The Root of All Evil: 2 pillars and 5 consequences
Is the world completely evil?
What is evil?
Does free will have anything or everything to do with evil?

Age old questions indeed,
used as arguments both for an against the existence of
a God. These questions were recently raised during an
interesting discussion with some
friends, so I decided to give a
short summary here of the way in which
Martines de
Pasqually approached the matter in
his Treatise on the Reintegration of
Beings.
The suffering that people
experience everyday is obviously the main argument for
the idea that an evil force is opposing human
happiness, and the urge to find explanations for this
matter of fact has been just as strong. As far back as
we look in written history, the world has been
described as both a good and a hostile place. Gnostic
sects have taken the view that the world is all evil,
created by an evil demiurge. Many others, like Plotinus
and many christians (for instance St Francis of
Assisi), took the view that the world is a mixed bag:
there is some evil (caused by Man, the Devil, etc.) and
some good (Plotinus
would speak
of the Beauty in natural world, or good deeds, love,
etc.).
What was Martines de Pasqually’s view on the origin of
Evil?
There are 2 principles on which Martines bases his
cosmology (which is actually a
cosmosophy):
1. God is good and manifests himself by
emanating immortal beings through
immutable laws and to whom he gives commandments. Thus,
Martines posits that all of creation is attributable to
God himself, creating beings as his agents. Hence,
there is no separate demiurge in martinism.
2. Evil is defined as those beings’ voluntary departure
from those commandments.
Those
2 premises have 5 consequences with regards to
evil:
1. God did not create evil. Evil, being the result of
disobedience to God’s commandments, is necessarily the
responsibility of the evildoers, who are in the first
instance ‘angels’, and then man (Adam’s fall) who
followed the nefarious influence of those fallen ones.
That nefarious influence continues -
click here for one particular example.
2. Divine laws being immutable, denial (refusal of God)
and even rebellion don’t modify the fundamental laws by
which beings are created, and thus even demons cannot
loose their immortality. Consequently, God cannot have
“prevented” evil, nor can he annihilate rebellious
beings as that would be a violation of his own laws.
3. The act by which rebellious beings separated
themselves from God is what formed a “place” in which
they are exiled, and that place was
given boundaries: the material
universe is that prison. Thus,
all material, natural,
physical (including geological) features, events and
accidents that we experience are the consequence of
original and stubbornly perpetuated rebellion.
4. However, because, as we have stipulated, all
creation comes from God, the boundaries of time and
space themselves result from divine laws. Indeed, in
Martines’ view, all creation
comes from
and is permeated by the divine. Those “laws of
creation” allow every being to work at their own
reconciliation with the Creator, through the
observance of commandments, understood and practised
because of their desire
to
migrate
back towards
divine Good and Beauty. Additionally, God
intervenes in his Creation to help this process of
reconciliation, through prophets and especially
through the figure of the Repairer, Christ.
Therefore, the material universe is both a prison
and a school, but in which the classes are not made
compulsory out of respect for the beings’ free will:
every fallen being is responsible for its own
re-education.
5. Because the persistence of a separation from God
depends on the existence of even a single rebellious
being, and because all beings are created immortal,
the resorption
of that
place, which is the temporal material universe, will
only occur when every single being has completed its
personal reconciliation
with God.
Martines de Pasqually thereby provides both an
explanation and a purpose for human suffering, be it at
the hand of fellow humans or because of natural
disasters. He provides guidelines for the betterment of
each individual through the accomplishment of divine
commandments. His view accommodates, and gives
perspective to, the scientific explanation for the
existence, preservation, and evolution of the universe
and of the life that inhabits it. His approach is
gnostic, in the sense that the knowledge of how and
especially why the world is the way it is holds the key
to everyone’s betterment. Knowledge of the Universe, of
Man and of God, as Louis Claude de Saint-Martin put it
in the title of one of his books. This knowledge excites
Man’s desire for spiritual beauty, and
through constant
effort, men and women develop
an ever stronger desire for unity with their
Creator, which is the foundation of all religion.
This is about a combat between Good and Evil, a
fight that one brings first on oneself, since that
is the condition for man’s reconciliation. The
battleground is first and foremost our own minds,
hearts and bodies, because just like the world, we
are a mixed bag of good and evil.