Slippery Stuff
The Physics of Skating
This is not a guide on how to
skate, but rather an investigation into how skating works.
My goal in skating was only partially to learn how to skate.
I was also profoundly curious to learn why skating works at all, what
physical laws serve as one's allies in the fight to stay upright, or
nearly so, on a slippery surface. What I would like to describe
here is some of the simple yet subtle physics which underlies the
elegance of skating well.
Like Newton, whose understanding of gravity is said to have been
inspired by having an apple fall upon his head, I have also found that
mistakes and accidents are often most useful in
illuminating the whys of the world. If you want to know how, just
do as you are told. If you want to know why, it is best to learn
by
trying to do otherwise. Science, both etymologically, and in
the popular imagination, is the business of knowing the
truth. In practice, however, it is more a process of
demonstrating
why and how one's
current understanding is false.
And so, without further belaboring the introduction, here are my
insights on why skating works. The
accumulation of these insights into
the "why" of skating has
not always been particularly helpful in learning the "how".
Nevertheless, I hope they will illuminate the internal beauty of
skating, and inspire some moments of contemplation out on the ice,
where it all comes together. For me, at least, the question of
why skating works has become an integral part of why I am obsessed with
actually doing it.
Bipeds on Ice - some basic considerations
For a biped who has evolved through millions of years walking on terra
firma, a smooth ice sheet offers definite challenges, but as any skater
knows, certain rewards. Boys soon learn the possibilities of
reduced friction offered by a frozen puddle in the school yard.
But after a short run, an exhilarating slide, and a few pratfalls,
recess is over, and the possibilities of unassisted locomotion on a
frictionless surface pretty well exhausted.
The kind of walking we are used to on solid ground requires that a foot
stay planted reassuringly just where it is put down. One can
count on each footfall providing a firm foundation, from which we can
move on, over and beyond it, pushing off for the next step. To
turn a corner, one plants one's next step to the outside of the
desired curve,
and pushes off towards the inside. One can even
twist one's body about a single planted foot, and turn to face one's
altered direction. Normal footwear on ice violates such
ground rules in a dramatic fashion: nothing at all is fixed in the
foundation here, be warned. Push off very delicately
indeed. Skates,
however, offer
fascinating possibilities.
The sharp steel edge of a skate cuts into a smooth ice surface
sufficiently to provide ample resistance to lateral motion, and
yet slides easily along its track, almost without friction. The
physical mechanisms which make ice slippery have been discussed
extensively in the literature without complete consensus. There
is general agreement that a thin film of liquid water is instrumental,
although the extent to which this film is produced by frictional
heating, or the inherent surface properties of the ice, is
not entirely clear. Two observations will suffice for almost all
that follows:
- a skate slides longitudinally with a coefficient of friction of
only a few percent
- a skate on edge resists any significant lateral displacement,
even when a skater applies a horizontal component of force equivalent
to more than his
entire weight.
The beautiful simplicity and contrast between these two ideal rules
contribute greatly both to the potential elegance of skating itself,
and to the
corresponding elegance of its physical analysis.
From the practical point of view of a biped interested in negotiating a
smooth sheet of ice, skates offer a wonderful opportunity.
Laterally they offer the customary traction of terra firma.
Longitudinally they offer a magic release from the bonds of
friction. A consequence is the possibility of achieving the
sensation of flight in two dimensions.
Longitudinal Stability - the impossible lightness of being
Sudden liberation from the bonds of friction creates problems for the
neophyte, until freedom becomes a habit and a coat worn lightly.
When walking on terra firma, the ultimate source of longitudinal
stability resides in forward velocity control. If we want to move
forward, we simply start leaning in that direction, and then step
forward to prevent ourselves from falling on our face. Once
moving forward, we essentially regain the vertical, but with each step
we constantly make corrections. Either we delay our pushoff from
the
hind foot for an instant, to accelerate and increase forward
lean, or we come up sharper on our leading foot to lean back a bit and
put
on the brakes.
On the ice, the rules change, and longitudinal stability, even when we
are in motion, takes on the character of the stability mechanisms we
are used to exercise on solid ground while standing still. When
standing, if something shifts our center of gravity forward, gravity,
acting at that point, creates a torque about our feet which then
increases our forward lean. As we
feel ourselves leaning forward, we then increase the pressure on our
toes. This creates a torque about the balls of our feet which
opposes the one created by gravity.
In an intriguing subtlety, skate blades are usually slightly curved
long
their length.
The standard radius of curvature near the center of figure skate blades
is seven feet. Hockey skates, although shorter, have even larger
radii. Therefore without making any muscular correction, a
forward lean causes us to rock forward on the curved blades.
Since their radius of curvature is larger than the distance from the
ice to our center of gravity, the point of contact with the ice moves
forward further than the initial center of gravity displacement which
created the lean. A natural stability is therefore assured.
As long as we keep our center of gravity within the length of the
blade, we are simply going to stay upright like one of those tippy toy
clowns with a weighted rounded base, which simply refuse to be knocked
over.
The fact that beginning skaters can, and frequently do fall
longitudinally, particularly onto their bottoms, is clear
evidence that the longitudinal stability offered by normal skates is
not absolute. At least a modest muscular effort is needed to
maintain the center of gravity within the length of the skate
blade. But perhaps the chief problem for beginners is that they
attempt strategies they are used to applying when walking on firm
ground. As customarily observed in the classic bottom bruiser,
any attempt to "put on the brakes" in order to correct a backwards lean
is quite ineffective. The marvelous freedom from longitudinal
friction is almost perfect, absolute, and in this case, unforgiving.
Due to the small coefficient of friction, these considerations of
longitudinal stability remain valid even at speed. An experienced
skater can build up momentum with a series of powerful strokes, and
then
simply stand nonchalantly while zooming down the ice without a care in
the world. The maneuver is particularly impressive when executed
backwards, but in fact requires minimal skill, other than a certain
level of sangfroid. The small frictional force experienced by the
skates as they slide along the ice does create a torque about the
skater's center of gravity which must be countered by the earthwards
attraction of gravity through a slight backwards lean. But since
the coefficient of friction is only a few percent, a few centimeters
displacement of the point of contact with the ice is sufficient.
Initial Transverse Stability - the two-footed solution
A skater must maintain stability laterally, as well as
longitudinally. Initially this presents the less troublesome
problem for
the beginner. Just standing on the ice with both feet side by
side
provides natural stability, since the center of gravity automatically
ends up between the feet, and the bite of the skates' edges into the
ice allow the same transverse balancing strategies used on dry land to
be instantly adaptable.
Although an attempt to mimic the direct longitudinal push-off so useful
in terra firma walking is not going to get a skater very far, the
rudiments of forward motion on the ice can be achieved through adapting
the "duck walk" strategy long favored by
toddlers. With the
feet well apart, the toes angled outward, forward motion is possible
basically by pushing off diagonally, alternating from one foot to the
other.
With a bit of practice, the efficiency of the basic skating stroke
improves, the increased velocity of forward motion narrows the opening
angle of the diagonal V's, the skates glide further on each step, and
the basic skating gait is acquired.
Throughout these initial attempts at locomotion, lateral stability
continues to be ensured by always keeping
the center of gravity well between the feet, and keeping both feet on
the ice a
good fraction of the time. The lateral component of the thrust
used in shifting
from one foot to the other is kept modest enough that the
center of gravity rocks over towards the new skating foot, but never
with enough energy to go over the top, and pass beyond the zone of
safety which exists when it lies between the two feet. Each
stride ends
reassuringly, with a gentle fall back onto the initiating foot.
The Zen of One Foot Skating - achieving stability on a single blade
If this were as far as things could go, skating would remain a rather
pedestrian activity, too similar to walking on solid ground. On
terra
firma, a foot, once planted, stays just where is both laterally and
longitudinally for the entire
duration of the step. But the key to the next stage of locomotion
on ice is that a sliding skate, once placed on the ice, is free to move
wherever the skate blade should guide it. This
near-magical ability is the key to taking lateral stability on the ice
to the next level. If it should happen that one's center of
gravity
moves beyond the zone of safety, to the outside of the skating foot,
that foot
can be turned outwards so that the forward motion of the skate then
brings the center of gravity back between the two feet again.
In fact, the ability to steer the foot laterally allows
stability to be maintained on a single blade, by actively steering it
to remain under
the
center of gravity.
In this sense skating is like running along, balancing a vertical
bamboo pole in the palm of your hand. If one finds the pole
falling to the right, one can steer the butt end back under the center
of gravity and recover equilibrium.
This mode of balancing laterally is shared by many rolling and sliding
sports, such a riding a bicycle or scooter, skiing, snowboarding, or
skateboarding. As such it provides a universal attraction for a
biped used to being trapped in the pedestrian dynamics of normal
walking. In ice skating, this coupling between forward motion and
the lateral position of foot or wheel achieves perhaps its purest
expression. Lack of friction leads to an effortless maintenance
of forward velocity, while the shortness of the skate's blades leads to
a very agile
steering system, which allows an exceptionally rapid lateral transfer
of the skating foot.
The most basic use of this lateral control allows development of the
basic mature skating stride, where the push-off on each stroke becomes
strong
enough to carry the center of gravity to the outside of the skating
foot, which then makes an outward arc. This arc first serves to
regain balance, and then, carried a bit further, shifts the center of
gravity back to the inside of the skating foot, allowing a strong
push-off from the inside
edge to commence the next stroke. Other modes
also become possible. Simulation of a skier's wedel is
particularly satisfying, as the skate traces a sinuous curve from side
to side, as the body hangs almost stationary in the middle.
Life on the Edge - locking into synchrony
Unlike a skier, who must always face the reality of the fall line, a
skater lives on an ice sheet of unbroken rotational symmetry. On
the ice, the possibility therefore arises to begin an arc and simply
continue it in an indefinite orbit, round and round, limited only by an
almost vanishingly small coefficient of friction. But unlike a
planet spinning through the vacuum of space, the orbit of a skater must
follow the direction set by his blade. Unless he wishes to end
twisted up like a crueiller, he must rotate once about his own axis for
each complete circle of his orbit. Like the moon, locked in
synchronous orbit around the earth, he must maintain one side pointing
to the center. His month must correspond to his day.
In practice, skaters rarely perform even single complete orbits in such
equilibrium, let
alone
orbits of many revolutions, and their motion is usually some
superposition of the skier's wedel, where the body maintains a fixed
orientation as his skates weave a sinuous path beneath him, and the
moon's ever center-facing swoon about the earth.
This dicussion brings up the essential concept of "edge". A
figure skater
is almost always "on edge", meaning that he is skating on a single
blade which traces an arc on the ice. His body
leans to the inside of the curve so that his weight balances the
centrifugal force generated by his trajectory. Although a bend at the
ankle often modifies the blade angle slightly, his skate naturally
follows
the
inclination of his body, so that a single edge, on the inside of the
arc, cuts into the ice.
In equilibrium, the curvature of this arc remains fixed.
Calculating torques about the
horizontal pivot axis which the length of
the blade makes on the ice, gravity, acting downward at the center of
mass, creates a torque which would increase the skater's lean, while
centrifugal force, also acting at the skater's center of mass, creates
an outward horizontal force which opposes and just balances the
gravitational torque.
As the skater proceeds to orbit in
equlibrium around a circle, his body
must also spin about its own axis once per revolution. His skate
then naturally remains tangential to the circle as it rotates around
the circumference. Although it takes a bit of skill to initiate
an edge with such matching rates of orbital and spin rotations, it soon
becomes second nature. An experienced skater has the impression
that once on edge, no active corrections are required, and he could
easily read a newspaper as he continues round and round on his
trajectory, forever.
A figure skate, with its curved blade, has a length of contact with the
ice of only a few cm. Its "track" along the ice is therefore not
inherently determined, like that of a ski in snow, and can be easily
diverted by a
slight counter rotation of the body. How is this inherent
lability to be reconciled with the undeniable feeling which a skater
has of being "in the groove" as he orbits around on his edge, reading
his newspaper?
The restoring force which creates this stability is created by
the
lateral displacement of the skater's center of gravity away from the
vertical, towards the inside of the arc. In equilibrium, a line
drawn on the ice from the point of contact of the skate, perpendicular
to the skate blade, passes directly under the skater's center of
gravity. The centrifugal force acts exactly along this line, and
therefore creates no torque about a vertical axis passing through the
point of skate-ice contact.
If,
however, some external influence
were to disturb this situation, say by causing the skate to twist
toward the outside of the arc, the line perpendicular to the skate
blade
would then move slightly ahead of the skater's center of mass.
The
centrifugal force then does
create a torque about the point of contact,
and its direction acts to twist the skate blade outwards, opposing the
displacement which created it.
This torque is in fact the only external torque which acts upon a
skater when only a single skate is on the ice. Without this
mechanism he would simply be unable to change his body's rate of
rotation about its own axis. Just as it provides the
essential mechanism of stability for staying on-edge, it also provides
the only mechanism for initiating rotational change. It is an
essential element of skating. Let us call it "edge torque".
An essential prediction of this model is that the edge torque grows
stronger as the skater's lean, and hence the lever arm between his
center of gravity and his skate, increases. This corresponds well
to the clear sense of greater stability felt by a skater on a deep edge.
Thinking ahead - active trajectory control
Although this "edge torque"mechanism couples spin and orbital angular
momenta, it does nothing to couple angle of lean, velocity, and radius
of trajectory. In other words, we can be "in the groove",
spinning in synchrony with our orbital rotation, but be moving too fast
or too slowly along our arc, so that centrifugal force is out of
balance with gravity, and our lean angle accelerates towards the
horizontal.
In this respect, there is no inherent stability mechanism to aid us,
and we are on our own to actively avoid an eventual lie-down on the
ice. The crucial variable which can prevent this uncomfortable
end-state is controlling the curvature of the trajectory. If one
finds oneself falling over, the cure is to twist the blade into a
tighter curve, thus increasing the centrifugal force, countering
gravitation, and recovering equilibrium. The blade can be twisted
by counter-rotation of the hips, upper body, arms, or a swing of the
free leg.
The basic mechanism of edge stability is the only way a skater
generates net torque while riding a single edge, but by
counter-rotating parts of his body, a skater can steer his skate's
trajectory out of equilibrium, and thus control the direction and
magnitude of this edge torque. The trick is that one cannot shift
the edge torque instantaneously. As in solving a Rubik's cube,
the order of rotations is important. One must think ahead, and
follow an indirect path.
Suppose one is on a right inside edge, arcing to the left, in near
equilibrium, and wishes to turn forcefully to the right, without change
of skating leg? The strategy is to first counter-rotate to the
right (clock-wise), thereby twisting the skate to the left. This
decreases the radius of curvature of the leftward arc, bringing his
center of gravity up over the skate trace, while simultaneously
generating a clock-wise edge torque. (Note that it is exactly the
net clockwise torque which the skater needs to get his body rotating in
the correct manner to be in equilibrium with his intended change from
left-ward to right-ward orbit.)
If left to itself, this edge torque would tend to simply restore the
skater's original trajectory. But the skater, thinking ahead,
does not leave things to themselves. After allowing the edge
torque to act for a while, he reverses the counter-rotation which
commenced the manouver, at about the moment that his center of gravity
comes over center. Voila, change of edge. He settles into a
right outside edge, arcing to the right.
An inexperienced skater
is invariably uncomfortable falling rapidly sideways, far from
equlibrium. It takes confidence to believe that one can still
catch the fall with a subtle twist of the hip, confidence which can
only be built by pushing the envelope, catching the fall again and
again, gradually further and further from equilibrium.
In this connection it is useful to point out that one is rarely in
perfect equilibrium. One is usually either falling, or, having
caught the fall, bouncing back to the vertical, often even passing the
vertical, and falling to the opposite side. In fact, just like in
riding a bicycle, if one wants to turn to the left, one must first
steer a bit to the right. This initiates a fall to the left, and
establishes the requisite lean into the desired leftward curve.
Side-winding on a Sinusoid
As mentioned above, it is possible to execute a wedeling motion on a
single skate, steering it back and forth from one side to the other as
the body hangs more or less stationary over the center of the sinuous
track. During such a manouver the usual skater's contraint
applies, and the force on the skate is always normal to the trajectory,
and essentially zero along it. Although the direction of force is
constrained, its magnitude has greater freedom, and can in fact be
modulated out of phase with the wiggles of the trajectory. To
avoid wandering off to right or left, the integral of the lateral
component must of course be zero. But it can be arranged that the
force is larger during the forward-sloping than it is during the
rearward-sloping portions of the sinusoidal track. This
results in net forward propulsion, using only a single skate.