GodBlogCon: The Hangover
It's always good to be skeptical of group-think.
This isn't meant to be critical of anyone, I'm just asking myself some hard
questions before I drink the
kool-aid:
1. Is blogging really going
to be "the next big thing"? Are comparisons to Guttenberg or television valid?
Or is it a temporary blip that will be surpassed by new technologies before it
ever really takes off? You can guess what the party line at GBC was, and they
may well be right. But someone needs to at least ask these
questions.
2. Even if blogging becomes
a mighty force, will it ever prove to be a significant force for the kingdom of
God? Will all these blogs really have much effect on the fulfillment of the
Great Commission? Is this a medium suitable to the task or will it turn out to
be a diabolical (literally) distraction; thousands of Christians pouring time
and effort into something that ultimately has little impact on God's work, but
which meanwhile keeps all those gifted people and their time and energy away
from more effective ministry? Again, I am not assuming a negative answer, I'm
just questioning those who automatically assume a positive
answer.
3. Will the close relationship
between Christian blogging and politically conservative blogging end up doing
more harm than good? Have we looked at the unintended consequences? For
example: When Christian bloggers vehemently argue for lower taxes, or less gun
control or less environmental regulation or in favor of military intervention in
Iraq (all positions I agree with, btw), will they create confusion between
Christian absolutes and positions based on human wisdom? There is no biblical
case that taxes must ALWAYS be lower or that ALL environmental regulations are
bad so these arguments must be made on pragmatic, not biblical grounds. But the
case is often stated with the same certainty and demand for orthodoxy as a case
made (in the adjoining item) for salvation by faith. Call it the World Magazine
Syndrome. At GBC my fellow conservatives seemed very defensive when these types
of issues were raised.
4. Can
blogging be an effective tool for evangelism and why is this being treated as a
minor side-issue of little
importance?
5. Is it healthier to
encourage Christian bloggers to respectfully debate these issues or to try to
avoid or repress them? OK, this one is rhetorical! After getting to know them,
I'm convinced that the leaders of GBC would all encourage this discussion.
Posted: Sun - October 16, 2005 at 05:33 PM