A Few Weeks with a MacBook Pro, Parallels, and MSDN Universal
Several weeks ago a maxed-out MacBook Pro arrived at my
doorstep, and since then I've been putting it through the paces as a .NET
development system --- using Microsoft's own Visual Studio 2005 on Windows XP,
running under OS X via Parallels Desktop for
Mac. To my surprise, I not only got this to work, but work well enough
to blow away my 1.6 GHz Dell running XP natively with twice as much
RAM...
 The
15.4" MacBook Pro was a big step up from my previous home computer, a 12",
700MHz G3 iBook purchased about three and a half years earlier. While most
reviews of the new Intel Macs have focused on comparing their performance with
the last generation of PowerPC-based machines, to me this is a more realistic
upgrade cycle. So even the OS X apps I run under Rosetta --- Apple's PowerPC
emulation software for apps that don't yet run natively on Intel chips --- run
much faster on this newer machine. And the Universal apps that
do
run on Intel are stunningly fast.As a
sidebar before I get to the meat of this mini-review, I made one rather
surprising choice when ordering the MacBook Pro: I ordered it with a glossy
screen. Like some
others, I was initially shocked when Apple released their new 13" MacBooks with
glossy screens. "A glossy screen? What
were they thinking?!" I went to have a look at
the local Apple store and, sure enough, it was easy to focus on reflections,
particularly on darker parts of the screen, but the display was otherwise crisp
and colorful --- more so than the matte displays on the nearby MacBook
Pros.I really wanted to see how the
display would fare outside, because on nice summer days I like to take my iBook
out to the deck to do a bit of web surfing. My wife and I were out there one
morning, her soaking up sun and me squinting at the iBook, and I realized I
did
have a glossy screen I could compare it to: the tiny display on my mobile phone.
I held the phone up aside the iBook and got quite a shock. Yes, I could focus on
the cell phone screen and see the clouds behind my head... but the text on the
screen was far more readable
than the iBook. The iBook's matte screen did
its job in dispersing direct reflections, but it was also picking up light
from every other
direction and bouncing that towards my eyes as
well, effectively washing out the screen. My wife looked, too, and agreed there
was no comparison: glossy won out, hands down. My gut reaction to the glossy
screen had been wrong, and I'm nothing but pleased with my MacBook Pro's glossy
display.I previously mentioned the
Parallels virtualization software when it was announced. I've been using it now
for several weeks, and putting my MSDN Universal subscription to good use. For
those unfamiliar, Microsoft's MSDN
subscription plans give software developers access to technical
resources. A Universal subscription is hellishly expensive (though I'm not
really privy to what my current employer might have negotiated), but it allows
developers to download and make use of various versions of Microsoft operating
systems and tools --- giving me a nice, legal copy of XP Pro to load up under
Parallels Desktop, along with SQL Server 2000 Personal Edition and Visual Studio
2005.Parallels Desktop starts you off
with a simple wizard to create typical VMs (Virtual Machines: think of these as
simulated computers that can run Windows, Linux, etc.). It took only a few
minutes to create a VM appropriate to Windows XP and bump the VM's RAM up to 1
GB (the MacBook Pro has 2 GB installed). I put the ISO disk image of the XP Pro
install disk on the Mac's desktop, set the VM to mount that image as its CD-ROM,
clicked the start button, and the XP Pro installation kicked off, swiftly and
silently, and completed without trouble. The installations of SQL Server and
Visual Studio also went well, as on any other Windows machine. Parallels Desktop
provided the VM with a virtual network adapter, so the new XP installation even
had network access via the MacBook's built-in 802.11g wireless connection. Even
sound worked well.Once logged into XP,
I went to the Parallel's Desktop menu and selected "Install Parallels Tools."
This kicks off an installation process within the VM that installs some special
drivers and software to help XP work more smoothly with the Mac. Without these
tools, one needs to click inside the VM's window to take control of its mouse
cursor, then click Ctrl+Alt to escape back to the Mac. With the tools, the mouse
is automatically in control of the Windows mouse cursor when over the Windows
window, if you see what I mean. The tools also permit cutting and pasting
between the Windows session and OS X, and set up a shortcut to folders shared
between OS X and Windows. Very cool, and very much without
hassle.Click the "full screen" button
in the window hosting the XP session, and the current display rotates to the
left, cube style, with a full screen Windows image taking its place. Press
Alt+Enter and the cube rotates back to the right, revealing the Mac desktop
again. If you have your Mac configured to bring up Dashboard by
moving the mouse to one of the screen corners, it'll still come up when Windows
is in full screen mode, giving quick access to all sorts of
information, such as battery status. For a new product, Parallels
Desktop seems exceptionally stable and
polished.I loaded the source code of
the project I'm working on for my employer, several thousand files in all,
mostly C#, and kicked off a build: the project built. I ran the database
installer: the database installed. I tried to run the program: that didn't go so
well.The first thing that got in my
way was that the product's security builds upon Windows domain security, and my
Windows XP installation was set up to use a workgroup. I didn't happen to have a
primary domain controller at home. My solution? I downloaded a copy of Windows
2003 Server (thanks, MSDN Universal), read just a little documentation, and
configured it as a domain controller... inside another Parallels VM on the same
Mac. I created a new user account in the domain, then switched to the XP VM and
joined the domain.The next hurdle in
running the software --- one that took me considerably longer to figure out ---
involved the DCOM configuration within XP. The app in question has IIS
components on the server side that make use of some legacy COM components, and
DCOM security needed to be set to allow the built-in ASPNET account to launch
and activate these components. Details, details... details I'd
forgotten.But after the dust settled,
I had a VM that could both build and test a very large client-server .NET
application, faster than the Dell notebook issued by my employer... side-by-side
with the day-to-day Mac apps that meet my personal needs, on a single machine
less than an inch think and weighing about five and a half
pounds.Why settle for a machine that
can't
run OS X?
Posted: Sun - July 2, 2006 at 07:52 AM
|
Quick Links
Recommended!
Software I've Written
Other Writings
Sites I Maintain
Archives
|