by Shelley Walsh ©2000
One way you can think about these special exponents is to make the starting number be 1 and think of exponents as representing how many times you are multiplying 1 by the number. So with 25 you are multiplying 1 by 2 five times to get 32. Then with 21 you are multiplying 1 by 2 once to get 2 and with 20 you are multiplying 1 by 2 zero times which still leaves you with 1.
Another way to look at it is to look at the pattern going backwards.
34=3*3*3*3
33=3*3*3
32=3*3
At each stage as we go to one power lower we divide by the base 3, so to go down to the next lower number 1, it would seem that we should divide by 3 again to get
31=3*3/3=3
and then for the next number down 0, we could divide again to get
30=3/3=1.
This is also one good reason not to raise 0 to the 0, because 0/0 isn't 1.
3-1=1/3
3-2=(1/3)/3=1/32
and continuing like this in general we get that
3-n=1/3n
Of course there is nothing special about 3, so to make a proper definition out of this we can replace it with a letter and say
a-n=1/an.
Another way of seeing that this definition makes sense is to look at the division property of exponents. With positive exponents you can simplify something like 57/53 by realizing that the top is 7 fives multiplied together and the bottom is 3 fives multiplied together, so the three fives downstairs will cancel with three of the fives upstairs to leave 4 leftover, so in effect what happens is that the exponents subtract. And nothing special here about 5, 7, and 3, you could do this with any numbers. But what if the top and bottom were reversed and instead you had 53/57? Then if you didn't have negative number exponents, this rule wouldn't work, but you could still cancel out 3 fives. It would just leave 4 leftover in the bottom instead of in the top and you would get 1/54. Without negative exponents you need to have two different rules, one for when the exponent upstairs is bigger and one for when the exponent downstairs is bigger. But by making the above definition we only need one rule, because when you subtract a bigger number from a smaller number you get a negative number, and it exactly works here if a negative exponent means the reciprocal of the positive exponent.
Another interesting thing about negative exponents defined this way is that powers of ten exactly correspond to the place values in our number notation system, with the negative powers as the place values to the right of the decimal point. The number
1x103+2x102+3x101+4x100+5x10-1+6x10-2+7x10-3+8x10-4+9x10-5
Now that I think I have convinced you that this definition makes some sense, here's something extra about it that can sometimes be helpful for computing with it.
You can think of the exponent as divided into two parts, the positive number and the minus sign. The positive number tells you how many times you multiply the number by itself and the minus sign says to take the reciprocal and you can do those operations in either order. The way the definition is written, you raise to the power and then take the reciprocal, which is usually the best way to do it if you have a whole number. So for example when you raise 2 to the -3 you write
2-3=1/23=1/8,
in effect multiplying 2 times 2 times 2 to get 8 and then taking the reciprocal to that. But if you want to raise a fraction to a negative power, particularly one with a 1 in the numerator, it is easier to do it the other way around. You could raise 1/2 to the 4 power by writing down the definition like this
(1/2)-4=1/(1/2)4=1/(1/16)=16,
inverting and multiplying in the last step, but you could do it easier by first taking the reciprocal and then raising to the power.
The reciprocal of 1/2 is 2.
24=16