Papunya Tula at Holmes a Court
The Holmes a Court Collection in Perth has rung in
2006 with a 25th anniversary "reunion" of paintings from the exhibition
organized by Andrew Crocker (and sold to Holmes a Court) that has became known
as Mr Sandman Bring Me a
Dream. Billed this time as
Papunya - circa 1980: works from the
Holmes a Court Collection and Lenders, in association with Papunya Tula
Artists, the exhibition opened on December 2,
2005 and closes in a week's time on February 5. News of this exhibition sent me
back to my bookshelves once again to retrieve and examine the catalog of the original (published by Papunya
Tula Artists Pty, Ltd and the Aboriginal Artists Agency, Ltd,
1981).The fact that there was a
catalog in 1981 for an exhibition devoted solely to Western Desert painting
strikes me as of considerable significance, let alone that it was republished
two years later as Papunya: Aboriginal
paintings from the Central Australian Desert
and translated into Portuguese and German. (Whether there were other
translations made and whether they existed primarily as "souvenir books" for the
tourist market in Alice Springs I haven't been able to determine.) Geoff
Bardon's Aboriginal Art of the Western Desert
(Rigby, 1979) was the only other published
monograph on the Desert acrylics at the time, although general exhibition
catalogs of Aboriginal art were beginning to include paintings from Papunya by
then.More so, the exhibition is the
most visible marker of Andrew Crocker's tenure as art advisor for the
cooperative, a tenure which was itself a watershed in the company's history.
The company had struggled for economic survival through the 1970s and struggled
indeed with a definition of its mission. For the first decade the line between
art object and ethnographic object was never clearly delineated. Although the
aesthetic power of the works was undeniable, much of the interest they generated
lay in the stories and in the glimpse into Aboriginal cosmology and myth that
they provided. In economic terms, supply outstripped demand, capital was locked
up in inventory, and paintings accumulated in the company's own "collection,"
which was sold finally in 1979 to the Australian Museum in an effort to restore
liquidity. An element of cultural preservation was mixed into all of this,
although it seems ambiguous whether the notion of documenting Aboriginal culture
before it disappeared had yet truly given over to the idea that painting could
provide a renewal of that culture, infusing life into a tradition that had
somehow managed to persist since 1906 when Bishop Frodsham of the Anglican
Church Missionary Society (CMS) had speculated, more with despair than with the
cynicism usually attributed to his remarks, that "missionary work then may be
only smoothing the pillow of a dying
race."(As an aside here in aid of
rehabilitating Frodsham, in the speech to the Australian Church Congress in
which the Bishop made that famous remark, he also told his colleagues, "We have
an airy way of speaking about Australia as a white man's country. But Australia
was, first of all, a black man's country, and I have never heard that the black
man invited us to take his property from him" (quoted in Andrew McMillan's
An Intruder's Guide to East Arnhem
Land (Duffy & Snellgrove, 2001), p.94).
McMillan comments that this statement "could be construed as one of the first
recorded declarations of Aboriginal rights to native
title.")Crocker was determined to
change all that. His idea was first of all to
market
the paintings--to actively create a demand for them. And it is only the concept
of marketing that can explain to me the far too clever and far too cute "Mr
Sandman" conceit. But to truly generate demand, he felt it was essential to
emphasize the aesthetic qualities of the work: the paintings were to be
presented as art, not as stories, and the emphasis on documentation decreased
under his direction. (I wonder if this also accounts for the change in the
catalog's title two years later.) Crocker's understanding of the importance of
positioning the work in the fine arts sphere was underscored later in the decade
when he mounted the first solo retrospective of an Aboriginal artist's work,
Charlie Tjararu Tjungurrayi: a
retrospective
1970-1986.An
Englishmen, unlike his predecessors, Crocker was eager to extend the reach of
Papunya Tula beyond Alice Springs and into the national and international
market. His sale of the 27 paintings in
Mr
Sandman to Robert Holmes a Court for A$35,000
certainly helped to do so. Although the amount of money the sale generated was
not exceptional, the placement of the works in such a major art collector's
hands must have made people take notice. And Crocker was able to take the
exhibition abroad a few months later to Los Angeles, taking along with him
Charlie Tjapangati and Billy Stockman. In 1983 the exhibition traveled again,
to France, where it was shown at the Australian Embassy in
Paris.To my eye, the paintings
themselves are a mixed bag. Stylistically, they seem to anticipate the art of
the 80s more than they show their roots in the previous decade. Many of them
display an emphasis on symmetry or at least regularity of design that blunts
some of the power of the earlier works. In his catalog essay assessing the
state of Papunya painting at the turn of decade, Dick Kimber
asks,
What do Aborigines think of this 'new' transposition of their art now that a decade has passed? In general, despite continuing tensions, the artist and their communities have adjusted or 'settled-in' to the change. The early delight and surprise has passed, but pleasure, satisfaction, teaching and social interest remain. Again, the initial surprise at the white or other 'outsider' people's wishing to purchase paintings has yielded to acceptance of the quirks of the 'white-fellow' way. Aborigines see the purchasers as wanting a 'pretty picture' and perhaps an 'easy story' -- that is, a satisfactory and true enough explanation but not a 'deep law' story.
Some of the painters are represented
by works that I personally find undistinguished, Kaapa Tjampitjinpa, Charlie
Tjararu Tjungurrayi, Paddy Carroll Tjungurrayi, and Clifford Possum among them
(although I should confess that I rarely find Clifford Possum's work inspiring).
There are a couple of lovely Water Dreamings by Dick Pantimatju Tjupurrula (d.
1983, the younger brother of Johnny Warangkula) that evoke Old Walter
Tjampitjinpa, but do not rise to the standards set by the master's treatment of
the subject. Three paintings by Johnny Warangkula may exhibit what Crocker
calls the painter's "hallmark ... three-dimensional effect which he achieves by
superimposing dots of different colours and sizes" but to my eye they do so
without the gentle lyricism of his earlier and smaller works. Indeed, size may
be the enemy of effect in many of these paintings, but in this respect they also
point forward to the larger canvases of the 80s and the artists' attempts to
grapple with adapting their designs to the scale of works appropriate to an art
museum's collection. Perhaps this is what Kimber had in mind when he wrote of
pretty pictures and easy stories.The
cover of the catalog reproduces one of Turkey Tolson's fine figurative
paintings, a coiled Snake Dreaming that also graced the cover of the next major
catalog of Papunya Tula paintings,
The Face of the Centre: Papunya Tula Paintings
1971-1984. Inside the catalog, the
first painting presented, by Harper Morris Tjungurrayi, is one of the simplest
and strongest. A central roundel with four perpendicular straight lines
represents the tracks of an Emu Ancestor to the waterhole at Anangra. At the
corner of each quadrant delineated by this central design, another circle
represents a cave site in the area, with two arcs depicting the hills in which
they are located. Although I'm usually loathe to compare Aboriginal masterworks
to modern painting from the west, I spent several minutes puzzling over the
mental echoes this work seemed to evoke in me before realizing that in its
somber tones and torqued energy, it brought to mind the face of one of Picasso's
Three
Musicians.Mick
Namarari's contribution depicts a Dingo Dreaming at the rockhole at Nyunmanu,
and while I would never call it a masterpiece, it does play interesting changes
on the patterned and decorative qualities that dominate so many of the paintings
in the show. As Crockers describes it,
The sequential motif shews a mother dingo walking with difficulty back to her litter. The difficulty arises because of the prey which is hanging from her jaws and which causes her to walk with a looping [sic] gait, rather like a swimmer's crawl. This notion is conveyed by the bow-leg-like line emanating from the circles. One dingo print is shewn. The
asymmetry of the depiction of the dingo's path in which arcs swing backwards and
forwards in no readily apparent pattern creates a visual tension across the
surface of the painting that contrasts with the decorative lines of bush bananas
that delineate the yellow and white bands of background dotting. This
background itself is in some ways the best part of the painting for me,
adumbrating as it does the minimalist, monochrome dotting of Mick's dingo and
marsupial mouse paintings of the 90s, which are particular favorites on mine in
his catalog.Likewise, Charlie
Tjapangati's Tingari canvas depicting events at Nakinga, two roundels on a
background of alternating bands of black, white, and yellow dots has hints of
the subtle and similarly minimal sandhills designs that have dominated much
men's painting coming out of Papunya Tula in the last couple of years.
Charlie's other painting in the exhibition is a tall, thin (66 x 19 inches)
jittery Tingari design whose somewhat off-center, lumpish, and irregularly sized
roundels connected by attenuated pathlines has the glow and vibrancy of fine
works by John Tjakamarra and early Anatjari
Tjampitjinpa.Willy Tjungurrayi's
painting of Tingari events of Kulkuta has many fine subtleties in color,
patterning, and shape that prevent it from settling into regularity, although at
first glance it doesn't seem to be a particularly striking piece of work.
Crocker apparently wasn't impressed; in his annotation he offers the following
judgment: "The artist has some beautiful works to his credit. They are, however,
rather different from this one." (Fred Myers tweaks Crocker's affectations
noting that "only Crocker would insist on the circumflexed old-fashioned British
spelling of 'role' in the catalog" (which I can't reproduce here); note also the
spelling of "shewn" in the annotation of Mick Namarari's painting quoted above.
Elsewhere, Crocker explains Charlie Tjararu and Mick's freedom from traditional
ideograms by noting that they have been "acquainted longest with Europeans."
But lest you suspect that this contact has somehow compromised the integrity of
their cultural attachments, he adds "Both remain thoroughly
au
fait [my italics] with the song
cycles".There are two paintings rich
in surprise and delight for me. Tommy Lowry's Tjapaltjarri treatment of a Snake
Dreaming at Talipata is a real riot of color, greens, blues, and reds providing
incident and contrast amidst the black, swirling, writhing path of the snake.
Once again, Crocker's assessment is cause for a smile. "The fact of his not
having the habit of painting regularly gives his work a naive quality and a
certain freshness absent from many of the other works." The judgment is dead
on, even if I wouldn't have phrased it that
way.And lastly, there is a wonderful
work by Pinta Pinta Tjapanangka, glossed by Crocker as an increase ceremony for
the
mungilpa
grass which takes place at Mayitayinya. The work adheres to the traditional
four-color palette and features a large central roundel representing the
ceremonial site. Small roundels and even smaller black circles spin and radiate
away from this focal point in a design that brings to mind some of the earliest
(often unattributed) examples of work from Papunya, but with an overall surface
cohesion that anticipates the large masterpieces of the 80s. Perhaps my
appreciation of this work stems from its recapitulation of
Mr
Sandman as a pivotal exhibition in the early
history of Western Desert acrylic
painting.And this is, in fact, the
delight in the opportunity afforded by a presentation such as the one now
appearing at the Holmes a Court Gallery. The major retrospectives of Papunya
Tula work, including The Face of the
Centre (1986),
Dot &
Circle (1986),
Twenty-Five Years and Beyond: Papunya
Tula Painting (1999), and
Papunya Tula: Genesis and Genius
(2001), by their very scope, offer riches far
beyond those presented in Mr
Sandman. Its appeal lies rather in the
opportunity to examine a body of work from a single moment in time, and an
important moment at that. The delights of temporal comparisons are compressed
into a single year and the examples of
Papunya - circa
1980 lie in discovering in each painting its
own links forward and backward through time. In this respect these paintings
stand in relation to the history of the acrylic painting movement as any
instantiation of the Dreamtime does to the Dreaming itself: they capture the
past and the future in the "present"
moment.Note: As usual, I have relied
heavily on Fred Myers' Painting Culture: the making of an Aboriginal high
art for historical details. The
facts are his (I hope); any mistakes in the interpretation of them are, of
course, mine.
Posted: Sun - January 29, 2006 at 07:48 PM
|
Quick Links
About this Blog
A collection of personal reflections and readings on the art of the indigenous people of Australia, their culture, anthropological studies, the art market, and whatever else strays across the cultural horizon.
If you don't wish to leave comments on the blog itself please fee free to contact me directly. Will Owen
Calendar
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
|
Categories
Archives
Past Posts, Selected
Technorati
Find It In a Library
Find It In An Australian Library
Creative Commons
XML/RSS Feed
Links
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Jul 22, 2007 09:19 AM
|