Martinism
Holy Trinity or Holy "Quatrinity"?
09/08/2009
In
his Treatise on the
Reintegration of Beings, Martines de Pasqually
often refers to the hypostases of the divinity.
However, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in
the Treatise,
don’t seem to follow strict Catholic dogma. Martines de
Pasqually was a roman catholic, yet his use, and
probably his grasp, of common theological terms
teetered on a fine line between orthodoxy and heresy.
Robert Amadou, arguably the greatest specialist of
Pasqually’s teachings since the 18th century, described
Martines’ archaic christology as antiochian and
pre-nicene.... Read
More...
Martines de Pasqually colloquium
22/02/2009
Martines de Pasqually tricentenary meeting
Organised by the Eleazar
Institute
In collaboration with the Martines de Pasqually Society
and the bookshop l’Etoile du Mage
In:
Marseilles, France, Saturday 18th and Sunday 19th
September 2010
The Temptation of Adam
09/10/2007
We already know
about the Temptation of Christ, and Jesus’ victory over
the Devil. In his Treatise on the
Reintegration of Beings, Martines de
Pasqually tells us of another
temptation, which is the cause of man’s fall.
Indeed, the Temptation of Adam didn’t
end well, and it took the Repairer,
His Son, to initiate the reconciliation of Adam’s
descendants with their Creator. Read
More...
The Root of All Evil: 2 pillars and 5 consequences
14/09/2007
Is God responsible for all the suffering and evil in
the world?
Is the world completely evil?
What is evil?
Does free will have anything or everything to do with evil?
Age old questions indeed, used as arguments both for an against the existence of a God. These questions were recently raised during an interesting discussion with some friends, so I decided to give a short summary here of the way in which Martines de Pasqually approached the matter in his Treatise on the Reintegration of Beings. Read More...
Is the world completely evil?
What is evil?
Does free will have anything or everything to do with evil?
Age old questions indeed, used as arguments both for an against the existence of a God. These questions were recently raised during an interesting discussion with some friends, so I decided to give a short summary here of the way in which Martines de Pasqually approached the matter in his Treatise on the Reintegration of Beings. Read More...
Moses on Mount Sinai and the seven worlds paving the way to reintegration
26/08/2007
Although the
planets only occupy a very small proportion of
Martines’ highly complex body of teachings, they are of
central importance. Indeed, the celestial immensity, in
Martines’ table, is shown as the intermediary between
our universe—represented by the
terrestrial immensity—and the Creator’s closest
agents in the supercelestial immensity.
Read More...
Read More...
Louis Claude de Saint-Martin and Plato: Where do our ideas come from?
22/07/2007
Do ideas
originate in the brain, or from the input of the
senses, or are they independent of any individual
brain? Do we depend on external stimuli to form ideas,
or are we born with a set of ideas that just kick in
independently of our environment? Is consciousness the
product of nurture or nature? How interdependent are
our ideas and our consciousness?
These questions may seem very outdated today, as the debate appears to have been settled by the neurological argument, according to which the brain is the origin of our consciousness. The question has now shifted to how consciousness arises, which is a similar problem to how ideas are produced.
However, the hypothesis that the brain is not the origin of all our ideas, but merely a “transducer”, can still be made: can one discriminate between a brain that only analyses and translates a raw input into a given output and a brain that is the actual source of the same output? Read More...
These questions may seem very outdated today, as the debate appears to have been settled by the neurological argument, according to which the brain is the origin of our consciousness. The question has now shifted to how consciousness arises, which is a similar problem to how ideas are produced.
However, the hypothesis that the brain is not the origin of all our ideas, but merely a “transducer”, can still be made: can one discriminate between a brain that only analyses and translates a raw input into a given output and a brain that is the actual source of the same output? Read More...
The three extremities of the Earth
20/08/2006
This is certainly one of the strangest aspects of
Martines de
Pasqually’s teachings: the Earth is triangular
(see section 73 of the Treatise, referenced
below). In fact, according to Martines, not only
the earth but also the entire universe and the
bodily shapes of all its inhabitants - including
you and I - are triangular. This flies straight in
the face of several passages of the Scriptures (Ez
7:2, Rev 7:1), but as I will show, there is a
catch, as always, in understanding what Martines
is really talking about. Read
More...
The Universal Figure
10/07/2006
When trying to grasp the entire creation at one glance,
there are few possibilities: you must resort to a
figure that, through heavy use of symbolism, allows
extensive interpretation while remaining true to the
world-view of the person or society that produced it.
One of the most striking interpretations of creation,
the universe and how man fits in it, is the one the
Martines de
Pasqually taught his disciples. Louis Claude
de Saint-Martin drew an interpretation of the
universal figure in his own copy of the
Treatise on the Reintegration of Beings, and this
is what I'll be discussing in this post. Read
More...
First paragraph of the Treatise of reintegration by Martines de Pasqually
06/06/2006
The following excerpt is a translation of the first
paragraph of Martines de Pasqually’s Treatise on the
reintegration of beings in the first property, virtue
and divine spiritual power.
The Treatise is considered to be a (pseudo-) midrach from the 18th century. Indeed, it is a commentary of the bible, and in many places, an extrapolation thereof. The scriptures are the lattice on which a profound teaching is woven. The actual source of Martines’ teaching is a matter of debate, but I have already mentioned one likely candidate. Read More...
The Treatise is considered to be a (pseudo-) midrach from the 18th century. Indeed, it is a commentary of the bible, and in many places, an extrapolation thereof. The scriptures are the lattice on which a profound teaching is woven. The actual source of Martines’ teaching is a matter of debate, but I have already mentioned one likely candidate. Read More...