.  After a first quarter with falling CD sales, EMI is ready to differentiate itself from the pack with this bold move.  Bravo!  Video from CNBC below:]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Apple TV&#x27;s disruptive technology</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-04-01T13:04:50-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-783</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-783</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I have to admit that I didn't expect the Apple TV to get as much attention as it has been getting since it began shipping a couple of weeks ago. But, then again, I didn't think much of the iPod's impact when I first beheld it at an Apple store five years ago. Why could something so simple and pretty limited in scope create a fundamental disruption the TV marketplace?  Carl Howe, writing for investment site Seeking Alpha, offers some compelling reasons for your consideration:

<div class="image-right"></div"Apple TV is about to attack the fundamental assumptions underpinning the TV business just as the iPod cut the legs out from under CDs and radio stations.  How?  Because with Apple TV combining the flexibility of the Internet with a living-room, big-screen experience, consumers now will:

1) Vote for programming with consumer dollars [instead of via the viewer rating and ad-supported paradigm], 2) Watch what they want, when and where they want it, 3) Enjoy TV programming a la carte."

Check out the entire article here.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The PoMo and the bait &#x26; switch</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-04-01T11:32:45-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-781</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-781</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Thoughts on thesis, part 3

Posts in a series of commentaries on my thesis project for the Master of Arts in Communication.

There are two lines of thought emerging from the review of literature at this point.  One is the point of departure for postmodern advertising from modern, pre 1990s advertising.  Where modernism created a consumer culture by harnessing image and textual advertising to stimulate and cultivate desire and felt needs for products, postmodernism is an evolved consumer culture where advertising transcends product by presenting a hyperreality where self becomes defined by consumption and brand images become iconic&#8212;disassociated from the products they represent.  The second is a recognition of the aware consumer of the postmodern era with a highly evolved sensibility when it comes to advertising that is perceived to be deceptive or misleading.  The &#8220;bait-and-switch&#8221; of some ad messages creates and increasingly guarded and skeptical consumer, the effects of which can even bleed over into other brands and products.  It&#8217;s a break in the sacred (or profane) bond between consumer and producer where consumers are aware and accept they are being sold to, and in exchange for receiving a sales pitch, expect to be given honest, albeit hyped, information.

In the case of the former line, church growth advertising fails to recognize the impact of the postmodern shift as it pertains to advertising messages.  Many church marketers make the faulty assumption that modernist approaches in creating advertising messages will reach postmodern-minded people.  The truth is that both modern and postmodern consumer messages are problematic at best when applied to fulfilling Christian evangelistic aims.  Product marketing approaches targeting consumers often repackage the enterprise (institutional services) of a church rather than present a gospel message.  Or, the Gospel itself is productized as a turn-key consumer product, making conversion purely transactional rather than transformational.  Theologically both productizing the church and elevating Christianity or the church to image-driven brand status is troubling.  There is much to explore here.

<div class="image-right"></divIn the case of the second line, some church marketers have resorted to concealing their true identity in their messages in order to create &#8220;buzz&#8221; marketing campaigns to bring more people through their doors (like the one pictured that made national news last week).  The trouble with this technique, as advertising research tends to support, is that the consumers intrigued enough to investigate the &#8220;buzz&#8221; inevitably find out the truth: the mysterious entity that is advertising on billboards or via direct mail is really just another church.  This risks developing a growing audience of disappointed and even avoidant consumers.  Churches overestimate their ability to truly differentiate themselves from traditional churches once the switch is made.  Rock music worship and relevant, entertaining messages hold less sway with postmodern consumers with vastly superior alternatives to choose from.  In such cases, I propose leading with spirituality and the message of Jesus could be a more effective (and honest) message strategy.

Do either of the approaches generate a backlash with certain people (postmoderns seeking spiritual connection)?  Does growth in simple, neo monastic and house church movements constitute a reaction to such approaches?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Vista security flaw curses the cursor</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-04-01T11:25:08-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-782</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-21.html#unique-entry-id-782</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divOf the many things I could have posted in the past three months about Windows Vista (poor reviews, security issues, steep upgrade requirements, copied features), this one is perhaps the most damning indictment.  It seems that the cursor itself&#8212;that pointer/hourglass icon that you mouse around and click things with (really the heart of the GUI experience itself)&#8212;is vulnerable to a recent malware exploit in all versions of Windows, including Vista.  See it in action via video here.  All you stalwart Vista and XP PC owners be sure to get that forthcoming patch.  Beyond belief.  Sorry, but can I mention that my Macs live off of a high speed Internet connection that&#8217;s on 24-7 and I&#8217;m running no antiviral software?  Sure, I have a firewall on my router and in Mac OS X, but I have never had a viral infection of any kind&#8212;six years of Mac OS X and counting.

I&#8217;m not really going to be posting too much more about why people should dump Windows PCs for Macs.  Consider this post representative of 1,000 other reasons people should dump Windows.  Yes, I&#8217;m an unashamed Mac fanatic.  But I&#8217;m also seeing the writing on the wall.  The Mac is hip again.  The need for fanatics like me to evangelize is waning.  To some, Apple&#8217;s recent market share increases may not seem like much, but it has everything to do with momentum increasing against the MS hegemony.  The days of a single dominant OS&#8212;or even the relevancy of a dominant OS&#8212;are numbered.  Evidence of that?  Dell is now offering Linux as a preinstalled OS for consumer desktops and laptops.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>On message with the Kingdom revolution</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-03-23T23:48:02-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-779</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-779</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t spend time reading political blogs or news sites, but I recently caught this link from another blogger.  The article by Zack Exley published Alternet.org is a fascinating look at the kingdom revolution underway through the eyes of progressive liberals.  Overall, I think the piece is a pretty good outside interpretation of what is going on. Quotes and references include Rob Bell, Greg Boyd, Jim Wallace, and others.

...the Revolution is not primarily a reaction to Republican attempts to politicize the church.  What sets it apart from mainstream evangelicalism is not a liberal rejection of Republican politics, but rather a more radical rejection of conservatism and liberalism, and anything else that is not the "kingdom of God."  To the Revolutionaries, what seems righteous or commonsensical to humans does not matter; all that matters is what God wants.  Boyd writes in Myth of a Christian Nation: "To the extent that an individual or group looks like Jesus -- dying for those who crucified him and praying for their forgiveness in the process -- to that degree they can be said to manifest the kingdom of God.  To the degree that they do not look like this, they do not manifest God's kingdom."

And if you can stomach some rants, the comments also worth a read (in some cases) to get an insight on how people outside the church perceive this movement (for lack of a better term).  The article also describes this &#8216;whole deal&#8217; as a sort of convergence of the emerging church, evangelical progressives and kingdom revolutionaries.  Sign me up!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The future of 80s music is here</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-03-23T23:01:53-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-780</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-780</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divI had a brief email conversation recently with an old friend about some 80s and 90s music&#8212;&#8220;Break it Down Again&#8221; by Tears for Fears, to be exact (from the Elemental album circa 1993).  It seems like the 80s and 90s New Wave synth-pop sound that was creeping into today&#8217;s new music is gaining more momentum.  Case in point, The Brothers Martin, a new collaboration of brothers Jason of Starflyer 59 and Ronnie of Joy Electric.  Hooray!  I&#8217;m busting out my pastel plaid pants, cardigan sweaters, Ray-bans and hair gel.  A shout out to my nephew, Brandon for turning me on to the Brothers.  Funny, Brandon wasn't even alive when the New Wave was really new.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>It&#x27;s all been done</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-03-17T14:21:03-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-777</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-777</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Thoughts on thesis, part 2 Posts in a series of commentaries on my thesis project for the Master of Arts in Communication.

Even when you think you are approaching a topic or research question with relatively little written about it, some earnest research for your literature review turns up enough published sources to prove you wrong&#8212;at least partly.

And so it is with my project this week.  I made a trip to the library to retrieve my first batch of books for review and possible inclusion in my prospectus.  Here&#8217;s a list of nine titles I need to get through in short order:

<div class="image-right"></divBudde, Michael L.  - Christianity Incorporated Shelley, Bruce L.  - The Consumer Church Miller, Vincent J.  - Consuming religion Wells, David F.  - God in the Wasteland Fitch, David E.  - The Great Giveaway Kenneson, Philip D.  - Selling Out the Church Lyon, David - Jesus in Disneyland Roof, Wade C.- Spiritual Marketplace Twitchell, James B.  - Branded nation

Amassing a wealth of published literature on my topic is very important&#8212;and the big jackpot with some of the books are the bibliographies.  They can be the jumping off point for many other sources that my feeble research at the University library didn&#8217;t yield.

Back to my earlier point, there is more out there to draw upon than I originally thought.  Yet, I don&#8217;t feel it has all been said before.  I think my hypothesis and approach is unique enough to add value to the conversation.  What&#8217;s painfully clear in my research so far is that, while a large segment of the church has bought into consumer marketing, very little if any research (as far as I have found) has been done on how Christian messages and concepts translate into consumer advertising and marketing.

Time to starting filling the vacuum.

The modern versus postmodern consumer In other words, who&#8217;s the shallowest, most self-centered, consumption -oriented, jerk out there?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Everything starts where I say it does</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2007-03-10T19:12:25-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-776</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-776</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Just landed my copy of Lovedrug's latest, Everything Starts Where It Ends.  I must give it my full recommendation right here and now.  Music heavy posting this month.  Deal with it.  Enjoy the fresh vid.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>All that&#x2c; and a bag of chips on my shoulder</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-03-10T18:48:22-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-775</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-775</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Thoughts on thesis, part 1  All that, and a bag of chips on my shoulder

Posts in a series of commentaries on my thesis project for the Master of Arts in Communication.

I&#8217;ve had recent misgivings about what is emerging as my MA Comm thesis topic, mainly because there is en element of negativity that I can seem to shake.  Part of this comes from a place of disillusionment with modern Evangelicalism in America.  My experience both in attempting a church plant (as a team member) and serving in a mega-church wannabe congregation have contributed to an enormous drive to open the books on consumer marketing trends prevalent in the church that I hypothesize to be counterproductive to the mission of the kingdom.

<div class="image-right"></divBut all this amounts to a pretty whiny-sounding thesis.  I want to acknowledge up front that I recognize that.  I guess what the project must endeavor to accomplish is a logical critical analysis of these trends and the potential unwanted effects on targeted consumers with regard to their beliefs and opinions about Christianity and the Christian church.

As a card-carrying member of Generation X, it&#8217;s my contention that the majority of the consumer marketing tactics being employed by today&#8217;s evangelical churches serve to reinforce and strengthen the established modernist worldviews of existing Evangelical elites, while disillusioning those outside of the church that hold a more postmodern worldview.  In short, advertising and marketing tactics attract a specific &#8220;customer&#8221; type, while &#8220;dis-attracting&#8221; a growing segment of society.  Since I believe consumerism is the antithesis of kingdom life, I have an obvious concern that such marketing practices are practically and spiritually counterproductive in expanding the kingdom.  (Pretty obvious if you go back through and read the Church category on this blog.)

I hope to do this by taking a theoretical communication approach to the preponderance of consumer messages that are used in church marketing materials.  I&#8217;m not wanting to quantitatively prove that X percent of churches are using consumer marketing.  But rather, making the assumption (based on observation) that some churches are using consumerist messages, I want to critically analyze how these messages are likely understood or interpreted by audiences using a primarily postmodern mode of critical analysis.

I&#8217;m in way over my head.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Reach out and touch your data</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-03-04T09:29:53-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-774</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-774</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[last summer some buzz was being generated on the blogosphere about a paradigm shifting design for the iMac by fan and designer Adam Benton.  In case you didn't see them, I include a couple shots here.

What makes this particular design idea interesting is the forthcoming Apple iPhone's multitouch interface and the rumor from this past week that Apple is prepping new Mac displays that include multitouch capabilities.

While the iMac design shown here may not be exactly what future Macs look like, it makes it easier to imagine a touchscreen and clear/glass-like interface--something a little like the translucent, touch-your-data computer interface showcased in Steven Spielberg's Minority Report in 2002.

With Apple's multitouch patents and innovative computer design chops, I fully expect more human interfacing in the future, birthed on the Mac platform.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Qwest finally gives it away</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-03-01T19:58:46-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-773</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-773</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divAfter suffering with cheap and slow 256 Kps DSL service from Qwest, I received the offer I had been waiting for (seemingly forever) just a couple of weeks ago. For the same monthly price I was paying, I could enjoy a five-fold speed bump (to 1.5 Mbps DSL) if I agreed to a 2 year commitment.  How could I resist?  I&#8217;m now exploring the strange flavors of YouTube without waiting for the darn download to catch up to the streaming.  Thanks, Qwest.  My loyalty is growing.  Sorry about all the YouTube linked posts.  Little time to write lately.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Ich bin Anberlin(er)</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-03-01T19:38:44-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-772</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-772</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[While I was in the newborn fog (and still am), Anberlin released "Cities."  To celebrate, enjoy this vid trailer about the record.  Definitely their best yet, from what I hear.  Downloading it right now.  Producer Aaron Sprinkle does it again.  Seems like all my favorite music has something to do with him lately.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Hallelujah</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-03-01T19:32:30-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-771</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-20.html#unique-entry-id-771</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[As I sit here keying this in, I'm reflecting on the 15 inches of snow I've shoveled--three times in the past 12 hours.  And I guess I'm in for the night, waiting to see what cruel joke the plow leaves for us in the morning.  Blizzard 2007.  This is it, folks.  It's been a while since I've seen this much so fast.  October 31, 1990 maybe.  To brighten mood, and help look upon this snow with the wonder my 8-year-old does, here's a little gem of a vid I found on YouTube: Over The Rhine covering Leonard Cohen's Hallelujah.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>In the newborn fog</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2007-02-14T22:08:27-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-19.html#unique-entry-id-770</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-19.html#unique-entry-id-770</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[What happened?  TSAWWT is humming along with its regular brand of brilliant wit and/or boring content, and then--nothing.  Is this a blog fast?  What gives?

<div class="image-right"></divWell, you saw the news last month.  A newborn is now calling the shots around here.  And while I have several thoughts running through my mind at any given moment that I would love to blog about, the combination of precious little sleep, the day job and grad school have me on the ropes with my writing.

This too shall pass.  I do plan to post most often on my Thesis topic in the future as a way of flushing it out and getting some feedback going.  I also hope to redesign TSAWWT's page layout at some point--moving to a three column with permalinks (finally).  Don't hold your breath, but I do promise this will happen.

Until more sleep and free time opens up, explore the links on the rest of the site.  I'm going to get some shut eye while I can.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Amusing ourselves to death for one hour each Sunday</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-01-27T20:26:08-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-769</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-769</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Most recently I completed my Advanced Media course for my MA in Communication.  One of the required readings was Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death.

<div class="image-right"></divAside from a historical and well-thought-out indictment of TV media, I was struck with what Postman had to say about the Church.  At the time if his writing, the PTL and Swaggart scandals were fresh memories for Postman.  Televangelism was his ripe target for criticism.  What is amazing is how applicable his words are for today.  The entertainment and marketing driven local church was just a twinkle in some pastor's eye in 1985.  Postman's work can be recast to analyze the folly of experience-driven, productized churchianity.  In my last paper for the class, I propose just such a reading of Amusing Ourselves to Death--a cautionary tale for today's Church.

If you're brave or bored, feel free to read the attached five-page review with this perspective.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>David Brent on Microsoft Values</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-01-25T14:11:00-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-768</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-768</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I can't help but think that Microsoft UK has more going for it than the HQ in Redmond after seeing this video.  It's nice to have some more David Brent after such a long absence.  Nobody understands the business world better than Brent.  Genius.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Cutest baby since Emma and Ethan</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2007-01-12T20:37:22-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-767</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-767</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Kid 3 arrives: Everett James Wold, born 1-11-07 at 1:55 p.m. Mommy and baby are doing great.  Daddy has a cough.  I may be behind in updating for a few days, but this should hold everyone.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Wold baby watch 2007</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2007-01-10T19:55:15-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-766</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-766</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Watch this space.  News and information updates to follow....]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Apple TV 1.0 reflections</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-01-10T19:54:28-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-765</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-765</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Just wanted to post about what I would like to see in the Apple TV that hasn&#8217;t been announced in the just-released version 1.0.  By now I think we can begin to understand the Apple TV box will serve to connect people with their Macs' and iTunes', paid-for content, rather than act as a TiVo/DVR device.

<div class="image-right"></divThere are pros and cons to this.  The biggest pro for Apple would seem to be creating more demand and use for iTunes-purchased video.  This is a paid content strategy, as opposed to a commercial broadcast strategy.  But, because of how the TV and movie industries have evolved differently from the music industry, it does not provide a complete digital solution for the paid video content people already own a boatload of (DVDs)&#8212;at least, not yet.

I&#8217;d be willing to fully embrace this approach if two things happen: First, storage capabilities must increase so that people can manage the storage of as many videos (TV and films) as they do songs in iTunes.  This will come, but has a way to go (1 Tb drives are just now hitting the market.  Apple TV's 40 Gb drive won&#8217;t cut it).  Second, a solution for ripping DVDs and HD DVDs/BluRay video into iTunes must become more mainstream and usable (built-in to iTunes like the ability to rip CDs)&#8212;beyond third-party apps like Handbrake.  Those two desires notwithstanding, I&#8217;ll probably get an Apple TV anyway, since I can connect to my network and access my Mac content from the home theater.

But beyond the cons of content side, there is one more feature that I hope and pray comes to the Apple TV box: iChat AV. And why not?  Hook up a camera to that USB 2.0 port and you should be in business.  I&#8217;d love to video conference from my media room HDTV.  I don&#8217;t think Apple realizes this yet, but video conferencing on this large and personal scale would be a killer app for personal communication.  Add to this a simple Apple-style interface option to access Web video via Google/YouTube (via the remote control), and you could unleash hours of mindless viral video fun in the home theater.  I think these things are coming, but we&#8217;ll have to wait a little while longer to see them.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Wake up and smell the kingdom</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2007-01-10T19:52:57-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-764</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-764</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[&#8220;But thanks be to God, who always leads us as captives in Christ's triumphal procession and uses us to spread the aroma of the knowledge of him everywhere.  For we are to God the pleasing aroma of Christ among those who are being saved and those who are perishing.  To the one we are an aroma that brings death; to the other, an aroma that brings life.  And who is equal to such a task?  Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit.  On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, as those sent from God.&#8221;  2 Corinthians 2:14-17 TNIV

I looked at this passage in a couple of other translations.  I was intrigued by the notion of a for-profit Gospel, and how Paul slices through it with a higher, kingdom calling.  But as I re-read it, I began to think more about the metaphor of aroma that Paul uses to describe our evangelistic role as believers.

<div class="image-right"></divTo me, an aroma, or a smell, requires close, personal contact.  You don&#8217;t get a true scent of another person by sitting in an auditorium and watching them perform on a stage, or by watching television or by visiting a church&#8217;s retail welcome center that&#8217;s been laced with a potpourri fragrance like a Bath & Bodyworks store.

This passage in 2 Corinthians led me to ask myself some uncomfortable questions: Can people smell the knowledge of Christ and His kingdom on my skin?  Am I getting close enough to anyone to let them get a whiff?  If they do get close enough, are they smelling the authentic me in Christ, or some kind of artificial, Old-Spice scent hiding a really obnoxious odor underneath?

Corporately, are we more concerned with presenting our churches as clean-smelling, deodorized, never-let-them-see-you-sweat, retail experiences in hopes of attracting the right customers?  Or do we create authentic communities of grace that aren&#8217;t embarrassed by a little body odor, but also understand the power of the kingdom aroma we have together in Christ?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The Apple iPhone and the rise of the podcomputer</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2007-01-09T22:09:07-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-763</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-763</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[For all of you wondering about my reaction to today&#8217;s Macworld "Steve"-note speech, I&#8217;d like to draw your attention to a post from a while back&#8212;8/29/05.  That&#8217;s when I predicted (or dreamed up) the idea that the hand-held (an iPod) could become all you needed for a mobile PC.  And I didn&#8217;t mean like a Treo or Palm or Windows CE.  I meant a fully functional image of your computer that you could just port-in to a PC setup (CPU, keyboard, monitor) and use.  With OSX on board, software and data storage, the device would allow you to take your full computer world (digital life) with you anywhere.

Fast forward to Apple&#8217;s announcement today.  How close am I?  Well, it's definitely not exactly what I was thinking, but it's darn close (it does have WiFi, after all).  Plus, we can expect this to evolve much like the iPod and the Mac have evolved.

You really need to follow this link and check this thing out to understand it.  Lev Grossman of TIME magazine had this to say: "Apple's new iPhone could do to the cell phone market what the iPod did to the portable music player market: crush it pitilessly beneath the weight of its own superiority.  This is unfortunate for anybody else who makes cell phones, but it's good news for those of us who use them."  The rest of this article is outstanding.

Yes, today was a good day to be a Apple addict.  Dawni has frozen our joint account.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Impossibly successful parody</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2007-01-09T22:01:58-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-762</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-762</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I always thought that Michael Cera, who played George-Michael Bluth, the hapless son of Arrested Development&#8217;s Michael Bluth, had an uncommon comic talent.  Now that the show has been cancelled, many have been wondering what has become of some of the shows cast members.

The embedded video is a first rate send-up of the Aleksey Vayner personal resume video that was virally circulated in 2006.  It seems Michael is busy keeping his comic new media chops in top shape.

Enjoy &#8220;Impossible is the opposite of possible.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Arresting development</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2007-01-09T21:52:01-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-761</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-761</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divPolice reunion in the offing?  It seems that some dreams may come true if reports of a reunion tour materialize in 2007.  Unlike some, I&#8217;ve been progressively bored by Sting&#8217;s solo career (yes, even the fancy-shmancy lute record).

And while a reunion tour would be fantastic, it pales in comparison to getting back into the studio together for new material.  "If you love somebody, set them free."  Well, we did that for Sting, and he never came back.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Clone bowl</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2007-01-02T21:44:08-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-760</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-18.html#unique-entry-id-760</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divWho would have predicted a Star Wars fan club marching in the Rose Parade on New Year&#8217;s Day dressed as full on storm troopers?  It might have been more interesting to watch those silly clones play some football.  I, for one, welcome our international, flag-bearing, storm trooper overlords.

This is one of those surreal moments in pop-culture that just makes you feel giddy.  For every one of those moments there are probably several that make you feel nauseated.

Speaking of science fiction, I&#8217;m now into season 2.0 of Battlestar Galactica on DVD (thanks to Netflix).  I do love this show, and have been quite happy to watch it apart from the commercially interrupted network version in true 16:9 format&#8212;even if I&#8217;m delayed by a year.  And, then it&#8217;s on to season 2.5.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Emergent thought in early America</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-12-30T08:18:27-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-759</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-759</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Some have criticized the emerging church for eschewing a definitive statement of faith.  I realize this is kind of late to this discussion and dated information, but I ran across this text recently which provides a strong rationale for not attempting to create a doctrinal statement for something as dynamic and conversation-driven as the emerging church.  The excerpt was included in Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death (required reading for my advanced media course), and is taken from the autobiography of Benjamin Franklin.  Within that work Franklin quotes Michael Welfare, one of the founders of a noncreedalist religious sect in that day known as The Brethren or The Dunkers (see this wiki for background).  When Franklin suggested Welfare publish a doctrinal statement to help abate misinformation about the group that was spreading in society, Welfare responded with this incredibly modest and cogent statement:

When we were first drawn together as a society, it had pleased God to enlighten our minds so far as to see that some doctrines, which we once esteemed truths, were errors, and that others, which we had esteemed errors, were real truths.  From time to time He has been pleased to afford us farther light, and our principles have been improving, and our errors diminishing.  Now we are not sure we have arrived at the end of the progression, and at the perfection of spiritual or theological knowledge; and we fear that, if we should feel ourselves as if bound and confined by it, and perhaps be unwilling to receive further improvement, and our successors still more so, as conceiving what we their elders and founders had done, to be something sacred, never to be departed from.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>All the Macs I have known</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-12-16T11:25:29-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-758</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-758</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[As promised, here is my Macintosh owner's anthology, spanning 15 years.  All of these machines were used for my graphic design business at one point or another.  This only includes Macs or Apples I have purchased.  Going back to college use, we can include: Apple II, Apple IIe, Mac Plus, Mac Classic, Mac IIci, Mac Centris and Mac Quadra machines.  Okay, I am a total geek, but I hope the personal history is fun for everyone:  Macintosh LC III CPU: Motorola 68040 25 Mhz 80 Mb HD Owned circa 1992-1995 [Sold to a friend] Status: Unknown, presumed running Mac OS 7.2  Power Macintosh 7100/66 CPU: Motorola/IBM PowerPC 601 66 Mhz 250 Mb HD Owned circa 1995-1999 [sold to brother-in-law for college] Status: Donated to school, presumed running Mac OS 9.1 Fun fact: This was the most expensive Mac I have ever purchased  iMac 333 "Blueberry" CPU: Motorola PowerPC G3 333 Mhz 6 Gb HD Owned circa 1999-2002, 2005 to present [sold to parents, then reclaimed after their Mac mini upgrade] Status: Running Mac OS X 10.2.9 "Jaguar" on home network  PowerBook G4 Titanium CPU: Motorola PowerPC G4 550 Mhz 20 Gb HD Owned circa 2002 to present Status: Running Mac OS X 10.3.9 "Panther" on home network via airport wireless  eMac G4 CPU: Motorola PowerPC G4 800 Mhz 80 Gb HD Owned circa 2004 to present Status: Running Mac OS X 10.4.8 "Tiger" on home network via ethernet]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Requiem for a TI-99/4A</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-12-12T19:43:55-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-757</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-757</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Recently I mentally traced my fascination with computer technology back to its source.  The photo and link will tell you all you need to know about my first, real computer.

<div class="image-right"></divThe Texas Instruments TI-99/4A.

It&#8217;s hard to imagine I had the patience, but I used to spend hours writing text-based game programs in BASIC.  The process involved loading my code from a cassette tape into the TI&#8217;s memory.  From there I&#8217;d dream up an intricate web of multiple choice tasks for the game player to navigate the storyline.  Make a false move, and you were dead&#8212;game over.  I had dreams of releasing my fantastic adventure games to the world someday.  Those were the days.

<div class="image-right"></divI never really did any programming after that.  I think this had to do with my own aptitude for code being pretty limited.  I&#8217;ve always been a words and pictures guy, out of my element when exposed to complex mathematical systems.  So all my experience in middle school on Tandy TRS-80s and Commodore 64s never made a programmer out of me.  Instead, I gravitated toward my friends&#8217; who had Ataris and ColecoVisions, and stuck to playing cartridge games (I had 3) on my TI.

From there, I transitioned toward becoming an expert user rather than a creator.  I learned to type in high school on an Apple ][ (my choice), and used a lab of Apple IIe computers in college (freshman year) to compose all my papers.  By my sophomore year I became involved with the college newspaper and a dedicated lab of Macintosh Plus computers (circa 1990), some with external 20 Mb hard drives.  After my transition to my alma mater, I upgraded to a lab with the latest Mac IIci models and a laserwriter doing graphic design and editorial work for the college magazine.  By then, there was no looking back.  In fact, I didn&#8217;t use Windows until I demanded to use Windows 3.1 software for my first full time job out of college (for AmiPro and MS Word).  Subsequently I never touched a DOS PC.

In future posts I&#8217;ll do an overview of the Macs I have owned, and where they all ended up since my first actual purchase.

I would, however, like to extend enormous gratitude to my parents for purchasing the TI 99/4A for me.  I know it must have been a sacrifice at the time.  It was a catalyst for my future geeky life, and I am very grateful.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Poppins for terror</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-12-12T19:41:06-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-756</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-756</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yyFGRbONd-w"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/yyFGRbONd-w" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

This is brilliant.  I&#8217;d like to see the entire move re cut in this format.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Studio 60&#x2019;s alternate reality</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-12-08T09:01:51-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-755</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-755</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Let me start this post by saying that I really enjoy this show.  The characters are interesting and the pace of the dialogue is fantastic, and often, thanks to Matthew Perry and Bradley Whitford, comic.  But I want to return to an earlier idea that began when I posted about the program in October.

In the most recent Christmas episode we find the fictional NBS TV network pinned down under an FCC fine for indecency due to an expletive uttered during a live news interview in Iraq when an RPG exploded near the news crew and a soldier.  The situation for NBS (a proxy for NBC/CBS/ABC/FOX) was so grave that the lawyers were advising executives that the network could lose its broadcast license if they refused to pay up and move on.

This got me thinking: Is this a realistic scenario?

...<div class="image-right"></divIt&#8217;s hard to know when this script was written, or how much credit Sorkin gives the average viewer of the program for awareness of current FCC issues.  In early November the FCC ruled quite the opposite.  In fact, the commission stated that profanity can indeed be aired uncensored in broadcast news interviews, but not on awards shows or in fictional shows.

The November 6 FCC press release stated, &#8220;&#8230;the broadcast of the &#8216;S-Word&#8217; during [CBS] &#8216;The Early Show&#8217; was neither indecent nor profane in this instance due to the fact that it occurred during news programming.&#8221;

I suspect that series creator Aaron Sorkin knows about this recent ruling, but am not sure what his motives are for sending the Studio 60 storyline down an alternate reality.  It could be that it&#8217;s just good drama, and that an FCC decision against profanity on the news could just as easily have happened and created the conditions for the fiction to become reality.  I can give this the benefit of the doubt.

But here&#8217;s where I&#8217;m troubled.  The FCC gets a boatload of criticism from Hollywood and the media networks over decency issues.  Do we really need to use dramatic license to conceal a pretty logical and consistent decision by this regulatory body?  Is it irresponsible to pretend media regulation is worse than it really is, when so much of the Studio 60 program freely mixes in real events and people with its fiction?

Now, this isn&#8217;t some moralizing protest or outcry.  This is a media ethics critique.  My concern is about what the show&#8217;s creative element believes about its audience.  Are we using fiction, and distorting reality, to confirm and propagate particular beliefs and attitudes?

...That said, I&#8217;m not against any program (fiction or non) with a strong point of view.  Studio 60 doesn&#8217;t have to be unbiased or benign in any way....  But I do think that the questions raised here are worth consideration, regardless of what side of a social-political media argument one is on. As for the Studio 60 storyline, in the words of NBS President, Jordan McDeere, &#8220;Lawyer up, Jack.  It&#8217;s the news.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Xmas in Cupertino moved to January</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-12-08T08:43:33-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-754</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-754</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[January&#8217;s MacWorld is shaping up to be the mother of all rumored product launches.  Here is quick list (in no particular order) of what could be announced:

<div class="image-right"></div- The iPhone cell phone (slim and smart/PDA models) - Widescreen iPods with touch screen click wheels (possible WiFi) - iTV launch in final form and detail - MacOS X Leopard (set to launch in Q1 or Q2 in 2007&#8212;could be sprung early) - iWork w/Numbers spreadsheet App &#8230;and one more thing, of course.

Just to tide us over through the holidays, I somehow missed this great Wired article published in October.  It details the development and birth of the iPod.  For technology history buffs, this has all the interesting details on the design and production process involved.

One more dark horse prediction: OS X for PCs.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Merry Christmas from Ohio&#x2c; USA</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2006-12-08T08:39:46-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-753</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-753</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Over The Rhine is releasing a full-length Christmas project called Snow Angels.  If you are an OTR fan, you&#8217;ll understand how fitting that title is.

I didn&#8217;t stumble onto this until recently, but now realize that this is the Christmas album I&#8217;ve been waiting for all my life.  Check on this info page linked here for a complete track list and a couple of free MP3s.  Sweet!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A disturbing ONE</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-12-02T17:07:59-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-752</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-752</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Okay.  I work for a large corporation.  I admit to performing music (a cover song) at a corporate meeting--rewriting the lyrics and everything (a funny version of YMCA).  But nothing compares to the current viral video for U2's "One" covered at a corporate meeting by a Bank of America sales guy.

<div class="image-right"></divIt's beyond the pale.  The lyrics start off a little quirky, and then get downright creepy.  My advice would have been, what reads okay on paper will probably sound really weird when sung to an audience by a Bono wanna-be wearing a shirt and tie.  But some people just don't have that kind of internal editor.  Lucky for us.

I would link to it here if YouTube still had it, but you'll have to do some clever Google searches to find it on the web.  Try this link for starters.  I have no idea how long it will last.  Obviously B of A lawyers wanted this thing off the 'net.  Easier said than done.  If I ever do this, somebody please rush the stage and slap me upside the head.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Speed: A new reason to think different</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-12-02T16:40:16-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-751</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-17.html#unique-entry-id-751</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[It&#8217;s kind of a strange new world now that we have Macs and Windows PCs running on the same Intel chips.  It leads to new questions about operating system performance that deserve some exploration: All chips being equal, what would be the performance difference between running the same applications in Windows Vista or MacOS X on the same hardware configuration?  Why would anyone switch from Windows to Mac to run Adobe Creative Suite, for example?  Why would anyone care?

<div class="image-right"></divHere&#8217;s where things get interesting.  As many PC users will discover in 2007, Vista has a lot of high gloss user improvements and security features making it more akin to the look and feel of MacOS X.  But, I suspect, what people also will soon discover is that an entirely new disparity between Windows and MacOS X has emerged&#8212;and rather quickly: system speed.  For all its improvements, Vista is huge and requires a big bite of the PC's processing power to run.  Many will be alarmed to see what the minimum and suggested system requirements are--all before their favorite apps get their share.

<div class="image-right"></divBrian Caulfield for Red Herring: "Meanwhile, Microsoft struggled to lash a fresh batch of innovation together with the massive amount of software and hardware the Windows operating system has to orchestrate.  Windows was already so sprawling that Sun Chairman Scott McNealy once referred to Windows as a 'welded shut hairball.'  'It&#8217;s being driven by the inability of debugging and development efforts to scale up,' said Linux advocate Eric Raymond of Vista&#8217;s many delays.  'In other words, Vista is too big to work.'"  (Portion excerpted from MDN)

All things being equal (CPU model and clock speed, RAM and video processor), OS performance will be a whole new ballgame.  Next year let&#8217;s watch the Mac go head to head against a Windows Vista machine running the same software, and let the fun begin.  I can see the new Ad campaign now: all your software runs faster on MacOS X.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Note to self: Don&#x2019;t get too smug</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-11-27T18:09:24-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-750</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-750</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[My friend recently posted a comment which politely told me to lighten up and let it go when it comes to my Mac/Apple evangelism.  I had recently posted that the inventor of the internet uses a Mac.

<div class="image-right"></divAfter reading his comment I clicked over to my Mac Daily News RSS feed (yes, I am that much of a Mac geek) to find this post: "Al Jazeera Chooses Apple Macintosh Technology."

Needless to say, I laughed out loud.  So this post is dedicated to Pete, and his words of wisdom.  But will I stop posting my overzealous, nearly militant pro-Mac rants?  I dunno.  They make some pretty good Kool-Aid in Cupertino.  I'll probably follow this post up with a righteous slam of Microsoft.

Perhaps I should seek treatment.  Anyone want to organize an intervention?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Signs of insanity</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-11-15T19:01:27-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-749</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-749</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Okay, so I don&#8217;t always get turned on to some internet goodness when it first hits.  But thanks to my university pal, Sally K., I&#8217;ve got this one to share with you.

<div class="image-right"></divIf you&#8217;re sick of lame or embarrassing church signs, just make your own.  You don't have to have an M.Div.  to wax theological on a lighted marquee.  The churchsigngenerator.com site allows you to choose from one of five designs and create a custom message image that you can grab and post.  Here's one using the First Baptist Church flavor.  As you can see, I'm a fan of totally exasperated preachers.  That kind of leadership frustration leads to some great church sign ideas.

Every time I do this I crack up.  It seems like everything is funnier on a church sign.  Try it for your self.  Send me a few of yours via Email.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Newsweek covers the cross and politics</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-11-09T20:22:10-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-747</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-747</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t miss this rather lengthy exploration of the emergence of political evangelicalism in America.

<div class="image-right"></divGiven the outcome of Tuesday&#8217;s elections, I found it worth the time to familiarize myself with this historical perspective, since the American conservative politicization of The Church has largely been a phenomenon that has occurred in my lifetime.  The comments to the article on the web site are also very interesting.

To add some perspective to this in light of last week&#8217;s other notable event (Ted Harggard&#8217;s resignation over scandal), I include this excerpt on political evangelicalism from Gordon Macdonald in Leadership Journal&#8217;s Out of Ur blog (props, again, to Knightopia, who also posted this stub).

Our movement has been used.  There are hints that the movement&#8212;once cobbled together by Billy Graham and Harold Ockenga&#8212;is beginning to fragment because it is more identified by a political agenda that seems to be failing and less identified by a commitment to Jesus and his kingdom.  Like it or not, we are pictured as those who support war, torture, and a go-it-alone (bullying) posture in international relationships.  Any of us who travel internationally have tasted the global hostility toward our government and the suspicion that our President&#8217;s policies reflect the real tenants of Evangelical faith.  And I might add that there is considerable disillusionment on the part of many of our Christian brothers/sisters in other countries who are mystified as to where American evangelicals are in all of this.  Our movement may have its Supreme Court appointments, but it may also have compromised its historic center of Biblical faith.  Is it time to let the larger public know that some larger-than-life evangelical personalities with radio and TV shows do not speak for all of us?

Yes, it is.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Inventor of the Web uses a Mac</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-11-09T20:08:16-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-746</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-746</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Just a little pro Mac propaganda (it&#8217;s been a while).  Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientist who is credited with creating the world wide web--the internet as we know it, uses a MacBook Pro.  (Sorry, it&#8217;s not Al Gore after all.)  Picture and link provide some nice proof.

<div class="image-right"> </divGee.  He&#8217;s pretty smart.  I wonder why he uses Mac OS when 95 percent of the rest of the world uses Windows?

As for the linked story, his concerns are interesting&#8212;especially in light of mediated communication theories.  I&#8217;m gonna flag this clip for my advanced media communication class coming up next session.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Wake up to postmodernism</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-11-09T19:44:30-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-745</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-745</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[It's real.  Get used to it.  Tune in and turn on your brain.  Knightopia has posted a link to some great free audio programs from Brian McLaren speaking at Wake Forest University Divinity School recently.  Go grab some excellent talks on postmodernism, empire and the Kingdom.  As Steve Knight says, if you have never heard him give his series on postmodern thought, this is an excellent source.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Celebrate political Ad freedom day</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-11-06T18:57:43-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-744</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-744</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[You may have heard of "Tax Freedom Day" where we celebrate the point in the year when the money we make is now lining our own pockets instead of Uncle Sam&#8217;s (also a date that seems to slip later and later into the each year).

<div class="image-right"></divToday is "Political Ad Freedom Day 2006"&#8212;the day that TV and print Ad media once again start selling us products we don't really need instead of selling us politicians we don't really want to vote for.  (Also known as Election Day.)  I almost gave up TV because of all the immorality being paraded in front of me every evening (interrupting perfectly good TV programs).  I&#8217;ve never been so happy to see just another Ad for Cialis in my whole life.

But fear not.  Next year I'm getting TiVo.  Power to the people!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Your bod in a &#x2018;pod</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-11-06T18:50:47-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-743</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-743</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[For the past several years I have been scoffed at because of my idea to dress up my beloved children as iPods for Halloween.  To put it bluntly, it hasn&#8217;t happened.

<div class="image-right"></divBut 67 million iPods later, and I don&#8217;t seem like such an idiot.  The iPod seemed to be the costume dujour this year&#8212;just behind the immense popularity of pirate Jack Sparrow, Narnian characters and comic book superheros.  This post points to a link of user-submitted photos on Engadget that prove home-made iPod costumes kicked a little sweet music into Halloween 2006.

My favorite is this all black iPod silhouette dancer from the kinetic iPod commercials, complete with color background and white earbuds.  Bust a move!

Next year costuming one of my three is gonna be my domain&#8212;be it a Shuffle, Nano or 5G.  Wait and see.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Numbers that should haunt us</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-11-02T19:40:30-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-742</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-742</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The associated press reported on Halloween that political parties and campaigns have exposed voters nationwide to nearly $160 million in ads attacking congressional candidates so far this campaign season.  Let that number sink in.

Consider the following relative value of $160 million (divided into $3 million per week), when compared with what a weekly United Way donation can buy.  In 2006, weekly donations of: >

$1 (the cost of a lottery ticket)&#8212;provides work clothes for someone to interview and start a job.  >

$2.50 (the cost of an express bus ride to downtown)&#8212;teaches two students from abusive backgrounds violence prevention so they can break the pattern of abuse.  >

$3 (the cost of a latte)&#8212;helps four victims of domestic violence get counseling and legal advice.  >

$8 (the cost of a fast food meal)&#8212;pays for a family of five to have a hot meal a day for one month.  >

$10.50 (the cost of a dozen bagels)&#8212;provides one year of in-home meals, allowing an elderly person to continue living in his/her home.

...$20 (the cost of a manicure)&#8212;helps 83 new immigrants learn English and moves them toward U.S. citizenship.

...$50 (the cost of a floral delivery)&#8212;helps stabilize families in crisis with short-term shelter, food, and/or childcare assistance.

In capitalism, advertising serves to help sell products which support businesses and individuals with profit and income, and ultimately become living wages.  Capitalism is by no means always honorable, fair and equitable, but at least it functions in the fabric of daily commerce.  Negative political advertising supports no wages (other than the windfall advertising agencies and TV stations receive).  It is zero sum spending&#8212;money to create messages to counteract or cancel out the messages of another candidate.  There is very little, if any, redeeming value to this&#8212;and a whole lot of negative ethical value.

<div class="image-right"></divWhen you think about your candidate of choice next Tuesday, and the potential good they could do in Washington, think about how much money they have wasted to get there.  There has to be a better way.  I think I&#8217;d rather donate money to any one of the above causes than flush it down the toilet of election campaigning.  Who&#8217;s with me?

Oh yeah, vote for Pedro and your wildest dreams will come true.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Boyd now blogging</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2006-11-02T19:30:19-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-741</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-741</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;m very pleased to point out that pastor Greg Boyd has taken up blogging from his newly renovated personal web site.  Here&#8217;s my favorite excerpt so far (thanks Derek), as he reflects on what he should say in a CBS News interview:

Anyway, I've thought and prayed a lot about how I should use this precious 90 seconds and I got a very clear revelation from God: &#8220;Hi Greg.  Explain to America how &#8216;will&#8217; and &#8216;will not&#8217; are not &#8216;logical contradictories&#8217; but are, instead, &#8216;logical contraries,&#8217; which of course means they don&#8217;t exhaust the alternatives of future tensed propositions.  Explain to them how &#8216;will&#8217; and &#8216;will not&#8217; cannot be simultaneously true, but they can both be simultaneously false -- just in case &#8216;might&#8217; (the real contradictory of &#8216;will not&#8217;) and &#8216;might not&#8217; (the real contradictory of &#8216;will&#8217;) are both simultaneously true.&#8221;  I said, &#8220;Lord, are you sure?  I&#8217;m thinking this could take a little more than 90 seconds.&#8221;  And God, being a good Open Theist, said: &#8220;Okay, I change my mind (see Ex.32: 10-14).  Why don&#8217;t you just show them my beauty and tell people to stop dragging me into their ugly secular politics.&#8221;  I said, &#8220;THAT sounds a bit more feasible.  Thanks Lord.&#8221;

You gotta love that kind of humor.

The site hasn&#8217;t enabled any sort of blog tools like commenting for permalinks, which I hope they add later, but it&#8217;s nice to get some more of this beautiful mind out here in the blogosphere.

Check Greg out.  He&#8217;s now linked in my blog roll.  No anti open theism flames, please.  Peace to you.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Johnny can read</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2006-11-02T19:11:05-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-740</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-16.html#unique-entry-id-740</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;m pleased that the assigned reading for my interpersonal communication class has become more interesting than I first anticipated.

<div class="image-right"></divNo text books (a few excerpts).  Just a couple of very interesting, if difficult, works on the philosophy of dialogue and the study of self-disclosure.  I&#8217;ve updated my sidebar to reflect what I&#8217;ve been filling my head with this month (with relevant Amazon links).  Take Martin Buber, pictured in this post.  What a mind bender.  Nice beard, though.  Kinda looks like the grandfather in Heidi.

Say goodbye to a couple of good writs from my 2006 summer list.  I hardly knew ye (or thou).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Mowing the Astroturf</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-10-29T08:23:27-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-739</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-739</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[There are good, solid practitioners of Public Relations.  And then there are the ethical equivalent of used care salesmen (some of whom would be offended I made this reference equating them with PR hacks).

Last week Wal-mart received some more negative press when it was discovered that a couple of pro-Wal-mart blogs, ostensibly by independent citizens, turned out to be run and written by PR professionals from Wal-mart&#8217;s PR firm.

<div class="image-right"></divThis is astroturfing online&#8212;fake grassroots media designed to influence public opinion.

When I was attending college, students in my PR class were required to memorize the entire PRSA Code of Ethics (kudos to professor, Daniel Pawley, wherever you are).  I&#8217;d like to point out this particular portion from the 2000 edition of the code:

&#8220;Honesty: We adhere to the highest standards of accuracy and truth in advancing the interests of those we represent and in communicating with the public.&#8221;

The Code also gives the following pertinent examples of improper conduct: &#8220;Front groups: A member implements &#8216;grass roots&#8217; campaigns or letter-writing campaigns to legislators on behalf of undisclosed interest groups.&#8221;  &#8220;A member deceives the public by employing people to pose as volunteers to speak at public hearings and participate in &#8216;grass roots&#8217; campaigns.&#8221;

I thought it would be good to point out that not all PR professionals would stoop to the astroturf level.  After all, real turf is a much better playing surface.  Ask anyone.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A strong case for power under versus power over</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-10-25T19:48:20-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-738</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-738</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve got a few personal reasons for not saying too much about the LWCC/Bachmann mis-endorsement incident and fallout on my blog, starting with my intention that I don&#8217;t blog to be conversant on politics (not that there is anything wrong with that).  But I do want to post a link to this op-ed article from Sunday&#8217;s StarTribune, because I think it is a fantastic witness to The Kingdom and its proper relation to human politics.  I am sure some will disagree, but I am just as sure that the perspective given in this article is underrepresented in public discourse.  And I want to raise awareness in whatever small way this blog can.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>News Flash: New Mexico has WMDs</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-10-25T19:35:49-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-737</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-737</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is why I love reading Engadget.  This techno blog covers all manner of super cool electronic gadgetry.  Aside from their misguided affection for the Zune, they pretty much keep me up to speed on everything electronic going on out there.

Today they published a story about two "New Mexican" inventors who recently filed a patent for a &#8220;high-power microwave system employing a phase-locked array of inexpensive commercial magnetrons.&#8221;  More on this alarming news from Engadget:

<div class="image-right"></div&#8220;Translated into English that basically means that these guys claim you can combine the magnetrons (the bits that generate the actual microwave that cooks your popcorn) from a bunch of consumer-grade microwaves and tweak 'em a bit to develop a megawatt-level death ray, or in military/legal parlance, a &#8216;directed energy weapon system.&#8217;&#8221;

But it&#8217;s not just the article, as much as it is the comments that crack me up.  Here are three of my favorites from this one:

dextro @ Oct 23rd 2006 3:24PM I, for one, welcome our death-ray equipped overlords....

Rat (expletive) @ Oct 23rd 2006 3:38PM So they built the BET from G.I.  Joe?  Are they going to use it to gestate spores in the upper atmosphere as well?  Meh.  Call me when you get in into a rifle form factor.  Oh, and shouldn't that be &#8216;New Mexico inventors&#8217; rather than &#8216;New Mexican&#8217;?

T.  Bell @ Oct 23rd 2006 4:15PM I would like to echo the concern of others here and say that we can't let this technology remain in the hands of any Mexicans, be they New, Old or otherwise.  I've severely burned the roof of my mouth on a surreptitiously over-microwaved burrito on more than one occasion, and I can only imagine the carnage a burrito whose refried core is superheated to plasma and launched in a projectile weapon.  The choice is clear.  We must rid Mexico of these Weapons of Microwave Destruction.

See the full article and all the comment posts here.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I heart iPod</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2006-10-25T19:33:01-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-736</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-736</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This week the Apple iPod turned 5 years old.

<div class="image-right"></divMy 2G iPod (looks just like the 1G pictured, but has a touch wheel inside the ring of four buttons) has been my daily musical companion since my birthday in May 2003, just as the 3G iPod was debuting.  At the time, my beloved wife picked it up at Best Buy on a very limited clearance sale for $199 (full price for the 10 gig model was usually $399).  This May it will turn 4 years old.  (The G stands for &#8220;generation.&#8221;  A 2G iPod is a 2nd generation iPod.)

This is truly remarkable considering the battery on most of these devices was only expected to last 18 months.  My battery has never been replaced, and I fully expect it to give up the ghost some day soon (in fact, the long march to oblivion has already begun).  But before that happens, I am compelled to post this tribute to my diminutive digital music wonder.

I can&#8217;t speak for those have had problems with their iPods.  I know that those problems can and do occur, so I&#8217;m not posting this to praise Apple in general on iPod quality.  No, this is specific to my little 3-and-a-half-year-old 2G iPod.

You rock!]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A pretty good weekend for the Vikes</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2006-10-22T19:29:44-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-735</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-735</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[A few weeks ago my nephew, Cameron, broke his femur (into 5 pieces) in a football game.  Needless to say, this local football hero saw a promising 2006 season end far too soon.  He made it through an 8-hour surgery to put the bones back in place and attach a metal plate and several screws.  The kid's been through a lot.

<div class="image-right"></divFast forward to today, and I just watched the Vikes trounce the Seahawks 31-13.  Just yesterday, Cameron had the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to sit in on a closed practice at Winter Park.  He pretty much got to meet everybody on the team.  Pretty cool.  Here's a shot with Brad Johnson.

And there's many more candid photos where that one came from.  Mom and dad also were on hand to enjoy the event, and made sure plenty of photos were taken.

I'm really going to miss seeing Cameron play this year, but this is one story that will become legend in our family.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Your best life is just a game</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-10-22T19:25:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-734</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-734</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This not parody.  This is a real product created by real people.

<div class="image-right"></divI was sure it didn&#8217;t get any more absurd than the Left Behind video game.  But then the big O from Lakewood has to get all low tech on us to revolutionize church small groups with a board game (or is it, bored game).

Unbelievable.  As another blog pointed out, what is the fate of those who lose, your worst life now?

Growing up I always preferred LIFE to Monopoly because, even though the person with the richest bank account won the game, you could still finish with a respectable 2nd or 3rd place.  Monopoly always seemed to be about the total economic destruction of your opponents.

In the case of the Christian &#8220;Life,&#8221; perhaps we should leave the &#8220;games&#8221; to Parker Brothers and Milton Bradley.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>On warfare and the real enemy</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2006-10-18T20:31:18-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-733</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-733</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Two years ago I had the opportunity to sit in on a series of talks with Brian McLaren concerning the topic of modernity, postmodernity, etc. One of the things that I couldn&#8217;t reconcile at the time was his suggestion that The Church ease up on the metaphors of warfare in its discourse.  He advocated this idea not because it was such terms were incorrect, but because they had, perhaps, become counterproductive to our message and mission&#8212;a distraction to those that would equate our message of the gospel with extremist religious groups.

<div class="image-right"></divI pondered this from the perspective of having recently studied Greg Boyd&#8217;s warfare theodicy and developing a far deeper understanding (for me) of spiritual warfare than I ever had in my Pentecostal upbringing.  While I agreed with McLaren&#8217;s assertion about the current day implications of the language we use, I also found the concept of warfare, when applied to spiritual powers, to be more than metaphorical, and to be something essentially misunderstood or avoided by most of The Church today.

...Recently, in completing my series of posts on the Lost Art of Evangelism, I believe I have reconciled this&#8212;and it comes into focus in the language used by James Dobson and others in advancing their political causes.

...If you can find a politician who understands the institution of the family, &#8230; who understands that we are at war with those who want to destroy us utterly, who understand that liberal judges need to be reigned in, and if you can find a politician who lives by a strong moral code and believes in Jesus Christ, God&#8217;s only Son of God, ...

...The enemy is portrayed as a vast cadre of fellow human beings who don&#8217;t uphold the sanctity of life, marriage and the &#8220;true&#8221; American Way.

...He makes war against people, lacking the courage or theological backbone to name the real enemy and wage a spiritual battle.  He fights a war against opposing parties, judges, protesters, the media, etc. (people) to defeat the secular culture and establish or preserve a religion-based morality, rather than engage a spiritual enemy of darkness to advance the Kingdom by presenting Christ&#8217;s light embodied in actions and words.

...Dobson&#8217;s rhetoric of war targets and divides a humanity living under the curse of the law.

"All who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written: 'Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.'  Clearly no one is justified before God by the law, because 'the righteous will live by faith.'  The law is not based on faith; on the contrary, it says, 'Whoever does these things will live by them.'  Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: 'Cursed is everyone who is hung on a pole.'  He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit."

..."Before the coming of this faith, we were held in custody under the law, locked up until the faith that was to come would be revealed.  So the law was put in charge of us until Christ came that we might be justified by faith.  Now that this faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law.  So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.  There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

...Christ&#8217;s fulfillment of the law unites humanity around faith in Him, rather than divides over the curse of the law.

...We have no hope of transforming humanity by imposing the curse of the law and invoking a metaphor of warfare with fellow humans....  Furthermore, the imposition of the law can transform no one or no culture, as Galations 3:11 makes plain: &#8220;&#8230;clearly no one is justified before God by the law&#8230;&#8221;

The distinction I draw concerning the appropriate use of the language of warfare has to do with who I believe the real enemy is.

...I call upon Dobson and others like him to rethink their political rhetoric and motives related to the mission of the Gospel and the work of Christ in light of a Galations 3 view of humanity.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Narcissism&#x2c; alive and well in NYC</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-10-17T19:36:07-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-732</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-732</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Have you met the latest motivational sensation, Aleksey Vayner?  <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hbr-VwhPoCc"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hbr-VwhPoCc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Remember, success is all in your head.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A protest of beauty</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2006-10-14T17:26:50-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-731</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-731</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Last week Dawni and I enjoyed an evening of great music by Sara Groves.  Her most recent recording, Add to the Beauty, was voted CCM Magazine&#8217;s Album of the Year&#8212;a well deserved accolade.  I did a little plug for this outstanding record back in November, 2005.  It&#8217;s a pity that the hometown girl can&#8217;t sell out a hometown show (at Bethel University&#8217;s outstanding concert hall).  Perhaps it was poorly promoted, or perhaps her songwriting challenges today&#8217;s consumer Christian music fan a little too much.  Their loss.  It was fantastic.

<div class="image-right"></divSara related a story you may have heard several years ago. In 1992, Vedran Smailovic, a cellist with the Sarajevo String Quartet, witnessed 22 of his neighbors die in a bomb blast as they stood in a queue waiting for bread in Sarajevo.  The next day, Smailovic walked into the bombed out crater that remained with his cello.  Wearing his performance tuxedo, He began playing his instrument, plying his musical craft to mount the only protest he could.  (More.)

A life of beauty is a protest&#8212;it is an act of spiritual aggression toward the ugly bastion of evil in this world.  As Sara says of beauty in one of her recent and most moving songs, this is &#8220;how it matters.&#8221;

As Woodland Hills Church is currently running a group study called Experiencing the Beautiful Life, I thought I would highlight a few quotes that resonate with what Sara said much better than I.

&#8220;In such ugly times, the only true protest is beauty.&#8221;  - Phil Ochs

&#8220;The awful thing is that beauty is mysterious as well as terrible.  God and the devil are fighting there and the battlefield is the heart of man.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Is this for real?</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-10-14T11:07:01-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-730</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-730</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Not sure what to make of this, but a few weeks will tell us whether this is a load of bull or the real deal.

<div class="image-right"></divFull wide screen video, touch click wheel on the screen and WiFi or wireless of some kind.  Could it even be a cell phone device?

Kind of makes that brown Zune look like trash even more than it already did (if that&#8217;s even possible).  And this is just a speculation on the design posted on engadget&#8212;not the real device.  Still, that looks like it makes a lot of sense.  Touchscreen click-wheel that disappears after a click.  Not available in brown.

<div class="image-right"></divYesterday Apple joined Product Red and introduced the Red iPod nano.  Not really a nano guy, but that would be pretty cool.  Bono was on Oprah to introduce Chicago and the U.S. to Product Red merch from several merchants.  I think someone is gonna get somone a Red t-shirt for Christmas this year.  Edge?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The Body politic</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-10-13T20:03:18-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-729</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-729</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Short notice, but the Bethel University Student Association is sponsoring a "Faith and Politics" dialogue between Jim Wallis and Greg Boyd October 23.

<div class="image-right"></divThe event will take place on Monday, October 23, from 8-10 p.m., in the Benson Great Hall.  Wallis, founder of Sojourners, is on a book-signing tour for the paperback release of God&#8217;s Politics: Why the Right Gets it Wrong and the Left Doesn&#8217;t Get It.  The hardcover spent several weeks on the New York Times bestseller list.  Wallis will sign books after the evening event.  Also, Boyd will do a signing for his latest book, The Myth of a Christian Nation.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Finally&#x2c; a URL you can remember</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2006-10-08T18:19:05-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-727</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-727</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official.  This blog now has the simplified domain of http://www.toddwold.com.

<div class="image-right"></divFind me here&#8212;and try to keep up with The Speed At Which We Travel from time to time.  Also, spread the word and add me to blog rolls, etc. I know I risk getting a little big for my britches&#8212;but I&#8217;d like a wider audience.  If you have friends that enjoy perusing blogs and/or have their own, turn them on to TSAWWT via my new URL.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Beam me up&#x2c; DA</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-10-08T18:16:21-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-728</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-728</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The news broke recently that Dutch scientists recently conducted successful quantum teleportation experiments.

<div class="image-right"></divCool.  Could the ability to beam ourselves across the globe (or across town to the office) be very far away?  Probably.

The scientists maintain that what they did is more akin to creating a doppelganger than a Star Trek transporter.  Daniel Amos was on to something big back in 1983.  It certainly gives new meaning to the phrase double Dutch.  Okay, I&#8217;ll stop writing now.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>You say goodbye&#x2c; I say Helio</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-10-08T18:10:40-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-726</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-726</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve run across the &#8220;so hot right now&#8221; device that gets close to what I&#8217;m looking for in the wished-for WiFi iPod or MS Zune.  The Helio is a socially networked mobile device/cell phone.  It integrates voice, text, camera, video, music, web, IM (AIM, iChat or Yahoo), games and the clincher&#8212;myspace features.  Interact with MySpace mail, view pages, post comments and photos, and add new friends.

<div class="image-right"></divThe success of the Helio experience will come down to the usability of the interface, with its numerous extensions to text messaging, web and MySpace features.  But this is the device to watch.  Whatever Apple has cooking with regard to the rumored &#8220;iPhone,&#8221; Helio may just be the unintentional market research and prototype.  If Helio gains traction, add a brand like Apple to the mix and there you have it!  Check out their web page for details.  Could they be any more Apple-like in their aesthetics?

And maybe Wifi isn&#8217;t the answer I've been predicting.  Maybe cellular network technology, which is ubiquitous in it&#8217;s coverage, is the channel and data network pipeline to carry an iPod or iPhone into the socially networked communications future.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Anything but blue about this music</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2006-10-04T22:04:26-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-724</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-724</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divThis is not a review.  This is a strong suggestion.  Go buy this record.

I now feel supremely stupid for blowing off the Leigh Nash show at c-stone this year.  Don't be as stupid as I was.  Go to iTunes (or whatever music source you frequent) and give them your $9.99.  Do it right now.

This album is a rebirth of sunny, beautiful pop brought to you by the former chanteuse of Sixpence None The Richer.  I've been listening to it non stop since I downloaded it this past Saturday.  The combination of a fall color trip to the north shore, warm sunshine and these songs was intoxicating and therapeutic.

You won't be sorry or blue for picking up your very own copy of Blue on Blue.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rediscovering the lost art of evangelism episode 10&#x2c; the last</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-10-03T22:10:24-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-725</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-15.html#unique-entry-id-725</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is part 10 of a series of posts that interact with Guy Kawasaki's 10 principles of "evangelism."

...Be nice to the people on the way up because one is likely to see them again on the way down.

...We should all please our neighbors for their good, to build them up.  For even Christ did not please himself but, as it is written: 'The insults of those who insult you have fallen on me.'  For everything that was written in the past was written to teach us, so that through the endurance taught in the Scriptures and the encouragement they provide we might have hope.  May the God who gives endurance and encouragement give you the same attitude of mind toward each other that Christ Jesus had, so that with one mind and one voice you may glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.

...Chapter 12:14-16 is a very direct confirmation of what Kawasaki is saying in his last point of the 10.  Romans 15 points this idea in a very specific missional direction, to &#8220;please our neighbors for their good, to build them up.&#8221;

<div class="image-right"></divI&#8217;ve been thinking about this a great deal lately, spurred on by the most recent teachings at our church.  It makes me remember the time when Sinead O&#8217;Connor performed on SNL (in the 90s) and finished her tune by holding up a picture of Pope John Paul II and tearing it in two, saying, &#8220;Fight the real enemy.&#8221;...  We are to fight the real enemy, and our fellow human beings are not it.

Too often we have these pictures of apparent human &#8220;enemies&#8221; we carry in our heads and our hearts that we like to expose and tear to shreds in righteous protest.  They are politicians, celebrities, criminals, dead-beat dads, drunk drivers, drug dealers, or even the neighbor next door that you have been feuding with for 20 years.

...Or are we more likely verbally tearing up the pictures of fellow sons of Adam and daughters of Eve that have been co-opted in the great rebellion.

...I like that idea: the vigilante justice of love and mercy riding out to fight the real enemy.

...It can be overlooked how Paul recalls the Proverb in Romans 12:20 for the New Covenant: &#8220;If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink.

...But I don&#8217;t think it is incorrect to infer that the physical metaphor has a very real spiritual dimension.  Burning coals connote warfare, as we read in Psalm 11:6 (and many other places), and purification, as in Luke 3:17.

...The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.&#8221;

...John answered, &#8220;Anyone who has two shirts should share with the one who has none, and anyone who has food should do the same.&#8221;

...We should consider social justice, love and compassion as primary spiritual weapons in our arsenal&#8212;on the same level as prayer and worship.  They are not merely some add-on to our lives and church communities designed to make Christianity more attractive and generate good PR.  They are not nice-to-haves that are less important than evangelism, but rather an integral component of our mission constituting the spiritual ground breaking that must occur before planting and harvesting (I apologize for the mixed metaphors).

...These are the essential questions that have engaged me as I have written this series....  I hope this has been helpful for anyone else that has taken the time to read it all.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Studio 60 stereotypes redux</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-09-28T22:34:35-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-723</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-723</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t want to give this small critique too much emphasis, but I think it is worth a post and maybe a discussion.  I watched episode 2 this last Monday and was able to get the &#8220;Crazy Christian&#8221; plotline a little more figured out.  All in, I think it&#8217;s a valid (although oft-repeated) commentary on certain evangelical groups&#8217; (yeah, I&#8217;m talking &#8216;bout you, Focus On The Family) tendency to get up and arms about TV programming that they deem offensive (or expect to be offensive, in this case).  Par for the course.  But American evangelical Christianity is an enormously complex subculture.  In order to critique aspects of it dramatically, you have to go deep to be credible and believable.  Accuracy, even in fiction, matters.

<div class="image-right"></divSo let&#8217;s think about how this was done on Studio 60 for a minute: At the beginning of the most recent episode, the president of the network holds a press conference to announce the return of Matt and Danny to Studio 60.  A reporter who poses a question about the infamous &#8220;Crazy Christians&#8221; sketch in the Q&A identifies themselves as being from Rapture magazine.  Later, there is a heated discussion about the event with the network president questioning how such a publication could get press credentials, to which a subordinate replies that Rapture has four times the circulation of Vanity Fair (which has 1.1 million readers in real life).

Aside from the rather silly name for the publication, there&#8217;s quite simply no real-life proxy for this data.  The only other Christian magazines I could think of with large circulations were Focus On The Family magazine (circulation 1.5 million&#8212;and the most likely target of this storyline), Charisma (circulation 250,000), and Christianity Today (circulation 150,000).  Why not just say that Rapture (if it is the fictional Focus On The Family magazine) has a larger circulation than Vanity Fair, rather than exaggerate it to four times the size?

But here&#8217;s my real beef: Why not use a real-life publication with real numbers in the storyline?  Certainly this falls safely under fair comment.  When the program refers to real people (celebrities) and real TV shows (SNL), why not refer to real magazines (as opposed creating a fake one to compare to real ones like Vanity Fair and The Christian Science Monitor, both mentioned by name in the episode).

<div class="image-right"></divTruth be told, there are a handful of real and smaller publications that would likely show up at this kind of press conference, and one in particular that would do us all proud: Relevant, (circulation 80,000) which was created by Cameron Strang, son of Charisma magazine founder, Stephen Strang.  In fact, Relevant did a nice little preview of Studio 60, recommending it in its September/October 2006 issue.

Again, I like Studio 60 very much so far.  All I can say to Aaron Sorkin et al regarding Christianity in the plotline is, &#8220;Let&#8217;s be real.  Show us you really know the subculture, and we&#8217;ll be more apt to really listen to your message.&#8221;

Thoughts?

Again, still looking forward to more of this superb show.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Help me&#x2c; Obi-Wan Kenobi</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-09-27T20:49:57-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-722</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-722</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Ever wonder about those holographic, 2-D intergalactic communication devices you&#8217;ve seen in the Star Wars movies?  First, it was a recording of that memorable and desperate message from princess Leia stored in R2-D2: &#8220;Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi; you&#8217;re my only hope.&#8221;  Then, in later movies, it seemed to be the video phone of choice a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.

<div class="image-right"></divRobert X.  Cringley thinks this is one of the possible but heretofore hidden features of the Apple iTV device.  He points out in his latest column that the USB 2 port on the device could have a variety of uses&#8212;but he thinks it will run an iSight camera allowing an H.264 video conference from your home theater HD big screen TV (just as iChat does today on the Mac).

Maybe it&#8217;s not all that earth-shattering.  Yet, how many of us are able to do this today?  Would we be interested in a life-size interactive image of our family and friends from far, far away to converse with and share other media?  I know my answer is yes.

I like Cringely&#8217;s vision here.  And while it&#8217;s hard to predict just what Apple has waiting in the wings, I think this would be fantastic.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Zune shares like a bad virus</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-09-27T20:42:26-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-721</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-721</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I had high hopes for the WiFi capabilities of the Microsoft Zune.  Sadly, I think my hopes were misplaced.  Why am I not surprised?  Oh yeah.  Microsoft built this thing.  Actually, it&#8217;s built by OEM Toshiba and MS just slapped their name (and maybe software) on it.

<div class="image-right"></divIt seems the only thing the WiFi is good for is beaming your pal (who also has to have a Zune) a song you want to &#8220;share.&#8221;  This sounds nice, except that the Zune wraps any content (any and all content) in an additional DRM scheme that limits play to 3 times or 3 days&#8212;whichever comes first.  After that point, the lent media dies&#8212;unplayable, unsharable, unconceivable.

And that&#8217;s it folks.  That&#8217;s all the Zune&#8217;s WiFi does.  Nothing more to see here.  Move along.

I&#8217;ll go on record right now and say that if Apple does WiFi in its 6G iPod (which is a big if), it will be done right.

Oh wait, the Zune comes in brown.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>God is my DJ</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-09-23T09:35:28-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-719</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-719</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Check out this WSJ article (a freebie) concerning the iPod Shuffle&#8217;s claim on random play, and the mathematical debate involved in being truly random (hint: it isn&#8217;t).  The article goes all the way into quantum physics and chaos theory.  It&#8217;s a good read, even if you hate iPods.

<div class="image-right"></divThe article points out is that it is difficult (impossible) for humans to develop truly random numbers (via purely algorithmic methods) without tapping into the unpredictability of the universe.  The fact that this reflects on the iPod shuffle is an amusing comment on its place as a cultural artifact and object of technology.

I have often thought that my iPod, when in shuffle mode, could be directed or influenced by the spiritual.  For example, when the perfect song cues up and plays at just the right moment.  I think, &#8220;Cool!  God is in my DJ today.&#8221;  Whether it&#8217;s true or not doesn&#8217;t really matter.  I know that God knows I am getting something new from Him out of an unpredictable song choice&#8212;and I know He&#8217;s always interested in that.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Finally&#x2c; I can sleep at night</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-09-23T09:31:43-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-720</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-720</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is the App you can&#8217;t live without that you have been living without all your life.  For all you with Mac OS X Tiger running, this little widget is the answer to your non-apple software version upgrade/update manager dreams.

<div class="image-right"></divEver want to make sure MS Word has all it&#8217;s current updates and patches?  How about Adobe Acrobat?  Put them into this little gadget and let it find out for you with the click of a one-button mouse.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Studio 60 stereotypes born again&#x2c; for the first time</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-09-20T06:58:18-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-718</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-718</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I really like this new show: NBC&#8217;s Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip.  Based on the premier episode I think it&#8217;s going to be a fun and interesting ride.  That said, there were two flaws that became more and more obvious as the episode played on.

<div class="image-right"></divFirst, was the nature of the comedy show they have vaguely based the show on: SNL.  The fictional surround of the show (the comedy show cast, the vague references to sketches being aired) just didn&#8217;t ring true to me.  I think that this will be a nagging issue if it doesn&#8217;t improve by becoming more believable.  The audience can&#8217;t go on thinking in the back of its mind that this must be the lamest sketch comedy show ever&#8212;even if it is a fictional construct.

Second, is the subplot of an overtly Christian lead character on the comedy show.  This could be inspired by Victoria Jackson, SNL cast member from 1986-1992 and an outspoken Christian who rose to fame as the show&#8217;s resident airhead.  In the fiction of Studio 60, Jackson is recast as one of the &#8220;big three&#8221; lead actors of the show struggling through the interpersonal conflicts connected with her Christianity and working in the hardened, cynical worlds of both TV and comedy.

This could be interesting, except that it seems to be attracting every negative stereotype of evangelical Christianity out there.  While some of this is deserved (and, no doubt, like shooting fish in a barrel for the writers), at a point it stops being plausible.  Like the believability of the comedy show above, this plot line doesn&#8217;t ring true when they pile on every conceivable &#8220;born again&#8221; cultural prejudice (positive and negative) around this role.  I like that the character is intelligent, in contrast to the ditzy blond of Jackson.  But I think they need dole out the Christian subcultural jabs and veiled insults in more measured doses, lest the program devolve into a dry commentary on TV media and Christianity rather than the crisp, intelligent dramedy it has every potential to become.

We&#8217;ll have to watch for a while to see where this all goes.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Apple of your Ive</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-09-15T20:08:22-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-717</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-717</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not sure that most people are aware of all the fantastic product designs that have originated from Apple VP of Design, Jonathan Ive.

<div class="image-right"></divThis gifted Brit has developed a core of uber-talented industrial designers at One Infinite Loop that have rocked the consumer technology world over the past decade: Apple Newton, iMac G3 through Intel, iBook, iPod, iPod mini & nano, Mac mini, Powerbook Titanium, Mac Pro, etc. You have to view all of this work in a timeline gallery to get an idea just how much of an impact Ive has had.  Now you can.

If you&#8217;ve interested, read this recent article from BusinessWeek and take a digital walk through the Ive portfolio slide show to see the product designs he has been a part of.  His work is just one of the many reasons I am a Mac fanatic.  (I&#8217;m also a Lego maniac, but that&#8217;s for another post).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>High-def communication</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2006-09-15T20:00:29-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-716</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-716</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[My first paper for COM600 (Intro to Communication Theory) was to create my own definition of communication.  Here it is:

&#8220;The dynamic, contextual and coded interchange of meaning between or within interactively capable beings.&#8221;

<div class="image-right"></divI&#8217;m not happy with it, but I think the paper&#8217;s closing paragraph was pretty good&#8212;far better than the definition itself.  So as a writer I found a bit of satisfaction there.

&#8220;Crafting a definition of communication is both art and science.  As Frank Dance (1970) assigned the role of conceptualizing communication to science, he also asked, 'Do our definitions of communication serve us' (p.  203)?  I believe they do.  Each model provides a useful new perspective on this essential behavior, even when I don&#8217;t fully agree with all of them.  These diverse viewpoints have broadened my thinking and given me an appreciation for the skill and originality involved in combining words to produce both an artful and a practical definition.&#8221;

The definition is a lifetime work in progress&#8212;one that may never &#8220;arrive&#8221; at a final destination.  To give you an idea of this, professor Leta Frazier Ph.D. shared hers with the class last night, and I was blown away:  &#8220;Sharing Meaning&#8221;

I love it.  Sure, you can criticize it for being too simple or too general, but you must give credit to something that says so much with just two words&#8212;and very simple words at that.  You learn how to &#8220;share&#8221; in kindergarten.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>It&#x27;s Christmas day</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-09-12T21:45:50-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-715</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-715</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The calendar says September 12, 2006, but it's Christmas day in San Francisco.  Steve Jobs unwrapped a bevy of new iPod and movie-related goodies in a special media event held at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts Theater in San Francisco.  Check out the event playback on Apple's site.

<div class="image-right"></divThe most exciting new gadget is the forthcoming (Q1 2007) iTV module.  Wireless networking of all your digital content from your Mac (or PC running iTunes 7) to your HDTV home theater.  This is truly a game changer in digital convergence.  Check out the details here.

And how 'bout that crazy small 2 GB shuffle?  And I love this about Apple: Let's make the iPod hard drives bigger--and knock $50 off the price while we're at it.  The new iPod is available in a 30 GB model at a lower price of $249 and an 80 GB model for $349.  Not the wide screen iPod the market was half expecting, but the prices will move some units this Fall.

I am, however, disappointed.  I expected an iPod with WiFi--and stand by my previous assertion that this little piece of tech could spark a whole knew game in mobile music and social interaction.  I was also looking for this device to have an iSight camera to provide handheld video chat capabilities.  For now Apple is content to let the Microsoft Zune (also forthcoming) be the test case for a WiFi device.  This may be Jobs acting out of his gut feel for what will catch on. Steve's gut is usually right.

For now, I'm just gonna keep dreaming my WiFi iChat iPod dreams.  Of course, iTV will be coming to my home theater next year.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rediscovering the lost art of evangelism episode 9</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-09-12T21:17:03-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-714</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-714</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is part 9 of a series of posts that interact with Guy Kawasaki's 10 principles of "evangelism."

...In the quest to grow churches, we often end up become product evangelists for our church organizations rather than Jesus and his kingdom.  In doing so, we can end up creating a proxy for the kingdom designed with a wide variety of ministry and life solutions.

...Recently one person was &#8220;selling&#8221; my sister-in-law (a believer) on their brand of church by talking about their exciting new family church program.

...<div class="image-right"></divWe are driven to invent new marketing slogans to try to impress the marketplace and help differentiate our product: &#8220;Church for those who don&#8217;t &#8216;do&#8217; church,&#8221; I saw recently.

...But we lie when these things are what we evangelize&#8212;when we make ourselves and our churches into the good news, rather than the person of Jesus.

David Fitch writes about it this way in Out of Ur: &#8220;&#8230;we have organized church life around the busy lives of Americans living the dreams of capitalism and democracy that leave little time for mission, community and worship.  I fear the &#8216;church&#8217; for evangelicals has, in George Hunsberger&#8217;s words, become &#8216;the distributor of religious goods and services.&#8217;  As a result, I fear we evangelicals are becoming less and less noticeable and barely distinguishable as a people from the rest of our society who live as if God does not exist.&#8221;

The goods and services, the brand that produces them (a church) become what we &#8220;market&#8221; and &#8220;sell&#8221; to consumers.

I think every long-time Christian has heard at one time or another that the newly saved are the most excited and most motivated to evangelize.  And I&#8217;ve found that new Christians are usually the most focused on Jesus, and what he has done to transform them, rather than what a church has done for them.

...He concluded that the most powerful word-of-mouth advocates might be the customers who have only done business with you once so far.  They are the most excited; repeat customers are probably accustomed to the great product/service and therefore, ironically, less likely to talk about it.

The problem with marketing-driven evangelism is that your product has to get better, cheaper and/or faster to keep driving new and exciting marketing fodder....  When your product is a church&#8212;when you have productized your church in order to market it&#8212;that becomes a real problem at some point.

...Fitch sees this pattern in the church today: &#8220;&#8230;The church in essence is left to be a sideshow to what God is doing for, in and through individuals.  We no longer have a need for the church to be the social manifestation of His Lordship where He reigns over the powers of sin, evil and death, the very inbreaking of the kingdom of God, where His mighty works are made manifest and put on display before the world (1 Pet 2:9), where hospitality is such an overpowering ethos that the lost in this world are compelled by this invitation.  As it is right now, we lack a way of life that people look at and see and say, &#8216;Look what manner of life has been made possible in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.&#8217;&#8221;

...When the overriding goal becomes presenting Jesus embodied in our community&#8212;our local expression of The Church&#8212;the pressure to sell, market, persuade, etc. falls away.

Consider the well known verse, Co 5:17 TNIV &#8220;Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!&#8221;

The truth of Jesus we are compelled to share need not be made new through our creative effort....  Our story to unbelievers comes out of living this life &#8220;in Christ&#8221; individually and as a community....  Instead, we simply must live this life like we mean it, and tell our stories (yes, even in creative ways*).

...*I don&#8217;t want to confuse the creative evangelism of the gospel with what I am talking about in this post, which is the evangelism of a church, it&#8217;s goods and services.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>No school like the old school</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2006-09-06T21:37:06-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-711</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-711</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I have something new in common with my 7-year-old daughter.  We both started school this week&#8212;second grade for her and the M A in Communication for me (is that seventeenth grade?).  I think she likes the idea of a kind-of shared experience for us. She keeps asking me if I&#8217;m going to school yet.  Well, it&#8217;s official.  I&#8217;m a student of Bethel University Graduate School.

<div class="image-left"></divAfter a rather involved and compressed admissions process (I just decided to apply for this in late July), my first real class is 9/7/06.  Two years from now I hope to be discussing my thesis with you and shopping for a book deal (a guy has to have a dream).  For now, Emma and I could use your prayer support as we get used to homework all over again.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Agassi: the good sport</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-09-06T21:36:11-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-713</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-713</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This says it all....

<div class="image-right"></div"The scoreboard said I lost today, but what the scoreboard doesn't say is what it is I have found.

And over the last 21 years, I have found loyalty.  You have pulled for me on the court and also in life.  I've found inspiration.  You have willed me to succeed sometimes even in my lowest moments.  And I've found generosity.  You have given me your shoulders to stand on to reach for my dreams, dreams I could have never reached without you.

Over the last 21 years, I have found you.  And I will take you and the memory of you with me for the rest of my life.

Thank you."

Thank you, Andre.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I&#x27;m definitely not a genius</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-09-06T21:09:24-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-712</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-712</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The past few days those of you using Microsoft Internet Explorer (MS IE) for Windows XP to get around the internet may have noticed a display glitch on my page.  All my posts are being shuffled far down the page.  I&#8217;m hoping that by the time you see this post the problem has been corrected.  It seems that amid the hubris of tricking out my sidebar with new features, some tiny detail in the code created this issue on the Win XP platform (much to my chagrin).

<div class="image-right"></divHere&#8217;s my story: I&#8217;m able to preview my site code on the Mac in Safari, MS IE, Netscape, Opera and Firefox (all Mac OS versions).  But unfortunately this does not give me a clue as to what it will look like in Win XP IE.  So I have to test (view) the page live from someone else&#8217;s Win XP computer to make sure it is rendering properly.

This is a bit embarrassing.  But, at least, now you know why this may happen once in a while.  It&#8217;s simply not worth it to me to shell out a few hundred bucks to boot my Mac into Windows XP just to see if its finicky IE browser will render my page properly.

If you run Windows XP, allow me to recommend Firefox.  It kicks all over MS IE, is more secure, user friendly and correctly displays my site 99% of the time regardless of the platform.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The trivial nature of eschatology...</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-09-02T22:59:22-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-709</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-709</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[...really lends itself to some kickin' video game development.  The book of Revelation is a gold mine of gaming scenarios and visual ideas, once you get past the King James English.

Left Behind Games, the geniuses behind the upcoming computer/video game, &#8220;Left Behind: Eternal Forces,&#8221; have been working overtime lately claiming to correct misinformation in the blogosphere and defend their dubious endeavor.  [actual screen shot]

But I think it is totally unnecessary to tear into this thing.  Just go to their web site and learn more about it, look at the screen shots, see how they pitch it, read the marketing hype and get the story straight from the horse's mouth.  If you can come away without any kind of uncomfortable or soiled feeling (like maybe some spiritual discernment kicking in), then by all means, buy this game as soon as possible.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll enjoy it as much as the other kids who were left behind&#8212;in school.

But if you can't take the time right now, just read this quote from the CEO of Left Behind Games and think about if for a while (reported by Skye Jethani in Out of Ur): "Troy Lyndon...says the game will probably appeal to the same audience that was undisturbed by the violence and gore in 'The Passion of the Christ.'  Lyndon says he anticipates those on the liberal left will criticize Left Behind: Eternal Forces, 'but megachurches are very likely to embrace this game.'  And they will be the main marketing outlets for the product."]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I believe in evolution</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-09-02T10:41:48-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-710</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-710</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Now that I've got your attention, you may be noticing some evolution taking place with TSAWWT.  I&#8217;ve discovered and implemented a few features that I&#8217;ve been wanting on the page for a long time.

<div class="image-left"></divRecently added to the sidebar is a FilmLoop animated slide show.  This is a software-based internet photocasting tool that updates my web page in real time.  I&#8217;ll be featuring recent snapshots in that box.  Right now you are seeing photos from our recent vacation out West.  The software for FilmLoop is free, so go ahead and download it for some photocasting fun (Mac or Windows).

<div class="image-right"></divIn addition, I brought back my reading list to the sidebar to highlight the current books I am reading or have read recently.  This version is powered by LibraryThing, which is an online social networking technology that centers around people&#8217;s personal libraries&#8212;kind of a myspace for people who love books.  Its blog tool allows me to easily generate the list, book cover visuals, book links and it automatically updates my site when I add or delete books&#8212;no code changes required.  The images link to Amazon, and the titles are linked to LibraryThing.  Check it out some time.

I do need some opinions.  Since I&#8217;ve moved to category tags for all of my posts (on the right sidebar), I am considering getting rid of the monthly archive.  My reasoning is that everything is available in the category views in reverse chronological order.  The archiving system of Rapidweaver only allows this ever growing sidebar list which takes up more and more space, every month.  I&#8217;d rather get rid of it and replace it with a recent posts section and a recent comments section.

Tell me what you think?  Would anyone miss the monthly archives?

I&#8217;ve also added details on the technology being used for TSAWWT on the About Me page, in case anyone is interested.  This is geeky fun for me, but also provides information to anyone that may want to use the same platform or get the code for various site features.  Share and share alike.

Future plans for the rest of 2006 are implementing a simplified URL (such as www.tsawwt.com) to begin to build traffic, a blog roll tool to make my links list more effective and easy to update, permalinks and maybe even a new site design (if I get bored with this one).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Kingdom transparency&#xa;</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-09-01T19:56:46-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-708</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-708</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[There has been a great deal of press on The Myth of Christian Nation since the New York Times article broke July 30, 2006.  The topic of God and politics aside, I ran across something in reviewing the recent media coverage that I feel compelled to share.  I have rarely read someone giving such a transparent, heart-felt mea culpa related to something they had written.

I think we all have things we regret we said or wrote in the past.  I have not (yet) published a book to have to worry about this on a large scale, although this blog and my verbal rants likely have seen some low moments that will become more apparent to me as I grow.  Hindsight is 20/20, but it&#8217;s blind if you never turn around to take a look.

As a persuasive writer, doing a complete one-eighty on something you wrote is excruciating stuff.  So I share this quote from author and speaker Dave Burchett from His Crosswalk blog post about Greg Boyd and The Myth of Christian Nation.  I pray that I will have the maturity to recognize and repent of any of my former mistakes in such an open manner&#8212;even for something like political opinions.  I don&#8217;t know much about Burchett, but I like him already.

&#8220;I have been roundly criticized for supporting George Bush in my first book, When Bad Christians Happen to Good People.  I regret the political references I made in that book.  I wish I could remove them because I found out that political remarks polarize and deflect the message of the Cross.  I tried to make it clear that Christians were making a mistake by trying to change our culture through politics instead of by changing hearts for Jesus.  That book was written during 9/11 and after I had been personally convicted of my sin toward President Bill Clinton.  I did not pray for Bill Clinton.  I did not respect him as the authority my sovereign God allowed to be in power.  I regret the impression that I gave to some readers that I believed the Republican party was the official party of Christianity.  I do not believe that at all.  And yes, I expect to see Democrats in heaven.  And Libertarians.  A few Republicans will be there too.  But the common link will not be political ideology.  The link that will bring us there will be Jesus.  Period.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Podfather III</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-09-01T08:09:15-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-707</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-14.html#unique-entry-id-707</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Fans of the Ricky Gervais, Stephen Merchant and comedy enigma Karl Pilkington, will be pleased that Season 3 of the Ricky Gervais Show is off and running with Episode 1.

<div class="image-right"></divThe world&#8217;s most popular podcast ever (even recognized by the Guinness Book of World Records) now charges $1.95 an episode for its dry, offbeat and riotous installments&#8212;well worth it if you want to giggle your way through a 45 minute bus ride.  I can&#8217;t recommend it for drivers, as I fear most listeners would become quickly impaired and become a danger to themselves and others.

Get the links to subscribe on rickygervais.com.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Hollywood looking for the cluetrain</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Film</category><dc:date>2006-08-25T21:41:19-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-706</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-706</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I just added a link to Robert X Cringley on my links list sidebar.  It&#8217;s about time.  Check out this insightful quote from Friday&#8217;s column about what has Hollywood loosing sleep:

&#8220;Something is wrong with the movie business.  Its core market of boys and young men have stopped going to the movies and are, instead, surfing, texting, SMS-ing, gaming, and making and watching these stupid videos [on YouTube, etc.].  Time and money previously spent at the multiplex is being spent at home and online and Hollywood is hurting as a result -- hurting not just because of revenue and profit shortfalls, but because the industry no longer has confidence that it knows for sure what its core market wants to see on-screen.&#8221;  <div class="image-left"></divYou can get the whole article on his PBS column site.  For a while there, it seemed as if someone in Hollywood had this figured out with the ostensibly brilliant blogosphere run up to Snakes on a Plane.  But then the movie came out and grossed only a $15.2 million opener.  Could it be all those coveted 18 to 30 year olds were already downloading it on Bit Torrent?

I have my own humble opinion on all this&#8212;and I do think maybe a few Hollywood execs get it.  Audiences are conversations.

Whether you are talking old-school film production or user-generated Web media, good stories are what really matter.  Build your film business by bringing good stories into the conversation.  This will make all the difference.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Windows Vista: the Devil you don&#x27;t know</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-08-25T21:25:34-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-705</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-705</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t posted a smug rant about Microsoft Windows for a few months now, so I&#8217;m due.  I apologize in advance for any offense this may cause.  There are three things every devoted Windows user should know about the forthcoming (and oft delayed) Windows Vista upgrade:

<div class="image-right"></divThing Number 1: Every feature in Vista has been available in Mac OS X for more than a year&#8212;and in some cases, up to five years, such as the liquid/aqua aesthetic they are calling "Aero."  If you think those Vista &#8220;gadget&#8221; apps are cool, you should see Mac OS X.4 Tiger&#8217;s widgets on the Mac.  And if you want something like Mac OS X.5 Leopard&#8217;s forthcoming Time Machine real-time backup or Spaces feature, you&#8217;ll have to wait for Microsoft&#8217;s next OS release, scheduled for the twelfth of never.

Thing Number 2: Vista is still built atop the same problem core that good-old Windows 95 was built on. That means that security and bugs will continue to be an issue.  Top Tech News said in an article Thursday, &#8220;Testers and pundits alike say Vista Beta 2&#8230;is plagued by bugs and blue screens.&#8221;  Robert Scoble, former MS blogger advocate and co-author of Naked Conversations, said this of Vista Beta 2 in his Blog this week: &#8220;This sucker is just not ready.  It feels like it needs a good six more months.&#8221;

While Vista should be more secure out of the gate than XP was, there&#8217;s some good reasons why Mac OS X has offered better security over any Windows flavor for the past five years running.  And, as David Pogue points out in his New York Times column today, it&#8217;s not because there are fewer Macs out there.

Thing Number 3 (and this is the biggest one): Vista will likely not run well (or at all) on your existing or aging PC.  At this point Windows Vista involves a huge amount of legacy code and some pretty significant minimum processing and RAM requirements.  If you bought a good performing machine for XP, NT or 2000 three or four years ago, Vista will likely require another upgrade to make you Vista capable (see this on their own requirements page).  And you'll have to fork over more for the really cool premium edition.  Say hello to planned obsolescence.  Thank you, Windows monopoly.

Since Mac OS X came out, each version (X.0 through X.4) has run on PowerPC G3, G4, G5 and current Intel processor-powered Mac hardware at respective, if not better than previous, system performance (allowing for the suggested RAM requirements).  While this won&#8217;t be the case in perpetuity, it is a testament to the modern foundation of OS X that my 2002 PowerBook G4 550 MHz is as useful to me now as it was when I bought it&#8212;even more so with the additional features of newer Mac OS releases.

Now that you are well informed about the future Windows Vista holds, it may be advisable to keep using Windows XP for a couple more years.  The most current build of XP, while annoyingly in your-face at times, is mature.  Perhaps it&#8217;s better to stick with the devil you know.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Quantum theology</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2006-08-22T21:47:11-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-704</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-704</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[In the category of truly sidetracking my one-track mind, I stumbled upon this fascinating information in a news release from an author positing an interesting hypothesis behind the Salem witch trial hysteria.  Not to pitch this book or its specific hypothesis, I was more fascinated by the little-known quantum physics experiment that gave rise to it.  I did a little more research on it to verify what I was reading.  (How did I get sidetracked?  A new RSS feed from PR Web's religion category.)

<div class="image-right"></divThe double slit light and quantum eraser experiments: Photons are fired one at a time.  If the researchers does not know which slit each photon passes through, a zebra pattern is formed indicating interference as taken place.  If the researcher knows which slit each passes through, the zebra pattern disappears.  It makes no difference whether the measurement is taken before or after a photon passes the slits, or if it is taken before and then erased.  The result is the same.  The researcher&#8217;s knowledge or lack of knowledge makes the difference.

The release stated that Noble-winning physicist Richard Feynman called this the &#8220;central mystery&#8221; of quantum mechanics, that something as intangible as knowledge -- in this case, which slit a photon went through -- changes something as concrete as a pattern on a screen.

&#8220;It&#8217;s perhaps even more spectacular,&#8221; said author Stephen Hawley Martin, &#8220;that a basic tenet of modern science has been proven wrong by this experiment.  Yet, no one in science or elsewhere seems to have focused on this.  Thought that remains inside a person&#8217;s head would be incapable of having an effect on this experiment.  Yet thought in the form of knowledge about which slit a proton passed through had a profound effect.&#8221;

From wikipedia, &#8220;How can this be?  It would seem that the 'choice' to observe or erase the which-path information can change the position where the photon is recorded on the detector, even after it should have already been recorded.&#8221;

Is choice hard-wired into the nature of the universe?  I&#8217;m going to have to think about this one for a while, but I can&#8217;t help but wonder how this experimental finding fits into the metaphysical and/or spiritual realm transcending the physical.  Fascinating theological implications.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Suspicious minds</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Books</category><dc:date>2006-08-21T19:58:33-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-703</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-703</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[We're back from our ten day western odyssey through 5 states (Iowa, Nebraska, Colorado, Wyoming, South Dakota).  I now need a vacation from my vacation.

I happened upon an interview today while combing through the comments on an Out of Ur story, and thought I would share a link and a pertinent quote.

<div class="image-right"></divOne of the significant differences between modern and post-modern thinkers is how, generally, they understand and respond to consumer marketing tactics.  While the established evangelical church has embraced marketing techniques to advance the gospel, the statistics show a marked generational dropoff in younger adults (30s and 20s).  My suspicion is that the very thing (cultural relevance through pop media) being used by the older generation to reach the younger one is the very thing that is driving them away.

It's hard to prove this hypothesis without some serious new research.  Voices like Sarah Cunningham are beginning to draw this into focus:

"Twentysomethings were raised in a media-driven culture and are naturally suspicious of stunts, ploys, and marketing campaigns crafted to get their attention.  For good or bad, we carry this suspicion with us into the spiritual arena as well.  So when we are confronted with new Christian trends and conferences and books pitched as the end-all-beat-all answers, we can't help but wonder if the movement at hand will have any lasting value or whether it will be one more flash in the pan.  Liturgy, on the other hand, speaks to us of a timeless, unchanging God who is not reliant on magic tricks or aces up the sleeve to get people into his congregations.  here is something proven, and therefore credible, about practices that extend back to ancient times."

Cunningham is the author of Dear Church: Letters From A Disillusioned Generation, published by Zondervan.  You can read the interview this quote came from here.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Lost in transmission</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-08-08T21:17:25-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-702</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-702</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Something to noodle on while I am out of pocket on TSAWWT blog posts for the next week or so.

...Much of the modern evangelical church is a step behind huge sociological and communication shifts.  Most notably is the transformation from consumerism to producerism&#8212;from cool spectator-driven to warm participation-driven media and communication.  In a recent PRSA presentation I downloaded from Andrew Lark, a communications consultant, he describes human communication in terms of major eras we have been moving through over time driven by our communication media....  The Transmission Era 2)  The Triangulation Era (Web 1.0) 3)  The Participatory Era (Web 2.0)

The modern church still fits squarely in the Transmission Era in many ways, whether the media is print, preaching driven, radio, film or TV.  But The Church didn&#8217;t used to be this way.  In the absence of any prevailing communication method aside from verbal (literacy and written communication was quite limited, the impact of epistles notwithstanding), the early church was much more participatory.  It had to be.

Today, in the postmodern era, communication media is increasingly characterized by participation.  Of all the potential or pitfalls of postmodernism, this is the most exciting and encouraging aspect to me&#8212;an opportunity to bring us back to a more of a New Testament church ethos, albeit in new, and even digital, wineskins.  And the church communities that will thrive (regardless of old or new, high or low, large or small) will be the ones that emphasize participation rather than passive, one-way transmission of consumerism.  And this isn't just about blogs and wikis.  It's about how you do everything.  A few of quotes to provoke thought and comment:  &#8220;We are entering one era in which the technological infrastructure is creating a different context for how we tell our stories and how we communicate with each other&#8221; - Andrew Nachison, Director, Media Center  &#8220;One of my new laws for communicators is 'the more you participate, the more transparent the dialog becomes'" - Andy Lark

&#8220;Whether the existing church likes it or not, we are giving birth to a generation of people who view themselves as participants.  &#8230; Our elders, the Baby Boomers, learned how to communicate to consumers, but to find success in the future, a new generation will need to learn how to speak to a new breed of producers who have been radically transformed by using the Internet....  Emboldened by this participatory movement and empowered by easy-to-use technology, we are starting to expect different things from our churches, pastors and denominations.  We look forward to something more profound from our churches than vision casting, finding our spiritual gifts, mall-like facilities, coffee bars and candles.  We expect to participate; we expect to co-create the church.  As bloggers, we take an active role in our personal spiritual formation.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Meet an internet celebrity</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-08-05T16:51:45-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-701</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-701</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divSpace 150 has gone and done it again.  We are the Web unites &#8220;internet celebrities&#8221; to support &#8216;net neutrality.  Get on the bandwagon and show your support here.  Unless, of course, you&#8217;re totally against this.  In which case, you can just enjoy the goofy new music video featuring gem keeper Leslie Hall, the Tron guy, Peter Pan, the Chinese Backstreet Boys, and more.  Check it out.

Then, get even deeper into the madness by visiting Leslie Hall&#8217;s Gem Sweater Mobile Museum.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Making The Church safe for democracy</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-08-05T16:34:54-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-700</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-700</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divOkay, this has got to be my last post about this.  Sorry--bear with me for one more round.  With The Myth of a Christian Nation gaining quite a bit of attention since the July 31 New York Times article, I thought I&#8217;d post a link to a piece recently published by Next Wave, but originally written in 2003.  It&#8217;s another good take on the issue of politics, patriotism and The Church.  It&#8217;s unfortunate that some in full-time ministry have been displaced over these issues (as mentioned in this piece), but I pray the growing awareness will make it safer for more people to affirm a view of the Kingdom that places power under people rather than seeking power over them.  Not left, nor right, just the Kingdom.

Also, Nick Coleman of the Star Tribune did a nice piece on Greg Boyd's NYT odyssey in this week's paper.  Since the NYT article, Boyd's book has rocketed from #32,738 to #20 overall on Amazon.com sales charts.  Now, do I need to change the diagnosis of BF from Bono Fatigue to Boyd Fatigue?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Get that guy some sun block</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-08-04T18:54:31-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-699</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-699</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The infamous Pat Robertson has now done a 180 on global warming, claiming in a 700 Club broadcast that the recent heat wave is &#8220;the most convincing evidence I've seen on global warming in a long time.&#8221;  He continues, &#8220;We really need to address the burning of fossil fuels.  It is getting hotter, and the icecaps are melting and there is a buildup of carbon dioxide in the air.&#8221;  (We&#8217;re running out of oil, too, Pat!  In case you didn&#8217;t notice paying $3.20 a gallon today.)

<div class="image-right"></div>Okay Pat, which is it: God&#8217;s righteous judgment or fossil fuels and carbon emissions that have been contributing to the rise in natural disasters (tsunamis, hurricanes, heat, drought)?  When you claim to hear from the Lord on these matters at one turn, and then flip-flop on what you said at another (in this case, even coming to some sense on the topic), don&#8217;t you realize you are discrediting yourself and your message?  Again, as I said in my January 6 post, you don&#8217;t speak for me or the Lord.

My recommendation to the rest of us?  If you happen to be near a TV set and the 700 Club comes on, walk right up to that TV screen and wipe some SPF 40 sun block right on Pat&#8217;s face.  Sure, it sounds crazy and will make a mess of your set, but he&#8217;s gonna need some for sure.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Three degrees of separation</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-08-04T18:48:46-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-698</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-698</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divClub Three Degrees is depending on City of Minneapolis zoning laws to keep a new strip club from opening in close proximity to the club.  As this Strib article points out, there is some disagreement (and confusion) over whether the club should be considered a church or a nightclub.  To be honest, the wording of law (with its specific reference to alcohol sales equating nightclubs with bars) and C3D&#8217;s non profit status (zero profit and mostly volunteer run) should be enough to give it legitimacy as a ministry.  (What nightclub in there right minds would be a volunteer-run, no drink, no profit venture?)  Although it may sometimes be hard to differentiate it from other aspects of the Christian entertainment industry (yeah, I&#8217;m talking about you, Nash-Vegas), Club Three Degrees has always been an out front evangelistic ministry.  Sure, it thinks of itself as a nightclub venue.  It holds concerts and sells beverages and appetizers.  But, it doesn&#8217;t do it to make money.  It does it to spread the gospel.  Knowing Nancy and Steve Aleksuk for several years, I can personally vouch for that overriding mission.  They&#8217;re obsessed (in a good way) with this purpose.

So will the strippers prevail?  In an updated article from the Strib today it looks like they did&#8212;at least in this round.  The full Minneapolis City Council voted 10 to 3 to grant a business license to the strip club owners.  C3D is now investigating legal action.  The council can vote any way they choose to, but it doesn&#8217;t mean decisions are legal.  That&#8217;s up to the courts.  But legal action versus the City could prove too costly.

Even if the Divas club does begin operating, there will still be a burning light at C3D in the dark nightlife of our city.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Really Simple Stupification</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-08-04T18:43:26-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-697</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-697</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, for anyone who cares, I finally figured out why my RSS feeds and summaries have been a little loopy.  (Does anyone even subscribe to my TSAWWT feed?)

MS Word and other programs have long had this great feature called smart quotes and apostrophes, which automatically replace the keyed character (the vertical kind) with a curved or &#8220;smart&#8221; character&#8212;in this case, an apostrophe that curves open to the left for contractions and possessives.

<div class="image-left"></divThis is great for visual text, but not for code.  To an RSS feed, characters of text from my blog (which have real meaning to human beings) are just bits of code.  If it doesn&#8217;t recognize the code it sees, it either replaces it with something else or drops it altogether.  How draconian.

Here&#8217;s the rub.  My habit of writing posts in MS Word and then putting them into Rapidweaver later has created a code-related error I have recently discovered.  When I use a curved apostrophe in a story headline, my RSS headline feed (which I use in the sidebar of the site) listing my most recent posts replaces them with question marks.  Annoying.  I&#8217;ve also discovered that when I include a photo in the code for the first line of text, my internet RSS feed omits the lead-in summary text completely from the feed.  Infuriating!

Well, knowledge is power.  Now that I know about this, I can revert to boring old vertical apostrophes, rearrange my photos and better conform to the legalism of RSS.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The multi megas&#x2c; coming soon to a theater near you</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-08-03T21:58:30-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-696</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-696</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been linking around the &#8216;net looking at various blogs&#8212;especially some that have sprouted more recently dedicated to church marketing.  Obviously in the age of the mega church, consumer marketing has become an important endeavor for some of these congregation....  On the one hand marketing can be fun&#8212;100 times more interesting than other ecclesial concerns.  I&#8217;m a creative, so the temptation to make marketing, branding, advertising and PR into tools of The Church appeals to me on a professional and missional level.  On the other hand, I have an enormous amount of discomfort with tactics that seek to grow individual churches on the back of the consumer marketing strategies....  What can be very successful tactics for selling fashion wear, iPods and dishwashers, just doesn&#8217;t do a good job really connecting lost people with Jesus.  The &#8220;conversions&#8221; in this sense can become conversions to a specific brand of church, rather than into a transformative relationship with Jesus as His Bride.

Often all this marketing does a much better job of selling one church versus the competition to existing customers (read: Christians)....  Usually it&#8217;s the 100-year-old church down the street that just plods along doing what it can to serve the Kingdom.

...<div class="image-right"></divThen I see the most recent business marketing trend to hit The Church codified in a new book (pictured) and something begins to make more sense to me.  The latest buzz, the multi-site church, is being advocated with a fairly consistent definition of what &#8220;church&#8221; is&#8212;a definition that needs to change.  You pick up on it in the marketing language of this book: on the book jacket, the blurbs and in the reviews on Amazon.

...Do we really need a single congregation to divide up geographically when parishes and communities of various denominations already have done so?...  But does everyone need to &#8220;go&#8221; to your church in order for you to have advanced the Kingdom?  Or look at how the language describes the multi-venue church as a better way to &#8220;ensure a successful DNA transfer&#8221; than traditional church planting....  The DNA metaphor is used in this case to mean that an additional multi-site venue approach better ensures that one church&#8217;s personality and characteristics will be replicated....  But with regard to that I simply ask, is this what the Kingdom looks like: a Starbucks on every corner?

...So my critique is more directed toward the marketing of the book, than the actual content, although the primary content and viewpoint of the work is pretty clear.  If I&#8217;m taking this all the wrong way or pushing my emergent agenda a little too far, then let this reinforce the point that the language being used describe the multi-venue movement is very telling....  And this isolation is a bad thing&#8212;something we should be tearing down rather than finding innovative new ways to reinforce.

This siloed view of The Church leads to larger, more powerful multi-site congregations operating more independent of others rather than more interdependently as the body of Christ.

...I&#8217;d be much more willing to consider what proponents of this movement (&#8220;revolution&#8221; is too generous a way to describe it) have to share if their marketing language more often referred to The Church as a unified whole (all of us), rather than positioned it as varied and competing locations (or even franchises)....  But we need to consider these new options and the advocacy of them looking through the lens of the &#8220;universal&#8221; Church (a nod to the Catholic tradition) and in coordination with the outposts of the Kingdom that already exist.

...I am heartened that a few of the large churches in my neck of the woods are not buying into multi-site trend and have, instead, moved to creating deeper relationships and partnerships with other smaller churches and ministries across the city.  Here you have interaction across denominations, congregations, races and cultures that unites the diversity of The Church and ignites a passion to advance the Kingdom.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Busted&#x21;</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2006-08-02T21:24:01-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-695</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-695</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Looks like Derek and Becky have been outed attending a "liberal" church.  Cool!

This is a screen grab from the video on the New York Times web site, "Politics and the Pulpit," that featured our church and pastor Greg Boyd.  As I was watching I caught a glimpse of someone familiar and had to rewind and look again.  Sure enough, there was Derek and a partially obstructed view of Becky.  So, I guess this means about a million people have seen him in the past couple of days.  See my July 30 post for background on this whole deal.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Dot Mac scoring a dot bomb</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-08-02T20:59:31-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-694</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-694</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been a .Mac user for three years or so, using it for web hosting (this Blog), Email, iDisk file sharing and several other useful features.  I&#8217;ve noticed on occasion that there are minor network outages that affect Email, iDisk or web sites, etc. On the wild Web, this is par for the course.

<div class="image-right"></divRecently, however, Apple has been under fire (see article) for a rash of major .Mac outages and a poor response to its customers.  I haven&#8217;t personally been affected much since I&#8217;ve not being using .Mac too heavily (although I did have some issues posting to my blog on Sunday).  Being a paid customer I totally sympathize with others that have been frustrated by this.  I hope Apple gets on the stick and makes it right with them.  I love .Mac, but agree that it is overpriced.  The more you can get out of it, the better value it becomes.  Something like this makes the price completely unreasonable.

My take on this problem has a silver lining.  I think Apple&#8217;s new iWeb application is getting some serious use by more and more users, which is taxing the .Mac infrastructure more than ever before.  iWeb has a pretty memory intensive (inefficient) but beautiful web page creation and file structure framework.  So, in the case of this outage, my guess is that popularity coupled with the awkward code of iWeb has been .Mac&#8217;s main issue.  That&#8217;s just conjecture, but It seems plausible.  Also, it looks as if they are adding more features and a blog for members, which is good.

Nonetheless, Apple should fix this&#8212;and fast.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Free lunch&#x2c; for a limited time only</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-08-01T20:58:47-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-693</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-693</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I recently saw Rupert Murdoch on Charlie Rose discussing the News Corp.  purchase of MySpace last year.  The discussion with this venerable tycoon of media was fascinating, to say the least.  One thing that struck me, however, was how much of a risk this $580 million purchase really is (although a far cheaper price than it would likely fetch today).  Murdoch stated that now he had to find a way to &#8220;monetize&#8221; MySpace&#8212;make the endeavor profitable.  For all the fun and games people are having with social networking technologies, aside from pure ad plays, not many people know how or if it will make money.  <div class="image-right"></divA quote from Robert X Cringley&#8217;s latest column about YouTube illustrates just how much uncertainty even the creators of these wildly popular technologies have about profitability:

&#8220;I met this week with managers for a VERY large Internet property&#8212;one that offers variations on all the current social networking fads like MySpace, FaceBook, and video sharing like YouTube.  Why did they think people submitted this material that could often be viewed as personally embarrassing or exposing inner thoughts to any wacko with a DSL line?  They hadn't a clue.  A table full of ultra-smart executives in their early thirties had no idea whatsoever why anyone would be so reckless as to use their service.  They were simply too old to make sense of it and knew that.  But whether they understand their members' motivation or not, they'll gladly take the tens of millions of advertising dollars such a phenomenon represents.&#8221;

The column also mentions the wild success of YouTube&#8212;which up to now has resulted in no profits (like MySpace).  Advertising is a great way to generate revenue, don&#8217;t get me wrong.  But I&#8217;m starting to believe that one of the primary attractants to sites like YouTube and MySpace&#8212;all user-generated content sites&#8212;is the free lunch.  Once you add more pervasive advertising and look for additional features to &#8220;monetize,&#8221; you begin to degrade this appeal.  The next logical step is to charge for membership and features.

No matter how cool a technology is, the free lunch can only last as long as the venture capital that created it.  Once you go IPO, the shareholders want to get paid.  In other words, get it while you can.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A new liturgy of repentance&#x2c; baptism</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-08-01T20:57:23-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-692</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-13.html#unique-entry-id-692</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve missed attending services at Woodland Hills for the past four weeks now&#8212;chalk it up to travel and family matters.  It&#8217;s been delightful to catch up via podcast.  I listened to the 7/16 message last week, which ended with the recitation of a home grown liturgy on baptism.  Being new to liturgy, I&#8217;m not sure what those with liturgical backgrounds would make of this.  Upon hearing it recited I felt compelled to key it in and share it more widely via blog.  The declarations really relate to the topic of my most recent post on The Lost Art of Evangelism (Episode 8)&#8212;so this had special relevance to me.

Renouncing Satan, His Works and His Pomp By the grace of God and the empowering of the Holy Spirit, we who are called to be part of the Kingdom Revolution pledge our lives wholly to our Lord Jesus Christ We renounce Satan, all his works and all his pomp.  We pledge to acquire all our life, worth, and security from Jesus Christ alone.  We renounce all idolatrous ways of getting life, worth and security.  We pledge to living in Christ-like love for all people, at all times, in all circumstances, including those who might regard themselves as our &#8220;enemies.&#8221;  We renounce all tribalism, all racism, all sectarianism, all hatred and all violence.  We pledge to living as a bridge between people and God and between people with one another.  We renounce the sinful walls that separate people from God and divide people along ethnic, national, political, generational and economic lines.  By the grace of God and the empowering of the Holy Spirit, we pledge our lives wholly to Jesus Christ, We renounce Satan, all his works and all his pomp.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>It&#x27;s about time</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-07-30T14:53:21-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-690</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-690</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></div

The New York Times ran a front page feature in today's paper about politics and evangelicalism that focused primarily on Woodland Hills, Greg Boyd and his Cross and the Sword sermon series that became the book, The Myth of a Christian Nation.  You can read it in its NYT site context here.  There is also a video piece that looks very good--let me know if anyone can get the audio to work (we had issues getting the sound to work).

<div class="image-right"></divWe were in attendance a couple of months ago when the Times photographers were in our service getting some pics for this piece.  Needless to say, today's article and chain reaction media exposure is bound to get Boyd and the church much more attention from all over the country.  While our congregation has, in many ways, gone through the challenging times with this back in 2004 and moved on, I think the pressure from the outside will likely grow as we progress through the 2006 and 2008 elections.

By this a.m. Boyd said he was getting an Email about every 60 seconds about the article.  I wish he had his own blog so he could share some of this.  I'm also imbedding a link to a PDF version to be accessible once the web page is archived by the Times.  You can get it here.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Way too Zune to say</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-07-26T17:40:26-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-689</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-689</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[There's a lot of posting out there in the pro-Apple blogosphere about Microsoft's upcoming Zune device.  It&#8217;s rumored to have a WiFi capability&#8212;something I've been looking for in the iPod.  This fall will bring the first salvos in a new battle in the digital media marketing war: A new iPod (with unknown new features and design) vs. the Zune from MS.

<div class="image-right"></divMost Mac/Apple enthusiasts are pretty smug about this, painting the Zune as a sure loser before it gets out of the starting blocks.  I&#8217;m not going to let myself be so dismissive.  If the feature set works and hits the market right, all bets are off.

I&#8217;m becoming more convinced that a portable device like an iPod with WiFi and social interactivity could lead to unintended technological disruption (and that&#8217;s a good thing).  Think about how podcasting came into being.  Here the marriage of iPod mobility and Web RSS gave birth to a disruptive new feature turning the iPod into a time-shifted media distribution channel.  Someone somewhere said, &#8220;hey, what if we did this with it?&#8221;  And podcasting was born.  RSS pushed podcasting and v-logging into the mobile space opening a whole new avenue of content.  This fundamentally changed iPod/iTunes, the Web and the digital audio market.

So what&#8217;s the next disruptive technology?  I don&#8217;t assume MS even knows, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that someone somewhere couldn&#8217;t accidentally stumble into it while messing around with some clever Zune hack.  The next question becomes could MS co-opt it as effectively as Apple.

A WiFi connected mobile video and audio device holds the potential to lead to an unintentional technological advance.  My hunch is that it would be social in nature (think mobile myspace social networking features).

Now, Apple could beat MS to the street with the new iPods this Fall.  (A new full screen WiFi iPod with integrated iSight, iChat, and eBook features please?)  But will they?  Wait and see.  In the mean time, let&#8217;s not assume MS couldn&#8217;t stumble onto the next big thing, as hard as that may be to believe.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Bareback rider</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><dc:subject>Main &#x7c; Current Posts</dc:subject><dc:date>2006-07-24T21:17:46-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-688</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-688</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Every once and a while you run into an old photograph that just leaves you in awe.

This is Dawnshelle's uncle Doug as a teen atop a pony.  It's clear by the pained equine expression that the poor animal is no match for the stature of the rider.  Still, there's just something amazing about this image.  You really can't stage something this authentic.  The peg leg pants.  The socks.  The penny loafers.  The lack of a saddle.  I think his feet are only inches from the ground.  Quintessential Suburban Cowboy.

Someday soon I will learn the true story of this photograph.  And I will publish it here for all to read.  Consider this a teaser.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rediscovering the lost art of evangelism episode 8</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-07-23T14:39:56-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-687</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-687</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[With so many characters&#8212;most if not all exhibiting some form of prejudice, stereotyping or racism&#8212;it was too easy to find something of myself on the screen.

...Col 3:11 TNIV &#8220;Here there is no Gentile or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all.&#8221;

Gal 3:28 TNIV &#8220;There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.&#8221;

...While there are those extreme examples in the film (the kind that make you say, &#8220;I could never do or say that&#8212;that&#8217;s terrible!&#8221;), it&#8217;s the subtle behaviors that are the most disturbing&#8212;the well-hidden, barely noticed, but subversive feelings of insecurity and fear that tend to push us to our worst moments.

...This kind of fear is behind my own thoughts and words when I descend to anything less than love for my fellow humans.

...But now you must also rid yourselves of all such things as these: anger, rage, malice, slander, and filthy language from your lips.&#8221;

(Sidebar: Often Christians have defined &#8220;filthy language&#8221; in this passage as expletives, etc. I think this should be applied more broadly.  &#8220;Filth,&#8221; as I choose to define it, must be any words or thoughts that degrade and devalue our fellow humans, even if we do it with G-rated or even biblical language.

...Romans 8:12-16 TNIV &#8220;If you live according to the sinful nature, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live.  For those who are led by the Spirit of God are the children of God.  The Spirit you received does not make you slaves, so that you live in fear again; rather, the Spirit you received brought about your adoption to sonship....  There is that wonderful idea that we are God&#8217;s children&#8212;His offspring, each one with the complete and total worth He ascribes to us.

This terrified old man of sin inside of me&#8212;the one that resists leaving my secure suburban bubble, avoids certain parts of the city, resists interacting with other races and mutters shameful stereotypes in my mind&#8212;must be daily put to death.

I&#8217;ve posted about fear and evangelism before in this series (episode 5), but I think it is very central to the question of racial reconciliation on an individual level.

...As difficult as it may be to believe at times, this societal fear we are immersed in is connected to the sin that enslaves all of humanity.

...This is how love is made complete among us so that we will have confidence on the day of judgment: In this world we are like Jesus.

...How do I live in love and drive out fear every moment of every day?

I need to step out and go to where I can break through this enemy stronghold and tear down the prison walls....  I need to put myself in a position to act in love and for love&#8217;s cause.

...Often people undergoing psychotherapy to cure a phobia work towards a point where they confront and experience the thing that they are most afraid of: flying in a plane, riding in an elevator, listening to David Hasselhoff music&#8212;whatever it may be.

...I can act in love with great confidence knowing that I participate in dealing the death blow to the real enemy in the spiritual war to overcome the divisive evil that enslaves humanity.

...James 2:1-10 TNIV "My brothers and sisters, believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ must not show favoritism.  Suppose someone comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor person in filthy old clothes also comes in. If you show special attention to the one wearing fine clothes and say, &#8220;Here&#8217;s a good seat for you,&#8221; but say to the one who is poor, &#8220;You stand there&#8221; or &#8220;Sit on the floor by my feet,&#8221; have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?

Listen, my dear brothers and sisters: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him?

...But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Freedom isn&#x27;t free (but it can be tacky)</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-07-18T20:08:34-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-686</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-686</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[A few short months ago I posted a plug for a great new book by Greg Boyd&#8212;The Myth of a Christian Nation.  The book cover depicts a redone photo of the statue of liberty holding a cross instead of a torch.  Lest anyone think that such a depiction is merely an isolated visual commentary, one congregation has gone and actually spent a quarter of a million dollars to revise Lady Liberty in just such a fashion: Our Lord&#8217;s Lady Liberty&#8211;The Statue of Liberation Through Christ.  I don&#8217;t think they would be fans of Boyd&#8217;s work.

They have an elaborate web site with Q&A document to help justify their artistic and evangelistic endeavor.  Of course, one could argue with many of their points.  However, I was disappointed by not being able to find this question or a response: Don&#8217;t you think something this completely cheesy devalues both American patriotism and your gospel message?  Well, we live in the land of the free, indeed&#8212;but that doesn&#8217;t guarantee us freedom from tacky (and wasteful) Christian artifacts.

Thanks to Zach Lind http://www.findingrhythm.com/blog/ for blogging this item.  I like your blog a lot.  Lind is the Drummer for Jimmy Eat World.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Van Halen was right</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-07-18T19:47:16-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-685</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-685</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divMight as well jump.  That&#8217;s what one scientific hypothesis suggests.  German scientists contend that the combined force of 600 million human beings jumping simultaneously could help change the earth&#8217;s orbital rotation resulting in the reduction of global warming&#8212;in effect, resetting the global climate.  Get the overview here.

Sure, this might be complete hooey.  But what if it isn&#8217;t?  Are we missing out on a sure-fire quick fix to global climate change?  Is jumping just a convenient solution to an &#8220;Inconvenient Truth?&#8221;

Or what if the scientists get their calculations wrong?  What if all that jumping actually creates a cataclysmic seismic shift like the one that doomed the dinosaurs ages ago?  I once heard about a synchronized toilet flush prank at a college dorm that resulted in the destruction of the building&#8217;s entire plumbing infrastructure.  Or, what if the jumping is horribly misaligned because nobody thinks to synchronize their watches.  Can we take that kind of risk?

<div class="image-left"></divPerhaps we should just sit down.

But what if it&#8217;s too late and too many people have bought into this scheme.  Does the effect of 600 million people jumping at once in the western hemisphere need to be cancelled out to avoid the destruction of life as we know it?  This means we&#8217;ll need to recruit a like number of people in the eastern hemisphere to jump at the same moment (11:39:13 GMT on July 20, 2006).  Can we mobilize the citizens of China, India and other nations quickly enough?  The Great Jump is scheduled for this Thursday.  It all seems hopeless now.

Planet earth is hanging in the balance.  Email your congressperson and stock up on water and canned food.  Dust off that portable generator.  This may be bigger than Y2K.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Blurbs don&#x27;t make the man</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Books</category><dc:date>2006-07-17T19:34:39-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-684</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-684</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></divI recently enjoyed Brian McLaren&#8217;s The Secret Message of Jesus, part of my summer reading list.  One thing I noticed was the long list of blurbs that were included (perhaps by the publisher and not the author).  The litany of laudatory reader quotes started on the dust jacket and continued on into the first four pages of the book.  It was a who&#8217;s who of authors, academics and artists, from Anne Rice, to Donald Miller, to Frederick Buechner.  All this was very interesting and impressive&#8211;all well deserved (heck, I'd write one myself).  But I came away feeling a little bit like this book must be what all the cool people are reading right now.  (At least there was no sign of Bono.)  There has been a pretty heavy Christian marketing assault going on for this book since it was released (which is great for McLaren and the whole topic of the Kingdom), but the excessive blurbing just seemed to take it to an extreme.  Did I pay to read the book, or famous people talking about the book?

This is a trifling point, but here&#8217;s an insight I picked up from Guy Kawasaki in his recent post about another book: &#8220;As a rule of thumb, the more blurbs you see on a book, the lower the quality of the book.&#8221;  Ouch.  That&#8217;s a bit harsh, but maybe something McLaren should consider talking to his publisher and publicist about next time out.  I happen to think his name alone has enough clout to sell quite a few books these days.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>You can run&#x2c; but you can&#x27;t hide</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-07-17T19:28:44-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-683</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-683</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[A few years ago an organization ran a billboard ad campaign that featured simple messages from God.  The stark white text on black signs were often clever attention getters amid the drive time tangle so many people endure.  Later, individual church signs would often copy or adopt these messages for their marquees&#8212;adding to the repertoire of church sign gospel that informs or pollutes towns large and small (depending on your point of view and/or the quality of the messages).  In any case, the God Speaks billboards now add to an already fascinating history of church signs dating as far back as the lighted marquee itself.

<div class="image-right"></divWell, sometimes (very, very rarely) you see a new one that makes you think and laugh your butt off at the same time.  Steve Knight calls attention to this particular gem from the local CSF at the University of MN.  It&#8217;s obvious someone there knows a thing or two about church sign folklore.  I don&#8217;t think anyone can argue with the message or its implications.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Church rotates on its axis</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-07-15T10:01:15-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-682</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-682</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></divIt&#8217;s been all over the emergent blogosphere since last week&#8212;Willow Creek shuts down it&#8217;s AXIS worship service (its well known and much lauded Gen-X, then also Y, service begun in the 90s).  After taking some time to discuss this with my friend, who found himself inside and then outside leading a similar effort at another megachurch, I went back to reread Dan Kimball&#8217;s post about it from last week when the news broke.  Inside of this very insightful post was some brilliant wisdom that I think extends beyond just generationally focused worship services to an even wider megachurch trend of creating culturally relevant worship venues.  Here&#8217;s the excerpt that makes the critical point not to be lost in all the hullabaloo over returning to more &#8220;intergenerational&#8221; worship:

"When launching a new worship gathering in an existing church, the question is - are the changes occurring out there, mainly generational (music style, appearance, language) which changes every generation?  Or are the changes bigger than that in worldview(s) and more about how people learn, specific values people have, how people think of God and the spiritual world etc.?

If it is just a generational change, then might as well just change the music, add some candles and create hip environment and play a video of the senior pastor.  [Sound familiar?]  That&#8217;s doing some outer dressing work&#8212;and I think that if we really peeled back the layers of the majority of these alternative services in existing churches&#8212;that is what you would find.

However, if the changes in culture are bigger than that&#8230;then it is absurd to think that creating a different aesthetic environment and changing the music is really being missional.  If we are specifically looking at a mission to our culture, then it means looking at community different, spiritual formation, evangelism, membership, leadership, communication etc.&#8212;the whole culture of a church will change.  Not just what happens in a worship gathering."]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>It&#x27;s only Fair</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2006-07-15T10:00:33-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-681</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-681</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divAaron Sprinkle&#8217;s new creative outlet, Fair, has me completely hooked with the debut release, The Best Worst-Case Scenario.  Sprinkle has been heavy into producing some major acts in the past several years, making this new project all the more interesting.  It was downloaded on a whim just a couple weeks ago after seeing a brief review and reading the raving user reviews in iTunes.  It will not disappoint.

Highlights: The sunny chorus of Confidently Dreaming and the sisters from Eisley doing lush backing vocals on Unglued.  (Sprinkle&#8217;s voice blends with theirs like he&#8217;s another sibling).  But what I discovered most is Sprinkle&#8217;s fantastic voice and gift for songwriting.

The only trouble is, I can&#8217;t quit listening to it long enough to move on to my other new albums.  Rest assured, Fair is a good habit.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Why I shouldn&#x27;t even be doing this</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-07-14T09:57:20-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-680</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-680</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></divIn some ways, blogging is nuts.  I know I must have some core need to digitally carve my initials onto cyberspace, but I do enjoy the writing outlet.  July marks an entire year of TSAWWT&#8212;and I think this will be the year I get a little more serious and organized about it.  But lest I get too high and mighty, here is a brief article that I think offers some important truths for any individual or organization that is considering starting a blog: Top 10 Reasons Your Company Shouldn&#8217;t Blog, by B.L.  Ochman.  Just for perspective, my struggle is with numbers 6, 7 and 8.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The seduction of meaningless information</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-07-14T09:55:39-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-679</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-679</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a great quote I ran across about using research studies to gain publicity or notoriety.  This phrase may not be original to her or new to you, but I&#8217;ve never heard it before&#8212;and I like it:

<div class="image-right"></div&#8220;Sometimes people throw stuff at the wall, draw a circle around it and say they hit the target.&#8221;  Posted by Marilyn Scott-Waters, July 9, 2006 on Guy Kawasaki&#8217;s blog.

Simple and unmistakably true.

In other words, if you have no real hypothesis you are testing in your research, then whatever your results are, you will have proved your thesis.

&#8220;Our study found that 42.35 percent of statistics are meaningless.  In fact, meaningless statistics are up 6.5 percent from last year.&#8221;

It&#8217;s the kind of thing that leaves people thinking, &#8220;Hmm.  That&#8217;s interesting.  But what does it mean?&#8221;  Let&#8217;s cut to the chase.  It don&#8217;t mean a thing.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Trolling for WiFi and a good piece of strawberry pie</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-07-11T19:46:58-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-678</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-678</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[As our tech lives continue to evolve, it occurred to me this year that Web access at Cornerstone (or during Cornerstone) was becoming harder to live without.  My fellow camper, Doug Glynn, had the good sense to bring his wireless laptop with, which we both made good use of.  I think I would have blogged a bit had I been able to use my own machine and software setup (the downside of software-based blogging).

<div class="image-right"></divSo here&#8217;s some huge props to the First Baptist Church in Bushnell, IL for providing free (if sometimes unreliable) WiFi internet access in their church parking lot about three miles from the fest.  Their pie and homemade ice cream social turned into a makeshift internet caf&#233; last week.  Too cool.  God bless you kind folks.

As for the phantom WiFi at the campsite, &#8216;tis a mystery we will have to explore further next year.  We spent some time driving around the Cornerstone grounds trying to pin down where the signal was emanating from, but to no avail.  We&#8217;ll go after it again next year.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>New math and the art of making noise</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2006-07-11T19:35:33-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-677</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-677</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Photo by Brian Behm

Hands down, the best performance of Cornerstone 2006 was MuteMath.  With a new full length album added to their lexicon, these guys are truly music and noise artists.  While influences abound, I don&#8217;t think anyone can say these guys are anything but original and visionary.  Pray that they settle their label dispute soon in order to get their music to a wider audience.  I finally was able to pick up their disc on site (for a paltry $10 bucks).  You can only get it here otherwise.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Dust&#x2c; tents and sanctified rock-n-roll</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2006-07-10T19:12:16-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-676</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-676</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divOf all the music festivals over the summer, Cornerstone (Bushnell, IL) has to be the harshest environment for music and camping known to mankind.  And yet, I cannot resist its underground charm, 300-plus bands and Jesus hippie roots.  Here is an inside look at the love-hate relationship many of us have with certain aspects of Cornerstone:

I hate the porta-johns, but love how the bands wallpaper them inside and out with posters (mostly homemade) promoting their shows at the fest.

I hate crap bands, but love the 10-plus generator stages that spring up for the festival (a rock show around every corner).  You gotta love 200 people crowded around a 4-piece playing their hearts out from a mound of dirt, drums and amps.

<div class="image-left"></divI hate screamo pounding through the forest at 2 a.m. I love 2 solid hours of Over The Rhine on a cool midsummer night.

I hate most of the on-site food (strawberry-lemon shake-ups being the exception), but love sampling breakfast fare from local greasy spoons in Bushnell and Macomb.

I hate the dusty, unpaved roads of Cornerstone farm, but love the wry dust graffiti that soon appears on all the cars.

<div class="image-right"></divI hate camping, but love sharing campsite BBQ dinners with The Violet Burning.

I hate when it rains and becomes one big mud puddle, but love how fresh rain gets all that dust out of the air.

I hate being a culture nerd, but love that I can spend some time indulging my inner-geek in relative obscurity at the Imaginarium.

I hate all the idiots driving the golf carts, but secretly love the idea of renting one for the duration.

I hate the corporate Christian marketing machine that seems to have a bigger and bigger presence in the merch tents every year, but love the creative ways little bands adorn their merch tables (and I love the free stickers).

<div class="image-left"></divI hate the sometimes immodest clothing (or lack thereof) some folks wear, but I love spotting Batman and Spiderman in full-on spandex costumes.  Wow.

I hate being out of cell range and unconnected to my computer, but love how we picked up a phantom WiFi signal somewhere at the campground for 2 days.

I hate art house movies, but love how Flickerings opens my mind a bit more each year.

<div class="image-right"></divI hate the blues, but love Glen Kaiser sightings (or sighting any ex-Rez band member).

I hate the Cornerstone showers.

I love the friends that make it all bearable.  Truly my brothers from other mothers.

[For a most complete wrap up of the fest, check out the live coverage blog and links to the videos above.]]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Amanda boom or bust</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-07-07T18:38:42-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-675</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-12.html#unique-entry-id-675</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divIf you&#8217;ve ever visited Rocketboom, you are familiar with its famous face, Amanda Congdon.  Sadly, Congdon has split from the videoblog after a disagreement with partner, Andrew Baron.  You can read about it here.

I&#8217;m not a Rocketboom addict (probably due to my slow DSL connection at home), but I will miss Congdon&#8217;s dry, yet cheery delivery of web 2.0 news and assorted tech strangeness.  I don&#8217;t know if Rocketboom could ever be the same.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Careful little mouths what you say </title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-06-28T21:09:03-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-674</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-674</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I grabbed a news clipping from Monday&#8217;s Chicago Tribune and was interested to read that the United Pentecostal Church in Harvey, IL is paying people $25 to attend their church services&#8212;a novel new evangelism approach.

...I&#8217;m not going to jump all over it with an opinion on the merits of this idea....  I believe I may have half-heartedly suggested this idea a few years back to my own congregation at the time.  But there are two specific statements made by Christians in the article that I do wish to comment about because I think there is something to be learned for pastors and lay ministers alike:

In the article a pastor commented on the evangelism campaign saying, &#8220;It doesn't matter how we get them in the door as long as we get them here.&#8221;  Later in the piece, another church member is quoted saying, &#8220;We&#8217;re told to spread the gospel by any means.&#8221;

<div class="image-right"></divNow, I believe that both of these folks have the best intentions at heart in spreading the Gospel.  But this illustrates with painful clarity the need to be aware of what we are saying to the world when we describe something like evangelism to a reporter.

...But with media relations, it&#8217;s what you do say that can cook your goose in the end.

I think most Christians, upon reflecting, would agree that those two statements are hyperbolic and not theologically true.  The problem is, that&#8217;s not how an outsider would necessarily understand them.

There are certain things we definitely would not do to &#8220;get people in the door&#8221; or spread the Gospel.

...This reminds me of one story from the 80s TV show &#8220;Real People&#8221; that featured a stripper for Jesus&#8212;a women who felt her professional skills could help bring people (men) to God.  I remember watching this family program when I was a kid and exchanging some very confused looks with my brother (we were preacher&#8217;s kids and had some understanding of conventional evangelism).

...In the case of paying people to attend church, I&#8217;m sure the fellow Christians I mentioned were simply overstating their justification.  But the problem with hyperbole in today&#8217;s literal media culture is that our words can be used to seemingly demolish all kinds of ethical boundaries.  A reporter or reader may not understand the comments within the same sub cultural context&#8212;and won&#8217;t necessarily assume the same or any level of exaggeration was used to convey the ideas.

...Matthew 5:33-37 TNIV &#8220;Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, &#8216;Do not break your oath, but fulfill to the Lord the vows you have made.&#8217;  But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all: either by heaven, for it is God&#8217;s throne; or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King.  And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black.  All you need to say is simply &#8216;Yes,&#8217; or &#8216;No;&#8217; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.&#8221;

...What I&#8217;m suggesting is that in the context of talking to news media, an awareness of how our words will be heard and/or read in their context is as critical as what we are saying.  Straightforward, direct messages, as suggested in Matthew 5:37, are most often the best route to gaining a proper understanding from your audience.

How often have we commented that someone was misquoted or had their words taken out of context in a news article?  I&#8217;m not promising that this can be avoided entirely, but I do suggest that we are better served using simple and face-value messages with the news media.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Job opening at Microsoft</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-06-27T21:06:23-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-673</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-673</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></divWith Bill gates moving to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation full time by 2008, there will soon be a job opening at Microsoft for a Chief Software Architect.  If you are interested in the position, make sure to watch the MS job site and get your resume sent in quick.  You&#8217;ll have to beat out public radio commentator, Rico Gagliano, who already has a resume and a cover letter on its way.  Here&#8217;s one excerpt to give you an idea of what you&#8217;re up against:

&#8220;Though I have never been the head of Microsoft before, I believe I am an outstanding candidate.  For instance, unlike most people in the world, I was able to permanently rid my Windows desktop of that stupid cartoon paperclip.&#8221;

Click here to read his entire cover letter.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Cash of the Titans</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-06-27T21:03:14-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-672</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-672</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Sunday the second richest man in the world (Warren Buffet) put his charitable funds in the hands of the number one richest man (Bill Gates), thereby endowing the world&#8217;s most formidable private charity with twice as much annual outflow.  This will mean in excess of $3 billion each year toward the chief causes targeted by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

<div class="image-right"></divI was able to catch the three of them (Bill, Melinda and Warren) on Charlie Rose Monday night having a fascinating conversation on how this historic arrangement came about.  Warren is famously pragmatic, and I am very glad he has chosen to do this at this stage&#8212;setting up the future value of his gift to be far greater than today.  I also was very impressed by Melinda Gates, whom I&#8217;ve never heard speak before.  She and Bill will be working tirelessly on the issues of global health, poverty and education for years to come.  Warren will skip back home to Omaha to do what he does best&#8212;keep growing Berkshire Hathaway and make sure the money keeps flowing.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rediscovering the lost art of evangelism episode 7</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-06-24T09:38:53-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-671</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-671</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[For example, the safe first step to recruit an evangelist for the environment is not requiring that she chain herself to a tree; it&#8217;s to ask her to start recycling and taking shorter showers."

...For a long time now many evangelicals have embraced this concept of providing &#8220;a safe first step&#8221; by redesigning the Sunday worship service experience.

...We&#8217;ve invested loads of money in buildings, lighting, comfy seats, multimedia, cup holders, etc. We&#8217;ve redesigned the weekly service to be experientially satisfying for modern consumers, including current and individualistic pop worship music, dynamic video production, drama and comedy, and a life-practical sermon (often in a culturally relevant serial format) all presented within a carefully timed, one-hour package.

...He often challenged the status quo in society, and his closest allies, the 12 disciples, must have certainly felt nervous about their own safety from time to time.

...So instead of defining a relationship with Jesus in terms of risk, think in terms of what a safe first step towards His Kingdom would be.

...He would demonstrate the open border of the kingdom of God by hosting or participating in parties where even the most notorious outcasts and sinners were welcome.&#8221;

Jesus&#8217; first act of ministry (and sign of the kingdom) was making sure a wedding host didn&#8217;t make a major social mistake by running out of wine at his own wedding party....  (John 2:4 TNIV) A quiet act of kindness and grace: Jesus&#8217; generous and kind spirit was the embodiment of His Kingdom message.

...Rather than set up a central venue or regular event (even though people gathered to listen to him teach in droves) in Jerusalem, he was perpetually on tour.

...I honestly believe these instructions were intended to help the Disciples learn how to conduct themselves in relating to people as much as they were to facilitate the logistics of their mission work.

...McLaren continues, &#8220;By accepting and welcoming people into his presence, just as they were, with all their problems and imperfections, Jesus was exposing them to His example and to His secret message.  In this way He could challenge them to think&#8212;and think again&#8212;and consider becoming part of the kingdom of God so they could experience and participate in the transformation that flows from being in interactive relationship with God and others.&#8221;

So what is the safe first step that The Church can provide for people in today&#8217;s world....  It is possible to over invest in something&#8212;and I think we may have over invested our Kingdom resources in this single form for the past two decades (and likely longer)....  Instead, we need to take a step toward those on the borders of the kingdom (to steal another metaphor from McLaren).

What if all the money (read: tithes) spent on venues, sound systems, talent and media was funneled back through the congregation and spent on throwing extravagant and generous parties for our neighbors....  What if 80 percent of the church budget was directly spent on connecting individuals with the safest first step of all: transformative friendships?

...I served briefly on a mega-aspiring church&#8217;s marketing committee just a couple years ago. The ad hoc group was tasked with developing marketing messages and tactics to promote the weekly services or sermon series.  While this can be a fun exercise for a PR and marketing professional, I began confusing people when I suggested that we take the church outreach (read: marketing) budget and look for ways to rain love and generosity on people in the community.  Instead of a 4-color postcard mailer for the DaVinci Code sermon series, let&#8217;s develop local teams within our congregations that can create and give gift baskets to their immediate neighbors (with yummy home-baked goodies, free transit passes, or a new tree or plant, etc.).

...They have since sent out two DVDs in mass mailings featuring their new worship center and worship team music at a cost I can only imagine.

My questions are these: Are we more interested in growing weekly church services or expanding the borders of the kingdom?  Have we capitulated Christ&#8217;s calling to pursue transformative relationships (safer for the seeker) in favor of leveraging our event-based marketing strategies (safer for us)?

...Jesus is calling us out of the safety of our buildings and on to the borders of the Kingdom to extend welcome to the world-weary immigrants who seek safe passage.  If we want to provide a safe first step, we need to step out and get our sandals good and worn out.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Cool is the enemy</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Culture</category><dc:date>2006-06-23T21:36:50-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-670</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-670</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divAnd since we're on the subject of Bono....  This is borderline BF, I realize (see my post from late May), but I need to let you know that I&#8217;m currently wrapped up in reading Bono: In Conversation with Michka Assayas.  It&#8217;s hard not to be idolatrous with this guy, but I&#8217;m gonna do my best to keep from going off the reservation.  Ironically I came out of the Zooropa and Pop album years really disliking Bono.  I found his public and performance persona and immersion into dance/pop music at the time annoying and shallow.  In retrospect I think it was my own sense of art that was a bit shallow.

But the Bono of reality is altogether different, and today, so am I.  Delving into these many conversations is proving to be a provocative, fascinating and inspiring read.  I&#8217;m also beginning to understand the ZooTV and PopMart theatrics much more by hearing him tell of the earliest days of the band.

So many insights are crammed into a thoroughly readable ongoing conversation.  One little excerpt I found particularly interesting was a comment about joining a band to be cool, versus being willing to be very uncool in order to connect with and express something far deeper.  I have to admit to spending my rock band years caught some place in between:

&#8220;The gauche nature of awe, of worship, the wonderment at the world around you.  Coolness might help you in negotiation with people through the world, maybe, but it is impossible to meet God with sunglasses on. It is impossible to meet God without abandon, without exposing yourself, being raw.  That&#8217;s the connection with great music and great art, and that is why it&#8217;s uncomfortable, that is why cool is the enemy of it&#8230;.&#8221;

Church worship musicians everywhere need to get this.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The road ahead less traveled</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-06-23T21:21:05-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-669</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-669</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t posted on tech for a while, but two pieces of news make it high time I did.

The first, Bill Gates has announced he is stepping down at Microsoft.  While I don&#8217;t want to minimize the stated reasons for his departure (focusing on his charity foundation full time), you can&#8217;t deny that this is the end of the road for him as a tech mogul (or the end of The Road Ahead, as it were).  Windows Vista in beta form is getting poor reviews, and the lateness of the release continues to astound just about everyone.  I don&#8217;t need to pour salt in the wounds of MS. I think the epic technology and business battle between Gates and Jobs has come to a close.  Tech pundits like Robert X Cringley see a looming exit for Steve Ballmer, as well....  For me, MS is like a presidential administration that you&#8217;ve lost all respect for.  When the next election rolls around and a new regime is voted into power, you feel like democracy can get a fresh start (if your candidate wins, that is).  I think with different leadership I could respect MS again.  It will, once again, be interesting to see where they take the company from here.

<div class="image-right"></divOne thing is for sure, the monopoly that once was (and still is) will never be the same.  And that&#8217;s a good thing.  Plus, you can&#8217;t ask for Gates to do anything better than find great new ways to put his enormous wealth to work for the good of humanity.  Maybe that TIME magazine cover with Bono went to Bill&#8217;s head.  If so, we should thank Bono for nudging yet another person in power down a new road of global impact.  (Really, though, Gates was well on his way without Bono's help.)

...I recently migrated from my PowerBook G4 550 MHz to an iMac G5 2.1 GHz.  Here is something I discovered last night....  For part of my work I have to rasterize 23 megabyte eps images in Photoshop (I know, that&#8217;s just a bunch of mumbo jumbo&#8212;bear with me).  This task typically takes about 15 minutes per file on my old TiBook.  Annoying, but something I learned to live with.  Last night I did the same task (using the same version of Photoshop) on my G5....  As I watched the progress bar progress rapidly across the screen, I became very excited.  The G5 ripped the image in less than 10 seconds.  I ran from my office to tell Dawnshelle (and thank her for letting me get the G5).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The Holy in the common place</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-06-22T22:09:59-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-668</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-668</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></divCousin Joel&#8217;s post (Weeds) connects with a song that I mentioned in a comment over on The Voiz blog by Aaron Flores.  He had posted about &#8220;what it means to be a Christian&#8221; last month which couldn&#8217;t help bring this song to my mind: &#8220;I Just Showed Up for My Own Life&#8221; by Sara Groves and Joel Hanson.  Since I have been remiss in pointing out the specific song for him, I thought I&#8217;d do it here.  (Aaron is a church planter, family guy and prolific vlogger.)

Cousin Joel&#8217;s spiritual revelation brought about by weeds and lawn mowing is a perfect example of finding &#8220;the holy in the common place&#8221; that Sara sings about.  The lyrics follow.  Just Showed Up for My Own Life by Sara Groves and Joel Hanson  Spending my time sleep walking Moving my mouth but not saying a thing Hoping the changes would take by working their way from the outside in I was in love with an idea Preoccupied with how a life should appear Spending my time at the surface repairing the holes in the shiny veneer  There are so many ways to hide There are so many ways not to feel There are so many ways to deny what is real  And I just showed up for my own life And I'm standing here taking it in and it sure looks bright  I'm going to live my life inspired Look for the holy in the common place Open the windows and feel all that's honest and real until I'm truly amazed I'm going to feel all my emotions I'm going to look you in the eyes I'm going to listen and hear until it's finally clear and it changes our lives  There are so many ways to hide There are so many ways not to feel There are so many ways to deny what is real  And I just showed up for my own life And I'm standing here taking it in and it sure looks bright]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Weeds</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-06-17T10:28:21-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-667</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-667</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divMy wife&#8217;s cousin Joel (professional chef and proud father of three in Omaha) recently sent out a writ to his pastor and family that deserves a wider audience (as if this blog would ever be considered a wider audience).  I don&#8217;t think Joel puts his thoughts down like this all that often&#8212;which makes this gem even more significant to share.  Read it here (pdf).

Beyond his very insightful central message about the spiritual weeds that encroach upon our souls, it also serves as a reminder to us all to keep our spiritual eyes and ears open in the midst of every day things such as mowing the lawn.  You never know what life lessons the Master has in store.  Makes me wonder what I missed yesterday when I mowed the lawn with my iPod earbuds jammed in my ears, slowly deafening me.  Why do I sometimes prefer to be numb instead of fully alive?  At least I&#8217;ll get another shot at the divine in a few more days.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Peace and stillness at 1&#x2c;110 miles per minute</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-06-12T19:11:34-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-666</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-666</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve added something to the header of my blog: the number 1,110.  This is quite literally the speed the earth travels (1,110 miles per minute, or 18.5 miles per second) as it orbits the sun.  You could say it is the speed at which we travel.

<div class="image-right"></divI reflect on this now after putting in just under a year writing this blog.  It&#8217;s all gone by so quickly.  While our orbital speed around the sun remains constant (not technically true, but practically speaking), it would seem that the rest of our lives continue to accelerate.  The centrifugal force increases.  We begin to spin out of control, away from the center.

The reality of this was brought home to me last year when I listened to a sermon about the J-curve phenomenon, and reclaiming the centrality of Jesus in everyday life (recorded 3/28/2004).  Some of the research behind the sermon was based on the work of physician and theo-futurist, Richard A Swenson in his book Margin.  It has been around for a few years, but I highly recommend this work.  The statistics alone will freak you out.  In the sermon, entitled &#8220;The Widening Gyre,&#8221; the speaker quotes part of a poem by William Butler Yeats:

The Second Coming Turning and turning in the widening gyre, The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the center cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.  The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity.  Surely some revelation is at hand; Surely the Second Coming is at hand.

I won&#8217;t try to re-preach the sermon here, but I hope this background helps explain something of how I came up with this blog&#8217;s title.  At least, when you see 1,110 you&#8217;ll be reminded of this little object lesson:

You can be traveling at 85 times the speed of sound and yet be still and at peace orbiting the constant, stationary and centered grip of the Master.  Or, you can lose this tethering force, and began accelerating in an ever-widening gyre, faster and farther away from who and what you are in Him.

How fast are you spinning?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>On a nonfiction (fender) bender</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2006-06-11T14:52:40-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-665</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-665</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Summer reading list 2006 Summer is upon us, and it&#8217;s time for my annual list of light summer reading (which is ushered in by my birthday as I generally receive a few books to get me started).  Some are new and some are a little less new:  <div class="image-right"></div &#8226;  The Secret Message of Jesus, by Brian McLaren &#8226;  Bono: In Conversation with Michka Assayas, compiled by Michka Assayas &#8226;  The Hidden Power of Electronic Culture: How Media Shapes Faith, the Gospel, and Church, by Shane Hipps &#8226;  Church Re-Imagined: The Spiritual Formation of People in Communities of Faith, by Doug Pagitt &#8226;  Naked Conversations: How Blogs are Changing the Way Businesses Talk with Customers, by Robert Scoble and Shel Israel &#8226;

The Myth of a Christian Nation, By Greg Boyd Plus, whatever strikes my fancy in the book tent at Cornerstone.

Some pretty light stuff.  When will I ever get back into fiction?  I guess I&#8217;ll leave that to the movie theatre.  &#8220;Cars&#8221; anyone?]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Live action d&#x2019;oh</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-06-09T21:43:20-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-664</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-664</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divI think I&#8217;m late to the party in discovering this, but nonetheless, this must be posted.  If you like funny and fascinating parodies check out this live action version of The Simpson TV show opening sequence.  Simply amazing in its detail.

I&#8217;m getting a feeling that the short-form internet movie is coming into its own as an entertainment genre&#8212;beyond faddish novelty to a normative media.  More and more content is coming out on a regular basis and there is advertising to support the creative work involved.  I&#8217;m always surprised by what viral video I see next.  Two sites of note in this regard: iFilm and Rocketboom.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>I&#x2019;m with stupid</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-06-08T20:33:51-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-663</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-663</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I posted a couple weeks ago about a C.S.  Lewis quote and its applicability to the current mega-church and mega-aspiring church proclivity toward entertainment media in their worship services&#8212;to the point of making the Sunday event their primary evangelism approach.  I riffed on Marchall McLuhan a bit in that piece, and was fascinated to read that my application of his medium and message theories to church practices was not at all unique.  The EmergentYS imprint of Zondervan has recently published a book by Shane Hipps, Lead Pastor of Trinity Mennonite Church in Phoenix, Arizona: The Hidden Power of Electronic Culture: How Media Shapes Faith, the Gospel, and Church.

<div class="image-left"></divHipps knows his subject well, having a former career in advertising and communication planning for high profile brands.  In the book &#8220;Hipps analyzes the broader impact of technology and media on the church,&#8221; according to Amazon.com.

This post is no book review, but don&#8217;t be surprised if insights from this work pop up in some of my posts down the road.  Like my early indications about Hipps, I&#8217;m not opposed to new communication avenues in worship, church community or outreach, but I&#8217;m very serious about analyzing the implications of what we are doing--how it affect our message, our relationship with God, fellow believers and fellow humans.  Context is crucial, which gets at my recent post and quote from Watts Wacker.

One of the most interesting research papers I wrote in college was about religious broadcasting, and the implications of presenting the Gospel message in the TV context.  That was in 1989, fresh from the media madness of the PTL scandal (which was the topic of my High School senior research paper).  Today the context is TV, HD, Film, iPod, MediaShout, PSP, Flash, Blog, V-Cast, MySpace, etc. The question is still relevant, if not more so.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Jinx&#x21; Buy me a Coke</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-06-07T21:23:05-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-662</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-662</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divNow for some truly weird science.  Another viral video you have to see to believe.  Ever wonder what can happen with you drop Mentos candy pieces into a liter of Diet Coke?  Go here to see the amazing result.  Now that&#8217;s what I call the freshmaker.  You&#8217;ll want to think twice about eating Mentos with Coke for a chaser.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Staring into the MirrorMask</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Film</category><dc:date>2006-06-07T21:05:58-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-661</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-11.html#unique-entry-id-661</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></divI was pleasantly surprised by a recent Netflix rental.  MirrorMask, directed by Dave McKean and starring Stephanie Leonidas, was an outstanding blend of storytelling, art and animation.  Written with Neil Gaimen and featuring the art and vision of McKean, MirrorMask is a dream fantasy tale of the highest order, brilliantly acted by Leonidas.  Read the plot summary on the imdb, and go check it out for yourself.  If you&#8217;re a fan of Labyrinth and The Neverending Story, this movie will take you back into those worlds, but in a whole new way.  Highly recommended for large format HD viewing.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Perspectives on authenticity</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-05-31T22:47:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-650</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-650</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I almost feel this post should be incorporated into my Lost Art of Evangelism series because it fits so well.  There are some great evangelistic principles that come from the Public Relations world&#8212;and I don&#8217;t mean new ways to market, create hype or generate publicity.  Rather, if you strip down PR to its most idealistic, essential truths (and get rid of the shrill publicity hounding), it can be about being Christlike with your words in many ways.  The life of Christ&#8212;his service and storytelling&#8212;is, at times, like a master class in PR.

Of course, this is not a perfect simile, but I&#8217;ve gained a lot of insight from thinking about The Church, Christianity and my own career from this perspective.

<div class="image-right"></divI recently ran across an interview about PR with futurist Watts Wacker that resonated with my thoughts related to church congregations, the use of marketing hype and applying descriptors like &#8220;authentic,&#8221; &#8220;relevant,&#8221; &#8220;organic&#8221; etc. to market their worship services to the public.  I&#8217;ve always felt there is a big danger in doing this&#8212;risking credibility, comparison, competition, etc. Wacker identifies this, connecting it with his idea of cultural schizophrenia and how it effects communication and context in today&#8217;s world.

&#8220;Cultural schizophrenia is the gap between the world as it presents itself and the world as you see it.  It has become much more difficult to communicate because the result of this has become an abolition of context, and&#8230;context is in effect an agreed-upon social norm.  But the way you do that is you find these stories that have had traction, and you align yourself with the ones that are in sync with who you are.

What we&#8217;re really striving for, and the way you communicate, is through authenticity.  And authenticity is taking what worked in the past and putting it in the context of today.  It&#8217;s never about saying you&#8217;re authentic.  Your customers get to say you&#8217;re authentic; you never get to say it about yourself.  You only get to strive to be authentic.&#8221;

There it is.  It&#8217;s not about saying you are authentic (or relevant, or emergent, influential, or missional).  It can only be something that you truly are.  And only your public (read: congregants and seekers) can say these things about you.

This is what sets some congregations apart from others in the how they are regarded by their public (both insiders and outsiders, believers and unbelievers).  There are those that need to say they are something, and those that truly are those things&#8212;without having to say it.  When it comes to how highly you are regarded from the outside looking in, there is a difference.

Still many churches may codify these aspirations about who they are or wish to become in their mission and vision statements.  I understand the need for this, but suggest that these written statements need not be used for this purpose.  Instead, I suggest making them more essentially about what your mission is, rather than focusing the attention on the perception you wish to achieve.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>How to dismantle your BF</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Internet Miscellany</category><dc:date>2006-05-29T21:22:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-645</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-645</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is too funny to pass up.  If you think you might have a medical condition recently identified as Bono Fatigue (or BF), you&#8217;ll want to take advantages of this web site for support.

Although I&#8217;ve been a raving U2 fan since the age of 13 (with some time off in the 90s), I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve quite succumbed to this disorder (denial?).  Although please warn me if you think otherwise.  I might require an intervention.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A shiny Nickel</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Music</category><dc:date>2006-05-28T21:24:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-642</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-642</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Some friends got us in to see Nickel Creek at private Bethel College show this past Saturday night (5/20/06).  And yes, we did feel like some of the oldest folks in the joint.  That notwithstanding, it was well worth the pittance we spent for the tickets.  Huge thanks to Chris & Ro!

This show was downright amazing.  (Photo credit: Nickel Creek web site/Adam Brimer)

Aside from NC&#8217;s always fantastic original music, the cover tunes stole the show: From the uproarious rendition of Randy Newman&#8217;s &#8220;Short People&#8221; (Sara and Sean Watkins are short indeed), to Radiohead&#8217;s &#8220;Nice Dream,&#8221; to an over the top version of Britanny Spears&#8217; &#8220;Toxic&#8221; complete with a computer-generated drum solo.

NC just kept it coming with extended jams of their signature tunes&#8212;for more than two solid hours.  Sara kept shredding her bow and belting out her vox.  And watching Chris Thile throw down on mandolin was a moment of ecstasy for this fan of stringed instruments.  Gifted is an understatement of the highest order.  Oh yes, and there was even tap dancing involved.

They concluded with a six song encore set that included a round of solo tunes for each one of them, with Sara doing Tom Waits&#8217; &#8220;Pony,&#8221; Sean doing one of his own tunes, and Chris doing a Bach fugue (think Nigel Tufnel sans the foot-played guitar).

I&#8217;m now on an earnest hunt to find them on DVD&#8212;nothing in video was for sale at the show.

It was a great way to kick off the 2006 summer music season.  The bar is set pretty high, but I&#8217;m sure my next live music binge at C-stone won&#8217;t disappoint.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rediscovering the lost art of evangelism episode 6</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-05-18T22:40:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-626</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-626</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is part 6 of a series of posts that interact with Guy Kawasaki's 10 principles of "evangelism."

...If a person cannot give a demo that quickens the pulse of everyone in the audience, he should stay in sales or in marketing."

...Merely giving a demonstration, in the case of evangelizing the Gospel, is more akin to doing and saying the right things to show what a Christian is like, and what a Christian does outwardly....  As one gets to know us more, who we are on the inside eventually becomes more important that the motions we are going through.

...My placement in this program was due to my landing in the advanced placement British literature course&#8212;part of the class was being a tutor.  It was a gig I didn&#8217;t mind because the rest of my class was mostly made up of women.  Yet, a grammarian and a tutor was definitely not &#8220;who I was&#8221; on the inside.  I would feebly help students edit their writing assignments, and then proceed to make the same mistakes in my own writing later on. One read through this blog will testify that this remains true of me today.  (A reader recently brought my attention to an egregious error on one of my pages that must have been there for months.)  I was passably successful pretending to be a tutor since I had an arsenal of quick reference books at my disposal (the Cliff Notes of grammar), and was really good at seeing errors in someone else&#8217;s work.

...I may be doing evangelism by having all the resources at my disposal and by judging the life of the one I am evangelizing.  Therefore, I can give a demo of the Christian life by acting accordingly.  But being a follower of Jesus&#8212;being the personal demonstration of that reality&#8212;is something more.

2 Co 5:17-20 TNIV &#8220;Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!  All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting people&#8217;s sins against them....  We are therefore Christ&#8217;s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us.&#8221;

Being the demo is a matter of a true inward transformation&#8212;with the &#8220;new creation&#8221; unconcealed.

2 Co 3:17-18 TNIV &#8220;And we all, who with unveiled faces contemplate the Lord&#8217;s glory, are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.&#8221;

I think this demarcation of doing and being is missed in the way many people view The Church&#8217;s role in evangelism.  For The Church, giving a demo today often means inordinately striving to create an experience of God or The Gospel, whereas being the demo unveils the transformative image of the Lord upon His Bride in everything she does....  What&#8217;s more, I would argue that the tactical aspects of evangelism will take care of themselves if we operate out of an unveiled state of &#8220;being&#8221; continually transformed into His image&#8212;living &#8220;as though God were making his appeal through us.&#8221;

I will never truly be a grammar tutor, although I continue to pose as one from time to time.  I am most assuredly a new creation in Christ, and I need to trust and live in this reality more and more often&#8212;thereby becoming the best possible demonstration.

I realize this is all horribly abstract, begging the question, &#8220;how do we live in such a way?&#8221;  May I recommend TrueFaced, by Bill Thrall, John Lynch, and Bruce McNicol as a fine exposition of a 2 Co 3:17-18 reality.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Learning to dance</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-05-12T21:48:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-618</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-618</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[He has a different take on it, which you can look at here....  However, in the context of what many evangelical mega-aspiring churches are doing with their Sunday services, I also find this quote to be an extremely current and appropriate critique.  (Funny how you can sometimes accept the truth of two seemingly competing perspectives on the same thing.)

In this post I&#8217;m focusing more on Lewis&#8217; perspective on the drive to create novelty and entertainment within the church services, rather than Pagitt&#8217;s angle on experimental approaches to how the community interacts with God and each other.

...They go to use the service, or, if you prefer, to enact it.  Every service is a structure of acts and words through which we receive a sacrament, or repent, or supplicate, or adore.  And it enables us to do these things best--if you like, it works best--when, through long familiarity, we don't have to think about it.  As long as you notice, and have to count the steps, you are not yet dancing but only learning to dance....  Good reading becomes possible when you need not consciously think about eyes, or light, or print, or spelling.  The perfect church service would be one we were almost unaware of; our attention would have been only on God....  It fixes our attention on the service itself; and thinking about worship is a different thing from worshipping....  Novelty may fix our attention not even on the service but on the celebrant [worship leader]....  There is really some excuse for the man who said, &#8216;I wish they&#8217;d remember that the charge to Peter was &#8216;Feed my sheep,&#8217; not &#8216;Try experiments on my rats,&#8217; or even, &#8216;Teach my performing dog new tricks.&#8217;&#8221;

I&#8217;ve posted about the &#8220;feeding my sheep&#8221; fixation of some believers&#8212;a red herring for many who are shopping for a church (asking "where can I get fed solid food," etc.).  For the record, I do think this quote goes overboard in terms of making the service far too staid....  But what I think we need to take from him today is the notion that a worship service is not some open invitation for creative evangelism techniques&#8212;at least not at the expense of other important elements.

Again last week I saw the phrase, &#8220;&#8230;we strive to craft worship experiences&#8230;&#8221; in a church&#8217;s communication materials referring to their worship services.

...The worship service should not be a spectacle, but that is where many evangelical churches have arrived.  And spectators are what many of them now have sitting in the pews.

...And baby boomers, who grew up under the cool blue glow of cathode ray tubes, now direct the lion share of evangelical Christian resources in the American church.  They have largely succeeded in merging the appeal of TV and nightclub entertainment with the Sunday service event, but at what cost?  If Marshall McLuhan is to be believed, it has been largely at the expense of the message.  It is The Gospel within an entertainment context, rather than the context of the community.

<div class="image-left"></divSadly, this event-driven, produced experience is the evangelistic alternative many have chosen instead of the much harder work of nurturing a faith community that equips believers to be The Church 24-7&#8212;out here in the real world.

...Instead of watching TV, I&#8217;m getting my fat, lazy butt up off the couch (or pew).]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Appledobe</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-05-07T08:38:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-612</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-612</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Then, check out Cringley&#8217;s column this past week for a possible peek at Apple&#8217;s applications strategy.  Together with last week&#8217;s prognostication, a potential seismic shift is building underneath the PC software world.

<div class="image-right"></divThe big picture strategy for Apple that emerges is threefold: 1) Make the OS irrelevant to Windows users who leverage Intel and Mac OS X (see the prior post).  2) Neutralize MS Office with Open XML standards-supported OS X office apps from Apple.  3) Dominate all other major creative pro software for Windows and Mac OS X by buying Adobe.

If those three elements come to fruition, sit back and watch Apple&#8217;s market cap zoom past Microsoft within 18 months.  Will it happen?  Ask Michael Dell&#8212;it just happened to him.  I invite your thoughts.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The best of all possible worlds</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-05-07T08:17:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-608</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-608</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></divCheck out Robert X.  Cringley&#8217;s column from two weeks ago. In it he contends that Apple is preparing to move beyond Boot Camp at some point to a Mac OS X that can run Window&#8217;s apps without requiring Windows.  He even goes so far as saying that he has it on good authority that Apple already has this running in the lab (and probably has for months, if not years).  He also claims he has some pretty deep insight into the infamous 1997 Apple-Microsoft stock investment and patent case deal that may hold the key to how this would be possible via access to the Windows API included in the deal (now that Macs are on the Intel platform, of course).

I&#8217;d have to say that reading this made me a little giddy.  Why?  Consider that Windows Vista will hit the market hard in early 2007 (or likely later) with a much reduced set of features from it&#8217;s original scope (more like Windows XP SP3).  Also consider that most malware affects the OS and the browser rather than other apps.  If you can run an OS with next to no security risks (like the Mac OS) and then run your native Windows apps with no performance hits and without running and maintaining the Windows OS, then wouldn&#8217;t that be the best of all possible worlds?

If this does happen, look for Apple to market this to Windows users this way: Why upgrade to Vista when you can run all your Windows apps without Windows at all--in an OS that&#8217;s more secure and years ahead of it?  I can&#8217;t wait.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Holy podcasts&#x2c; Batman&#x21;</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-05-06T09:39:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-604</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-604</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divI just added Erwin McManus of Mosaic in LA to the podcast page.  I've been catching that 'cast ever since I read The Barbarian Way a few months ago. Also, I want to promise you that Doug Glynn of Mesa, AZ will be back podcasting in the future.  I may even host that one myself, we&#8217;ll see.  Stay tuned, and send me anyone else to consider for my page.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Some kind of wonderful</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2006-05-05T20:55:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-599</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-599</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></divSome Kind of Wonderful (1987) was my favorite movie for about 3 years&#8212;capping my high school experience.  It was, in my opinion at the time, the finest film of the modern era (high praise from a sheltered preacher&#8217;s kid who couldn&#8217;t even go to movies until high school).  One of the things I identified with was being outside the popular circles.  Not quite the lowest in the adolescent caste system, but definitely confined to the creative, artistic, dramatic clique.  An Eric Stoltz type rather than a Craig Sheffer.

I mention that to say this: Just when my career life is in the midst of a major change curve, I hear from one of the few people in my high school past that I always wanted to reconnect with.  I get an Email out of the blue last week from this old friend&#8212;perhaps via my work address mined from a Google search, which finds me all too easily (along with a pro snowboarder from out West who seems to lead a much more exciting life than I do).  Cool.  Plus, she is in contact with another one of those few friends I lost all track of.

So, we will be setting up a lunch soon.  This will be wonderful, I think.  I feel just like Eric Stoltz again, only fat, bearded and balding, which isn&#8217;t very wonderful at all.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Dowsing the flame</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-05-04T20:51:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-591</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-591</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divI learned a lesson recently.  It didn&#8217;t take much, but I thought I&#8217;d blog about it to remind myself.  No flaming.  When reading web articles, posts, etc. I&#8217;m going to do everything I can to pause, reflect and then, if I do decide to comment, avoid flaming the author or other commenters.

I did write a flaming comment post about an interview I read a few weeks ago. It was no big deal&#8212;nothing really offensive or personal.  Just too harsh.  It didn&#8217;t take long for me to start to feel really bad about it.  Honestly I should know better&#8212;I work in public relations, where the first rule is the make friends with your public audience.  Plus, I&#8217;ve always striven for a Jesus type approach to my communications work&#8212;tell the truth, love my enemies, forgive, etc. At least I am comforted knowing that the Holy Spirit holds sway with my conscience.

So if you ever catch me doing that to someone else&#8217;s article or post, call me on it.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>What happened to April?</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Personal</category><dc:date>2006-05-02T21:51:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-589</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-10.html#unique-entry-id-589</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I have been remiss in posting.  Most of this has been due to about two weeks of 12 hour days.  I have some some posts drafted.  Just need to get them out there.  For those that think I've met some cruel fate, the news about my death has been greatly exaggerated.  Look for more posts in May.  Happy May day one day late.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rediscovering the lost art of evangelism episode 5</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-04-19T21:20:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-578</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-578</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is part 5 of a series of posts that interact with Guy Kawasaki's 10 principles of "evangelism."

...Try our product, take it home, download it, and then decide if it&#8217;s right for you.&#8221;

...I&#8217;m going to focus on one aspect of this principle here because I plan to touch on the rest of it in the next two episodes (those two principles seem highly related to each other and to this one).  I don&#8217;t want this nugget of insight to get lost in the shuffle.

...I don&#8217;t know how often I&#8217;ve discerned the subtle ways in which we marginalize the intelligence of the lost&#8212;in my own language, in sermons, in Christian media, web posts, or even cheesy Christian radio morning show DJs.  There can be a smug judgmentalism that creeps into our discourse.  And when you listen to it with the ears of an outsider (and perhaps the ears of Jesus), it can be down right offensive.

Yet, we Christians can&#8217;t even agree on the details of the Gospel truth ourselves (unless you think some 33,000-plus U.S. denominations divided over theological lines something The Bride of Christ can be proud of).

Let me state the obvious: Faith does not signify superior intelligence, any more than superior intelligence produces faith.

...Yes, it&#8217;s hard to see why this isn&#8217;t obvious to everyone.  From personal experience, it can be a tad bit frustrating to see people who are undoubtedly smarter than I am reject this truth.

...Are we worried that moving up the ladder of intelligence will produce the same result with us?  I think for some, this is an underlying fear.  All of our posturing about the greater truth we&#8217;ve found amounts to nothing more than a defense mechanism for our self esteem and transforms our walk of faith into the crutch so many outsiders judge us by.

...How this insecurity makes us act&#8212;what it makes us say, likewise, is not of His Kingdom.

I John 4:17-18 TNIV &#8220;This is how love is made complete among us so that we will have confidence on the day of judgment: In this world we are like Jesus....  The one who fears is not made perfect in love.&#8221;

While I had this passage in my mind while writing this post, I didn&#8217;t remember what preceded it in this chapter until I looked it up.  The writer spends the earlier portion discussing how to respond to those that reject Christ, or distort the truth&#8212;and what to conclude by it.  It&#8217;s rather telling that he then moves on to talk about loving without fear.

...In our striving to ascribe worth to others (see prior posts), let us include a generous assumption of human, God-given intelligence as an act of love.  This becomes a kind of golden rule of evangelism&#8212;which really should be modus operandi for The Church in all of its dialogue with the world.

You may even want to apply the aphorism my mother told me once in an effort to keep me from becoming too smug when I excelled at something in school: &#8220;Just remember, no matter how high your grades are, there&#8217;s always someone smarter.&#8221;  (This was always preceded by a generous amount of praise and encouragement, of course.)

...Thomas Aquinas prayed, &#8220;Lord, in my zeal for the love of truth, let me not forget the truth about love.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Why Windows will run better on a Mac</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-04-17T21:35:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-575</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-575</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple has received a boatload of media attention since releasing Boot Camp Beta, in what can only be seen now as a stroke of marketing genius in the wake of the Microsoft push back of Window&#8217;s Vista.  Perhaps the best analysis of this I&#8217;ve found thus far is from Daring Fireball.

Most PC pundits are expecting support for Boot Camp to be integrated into Mac OS X 10.5 harnessing Intel&#8217;s on-chip virtualization capabilities which will allow simultaneous running of Mac OS X, Windows, Linux and Unix varieties&#8212;with a shared clipboard between systems.  That&#8217;s just gnarly.

But that&#8217;s not the half of it.  PBS columnist Robert X.  Cringley has a fascinating take on it in his latest column.  He posits that Macs provide perhaps the best Windows experience sheerly by making it run insulated within the protection of OS X (and making a clean erase and reinstall of Windows an easy process--something MS suggests should be done often, but is too painful for most people to contemplate).  I&#8217;m not sure if I buy all of it, but it sure makes you think.  When looked back on in a few years, this will either be seen as a non event, or the defining moment of Apple&#8217;s business strategy to topple the competition in spite of the OS they offer.  Time will tell all.  Michael Dell must be worried.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Blogging in the clouds</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-04-17T21:31:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-574</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-574</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve added another experimental feature to this site for the right sidebar, something I&#8217;ve been wanting to add for a while: a Tag Cloud (see the linked wikipedia entry for the definition).  This one is provided by ZoomClouds, and is based on my Blog&#8217;s RSS feed.  When you visit, you can check it out to see Tags associated with my most recent posts.  More yummy RSS goodness.  Now I&#8217;m looking for a way to list my latest comments in the sidebar.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rediscovering the lost art of evangelism episode 4</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-04-05T18:49:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-556</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-556</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is part 4 of a series of posts that interact with Guy Kawasaki's 10 principles of "evangelism."

...No matter how revolutionary your product, don't describe it using lofty, flowery terms like &#8220;revolutionary,&#8221; &#8220;paradigm shifting,&#8221; and &#8220;curve jumping.&#8221;  Macintosh wasn't positioned as the third paradigm in personal computing; instead, it increased the productivity and creativity of one person with one computer.

...I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;m just more sensitive to it or what, but there seems to be a lot of marketing hype being used in The Church today.  You see it the most in the advertisements that fill the pages of Christian magazines (which seem to be growing in number every day).  Ads for ministry/evangelism tours (a showcase of several different preachers or teachers), various conferences (youth, worship, marriage, women, men, etc.) and other products in the Christian market.

Without passing judgment on specific ministries (or businesses), what they all seem to have in common is an extraordinary amount of marketing hype&#8212;the kind of lofty, inspiring language described above.

...They want to get their message out&#8212;and they want to cut through the clutter to get people to attend their outreach events.  Attendance makes the endeavor both profitable and means that &#8220;people&#8221; are being reached with the message (which, at face value, would be the Gospel).

But what if all that hype, while successful in corralling the sheep that have already been tagged as part of the flock, was actually an inhibition to others that really need to hear this message?

Now, before I go too far here, I&#8217;m willing to grant that there are new converts reached by many of these ministries&#8212;and that some hype has its place.  What I&#8217;m talking about is evangelism, and the process by which you either attract people, or maybe put them off, or confuse them about the Gospel altogether.

If we take Kawasaki seriously, and consider his experience in &#8220;converting&#8221; people to become deeply loyal customers, then I think this particular principle has something important to tell us: Effective evangelism also is about people&#8217;s pain.

All the hype and marketing spin in the world can&#8217;t connect with this core reality.  What Kawasaki is saying is that people don&#8217;t necessarily look to buy into the grand and glorious messages of The Church or religion....  And if we are to connect them with the saving message of the Gospel, we need to understand this&#8212;and seek to understand their pain.

...While there were times Jesus was not all that easy to understand, I would never consider his words to be filled with hype....  His message of the Kingdom and his acts of compassion were about healing and deliverance&#8212;the &#8220;signs&#8221; of the Kingdom.

...We are charged with advancing this Kingdom of healing and light against the kingdom of pain and darkness.

So instead of spending so much effort on how to hype the message in an advert for maximum marketing impact, perhaps we should spend the bulk of our energy on getting to know people&#8217;s pain&#8212;and why the Good News of this advancing Kingdom is the Rx they are looking for.

Don&#8217;t interpret this to mean that we can promise people a pain free life in this war-torn world.  But we have the ultimate answer&#8212;and this we can promise, through flickerings of the Kingdom life on earth today, to its final and culminating establishment over all the earth tomorrow.

...God&#8217;s dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them.  They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God....  There will be no more death&#8217; or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.&#8221;]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Just browsing</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-04-05T18:42:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-552</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-552</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divAnd who said the browser wars were over?  Seems like every weapon Microsoft has in its arsenal is facing new challenges to its dominance (OS, search, browsers, media players).  Microsoft&#8217;s security-riddled Explorer continues to lose share to Firefox/Mozilla on Windows, as well as concede share to Safari on the Mac (see link report).  Firefox has now moved to over 10 percent of users.  Explorer has dropped to a still commanding (but slipping) 84 percent.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Hell freezes over&#x2026;again</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-04-05T17:42:00-05:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-549</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-549</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[You may recall a few short years ago when Apple released iTunes for Windows&#8212;an announcement Steve Jobs heralded by saying, &#8220;Hell freezes over.&#8221;  And while the tantalizing possibility of running Windows XP on a Macintosh began to pick up considerable momentum when Apple moved to Intel chips, I guess I never thought I&#8217;d see this day.  At least not this quickly.  But it has happened.  And it&#8217;s for real.  This is no April fool&#8217;s.  Macs on Intel can now download new Boot Camp software from Apple, and run Windows XP right on the Mac at native speed (bye, bye Virtual PC).

<div class="image-left"></divThis announcement comes just over three weeks after the clandestine contest to boot Windows on a Mac was officially won.  It&#8217;s no coincidence.

So what&#8217;s Apple&#8217;s strategy here?  Two fold.  First, sell as many Macs as possible.  With the Windows Vista release pushed back to 2007, Apple is positioning itself to gain back PC market share throughout 2006.  Their shares rose nearly 7 percent on the announcement alone.  Second, advance the Mac OS X platform.  This may seem counter intuitive&#8212;running Windows to get more people to use Mac OS X.  But in this new scenario, OS X becomes the ultimate Trojan horse.  You can make the direct Apples to Oranges comparison (pun intended)&#8212;a true head-to-head.  A Mac gives you access to two OS possibilities&#8212;something a Dell can&#8217;t do (Three systems, if you count Unix and X11).  I think people will be much more comfortable purchasing a Mac knowing they can get at Windows apps natively if they need them (most won&#8217;t)&#8212;there&#8217;s no more down side risk for the consumer.  And the Upside?  iLife, Front Row, iChat, beauty, truth, enlightenment, world peace&#8230;.

Who said the OS wars were over?  Things are about to get interesting.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The unpopular politics of the Kingdom</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-04-01T12:56:00-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-542</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-9.html#unique-entry-id-542</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Greg Boyd has finally put his provocative &#8220;Cross and the Sword&#8221; sermon series in book form with the upcoming Zondervan release of The Myth of a Christian Nation.

<div class="image-right"></divI listened to this particular sermon series a little over a year ago as a podcast&#8212;and was simultaneously blown away and gratified to hear some of my own thinking confirmed and expanded upon.  I also have to admit that I was challenged as well.  (To subscribe to podcasts from Woodland Hills Church, hit my Church Online page for the RSS feed.)

If you&#8217;re wondering about my current view of faith and politics, this book will likely tell you all you need to know.  This excerpt is a good start.  I also must acknowledge that having my friend Pete in Magnetic North (my on and off band) had an impact on my thinking as well&#8212;one I very much appreciate (not that I am going to presume Pete agrees with Boyd on this or other topics&#8212;that&#8217;s only for him to say.  Just props for being a positive influence on me).  And, of course, Dawnshelle, her brother Derek (and wife Becky) and I have shared many conversations around the kitchen tables of life.

I recognize now that people are already starting to buzz and fume about this book and its title, getting all sorts of things out of whack in the process.  My Mother relayed some opinions that friends of hers had shared about Boyd when she told them where I was now attending.  At the time, they seemed way out of left field.  Now that I know this book is gaining some pre-release notoriety, I can see where they may be coming from, even though much is getting confused.  Boyd is in for a firestorm of criticism over this work.  I wish people would just read the book.  Every Christian needs to read this book.  (My comments are based on the sermons, of course.  I have not read the book yet myself--but look forward to it.)

Boyd has said Woodland Hills lost 1,000 people over this sermon series.

Now they can make that 996, net.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Missional impossible</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-03-23T18:29:00-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-8.html#unique-entry-id-535</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-8.html#unique-entry-id-535</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-right"></divIn the world of evangelical Christianity, a newly coined word or phase lives but a moment as a interesting and valuable way to capture a new idea, and dies a thousand deaths as a overused and misappropriated buzz-word.

...I saw &#8220;missional&#8221; show up recently in a powerpoint presentation as a way to explain why a congregation was endeavoring to start satellite venues to expand its reach.  The video-preaching, multi-campus plan was referred to as &#8220;missional.&#8221;  I think that was the moment I decided to quickly exit to grab a Caribou, lest I rush the stage screaming like a crazy activist.

...To be fair, missional is not an easy concept to wrap your head around.  I confess that I should not be regarded as any kind of authority.  But I have spent some time learning about it from those that are immersed in it up to their eyeballs.  I&#8217;m attempting to understand it better, and practice it more in my own walk.

So when I see it reduced to a new buzz-word in an attempt to make a trendy and ill-conceived mega-church expansion plan sound more hip and relevant, I cringe.  I&#8217;m even more discouraged that they may have picked up the term from me (see here), although I may give myself far too much credit (or blame).  For this purpose, I will relate the definition I began with, so aptly described in Brian McLaren&#8217;s Generous Orthodoxy:

&#8220;Jesus comes with saving love for the world.  He creates the church as a missional community to join him in His mission of saving the world.  He invites me to be a part of this community to experience his saving love and participate in it.&#8221;

...Both are integrated in expressing saving love for the world.  Those who want to become Christians (whether through proclamation or demonstration) we welcome.  Those who don&#8217;t, we love and serve, joining God in seeking their good, their blessing, their shalom.&#8221;

McLaren later quotes an unnamed source, &#8220;&#8230;in a pluralistic world, a religion is valued based on the benefits it brings to its nonadherents.&#8221;  Which begs a missional question, what benefits of the Good News are we bringing to our communities and cities?

So why do I get so worked up about this?  Because I&#8217;m very interested in people of faith being exposed to what being missional truly is.  And I&#8217;m dismayed that a congregation of 1,000-plus, well-intentioned believers now think that being missional is all about starting satellite video church venues and having small groups that center around the weekly service and sermon series.

McLaren continues, &#8220;Just imagine if every Christian could learn that this is what it means to be a missional Christian: to join Jesus in expressing God&#8217;s love for the whole world, to follow Jesus in his mission of saving love for the world.&#8221;

This is simply a word to the wise for church leaders (which includes three fingers pointing directly back at me).  Please understand a word, concept or idea more fully before you present it to the laity, and resist the temptation to bootstrap it onto your own ideas to give them more legitimacy.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>A shameless plug for the Cinecast Podcast</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Film</category><dc:date>2006-03-23T18:25:00-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-8.html#unique-entry-id-530</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-8.html#unique-entry-id-530</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="image-left"></divMy good friend (and proud new daddy) Brian turned me on to this podcast with current film reviews and commentary.  I&#8217;m impressed.  While I call myself a fan of movies, I&#8217;ve never really qualified as a film buff or learned critic.  Still, I&#8217;ve been looking for a good source of criticism for both mainstream and art house fare to help me focus my attention on the most worth-while films (and avoid wasting my time or 7 bucks on useless drivel).  I think Cinecast may be the ticket.  Thanks, Brian.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Windows Vista merely broken glass</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>Technology</category><dc:date>2006-03-23T18:19:00-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-8.html#unique-entry-id-527</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-8.html#unique-entry-id-527</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[The release of MS Windows Vista to consumers has now been pushed back to January, 2007, much to the dismay of the computing world.  Even for Microsoft, this is a pretty amazing setback.  They will completely miss selling Vista to consumers for the Fall 2006 back-to-school season and the holiday season.  Here&#8217;s is a compilation of tech reporters reacting to the news, provided by MDN.  Even better, check out Daniel Lyons in Forbes.com.  I can&#8217;t make this stuff up.

Windows XP was released in October of 2001.  More than half a decade later, a serious upgrade will finally be delivered.  Even if you count service pack updates, there were only two released (SP1 and SP2) in that time&#8212;and those added no real new consumer-level functionality.  Contrast that with the release of Mac OS X in 2000, and the subsequent release of four full scale versions since then, each one adding new features and refinements (like zero-config.  networking, iChat AV, Expose, iLife apps, Spotlight and Widgets, to name a handful over the course of six years).

My prediction is that Apples Mac OS X v10.5 &#8220;Leopard&#8221; will pounce before Vista is truly released.  Leopard&#8217;s release is planned for early 2007 as well.  What should have been a foregone conclusion (Vista releasing in 2006) is now much more interesting to keep an eye on. Apple has yet another golden opportunity to gain back some market share.]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Rediscovering the lost art of evangelism episode 3</title><description></description><dc:creator>woldcreative@mac.com</dc:creator><category>The Church</category><dc:date>2006-03-21T21:29:00-06:00</dc:date><link>http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-8.html#unique-entry-id-520</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://homepage.mac.com/woldcreative/blog/files/archive-8.html#unique-entry-id-520</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[This is part 3 of a series of posts that interact with Guy Kawasaki's 10 principles of "evangelism."

...A good evangelist can usually tell if people understand and like a product in five minutes....  It is very hard to convert someone to a new religion when he beli