O.A.R.'s
new disc Stories Of A Stranger
hit stores today. Arguably this is the most
powerful release from the Maryland by way of Columbus outfit yet. Amazon.com
saysStories
puts the listener "center seat, a few rows back" at an O.A.R. show. But fans
will pay a premium for this experience if they buy from iTunes - $14.99 in fact.
This is the most expensive single-disc
new release I can remember being released on the iTunes Music Store. Apple touts
the release as the "Bonus Video Version," offering a "making of" video, a
digital booklet and two useless dub versions of "Program Director" and "One
Shot." I will say it again. In fact I will scream
it...
$14.99 IS ENTIRELY TOO
MUCH TO PAY FOR AN ALBUM DOWNLOAD ON iTUNES OR ANY OTHER DOWNLOAD STORE.
There. I said it. And I will keep
saying it as long as record labels continue to put pressure on Apple other
digital retailers to pump up the price of album downloads.
I can buy
Stories
on CD for $9.99 at a variety of brick-and-mortar retailers this week. A video
and two throwaway remixes do not make it worth $5 extra. Sorry O.A.R. Sorry
Apple. Sorry big record labels. Music For Life will be skipping this new release
in protest.
18
Years and $104.30 Later: A Bon Jovi Ticket
Story
Early in 1987 Huntington, WV
was rocked by the news that Bon Jovi would headline a show at the rarely used
Huntington Civic Center. Without a doubt this would be the hottest ticket in the
River Cities since Elvis was slated to open the facility in 1977 (he died before
the show, though). Bon Jovi was sitting atop the charts with "You Give Love A
Bad Name" and the album Slippery When
Wet was a must-have for everyone aged 8 to 38,
give or take a few years either way.
Sometime in February of that year my
dad dropped off me and a friend at Scratch & Tilt, Huntington's most famous
arcade and official ticket outlet. These were the days before Ticketmaster,
ticket brokers and elaborate schemes bilk fans of hard earned money. About 200
of us gathered to draw numbers for the chance to buy tickets. I vividly recall
pulling number 15 out of the hat. Jean jacket clad teenagers, Marshall students
and some older "kids" our parents warned us about formed an orderly
line.
A few minutes later I plunked
down $15 for a ticket to see Bon Jovi in Huntington, WV. I couldn't believe it.
The biggest band of the year was going to play the 9,000-seat Huntington Civic
Center. My parents couldn't believe I was spending a week's worth of lawn mowing
money to see them.
Fast forward
almost twenty years -> -> -> ->
Staying true to the marketing
push behind Bon Jovi's latest effort
Have A Nice
Day, I couldn't help but have a smirk on my
face as I hit "Purchase" on Ticketmaster's web site yesterday morning. I had
just spent $119.30 for two upper level seats to see Bon Jovi play Columbus'
Schottenstein Center. Who would have believed on that cold morning in 1987 that
two decades later I'd spending $104 more to see the aging rockers crank out
their arena friendly hits?
Had I opted
to purchase the lower level or floor seats for the November 9 show, I would have
had to shell out more than $200 after facility fees, handling charges and
Ticketmaster "convenience" charges. Since I just purchased a new home and
realized this would be my 10th time seeing Bon Jovi, I rationalized the upper
level "cheap" seats would be more than acceptable.
Tupac
"2Pac" Shakur is not dead. No way. You can't convince me.
Has anyone else noticed this is the
most prolific "dead" guy in history? There has been more than a dozen Tupac
album releases since his death in 1996. Although many are remix or live discs,
at least a half dozen albums of original material have found their way to record
store shelves.
Now comes news that a
Tupac screenplay is heading to the sliver screen.
Live 2 Tell
is being developed as a feature film and will
begin shooting in March 2006 according
to Billboard.com.
Also, on a
recent trip to an urban record store I noticed an abundance of 2Pac merchandise
- calendars, posters, stickers, etc.
Coldplay's
X&Y
was the first album offered for pre-order on the iTunes Music Store. One week
later came the opportunity to pre-order the Black Eyed Peas
Monkey
Business. Then came a steady stream of
pre-orders - Bon Jovi, The Rolling Stones, Sheryl Crow, Fiona Apple, Depeche
Mode, Franz Ferdinand – and the list goes on.
I will admit it's a pretty sweet deal
at first glance. As an iTMS customer, I get the chance to pre-order a hot album
with the promise of extras and bonuses not offered on the standard download.
Typically it's a bonus track or a video. In the case of Depeche Mode, its access
to a pre-sale code for concert tickets. Cool,
eh?
But look deeper. These pre-orders
often carry a price tag heftier than their standard download counterparts -
$11.99 instead of $9.99. It also gives the big labels leverage to tout these new
albums in interviews and in the media. The labels can now say "Artist X's album
had 40,000 pre-orders through iTunes." I realize this isn't any different than
pre-ordering the disc through Amazon.com. But there the albums are frequently
discounted.
I also have to ask if the
bonuses are really worth the extra two bucks? Usually you receive a "bonus"
track that was actually deemed a throwaway by the band or the label. Why wasn't
it good enough to be included on the album in the first place? For completists,
it may be worth it. For casual fans, perhaps not.
And I still can't get past paying for
videos. These are supposed to be free! I remember MTV's purpose in the 80s.
Music videos are commercials for an album. Do you pay Aquafresh to see ads for
toothpaste? No. So why do I have to pay Sony for a John Mayer
video?
Apple To Sell Music Videos; Video iPods Not Far Off?
Word on the
street is that Apple is in negotiations with record labels to sell
music videos. Am I the only one who thinks it is a bad idea to pay for what is
basically a commercial for a song? Perhaps my age has something to do with this.
I remember watching NBC's Friday Night Videos (pre-MTV for you kids out there)
for the latest, hippest clips from the likes of Duran Duran, The Police and The
Cars. Obviously I remember also when MTV actually played music videos.
The funny thing is that I really don't
miss music videos that much. You'd be hard pressed to find someone who loves
music as much as I do. But music videos I could live without. Sure, I tune in to
the VH1 countdown, MTV 2 or MTV Hits everyone once in a while. And occasionally
I will check out the video section in the iTunes Music Store. But would I pay to
see these clips?
Sorry, but my answer
is a resounding NO. These are commercials folks. The entire purpose of a music
video is to sell records (or CDs or downloads) and merchandise. I realize
musicians and labels are looking for as many revenue streams as possible. But
this is not something that is going to take the over-30 crowd by storm.
Can Apple revolutionize music videos
(and possible movies) they revolutionized portable music with the iPod? All I
can say is I might pay attention if the product was as or more interesting than
the current iPods. No way do I want to watch a music video on a two inch screen.
Nor do I even want to think about downloading a blockbuster movie to only be
able to watch it in QuickTime on my Mac. Bring me a revolutionary product and I
promise to open up my mind again.
What is going on with all the covers albums? Is Rod
Stewart to blame. This trend really seemed to take off when Stewart delivered
The Great American Songbook
Series to masses of baby boomers eager to hear
mellow classics from a one-time rocker. Now we have entries from Rick
Springfield, Carly Simon and Michael McDonald. Erasure even got in on the act
with the shamelessly titled Other
People's Songs.
I'm not sure what disturbs me the most
- the fact so many artists are choosing the remake route or that I actually like
some of these albums. Many singers and musicians can breathe new life into
classics. And likewise, these classics can breathe new life into stalled,
failing or forgotten careers. At the same time, it is almost sacrilegious to
take on the Motown catalog or eighties classics.
Now, let's just hope this trend
doesn't carry over to shows a la Clay Aiken and his Jukebox Summer
Tour 2005. The American Idol will play songs from the 50s through
today because he "thought it would be cool to sing a bunch of covers and relate
to everybody." And while this formula is successful, I'd rather "relate" to a
band or singer based on the feelings I have and connections I made based on
their
original music.
Still, I think this is
going to be a lasting trend. Most of the remake albums are selling very well.
The Clay Aiken tour is apparently doing good business. Most people, it seems,
aren't bothered by the Nick At Nite approach to music.
As
I watched Live 8 replay on VH1 and MTV over the weekend, it became obvious the
Pink Floyd reunion was the musical show stopper. I won't spend a lot of time on
the details as the reunion as been written about endlessly elsewhere (see: Billboard
and Rolling
Stone), but let's just suffice to say it was obvious the reunion was
exciting for the band and fans alike.
It also appears that Pink Floyd is one
of the obvious sales beneficiaries of the Live 8 concerts. The band's catalog
appears to be moving well at retail. HMV reports that sales of
Echoes: The Best of Pink
Floyd jumped 1343 percent following the show.
Music Fans Download $1 Singles; Shy Away From $18 Albums
Music fans are sending record companies a message in
2005 – $1 downloads are more appealing than $18 CDs. So far, albums
sales are down 7% this year compared to last. Unless there is a second half
savior, the record industry will see a sales decline for the fourth time in five
years (2004 was the only year record sales increased from the previous years.
Thus far, 282.6 million albums have been sold compared to 303 million this time
last year.
Meanwhile, digital downloads
are skyrocketing. More than 158 million tracks have been sold this year compared
to 55 million in the first half of 2004. Apple's iTunes Music Store continues
it's push to a half billion downloads since the stores debut in 2003. But
everyone agrees $1 downloads can't offset the losses of $18 CDs.
And in the face of the news, many
major artists continue to balk at a la carte single downloads citing lost
revenue. Madonna, Radiohead and Linkin Park are just some of the examples of
those opposed to selling their music on a per track basis. Also concerned are
artists who write their own music as royalties are reduced to mere pennies per
download.
We are indeed reaching a
critical point in the music industry. Consumers have been given the choice of
downloading only the songs they like for a buck apiece instead of squandering
$20 on an album containing little more than a few hits, lots of filler and the
occasional bonus material. And its obvious that music fans are jumping on the a
la carte bandwagon. Therefore, recording artists and record companies must face
the challenge of reinventing themselves for this new model of purchasing.
Live 8 Rocks The World; MTV Networks Coverage Doesn't Rock Anything
The
stars came out in droves around the planet today. Paul McCartney, REM, U2, The
Killers, Madonna, Duran Duran, The Who, Pink Floyd, Barenaked Ladies, Dave
Matthews Band, Rob Thomas, Jay-Z, Stevie Wonder, Toby Keith, Linkin Park, Mariah
Carey and the list goes on and on. The people came out in droves - perhaps as
many as one million in Philadelphia alone. And the world tried to watch on
television.
Tried to watch? By no
means do I want to take away from the importance of Live 8 and the historic
impact it could have as the G8 leaders meet. But what was MTV and VH1 thinking
in their obtrusive and constantly interrupted coverage? Hosts and on-air
personalities rattled constantly, breaking into live sets and hopping from one
point in a venue to another. Other times the network cut to commercial mid-set.
Multi-act festivals are difficult to watch without the help of shoddy production
planning on the part of MTV Networks.
I remember watching Live Aid in 1985.
If my memory serves me correctly that show was presented without interruption,
save the occasional plea for aid (which, of course, was understandable). MTV and
VH1 should have taken a cue from the history books and put in place a better
strategy to bring this show to its viewers. Even with today's limited attention
spans, viewers are capable of watching more than 45 seconds of a song without
interruption.
This hack job may truly
represent the end of "music" in MTV. Let's hope Live 8 is more successful in
keeping the attention of the world's leaders than MTV was in presenting what was
probably the world's greatest concert.
Who's The Greatest American Rock & Roll Band Ever?
We've witnessed and been a part of many music
debates over the years. Who's the greatest band? What's the greatest album ever
recorded? What's the best song put on wax? But Whitney Matheson today proposed
an even tougher question in her USA Today column Pop
Candy.
What's the
greatest American rock band of all time?
While Matheson provides many
convincing arguments and anecdotes supporting a variety of bands, I couldn't
resist posing the same question to my friends. Not surprisingly, I got a variety
of answers with no consensus on which American band is the best.
Among the responses was the well
thought out "there's no way to answer that question as different time periods
have different greats" and the unsupported "CRACK THAT WHIP! Is Devo
American?"
Of course, the first
response I got was "you know this going to get ugly before it's over, right?"
And with that the suggestions rolled
in...
Creedence Clearwater Revival,
R.E.M., The Eagles and The Beach Boys were all frontrunners. But there was also
the obligatory Nirvana vote (although that was probably just to piss me off) and
the left field suggestion of The Jayhawks. My personal favorite was "does Lisa
Lisa and The Cult Jam count?"
For the
record, Music 4 Life supports the idea there are many great American rock &
roll bands from many different eras. Fleetwood Mac is just as important as The
Grateful Dead. And love them or hate them, jam bands like Phish and the Dave
Matthews Band have been equally important in recent years. How do you overlook
the impact of the Ramones or focus completely on The Beach Boys?
Spin
magazine has unveiled its list of the 100 Greatest Albums of the Spin era
(1985-2005) in its July
issue. It should come as no surprise that any list containing
Nirvana's
Nevermind
would come under fire by Music 4 Life. However, as time marches on, I'm
softening my stance on Nirvana and taking issue with the likes of Pavement, PJ
Harvey and Pulp.
I'm not picking on
artists whose names that start with
P.
And I'm not knocking the artistic merits of any of the above artists or their
albums. Instead, I'm having problems with
Different
Class,
Rid of
Me or
Slanted and
Enchanted being listed ahead of, or even
among,
Odelay,
Achtung
Baby and
OK
Computer. I realize Spin has a different
audience than Rolling Stone, Blender or Teen People (no Backstreet Boys on this
list!). But come on, how do you rank Beck's masterpiece at No. 16 while
Pavement's
Slanted
takes the No. 4 slot?
There are a lot
of great albums on Spin's list. But there is a surprising number of
long-forgotten and almost-never-was bands on the list. Crowding masters like De
La Soul, The Smiths and The Cure are Fugazi, Raekwon and At The Drive-In. And we
mustn't forget the lasting impact of Neutral Milk Hotel's 1998 masterpiece
(never heard of 'em), Elastica's
Elastica
(barely remember them) and Big Black's
Atomizer
(they were big in Vegas).
You are forgiven if you haven't heard
of any of these artists because neither have many others. I realize editors and
contributors to magazines like Spin and Rolling Stone compile these lists to
facilitate discussion, stir debate and ultimately spur subscriptions. But at the
same time it makes you wonder if they really have a finger on the pulse of the
music consuming public.
I'm not saying
an album has to be played on the radio or sell a million copies to be ranked
among the greatest of all-time. I believe quite the opposite actually. However,
the albums or artists should be recognizable. Shouldn't they?
Its
official. I'm hooked on Sirius Satellite Radio. I've only been a subscriber for
a few days but I already feel the need to constantly listen. Its been pure joy
for this music fan to switch channels every 30 minutes or so and hear a
completely different kind of music without interruption. When was the last time
you heard String Cheese Incident or Bob Marley on terrestrial radio? What about
Miles Davis segueing into Bob Dylan?
I
purchased Sirius primarily for its inclusion of Jimmy Buffett's
Radiomargaritaville and the eventual debut of the king of all media - Howard
Stern. However, I've since discovered the Big 80s (Channel 8) with three of the
original MTV VJs (Mark Goodman, Nina Blackwood and Alan Hunter); Motown Mondays
on 60s Vibrations (Channel 6) and Jam On's (Channel 17) non-stop programming of
The Grateful Dead, Phish, SCI and more.
The cool part is I know there is still
much more to be discovered, including the news and talk selections. I'm
beginning to sound like a commercial for Sirius, but I can't help myself. This
is truly one of the best investments we've ever made and I highly recommend it
for any music lover.
And we all know
I'd take Sirius over XM. Why? Because Clear Channel, as I understand it, is a
major investor in XM. Enough said.
So
now Wacko Jacko is free. What's next? Does he record a new album? Does he change
his ways? I've heard all the pundits chime in with suggestions. So I guess that
gives me license to do the same.
Music 4 Life's Suggestions For
Jacko:
• Ditch the R&B
producers. Look in the mirror Mike. You aren't black anymore.
• Hire "Mutt" Lange to write and
produce next album. His crafty pop/rock sensibilities will bring a new edge to
your lightweight sound. Think AC/DC meets Shania Twain. Hopefully he can
position you somewhere in middle. • Go
on a Carl's Jr. binge. Eat the most fattening hamburgers for every meal. You
need to put on, oh, say 100 pounds or so. If given the opportunity to a
commercial for them, do it! I hear it really boosts the careers of superstars
who really don't have careers (ask Paris).
• Beat up the lead singer of the Von
Bondies. It will do wonders for your career and image.
• Sell the ranch. You need the
money and you shouldn't have any use for the carnival rides
anymore. • Move to the beach and take
up yachting or something. Superstars need a high profile, expensive hobby. And
besides, you need to work on your tan.
• What's with the badges and the weird
suits? Let's see you in more of an Uncle Kracker outfit - baggy shorts, Def
Leppard tee under a flannel shirt and a trucker hat. And a wallet on a chain to
accessorize.
Follow these suggestions
Jacko and you'll quite certainly be on the road to superstardom! If not, you'll
at least be tolerable again.
Thanks
to Jimmy Buffett, I was made aware of the manatee's plight. Yesterday, today I
had the opportunity to see up close and personal the large, aquatic manatees at
the Cincinnati
Zoo. I realize, of course, this post is only loosely tied to music via
Jimmy Buffett. But, I highly recommend Cincy Zoo's Manatee Springs exhibit to
anyone who has the chance to see it.
The manatee, along with much of
Florida's biodiversity, is threatened. This exhibit is a great opportunity to
learn more about those threats while seeing the American crocodile and
alligators in their natural habitat and viewing the manatee above and below
water.
MPAA and RIAA Fail To Understand Technology & Consumers
This week the Motion Picture Association of America
ripped a page from the recording industry's consumer-hating script. With the
help of the FBI and, if you can believe this, Homeland Security, the MPAA shut
down BitTorrent site EliteTorrents.org because it was sharing the new Star Wars
movie just as it was released in theaters. This is the continuation of a series
of disturbing moves from the industries reprsenting movies and music.
Technology is changing the way young
consumers watch and buy (when the option is available) movies and music. Those
under the age of 30 are accustomed to having immediate gratification and
technology has played a large role during their formative years. It only makes
sense that they, the largest consumers of popular music and movies, turn to the
internet for entertainment. Sadly, the music and movie industries have, for the
most part, turned their back on these young consumers and the technologies
they've integrated into their lives.