|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH3CH2CH2CN
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen
|
|
|
Nuclear
Quadrupole Coupling Constants |
|
|
|
in t-1-Cyanopropane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of the nitrogen nqcc's in the trans conformer of 1-cyanopropane was made here on a molecular structure derived ab
initio with correction as discussed below. These are
compared in Table 1 with the experimental nqcc's of Demaison and Dreizler [1].
Structure parameters are given in Table 2, rotational constants in Table 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Table 1, subscripts a,b,c refer to the principal axes of the inertia
tensor, subscripts x,y,z to the principal axes of the nqcc tensor.
The nqcc y-axis is chosen coincident with the inertia c-axis, these
are perpendicular to the Cs plane of the molecule. Ø (degrees)
is the angle between its subscripted parameters. ETA = (Xxx
- Xyy)/Xzz. |
|
|
RMS is the root mean square
difference between calculated and experimental nqcc's (percentage of
average experimental nqcc). RSD is the residual standard deviation
of calibration of the B3PW91/6-311+G(df,pd) model for calculation of
the nqcc's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1.
Nitrogen nqcc's in t-1-Cyanopropane (MHz). |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. |
|
Expt. [1] |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14N |
Xaa |
- |
3.428 |
- |
3.405(45) |
|
|
|
Xbb |
|
1.364 |
|
1.341(50) |
|
|
|
Xcc |
|
2.064 |
|
2.064(39) |
|
|
|
|Xab| |
|
2.088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.019 (0.83 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
0.030 (1.3 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
|
2.146 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xyy |
|
2.064 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xzz |
- |
4.210 |
|
|
|
|
|
ETA |
- |
0.019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Øz,a |
|
20.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Øa,CN |
|
20.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Øz,CN |
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molecular Structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The molecular structure was optimized at
the MP2/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory assuming Cs symmetry.
The optimized CC and CN bond lengths were then corrected using
equations obtained from linear regression analysis of the data given in
Ref. [2]. The CH bond lengths were corrected using r = 1.001 ropt,
where ropt is obtained by MP2/6-31G(d,p) optimization [3].
Interatomic angles are those given by MP2/6-311+G(d,p) optimization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Table 2. t-1-Cyanopropane. Heavy atom molecular structure parameters (Å
and degrees). Complete structure is given here in Z-matrix format. |
| |
|
|
|
|

|
C(11)N |
1.1562 |
|
C(1)C(11) |
1.4609 |
|
C(1)C(11)N |
178.42 |
|
|
|
|
C(1)C(2) |
1.5280 |
|
C(2)C(3) |
1.5195 |
|
C(11)C(1)C(2) |
112.21 |
|
C(1)C(2)C(3) |
111.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Table 3.
t-1-Cyanopropane. Rotational Constants (MHz). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. ropt |
Expt. |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
23 908.0 |
|
|
B |
2 284.1 |
|
|
C |
2 168.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] J.Demaison and H.Dreizler, Z.Naturforsch. 37a,199(1982). |
|
|
[2] J.Demaison, J.Cosléou, R.Bocquet,
and A.G.Lesarri, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 167,400(1994). |
|
|
[3] J.Demaison and G.Wlodarczak, Structural
Chem. 5,57(1994). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n-Butyl Cyanide, anti-anti |
1-Cyanopropane, gauche |
|
|
n-Butyl Cyanide, anti-gauche |
CH3CN |
|
|
|
n-Butyl Cyanide, gauche-anti |
CH3CH2CN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Molecules/Nitrogen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t1CNpropane.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last
Modified 29 June 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|