Apokatastasis

Exploring the doctrine of reintegration

Blog
Exile

The Temptation of Adam

We already know about the Temptation of Christ, and Jesus’ victory over the Devil. In his Treatise on the Reintegration of Beings, Martines de Pasqually tells us of another temptation, which is the cause of man’s fall. Indeed, the Temptation of Adam didn’t end well, and it took the Repairer, His Son, to initiate the reconciliation of Adam’s descendants with their Creator. Read More...

The Root of All Evil: 2 pillars and 5 consequences

Is God responsible for all the suffering and evil in the world?
Is the world completely evil?
What is evil?
Does free will have anything or everything to do with evil?
Age old questions indeed, used as arguments both for an against the existence of a God. These questions were recently raised during an interesting discussion with some friends, so I decided to give a short summary here of the way in which Martines de Pasqually approached the matter in his Treatise on the Reintegration of Beings. Read More...

Moses on Mount Sinai and the seven worlds paving the way to reintegration

Although the planets only occupy a very small proportion of Martines’ highly complex body of teachings, they are of central importance. Indeed, the celestial immensity, in Martines’ table, is shown as the intermediary between our universe—represented by the terrestrial immensity—and the Creator’s closest agents in the supercelestial immensity.
Read More...

The Hesychast and the Ten Commandments - Fifth Commandment

Honour your father and your mother” (Ex. 20,12), “for it is through them that God has brought you into this life, and they, after God, are the causes of your existence.” However, Gregory introduces a twist: “thus after God you should honour them and trust them, provided that your love for them strengthens your love for God. If it does not, flee from them, yet without feelings of hatred”. This reminds me of Matt 19,29 And everyone who has left houses, brothers, sisters, father, mother, children or land for the sake of my name will receive a hundred times as much, and also inherit eternal life. Read More...

Louis Claude de Saint-Martin and Plato: Where do our ideas come from?

Do ideas originate in the brain, or from the input of the senses, or are they independent of any individual brain? Do we depend on external stimuli to form ideas, or are we born with a set of ideas that just kick in independently of our environment? Is consciousness the product of nurture or nature? How interdependent are our ideas and our consciousness?

These questions may seem very outdated today, as the debate appears to have been settled by the neurological argument, according to which the brain is the origin of our consciousness. The question has now shifted to how consciousness arises, which is a similar problem to how ideas are produced.
However, the hypothesis that the brain is not the origin of all our ideas, but merely a “transducer”, can still be made: can one discriminate between a brain that only analyses and translates a raw input into a given output and a brain that is the actual source of the same output?
Read More...

Perception of God: Beauty and the soul, according to Plotinus

People of faith claim that they can feel God’s presence, metaphorically in their lives, and even physically in their hearts. But if God is transcendent, non-physical or supra-physical as it were, how can such a perception be possible at all? Let alone be proven? Also, how can one receive what is sometimes described as a calling from a God that is supposed to be so unfathomable? These questions have acquired some momentum with writers like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris. Read More...

Gregory of Nyssa - Migration and Virtues (Pt 4)

Gregory of Nyssa

Part 4: Migration and Virtues

The tension caused by our awareness of our entrapment in time and space, and by our glimpses of a spiritual life beyond and above it, give us the desire to seek further, and urges the soul to set on a journey towards eternal goodness:

“Because true goodness is clearly opposed to that which is not good, we are faced with a contradiction. It follows that persons who separate themselves from that which is not beautiful become attached to true beauty which constantly and at all times remains good. Such a gesture has nothing to do with the temporal order; rather, the good always preserves its own integrity. The human soul migrates towards this good from its corporeal existence after it has exchanged the present good for another one that is impossible to see clearly because we are burdened by this fleshly existence. However, we can have a notion [of this change] and draw a certain parallel between it and a possible withdrawal from that knowledge which pertains to this present life. No longer does corporeal existence weigh us down nor are we influenced by the weight of opposing elements, for this struggle within our human constitution is equally distributed and maintains our health.” (Concerning Those Who Have Died, J.34. )


Indeed, St Gregory likens the movement of the soul towards God to an upwards migration, leaving behind the weight of its present, “fleshy existence”:

“Let us now attend to the words ‘Vanity of vanities, all is vanity,’ and ‘What advantage is to man in his labor under the sun?’ In my opinion these words represent a soul stripped of its present condition here below when it migrates to the life it yearns after. If a person pursues life’s nobler aspects, he views his earlier condition in a harsh light and despises his present experience in comparison to what he has discovered.” (Commentary on Ecclesiastes, J.291).

“Persons who believe their origin lies in heaven call themselves heavenly. As Paul says, they have migrated to the heavenly way of life and resemble the heavenly [Christ].” (Against Apollinarius, J. 145).

The return of our human nature to its original state, as St Gregory writes, can only be accomplished if his desire of things more spiritual is greater than his enjoyment of his present state:

“Although the stage attained [of letting the Word enter one’s heart] is indeed greater than what a person had earlier, this stage does not limit his good; rather, the limit of his achievement becomes a beginning for the discovery of higher blessings. The person rising never stands still. He moves from one beginning to another, for the beginning of even greater blessings is never limited. The desire of a soul thus rising never remains in its knowledge, but by an ever greater desire, it moves onwards. The soul thus progresses through higher realms towards the unbounded.” (Commentary on the Song of Songs, J.247).


An important aspect of Man’s migration to God is that it is a perpetual process, in which previous experiences are less important than those ahead. Indeed, when guided well, our reconciliation with God is a gradual and directional evolution towards God:

“All heavenly bodies that receive a downward motion [...] are rapidly carried downwards of themselves, provided that any surface on which they are moving is graded and sloping and that they meet no obstacle to interrupt their motion. Similarly, the soul advances in the opposite direction lightly and swiftly moving upwards once it is released from the sensuous and earthly attachments, soaring from the world below up towards the heavens. And if nothing comes from above to intercept its flight, seeing that it is of the nature of Goodness to attract those who raise their eyes towards it, the soul keeps rising ever higher and higher, stretching with its desire for heavenly things ‘to those that are before,’ as the Apostle tells us, and thus it will always continue to soar ever higher. Because of what it has already attained, the soul does not wish to abandon the heights that lie beyond it. And thus the soul moves ceaselessly upwards, always reviving its tension for its onward flight by means of the progress it has already realised. Indeed, it is only spiritual activity that nourishes its force by exercise; it does not slacken its tension by action but rather increases it. This is the reason why we say that the great Moses, moving ever forwards, did not stop in his upward climb. He set no limit to his rise to the stars. But once he had put his foot upon the ladder of which the Lord had leaned, as Jacob tells us, he constantly kept moving to the next step; and he continued to go ever higher because he always found another step that lay beyond the highest one that he had reached.” (The life of Moses, in From Glory to Glory, Jean Danielou and Herbert Musurillo, New York, 1961, pp.57-8).


This spiritual evolution stands in contrast with evolution in the material realm, in which its directionality is necessarily cryptic. Why cryptic? Extrapolating from Origen’s and St Gregory’s theosophy, it appears to me that the motor of apokatastasis is man’s soul. Thus, if the root of evolution in its material and spiritual manifestations is immaterial, this cause will remain entirely hidden from the material eye. Yet, the spatial imagery that St Gregory uses in order to describe spiritual growth rests upon a moral implication. As such, behavioural implications of spiritual evolution must arguably influence evolution in every realm, in time. Indeed, the practice in our everyday lives of virtues is, according to Gregory, the true essence of our migration:

“Everything considered earthly, dumb, and speechless joins the sound of its own chords to the great voice of the heavenly choruses. The stretched chords in such an instrument are steadfastness and immovability before evil in every virtue. The virtues unite the cymbal’s pleasing harmony with chords when the sound of cymbals arouses our eagerness for the divine choir. To me this signifies the union of our nature with the angels. ‘Praise the Lord with the sound of cymbals.’ I understand this as the union of the angelic [nature] with the human when our human nature attains its original state and gives forth that sweet sound in union with others in thanksgiving.” (Commentary on the Inscriptions of the Psalms, J.66).

Gregory of Nyssa - Contemplation and Desire (Pt 3)

Gregory of Nyssa

Part 3: Contemplation and Desire

As we have seen previously, Gregory of Nyssa taught that man must leave his current predicament and make his way towards God. However, this requires him to abandon complacency and self indulgence, to leave behind his old ways and to remain constantly vigilant -

“But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.” (Mt 24:43)


But how can one summon enough strength to practice the virtues and reach the purity that are required for walking the narrow path of reconciliation?

“There is a wide interval between those who have been purified, and those who still need purification. For those in whose life time here the purification by the laver has preceded, there is a restoration to a kindred state. Now, to the pure, freedom from passion is that kindred state, and that in this freedom from passion blessedness consists, admits of no dispute.” (In The Great Cathechism)


Therefore,

“if we must describe the masonry, then let incorruptibility and impassability mould the house which justice and freedom will adorn. Let humility and patience shine in another part of the house along with piety befitting God. Let love, the noble craftsman, fashion all these virtues in a marvellous way.” (Commentary on Ecclesiastes, J.325.)


In other words, the object of man’s desire, and love, is God’s Wisdom rather than his own:

“And so it is equally reasonable that he who is enamoured of wisdom should hold the Object of his passionate desire, Who is the True Wisdom; and that the soul which cleaves to the undying Bridegroom should have the fruition of her love for the true Wisdom, which is God.”


And what better way would there be, if one desires to become a temple for God’s Wisdom, than to follow Christ’s example of ‘detachment’ from sin and ‘immutability’ in virtue?

“Because Christ received the first fruits of our common nature through his soul and body, he made it holy and kept it in himself as unmixed and uncontaminated with any evil; by offering [the first fruits of our common nature] through incorruptibility to the Father of incorruptibility, he might draw all those of the same kin and race (Eph 1.5) and adopt the disinherited and God's enemies to share his divinity. Just as purity and detachment united the dough's first fruit with the true Father and God, we, the mass of dough, should cling to the Father of incorruptibility by imitating the mediator's detachment and immutability as far as possible.” (On Perfection, J.206)

The bishop of Nyssa considered that our desire to resemble Christ is born from the contemplation and the perception (theoria) of infinite Good. And God being infinite, that desire itself must be infinite:

“Since, then, those who know that is good by nature, desire participation in it [God as absolute virtue], and since this good has no limit, the participant’s desire itself necessarily has no stopping place but stretches out with the limitless. […]

“Hope always draws the soul from the beauty which is seen to what is beyond, always kindles the desire for the hidden through what is constantly perceived. Therefore, the ardent lover of beauty, although receiving what is always visible as an image of what he desires, yet longs to be filled with the very stamp of the archetype. […]

“This truly is the vision of God: never to be satisfied in the desire to see him. But one must always, by looking at what he can see, rekindle his desire to see more. Thus, no limit would interrupt growth in the ascent to God, since no limit to the Good can be found nor is the increasing of desire for the Good brought to an end because it is satisfied.” (Life of Moses, pp. 31, 114, 116; translation by Malherbe and Ferguson).


“We need an unceasing desire for higher things, which is not content to acquiesce in past achievements; we ought to count it a loss if we fail to progress further.” (On the Beatitudes, p.130)


In addition to sight, St Gregory uses another worldly metaphor to convey his thought of ‘theoria’, the perception of God: the scent of the divine – an imagery that was to become popular amongst kabbalists of the middle ages with regards to the immolation of the sacrificial lamb (holocaust). Whereas the fumes of the holocaust attract the divine to earth, it is the opposite movement that St Gregory has in mind, although both lead to the same goal:

“I will take up again what I said at the start of this homily: let no one who is passionate, fleshly and still smelling of the foul odour of the old man [2 Cor 2:16] drag down the significance of the divine thoughts and words to beastly, irrational thoughts. Rather, let each person go out of himself and out of the material world. Let him ascend into paradise through detachment, having become like God through purity. Then let him enter into the inner sanctuary of the mysteries revealed in this book [the Song of Songs]. […] The souls, therefore, draw to themselves a desire for their immortal bridegroom and follow the Lord God, as it is written [Hos 11.10]. The cause of their love is the scent of the perfume to which they eternally run; they stretch out to what is in front, forgetting what is behind. “We shall run after you toward the scent of your perfumes.” (Commentary of the Song of Songs, J.25, J.39).


Again, one sees that infinite desire can lead to eternally migrating away from the “foul odour of the old man” and towards the ‘scent of the perfumes’ of the ‘bridegroom’.

Gregory of Nyssa - Exile & “diastema” (Pt 2)

Gregory of Nyssa

Part 2: Exile & “diastema”


A characteristic of our fallen human condition is its separation from God, by which process, divine unity is broken. St Gregory develops the notion of “diastema” which has the connotation of a standing apart, an extension or an interval. When applied to theology, it implies a separation existing on the side of creation which has a beginning (arche) and end (telos), and thus temporal limitations of our present existence. It can therefore be understood as a temporal, thus temporary, exile:

“All our notions are bound by time; they attempt to transcend their proper limits but cannot. Intervals of time constitute all our thoughts as well as the thought content. Yet we have learned to seek and to cherish that which transcends all creation.” (Commentary of Ecclesiastes, 412).


However, “diastema” does not apply in any way to God, since no division nor succession can apply to Him:

“Every measure (diastema) of distance that we could discover is beneath the divine nature: so no ground is left for those who attempt to divide this pretemporal and incomprehensible being by distinctions of superior & inferior.” (Against Eunomius, J.79.5, 52).

“Those who draw a circular figure in plane geometry from a centre to the distance (diastema) of the line of circumference tell us there is no definite beginning to their figure; and that the line is interrupted by no ascertained end (diastema) any more than by any visible commencement.” (Against Eunomius, J.218.1, 4).


It is therefore in Creation only that temporal and spacial “separation” are found. In fact, “diastema” is omnipresent throughout every aspect of our material universe thereby becoming a defining characteristic of any alienation from God. Indeed, that separation also exists in our mind, because of our own mode of projecting temporal boundaries on the world, whereby we inherently insert mental “gaps” between us and God. This, in turn, burdens us with the intellectual awareness of our alienation from God and from the immediateness that characterises the God’s Presence of God:

“For seeing that human life, moving from stage to stage, advances in its progress from a beginning to an end, and our life here is divided between that which is past and that which is expected, so that the one is the subject of hope, the other of memory; on this account, as, in relation to ourselves, we apprehend a past and a future in this measurable extent, so also we apply the thought, though incorrectly, to the transcendent nature of God; not of course that God in his own existence leaves any interval (diastema) behind, or passes on afresh to something that lies before, but because our intellect can only conceive things according to our nature, and measures the eternal by a past and a future, where neither the past precludes the march of thought to the illimitable and infinite, nor the future tells us of any pause or limit of his endless life.” (Against Eunomius, J.360.16, 296).

In contrast to our incorporeal but temporal intellect, our soul is by nature spiritual, thus timeless and incorporeal, and therefore is more to the likeness of God, breaching that “infernal circle” of the mind’s “separateness”:

“What is the divinity which the soul resembles? It is not the body, [it] lacks form, likeness, quality, figure, depth, place, time and anything else which resembles material creation; rather, once all these attributes are stripped away, the soul reveals its nature which is spiritual, immaterial, invisible, incorporeal and unchangeable. If we contemplate the stamp of the archetype, the soul necessarily conforms itself according to that image. The soul is recognised by its characteristics, that is, as being immaterial, without form, spiritual and incorporeal.” (Concerning those who have died, 41).


Indeed, God

“[…] is simple by nature, immaterial, without quality, magnitude, composed of nothing, circumscribed by no form […]” (On the Making of Man, 209.50).


Thus, Man comprises at the same time the material, the temporal (intellectual) and the spiritual – a spark of the divine. As St Gregory writes, Man

“extends from the first to the last and is one image of Him Who is.” (On the making of Man, 406).

Therefore, in St Gregory’s mind the “diastema” does not preclude Man from transcending his material temporal limitations, on the contrary:

“In this life we can apprehend the beginning and the end of all things that exist, but the beatitude that is above the creature admits neither end nor beginning, but is above all that is connoted by either, being ever the same, self-dependent, not travelling on by degrees from one point to another in its life...For increase has no place in the infinite, and that which is by its nature passionless excludes all notion of decrease.” (Against Eunomius, 257).


This explains why man, however immersed in his material senses he may be, always has the potential to see, and desire the perpetual presence of the divine, and thus be reconciled with God. As we shall see later, desire is what can pull man from his earthly bonds, and set him on the path to reconciliation.

The three extremities of the Earth

This is certainly one of the strangest aspects of Martines de Pasqually’s teachings: the Earth is triangular (see section 73 of the Treatise, referenced below). In fact, according to Martines, not only the earth but also the entire universe and the bodily shapes of all its inhabitants - including you and I - are triangular. This flies straight in the face of several passages of the Scriptures (Ez 7:2, Rev 7:1), but as I will show, there is a catch, as always, in understanding what Martines is really talking about. Read More...

The Universal Figure

When trying to grasp the entire creation at one glance, there are few possibilities: you must resort to a figure that, through heavy use of symbolism, allows extensive interpretation while remaining true to the world-view of the person or society that produced it. One of the most striking interpretations of creation, the universe and how man fits in it, is the one the Martines de Pasqually taught his disciples. Louis Claude de Saint-Martin drew an interpretation of the universal figure in his own copy of the Treatise on the Reintegration of Beings, and this is what I'll be discussing in this post. Read More...

Subscribe to RSS feed

Posterous Posterous
© 2009 S_A_B Contact Me