Peace Through Strength?
November 4,
2005
Bush must veto McCain
Amendment
There are concerns today
because of the profits of the world's largest oil companies, because of the high
medical deductible of the world's largest retailer, and because of the
retractions of retirees' benefits from the world's largest auto
marker.
Who is to say that if any of us
were CEO of any of these companies things would be any
different?
The opportunity before us,
as always, is to make things better. The "more-more-more" syndrome does seem to
impact many in business these days. However, to be fair, the generosity of many
companies to our state and other needs has been
abundant.
These matters of business
can, by and large, be worked out in the marketplace. What has no margin for
error is our ability to provide peace and safety for our citizens and
country.
On Oct. 5, the U.S. Senate
passed by a 90-9 margin the McCain Amendment to a spending bill that, according
to an Oct. 29 editorial in the Wall Street Journal, would "hamstring the
military and CIA."
Among the nine "no"
votes on the ill-thought-out amendment was our Sen. Thad Cochran and Chairman of
the Senate Intelligence Committee Pat Roberts, R-Kan. Roberts says that
"interrogating terrorists is some of the valuable information we get. It saves
lives . . . passing a law that effectively telegraphs to the entire terrorist
world what they can expect if they are caught is not only counter-productive but
could be downright dangerous."
This
overreaction to the Abu Ghraib prison flap will place us in a disadvantage and
will signal an unwillingness to act aggressively in our own self-defense. The
U.S. House has yet to take this matter
up.
We can only hope our president
lives up to his often-stated priority to protect us and will veto this bill
should it reach his desk.
Ronald Reagan
has only been out of office 17 years, and hopefully his doctrine has not been
forgotten: "Peace through
strength."
John W. "Bill"
Bowlin
Hickory Flat
Posted: Mon - November 14, 2005 at 09:31 PM