| Sermon on the Feast of the Visitation |
|
|
Home Theology Main Page Email me! |
Your pilgrim shrines have all been boldly cut down, as prophets chopped the pagan groves, wrathful at the blashphemy of other gods. New at birth, without stain of soul, Mother of God with blessed paps--so pure! ascendant intercessor, standing cold and pale: bejewelled queen of higher realms; as Dagon you have tumbled down to earth: nagging Jewish mama, with a son you hardly knew. O Miriam, who saw her first-born die, how shall we see you now, so common and plain? Woman of faith, fulfillment of Eve's promise, vessel of light, conductor of peace, nurser of our hope. I wrote this poem when, after 5 1/2 years in a fundamentalist church, I finally began to come to terms with my Roman Catholic upbringing. Mary has always been a part of my life--whether as the quiet, gentle, beautiful woman hovering in the background of my family's faith; or as the picture of "papist" denials of the sufficiency of the atoning death of Jesus Christ; or as the symbol of the oppression of women in patriarchal Christianity. From all these influences, a new picture of Mary is beginning to emerge for me. I would like to share some of that with you. My image of Mary is based, primarily, on Luke's portrayal of her in his infancy narrative. Unlike the Mary depicted in Matthew, the Mary of Luke is active, an independent agent: here it is Mary who receives visions of the angel Gabriel, not Joseph; it is Mary who chooses to give her physical-spiritual self to God's redemptive purposes; it is Mary who picks up and visits her kinswoman Elizabeth; and it is Mary who ponders on the meaning of all these events. It is Mary's "yes" to God which is the primary focus of later Mariology. Through that "yes" Mary takes an active part in our redemption. As St. Ambrose put it: "Mary . . . has worked the salvation of the world, and conceived the redemption of all." This stress on Mary's part in our salvation led some to call her co-redemptrix. Tempting though it may be to see Mary as the female savior, balancing the male Jesus, such an approach leads too easily to a male/female dualism, where women and men are seen as radically different, requiring separate mediators to bring them to God. On to Part 2 |