The National
Science Education Standards have additional information. See
especially
Chapter
6 and the age specific Content Standards: K-4
and
Content Standards: 5-8.
This page is under construction - check back. Last updated October 2006. Comments?
Phillips, W.C. 1991, Earth Science Misconceptions, Science Teacher Feb'91 pp 21-23.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1999). Naïve Ideas in Earth
Science. MSTA Journal,
44(2) (Fall’99), pp. 26-30.
http://www.msta-mich.org
Geosphere
Hapkiewicz, A. (1999). Naïve Ideas in Earth Science. MSTA Journal, 44(2) (Fall’99), pp.26-30. http://www.msta-mich.org
- When things dissolve they “disappear.”
- Materials can only exhibit properties of one state of matter.
- Melting and dissolving are confused.
- Dew formed on the outside of glass comes from the inside of the glass.
- Expansion of matter is due to the expansion of particles rather than the increased particle spacing.
- Molecules of a gas “just float” rather than being kept in the gaseous state by their motion.
- There is not empty space between molecules, rather students believe there is dust, germs or “air" between the particles of air.
- Particles of solids have no motion.
- Relative particle spacing among solids, liquids, and gases is incorrectly perceived and not generally related to the densities of the states.
- Frequent disregard for particle conservation and orderliness when describing physical changes.
- Gases are not matter because most are invisible.
- Absence of conservation of particles during a chemical change.
- Failure to perceived that individual substances and properties correspond to a certain type of particle. Formation of a new substance with new properties is seen as simply happening rather than as a result of particle rearrangement.
- The temperature of an object drops when it freezes.
- Mass and volume, which both describe an “amount of matter,” are the same property.
- “Steam” is the visible cloud of water vapor over boiling water.
- Energy is a “thing,” an object or something that is tangible.
- The chemistry of biological systems does not follow all the same rules of thermodynamics as other systems.
- “Cold” can be transferred.
- Energy is truly lost in many energy transformations.
A list compiled by
the Operation
Physics Elementary/middleschool physics education outreach
project of the American Institute of
Physics. Author/editor is unknown. Bill Weiler of U. Illinois
posted these via the PHYS-L group 9/1998.
Also see misconceptions for Vision and hearing and Color and Vision.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1999). Naïve Ideas in Earth
Science. MSTA Journal, 44(2)
(Fall’99), pp.26-30.
http://www.msta-mich.org
Hapkiewicz, A. (1992). Finding a List of Science Misconceptions. MSTA Newsletter, 38 (Winter’92), pp. 11-14.A list compiled by the Operation Physics Elementary/middleschool physics education outreach project of the American Institute of Physics. Author/editor is unknown. Bill Weiler of U. Illinois posted these via the PHYS-L group 9/1998.
- Gases are not matter because most are invisible.
- Gases do not have mass.
- A "thick" liquid has a higher density than water.
- Mass and volume, which both describes an "amount of matter," are the same property.
- Air and oxygen are the same gas.
- Helium and hot air are the same gas.
- Expansion of matter is due to the expansion of particles, rather than the increased particle spacing.
- Particles of solids have not motions.
- Relative particle spacing among solids, liquids, and gasses is incorrectly perceived and not generally related to the densities of the states. (Microscopic model does not represent macroscopic properties.)
- Materials can only exhibit properties of one state of matter.
- Particles possess the same properties as the materials they compose. For example, atoms of copper are "orange and shiny," gas molecules are "transparent," and solid molecules are "Hard."
- Melting/freezing and boiling/condensation are often understood only in terms of water.
- Particles viewed as mini-versions of the substances they comprise: oxygen molecules are invisible, water molecules are tiny droplets, and diamond molecules are hard.
- Particles misrepresented in sketches: no differentiation is made between atoms and molecules.
- Particles misrepresented and undifferentiated in concepts involving elements, compounds, mixtures, solutions, and substances.
- Frequent disregard for particle conservation and orderliness when describing changes.
- Absence of conservation of particles during a chemical change.
- Chemical, rather than interactive. After chemical change, the original substances are perceived as remaining even though they are altered.
- Failure to perceived that individual substances and properties correspond to a certain type of particle ... formation of a new substance with new properties is seen as simply happening, rather than as a result of particle rearrangement.
- The "smoke" seen with dry ice is carbon dioxide vapors.
- The temperature of an object drops when it freezes.
- The chemistry in biological systems does not follow all the same rules of thermodynamics as other systems.
- Steam is visible water gas molecules.
- The oxygen we breathe does not come from plants.
- Gas makes things lighter.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1992). Finding a List of Science Misconceptions. MSTA Newsletter, 38 (Winter’92), pp. 11-14.
- Energy is truly lost in many energy transformations.
- There is no relationship between matter and energy.
- If energy is conserved, why are we running out of it?
- Energy can be changed completely from one form to another (no energy losses).
- Things “use up” energy.
- Energy is confined to some particular origin, such as what we get from food or what the electric company sells.
- An object at rest has no energy.
- The only type of potential energy is gravitational.
- Gravitational potential energy depends only on the height of an object.
- Doubling the speed of a moving object doubles the kinetic energy.
- Energy is a “thing.” This is a fuzzy notion, probably because of the way we talk about newton-meters or joules. It is difficult to imagine an “amount” of an abstraction.
- The terms “energy” and “force” are interchangeable.
- From the non-scientific point of view, “work” is synonymous with “labor.” It is hard to convince someone that more “work” is probably being done playing football for one hour than studying an hour for a quiz.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1992). Finding a List of Science Misconceptions. MSTA Newsletter, 38 (Winter’92), pp. 11-14.Hapkiewicz, A. (1999). Naïve Ideas in Earth Science. MSTA Journal, 44(2) (Fall’99), pp.26-30. http://www.msta-mich.org
- Time can be measured without establishing the beginning of the interval.
- The location of an object can be described by stating its distance from a given point, ignoring direction.
- The distance an object travels and its displacement are always the same.
- An object’s speed is the same as its velocity.
- If an object is accelerating, then the object is speeding up.
- An object’s acceleration cannot change direction.
- Acceleration always occurs in the same direction as an object is moving.
- If an object has a speed of zero (even instantaneously), it has no acceleration.
- The only “natural” motion is for an object to be at rest.
- If an object is at rest, no forces are acting on the object.
- A rigid solid cannot be compressed or stretched.
- Only animate objects can exert a force. Thus, if an object is at rest on a table, no forces are acting on it.
- Force is a property of an object. An object has force, and when it runs out of force it stops moving.
- The motion of an object is always in the direction of the net force applied to the object.
- Large objects exert a greater force than small objects.
- A force is needed to keep an object moving with a constant speed.
- Friction always hinders motion. Thus, you always want to eliminate friction.
- Frictional forces are only due to irregularities in surfaces moving past one another.
- Rocket propulsion is due to exhaust gases pushing on something behind the rocket.
- When dropped in a vacuum, objects of different masses fall at different speeds.
- When dropped in a vacuum, objects fall at constant speeds.
- A simple machine with a mechanical advantage greater than one is easier to use than a simple machine with a mechanical advantage less than one.
- Any force times any distance is work.
- Machines put out more work than people put in.
- Power is the same as force or work.
- Work is any activity one gets tired doing, gets paid for doing, or doesn’t like doing.
A list compiled by the Operation Physics Elementary/middleschool physics education outreach project of the American Institute of Physics. Author/editor is unknown. Bill Weiler of U. Illinois posted these via the PHYS-L group 9/1998.
- Forces acting on bodies/objects are associated with living things.
- Constant motion requries a constant force.
- If a body is not moving, there is no force acting upon it.
- Objects in a vacuum fall at a constant speed.
- If a body is in mortion, there is a force acting upon it in the direction of motion.
- There is no gracity in space.
- Time is defined in terms of its measurement.
- The terms distance and displacement are synonymous and may be used interchangeably. Thus the distance an object travels and its displacement are always the same.
- Velocity is another word for speed. An object's speed and velocity are always the same.
- Acceleration is confused with speed.
- Acceleration is always in a straight line.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1992). Finding a List of Science Misconceptions. MSTA Newsletter, 38 (Winter’92), pp. 11-14.Hapkiewicz, A. (1999). Naïve Ideas in Earth Science. MSTA Journal, 44(2) (Fall’99), pp.26-30. http://www.msta-mich.org
- Measurement is only linear.
- Any quantity can be measured as accurately as you want.
- Children who have used measuring devices at home already know how to measure.
- The metric system is more accurate than other measurement systems (such as the English system).
- The English system is easier to use than the metric system.
- You can only measure to the smallest unit shown on the measuring device.
- Some objects cannot be measured because of their size or inaccessibility.
- The five senses are infallible.
- An object must be “touched” to be measured.
- A measuring device must be a physical object.
- Mass and weight are the same and they are equal at all times.
- Mass and volume are the same.
- The only way to measure time is with a clock or a watch.
- Time has an absolute beginning.
- Heat and temperature are the same.
- Heat is a substance.
- Cold is the opposite of heat and is another substance.
- There is only one way to measure perimeter.
- Only the area of rectangular shapes can be measured in square units.
- Surface area can be found only for two-dimensional objects.
- Surface area is a concept used only for mathematics classes.
- You cannot measure the volume of some objects because they do not have “regular” lengths, widths, or heights.
- An object’s volume is greater in water than in air.
- The density of an object depends only on its volume.
- Density for a give volume is always the same.
- The density of two samples of the same substance with different volumes or shapes cannot be the same.
- The location of an object can be described by stating its distance from a given point, ignoring direction.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1992). Finding a List of Science Misconceptions. MSTA Newsletter, 38 (Winter’92), pp. 11-14.A list compiled by the Operation Physics Elementary/middleschool physics education outreach project of the American Institute of Physics. Author/editor is unknown. Bill Weiler of U. Illinois posted these via the PHYS-L group 9/1998.
- Objects become positively charged because they have gained protons.
- Objects become positively charged because their electrons have been destroyed.
- All atoms are charged.
- Larger magnets are stronger than smaller magnets.
- Current flows from a battery (or other source of electricity) to a light bulb (or other item that consumes electricity), but not from the light bulb to the battery.
- current flows out of both terminals of a dry cell or both connections in an electrical outlet.
- Current flows around a complete circuit, but it is used u by objects like light bulbs so less current returns than leaves the source of the electricity.
- All the electrons that make up a electrical current are initially contained in the battery or generator that is the source of the electricity.
- Electricity is produced in the wall socket.
- Electrons change into light when a lamp is turned on.
- Wires are hollow like a water hose, and electrons move inside the hollow space.
- A larger battery will make a motor run faster or a bulb burn brighter.
- Pure water is a good conductor of electricity.
- Electricity from a dry cell will shock or hurt if it is touched.
- Insulation is used to keep electricity in the wire.
- All wires are insulated.,
- Birds can perch on bare wires without being hurt because birds have insulated feet.
- A charge object can only affect other charged objects.
- The electrostatic force between two charged objects in not affected by the distance between them.
- Gravitational forces are stronger than electrostatic forces.
- Electrons which are lost by an object are really lost (no conservation of charge).
- A charged object can only attract other charged objects.
- Batteries have electricity inside them.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1992). Finding a List of Science Misconceptions. MSTA Newsletter, 38 (Winter’92), pp. 11-14.
- All metals are attracted to a magnet
- All silver colored items are attracted to a magnet.
- All magnets are made of iron.
- Larger magnets are stronger than smaller magnets.
- The magnetic and geographic poles of the earth are located at the same place.
- The magnetic pole of the earth in the northern hemisphere is a north pole, and the pole in the southern hemisphere is a south pole.
- Only magnets produce magnetic fields.
- A magnetic field is a pattern of lines (not a field of force) that surrounds a magnet.
- In a magnet, the magnetic field lines exist only outside the magnet.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1992). Finding a List of Science Misconceptions. MSTA Newsletter, 38 (Winter’92), pp. 11-14.
- Ice cannot change temperature
- When the temperature of a boiling substance remains constant, something is “wrong.”
- The bubbles in boiling water contain “air,” Oxygen,” or “nothing,” rather than water vapor.
- All liquids boil at 100°C (212°F) and freeze at 0° C (32°F).
- Heat is a substance.
- Heat is not energy.
- Temperature is a property of a particular material or object (metal is naturally colder than plastic).
- The temperature of an object depends on its size.
- Heat and cold are different, rather than being opposite ends of continuum.
- Boiling is the maximum temperature a substance can reach.
- Objects of different temperatures which are in constant contact with each other, or in contact with air at a different temperature, do not necessarily move toward the same temperature.
- Heat only travels upward.
- Heat rises.
- The kinetic theory does really explain heat transfer. (It is recited, but not believed.)
- Objects which readily become ware (conductors of heat) do not readily become cold.
- All solids expand at the same rate.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1992). Finding a List of Science Misconceptions. MSTA Newsletter, 38 (Winter’92), pp. 11-14.
- Objects float in water because they’re “lighter” than water.
- Objects sink in water because they’re “heavier” than water.
- Mass, volume, weight, heaviness, size, and density may be perceived as equivalent.
- Wood floats and metal sinks.
- All objects containing air float.
- Liquids of high viscosity are also liquids with high density.
- Adhesion is the same as cohesion.
- Heating air only makes it hotter.
- Pressure and force are synonymous.
- Pressure arises from moving fluids.
- Moving fluids contain higher pressure.
- Liquids rise in a straw because of “suction.”
- Fluid pressure only acts downward.
Hapkiewicz, A. (1999). Naïve Ideas in Earth Science. MSTA Journal, 44(2) (Fall’99), pp.26-30. http://www.msta-mich.org
- Air as a substance is not well understood. Air has negative weight or no weight.
- Days are shortest in winter.
- Water vapor is held or soaked up by the air.
- Humid air is “Heavier” than dry air.
- A vacuum or low pressure area “pulls” object into it.
- Wind speed is related to temperature of air - high speed means cold air and gentle or slow winds are warm.
- Acid rain, ozone depletion and greenhouse effect are thought to be caused by the same things and produce the same changes in the environment.
- Air pollution is always caused by human activities.
- Rain water should be neutral in pH.
Berthelsen, B. (1999). Students Naïve Conceptions in Life Science. MSTA Journal, 44(1) (Spring’99), pp. 13-19. http://www.msta-mich.orgOrganization of Living Things:
A list compiled by the Operation Physics Elementary/middleschool physics education outreach project of the American Institute of Physics. Author/editor is unknown. Bill Weiler of U. Illinois posted these via the PHYS-L group 9/1999
- Plants, fungi, eggs and seeds are not living.
- Young children do not recognize tress as living although they understand that seedlings are alive.
- Only large land mammals are animals.
- Penguins and turtles are amphibians because they are both in and out of water.
- Whales, jellyfish, and starfish are all fish.
- Behavior and habitat are criteria for classification.
- Food is anything useful taken into the body including: water, minerals, carbon dioxide (plants), and sunlight.
- Students concept of digestion is often confused both in the route and the process.
- Digestion is the process that releases usable energy from food.
- Respiration is synonymous with breathing.
Berthelsen, B. (1999). Students Naïve Conceptions in Life Science. MSTA Journal, 44(1) (Spring’99), pp. 13-19. http://www.msta-mich.org
- Plants obtain their energy directly from the sun.
- Plants have multiple sources of food (heterotrophic as well as autotrophic).
- Carbon dioxide, water, and minerals are food.
- Plants feed by absorbing food through their roots.
- Plants use heat from the sun as a source of energy for photosynthesis
- Sunlight is a food.
- Sunlight is composed of molecules.
- Sunlight is “consumed” in photosynthesis.
- Plants absorb water through their leaves.
- Plants produce oxygen for our benefit.
Berthelsen, B. (1999). Students Naïve Conceptions in Life Science. MSTA Journal, 44(1) (Spring’99), pp. 13-19. http://www.msta-mich.org
- Students are unsure about the hierarchy of atoms, molecules and cells. Cells are described as the components of many things including carbohydrates and proteins
- Students have difficulty discriminating between cell division, enlargement and differentiation. They may believe that living things grow because their cells get larger. The role of cell differentiation in growth is poorly understood.
- Students think in terms of two kinds of cells - plant and animal.
Berthelsen, B. (1999). Students Naïve Conceptions in Life Science. MSTA Journal, 44(1) (Spring’99), pp. 13-19. http://www.msta-mich.org
- Stronger organisms have more energy.
- There are more herbivores because they have more offspring.
- A species high on the food web is a predator to everything below it.
- Energy accumulates in an ecosystem so that a top predator has all the energy from the organisms below it.
- Carnivores can exist in a plant free world if their prey reproduce enough.
- The food that is eaten and used as a source of energy is part of the food chain; food that is synthesized into the body of the eater is now food for the next level.
Berthelsen, B. (1999). Students Naïve Conceptions in Life Science. MSTA Journal, 44(1) (Spring’99), pp. 13-19. http://www.msta-mich.org
- Daughters inherit most of their characteristics from their mothers. Boys inherit most of their characteristics from their fathers.
- Variation between species is a result of adaptation to environment instead of inheritance.
- Sexual reproduction occurs in animals but not in plants.
- Students do not distinguish between sexual and asexual reproduction.
- Asexual reproduction produces weak offspring. Sexual reproduction produces superior offspring.
- Students believe that transmitted characteristics are acquired during the life time of the animal.
- Individuals can adapt to a changing environment. These adaptations are heritable.
- Students do not understand the relationship between DNA, genes, and chromosomes
- Students can apply chance and probability to assigned genetics problems, but not to human situations in families.
Berthelsen, B. (1999). Students Naïve Conceptions in Life Science. MSTA Journal, 44(1) (Spring’99), pp. 13-19. http://www.msta-mich.org
A list compiled by the Operation Physics Elementary/middleschool physics education outreach project of the American Institute of Physics. Author/editor is unknown. Bill Weiler of U. Illinois posted these via the PHYS-L group 9/1999
- Students have difficulty relating an individuals adaptation to environment with changes in species phenotypes over long period of time due to selection.
- Students believe that transmitted characteristics are acquired during the life time of the animal.
- Individuals can adapt to a changing environment. These adaptations are heritable.
- Dinosaurs and cavemen lived at the same time.
- Acquired characteristics can be inherited.
- Humans are responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs.
- Some human races have not evolved as much as others.
- Evolution is goal-directed.
- Evolutionary changes are driven by need.
Berthelsen, B. (1999). Students Naïve Conceptions in Life Science. MSTA Journal, 44(1) (Spring’99), pp. 13-19. http://www.msta-mich.org
Also see misconceptions for Light and Color and Vision
- Objects are seen because they are bathed in light.
- Light travels from the eyes to the object.
- We can see because light travels to your eyes and then from the eyes to the object.
- Light to both our eyes and the object. There is no link between the two.
- Light is not necessary to see since we can see a little in a dark room.
- We see because we look, it has nothing to do with light.
- We can hear because we concentrate on the source of the sound.
- There is no similarity between light and sound.
A list compiled by the Operation Physics Elementary/middleschool physics education outreach project of the American Institute of Physics. Author/editor is unknown. Bill Weiler of U. Illinois posted these via the PHYS-L group 9/1999
- The pupil of the eye is a black object or spot on the surface of the eye.
- The eye receives upright images.
- The lens is the only part of the eye responsible for focusing light.
- The lens forms and image (picture) on the retina. The brain then "looks" at this image and that is how we see.
- The eye is the only organ for sight; the brain is only for thinking.
- A white light source, such as an incandescent or fluorescent bulb, produces light made up of only one color.
- Sunlight is different from other sources of light because it contains no color.
- When white light passes through a prism, color is added to the light.
- The rules for mixing color paints and crayons are the same as the rules for mixing colored lights.
- The primary colors for mixing colored lights are red, blue and yellow.
- A colored light striking an object produces a shadow behind it that is the same color as the light. For example, when red light strikes an object, a red shadow is formed.
- The shades of gray in a black and white newspaper picture are produced by using inks with different shades of gray.
- When white light passes through a colored filter, the filter adds color to the light.
- The different colors appearing in colored pictures printed in magazines and newspapers are produced by using different inks with all the corresponding colors.
- The mixing of colored paints and pigments follow the same rules as the mixing of colored lights.
- The primary colors used by artists (red, yellow and blue) are the same as the primary colors for all color mixing.
- Color is a property of an object, and is independent of both the illuminating light and the receiver (eye).
- White light is colorless and clear, enabling you to see the "true" color of an object.
- When a colored light illuminates a colored object, the color of the light mixes with the color of the object.
- Naive explanations of visual phenomena involving color perception usually involve only the properties of the object being observed, and do not include the properties of the eye-brain system.
Some References
- Alkhawaldeh, S. A. (2007). Facilitating Conceptual Change in Ninth Grade Students' Understanding of Human Circulatory System Concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 371-385.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Chapter 15 The Research Base. Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press
- Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1984). Children's preconceptions and content-area textbooks. In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Rochler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension Instruction: Perspectives and Suggestions (pp. 187-220). New York: Forgman, Inc.
- Arnaudin, M., & Mintzes, J. (1986). What Research Says: The Cardiovascular System: Children's Conceptions and Misconceptions. Science and Children, 23(5), 48.
- Arnold, M. and R. Millar (1996). "Learning the Scientific "Story": A Case Study in the Teaching and Learning of Elementary Thermodynamics." Science Education 80(3): 249-281.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view.
New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.- Bar, V. (1989). "Children's views about the water cycle." Science Education 73: 481-500.
- Bar, V. and A. S. Travis (1991). "Children's views concerning phase changes." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28: 363-382.
- Bar, V., B. Zinn, et al. (1994). "Children's Concepts about Weight and Free Fall." Science Education 78(2): 149-169.
- Barman, C., Stein, M., McNair, S., and Barman, N. (2006,). Students’ Ideas About Plants & Plant Growth [Electronic version]. The American Biology Teacher, 68(2), 73-79.
- Barman, C.R., Barman, N. S., Berglund, K., Goldston, M.J. (1999). Assessing students’ ideas about animals. Science & Children, 37(1), 44-49
- Barrass, Robert. (1984) "Some Misconceptions and Misunderstandings Perpetuated by Teachers and Textbooks of Biology." Journal Of Biology Education 18 : 201-205.
- Barrow, L. H. ( 1990). Elementary Science textbooks and potential magnet misconceptions. School Science and Mathematics, 90 (n8) , 7-16.
- Baser, M. (2006). Effect of Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction on Students' Understanding of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Journal of Maltese Education Research. 4.64-79.
- Bell, B. F. (1981a). "What is a plant: Some children's Ideas." N.Z. Science Teacher 31: 10-14.
- Bell, B. F. (1981b). "When is an animal not an animal?" Journal of Biological Education 15(3): 213-218.
- Bell, B. F. and M. Barker (1982). "Toward a scientific concept of animal." Journal of Biological Education 16(3): 197-200.
- Berthelsen, B. (1999). Students Naïve Conceptions in Life Science. MSTA Journal, 44(1) (Spring’99), pp. 13-19.
- Bishop, B., & Anderson, C. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.
- Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1991a). Development of pupils' ideas about seeing and hearing: The path of light and sound. Research in Science and Technological Education, 9(2), 223-244.
- Boyes, E.; and Stanisstreet, Martin. (1991b) Misconceptions in first-year undergraduate science students about energy sources for living organisms. Journal of Biological Education. 25 (Autumn 1991), p. 209-13
- Braund, M. (1998). Trends of children’s concepts of vertebrate and invertebrate. Journal of Biological Education. 32(2) 112-118
- Brown, D., & Clement, J. (1992). Classroom teaching experiments in mechanics. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 380-397). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel.
- Brumby, M. (1979). "Problems in learning the concept of natural selection." Journal of Biological Education 13: 119-122.
- Brumby, M. (1982). "Students perceptions of the concept of life." Science Education 66(4): 613-622.
- Burback, D. J., & Peterson, L. (1986). Children’s concepts of physical illness: A review and critique of the cognitive-developmental literature. Health Psychology, 5(3), 307-325.
- Cakir, M. & Crawford, B.(2001). Prospective Biology Teachers' Understanding of Genetics Concepts. Paper Presented at the annual meeting of the association for the Education of Teachers in Science. 1-18.
- Cañal, P. (1999). Photosynthesis and ‘inverse respiration’ in plants: an inevitable misconception? [Electronic version]. International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 363-371.
- Caramazza, A., McCloskey, M. and Green, B. (1981). Naive beliefs in sophisticated subjects: Misconceptions about trajectories of objects. Cognition, 9:117-123.
- Champagne, A. B., L. E. Klopfer, et al. (1980). "Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics." American Journal of Physics 48: 1074-1079.
- Champagne, A. b., R. F. Gunstone, et al. (1983). "Naive knowledge and science learning." Research in Science and Technological Education 1(2): 173-183.
- Champagne, A., Gunstone, R., & Klopfer, L. (1985). Instructional consequences of students' knowledge about physical phenomena. In L. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 61-90). Academic Press, Inc.
- Chi, M. T.H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199.
- Collins, A. (1985). Component models of physical systems. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 80-89, Irvine, California.
- Cromley, J. G.& Mislevy, R. J. (2004).Task Templates Based on Misconception Research: CSE Report 646. National Center for Research on Evaluation Standards and Student Testing CRESST.
- Dahlgren, L.O. and Marton, F. (1978). Student conceptions of subject matter. Studies in Higher Education, 3(7):25-35.
- Demastes, S. S., J. J. Settlage, et al. (1995). "Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: cases of replication and comparison." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32(5): 535-550.
- Demastes, S. S., R. G. Good, et al. (1995). "Students' Conceptual Ecologies and the Process of Conceptual Change in Evolution." Science Education 79(6): 637-666. '
- Demastes, S. S., R. G. Good, et al. (1996). "Patterns of conceptual change in evolution." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33(4): 407-431.
- Doran, R.L. (1972). Misconceptions of selected science concepts held by elementary school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9:127-137.
- Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's Ideas in Science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. New York: Routledge
- Driver, Rosalind, and Jack Easley. (l978)"Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students." Studies In Science Education 5: 61-84.
- Dykstra, D. I., C. F. Boyle, et al. (1992). "Studying Conceptual Change in Learning Physics." Science Education 76(6): 615-652.
- Eaton, J. F., Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1984). Student preconceptions interfere with learning: Case studies of fifth-grade students. Elementary School Journal, 64, 365-379.
- Engel Clough, Elizabeth, and Colin Wood-Robinson. (1985)"How Secondary Students Interpret Instances of Biological Adaptation." Journal Of Biology Education 19: 125-130.
- Engel, E. and R. Driver (1981). Investigating pupils' understanding of aspects of pressure, Centre for Studies in Science Education, Univeristy of Leeds.
- Eshach, H., & Schwartz, J. (2006). Sound stuff: Naive materialism in middle-school students’ conceptions of sound. International Journal of Science Education, 28(7), 733-764. –
- Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 498-531). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Fetherstonhaugh, T. and D. F. Treagust (1992). "Students' Understanding of Light and Its Properties: Teaching to Engender Conceptual Change." Science Education 76(6): 653-672.)
- Fisher, Kathleen. (1985)"A Misconception in Biology: Amino Acids and Translation." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 22: 53-62.
- Fung, P., Brayshaw, M., du Boulay, B. and Elsom-Cook, M. (1990). Towards a taxonomy of novices' misconceptions of the prolog interpreter. Instructional Science, 19(4/5):311-336.
- Fung, P., du Boulay, B. and Elsom-Cook, M. (1987). An initial taxonomy of novices' misconceptions of the prolog interpreter. CITE Report 27, Centre for Information Technology in Education, Institute for Educational Technology, The Open University.
- Garnett, P. J. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electric circuits and oxidation-reduction equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2):121-42.
- Grimellini-Tomasini, N., B. Pecori-Balandi, et al. (1993). "Understanding Conservation of Laws in Mechanics: Students' Conceptual Change in Learning about Collisions." Science Education 77(2): 168-189.)
- Gunstone, R. F. and R. T. White (1980). "A matter of gravity." Research in Science Education 10: 35-44.
- Gunstone, R. R. and R. T. White (1981). "Understanding of gravity." Science Education 65: 291-299.
- Hancock, Cyril H. (1940). "An Evaluation of Certain Popular Science Misconceptions." Science Education 24: 208-213.
- Hapkiewicz, A. (1992). Finding a List of Science Misconceptions. MSTA Newsletter, 38 (Winter’92), pp. 11-14.
- Hapkiewicz, A. (1999). Naïve Ideas in Earth Science. MSTA Journal, 44(2) (Fall’99), pp. 26-30.
- Hecht, H., Bertamini, M., & Gamer, M. (2005). Naive optics: Acting on mirror reflections. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 1023-1038.
- Helm, H. (1980). Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students. Physics Education, 15(2):92-97&105.
- Helm, Hugh, and Joseph D. Novak. (1983) Proceedings of the International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, July, 1983. ED 242 553.
- Henriques, Laura. (2002). “ Children’s Ideas about weather: A review of the literature.” School Science and Mathematics, v102 n5 p202-15
- Hershey, David, R. (1995). Avoid Misconceptions When Teaching about Plants, American Institute of Biological Sciences. [Electronic version]. Retrieved October 28th, 2007, from http://www.actionbioscience.org/education/hershey.html.
- Hopp, John C. (1985)"Cognitive Learning Theory and Classroom Complexity." Research in Science and Technological Education 3: 159-174.
- Hulland, C. and H. Munby (1994). "Science, Stories, and Sense-Making: A Comparison of Qualitative Data from a Wetlands Unit." Science Education 78(2): 117-136. '
- Kyle, W. C., Jr. & Shymansky, J. A. (April 1, 1989). Enhancing Learning Through Conceptual Change Teaching , In Research Matters - to the Science Teacher, No. 8902. National Association of Research in Science Teaching. Found online http://www.educ.sfu.ca/narstsite/publications/research/concept.htm
- Lawrenz, Frances. (1986) "Misconceptions of Physical Science Concepts Among Elementary School Teachers." School Science and Mathematics 86: 654-660.
- Lee, O., Eichinger, D., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G. D., & Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30 (3), 249-270.
- Linn, M. C., & Burbules, N. C. (1993). Construction of knowledge and group learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 91-119). Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
- Marmaroti, P. and Galanopoulou, D. (year) Pupils’ Understanding of Photosynthesis: A questionnaire for the simultaneous assessment of all aspects [Electronic version]. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 383-403.
- Matz, M. (1982). Towards a process model for high school algebra errors. In Sleeman, D.H. and Brown, J.S., (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 25-50. Academic Press, London.
- McCleland, G. (1975). Earthly mechanics: Two misapprehensions and a heresy. Physics Education, 10:128-129.
- McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In Gentner, D. and Stevens, A., (eds.), Mental Models, pages 299-324. Lawrence Erlbaum Press.
- McCloskey, M., Caramazza, A. and Green, B. (1980). Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naive beliefs about the motion of objects. Science, 5:1139-1141.
- McDermott, L. (1991). Millican lecture 1990. What we teach and what is learned-closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59, 301-315.
- Michael, J. A. (1998). Students' Misconceptions about Perceived Physiological Responses. Advances in Physiology Education. 19(1), S90-S98.
- Minstrell, J. (1984). Teaching for the understanding of ideas: Forces on moving objects. In C. W. Anderson (Ed.), Observing science classrooms: Perspectives from research and practice. 1984 Yearbook of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (pp. 55-73). Columbus, OH: ERIC Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 255 355).
- Mintzes, J. (1984). Naïve theories in Biology: children’s concepts of the human body. School Science and Mathematics. 84(7) 548-555.
- Moore, R.; Mitchell, Gill; Bally, Rod. (2002) Undergraduates' understanding of evolution: ascriptions of agency as a problem for student learning. Journal of Biological Education. 36 (2) (Spring 2002), p. 65-71.
- Novick, S. and J. Nussbaum (1978). "Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: an interview study." Science Education 63(3): 273-282.
- Novick, S. and J. Nussbaum (1981). "Pupil's understanding of the particulate nature of matter: a cross-age study." Science Education 65(2): 187-196.
- Nussbaum, J. and S. Novick (1976). "An assessment of children's concepts of the earth using structured interviews." Science Education 60: 535-550.
- Osborne, Roger. J. (1981). Children's ideas about electric current. New Zealand Science Teacher, 29:12-19.
- Osborne, R. J. (1983). "Modifying children’s ideas about electric current." Research in Science and Technological Education 1(1): 73-82.
- Osborne, R. J. and Gilbert, J.K. (1979). An approach to student understanding of basic concepts in science. Technical report, Institute of Educational Technology, University of Surrey.
- Osborne, R.J. and Gilbert, J.K. (1980a). A method for investigating concept understanding in science. European Journal of Science Education, 2(3):311-321.
- Osborne, Roger J., and John K. Gilbert. (1980b)"A Technique for Exploring Students' Views of the World." Physics Education 15: 376-379.
- Osborne, R. and M. M. Cosgrove (1983). "Children's conceptions of the changes of states of water." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20(9): 825-838.
- Osborne, R. and P. Freyberg (1985). Learning in Science: The Implications of Children's Science. Auckland, NZ, Heinemann Education.
- Osborne, R.J., Bell, B.F. and Gilbert, J.K. (1983). Science teaching and children's views of the world. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1):1-14.
- Ozay, E. & Oztas, H. (2003). Secondary students’ interpretations of photosynthesis and plant nutrition. Journal of Biological Education, 37(2), 68-70.
- Palmeri, A. (2007). Teaching about animals: Reflections on teaching to address the gaps between adults’ and children’s conceptions. Science and Children, 45 (1), 52-55
- Park, Jongwon; Han, Sooja. (2002). Using deductive reasoning to promote the change of students’ conceptions about force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, v24 n6 p593-609
- Peters, P.C. (1982). Even honors students have conceptual difficulties with physics. American Journal of Physics, 50(6):501-508.
- Phillips, W.C. 1991, Earth Science Misconceptions, Science Teacher Feb'91 pp 21-23.
- Pine, K., Messer, D., & St. John, K. (2001). Children's Misconceptions in Primary Science: A Survey of Teachers' Views. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(1), 79-96.
- Raghavan, K. and R. Glaser (1995). "Model-Based Analysis and Reasoning in Science: The MARS Curriculum." Science Education 79(1): 37-61.
- Reiss, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1999). Children's Knowledge of the Human Skeleton. Primary Science Review, Dec(60), 7-10.
- Roth, K. (1991). Reading science texts for conceptual change. In C. M. Santa, D. E. Alverman (Eds.), Science Learning Processes and Applications. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
- Rowell, J. A. and C. J. Dawson (1977). "Teaching about floating and sinking: an attempt to link cognitive psychology with classroom practice." Science Education 61(2): 245-253.
- Schollum, B. W. (1982). "Chemical Change." N.Z. Science Teacher 33: 5-9.
- Schollum, B. W. and J. C. Happs (1982). "Learner's views about burning." Australian Science Teachers Journal 28(3): 84-88.
- Shannon, B. (1976). Aristotelianism, Newtonianism and the physics of the layman. Perception, 5.
- Shepardson, D. P. and E. B. Moje (1994). "The Nature of Fourth Graders' Understandings of Electric Circuits." Science Education 78(5): 489-514.)
- Shipstone, D.M. (1984). A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits. European Journal of Science Education, 6(2):185-198.
- Shipstone, D.M. (1988). Pupils' understanding of simple electrical circuits: Some implications for instruction. Physics Education, 23(2):92-96.
- Shipstone, D.M., Rhoneck, C., Jung, W., Karrqvist, C., Dupin, J.J., Johsua, S. Licht, P. (1988). A study of student understanding of electricity in five european countries. International Journal of Science Education, 10(3):303-316.
- Siegal, M. (1988). Children's Knowledge of Contagion and Contamination as Causes of Illness. Child Development, 59(5), 1353-1359.
- Sleeman, D. (1984a). An attempt to understand student's understanding of basic algebra. Cognitive Science, 8(4):387-412.
- Sleeman, D. (1984b). Mis-generalization: An explanation of observed mal-rules. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference, pages 51-56. Cognitive Science Society.
- Smith, E., & Anderson, C. W. (1983, April). The effects of teacher's guides on teacher planning and classroom instruction in activity-based science. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. April 8-12.
- Smith, Edward L. (1983) "Teaching for Conceptual Change: Some Ways of Going Wrong." Final Report. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching, June 1983. ED 237 493.
- Smith, Edward L., and Charles W. Anderson. (1984) "Plants as Producers: A Case Study of Elementary Science Teaching." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 21: 685-698.
- Soloman, G. E., and Cassimatis, N. L. (1999). On facts and conceptual systems: Young children’s’ integration of their understanding of germs and contagion. Developmental Psychology V35 p.113-129
- Solomon, J. (1983). "Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains." European Journal of Science Education 5(1): 49-59.
- Songer, N. B. & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 28 (9), 761-784.
- Spiropoulou, D.; Kostopoulos, D.; Jacovides, C.P. (1999) “ Children’s alternative conceptions on weather and climate.” School Science Review, v81 p55-59 Sep 1999
- Stead, B. F. and R. J. Osborne (1980). "Exploring science students' concepts of light." Australian Science Teachers Journal 26(3): 84-90.
- Stead, K. E. and R. J. Osborne (1981). "What is friction? Some children's ideas." Australian Science Teachers Journal 27(3): 51-57.
- Stepans, J. (1994). Targeting Students’ Science Misconceptions. FL: Idea Factory.
- Stevens, A., Collins, A. and Goldin, S.E. (1982). Misconceptions in students' understanding. In Sleeman, D.H. and Brown, J.S., (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 13-49. Academic Press, London.
- Tamir, P., R. Gal-Choppin, et al. (1981). "How do intermediate and junior high school students conceptualize living and non-living?" Journal of Research in Science Teaching 18(3): 241-248.
- Tasker, R. & Freyberg, P. (1985). Facing the mismatches in the classroom. In Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (Eds.), Learning in science. The implications of children's science (pp. 66-80). Auckland: Heinemann.
- Teixeira, F. (2000). What Happens to the Food We Eat? Children's Conceptions of the Structure and Function of the Digestive System. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 507
- Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science. 10(2).
- Trowbridge, D. E. and L. C. McDermott (1981). "Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration." American Journal of Physics 49: 242-253.
- Trowbridge, John E., and Joel L. Mintzes. (1985) "Students' Alternative Conceptions of Animals and Animal Classification." School Science and Mathematics 85: 304-316.
- Trumper, R. and P. Gorsky (1993). "Learning about energy: the influence of alternative frameworks, cognitive levels, and closed-mindedness." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30: 637-648.
- Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. (1999). Learning about Skeletons and Other Organ Systems of Vertebrate Animals. Science Education International, 10(1), 29-33.
- Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1(2):205-221.
- Viennot, L. (1985). Analysing students' reasoning in science: A pragmatic view of theoretical problems. European Journal of Science Education, 7(2):151-162.
- Wallace, J. D. (1990). "The Concept Map as a Research Tool: Exploring Conceptual Change in Biology." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27(10): 1033-1052
- Watson, B., & Kopnicek, R. (1990, May). Teaching for conceptual change: confronting children’s experience, Phi Delta Kappan May 1990, pp. 680-684
- Watts, D.M. (1983). A study of schoolchildren's alternative frameworks of the concept of force. European Journal of Science Education, 5(2):217-230.
- Watts, D.M. (1985). Student conceptions of light: A case study. Physics Education, 20(4):183-187.
- White, B.Y. (1983). Sources of difficulty in understanding newtonian dynamics. Cognitive Science, 7:41-65.
- Wicklund, R.A. and Brehm, J. (1976). Perspectives on Cognitive Dissonance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
- Worth, K. (2000). The power of children’s thinking. Inquiry: Thoughts, Views, and Strategies (2), 25-31.
- Za'Rour, G.I. (1975). Science misconceptions among certain groups of students in Lebanon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12:385-391.