Somalia Is Still A ProblemAlthough the number of people facing starvation
has fallen in Somalia and international business is returning in a limited
fashion, the country still lacks an effective central government and still poses
the threat of being a haven for international terrorist groups, including
al-Qaeda.
It has been eleven years since the downing of two
American Blackhawk helicopters by Somali militiamen over the slums of Mogadishu.
But since the horrific events and the (short-lived) media spotlight on Somalia
that followed, things have not improved by much in the beleaguered country.
While the number of people facing starvation has declined and international
business is returning in a limited fashion, Somalia still lacks an effective
central government and continues to pose the threat of being a haven for
international terrorist groups, including al-Qaeda.
After the 9/11 attacks on the US, Western
governments placed renewed pressure on the authorities in Somalia and closed
banks in the country in an effort to stem the amount of funding to terrorists
that transited through that state’s borders. Although there has been
limited success in these endeavors, the closing of banks has neither solved the
problems for the US nor for the Somali people. Aside from the desired outcome of
potentially restricting access to funds by terrorists, ordinary and expatriated
Somalis have also been restricted from their own assets, something that has not
done well in creating any more pro-American spirit and may actually foster an
even greater animosity.
Another reason for the limited success of this
tactic is that the so-called Somali authorities with whom diplomatic relations
are conducted are mostly impotent. Somalia’s true authorities are the
powerful warlords who control wide swaths of the country and who owe no
allegiance to any regime in the fragmented capital, Mogadishu. In late January,
however, after nearly twenty months of talks, the warlords managed to strike a
deal between them that, although predictably fragile, led the way to last
week’s inaugural meeting of the new Somali Parliament. The renewed
attempts at peace are also endorsed and supported by Somalia’s neighboring
countries, something that had been lacking in previous attempts to re-empower
Mogadishu.
Although the formation of a national parliament has
the honorable intention of recreating a viable national government, it is a
faulty arrangement and one that may do little to reunite the country and reduce
the prevalence of terrorist activities. The MPs are nominated by the various
warlords and are approved by a group of tribal elders, a sort of senate. The
problem is that, in all likelihood, the elders will be chosen by those same
warlords, wholly discounting the apparent attempt at some form of
checks-and-balances.
Public opinion on the new government is also vitally
important. The widespread knowledge of Western insistence for its formation as
well as the exclusion of other non- violent groups—the recovering business
community, among others, complain about not being included in the
process—does not bode well for creating a national consensus. Without a
consensus, factional interests will still be sought, including those provided by
groups such as al-Qaeda.
As it relates to America, the question may be
whether or not, by attempting to put a tight stranglehold on terrorism in
Somalia, its policies are tuned well enough so that they do not beget an even
larger national security problem. Somalis see Americans dealing with various
warlords, such as Hussein Aideed—son of Mohamed Farah Aideed, the warlord
who led the fight to expel the US-led force from the country in 1993—who
are being paid to surrender their weaponry in an attempt to keep it out of
terrorists’ hands. Somalis also see many of these same warlords at odds
with their own interests as civilians are often caught in the inter-clan
crossfire. With this perceivable misunderstanding as to America’s
intentions in their country, the Somali people must not be left out of the
anti-terrorism equation. More may need to be done to strengthen a true central
government so that anti-terrorism policies may more precisely target the
terrorists and their financiers and not the civilians who still have a lot yet
with which to deal.
Posted: Mon - September 6, 2004 at 07:04 PM |
Quick Links
Illegitimus Non Tatum Carborundum
Categories
XML/RSS Feed
REQUISITE LINKS
The Economist
Neal Boortz Andrew Sullivan The Drudge Report WSJ's OpinionJournal The Cato Institute Fairtax.org Human Rights Campaign Constitution Preservation.org BBC News MacNN AIM Status
Schedules
iTunes Music Store
AMAZON LINKS
Archives
COUNTER
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category: Published On: Oct 06, 2005 11:57 PM |