Book Review: The Heart of Christianity (Marcus Borg), reviewed by Paul
Hinson
What does it mean to define oneself as a
“Christian?” Does being a Christian require assent to a particular
set of beliefs or doctrines? Is it a way of living characterized by certain
behaviors? Is it doing certain things in this life as a reward for some future
life or reward after death? Does being a Christian require a particular way of
reading or understanding the Bible? In “The Heart of Christianity”
Marcus Borg addresses these issues mostly for the benefit of the vast numbers of
people who find themselves disaffected with Christianity...
The Heart of Christianity, Marcus
Borg, Harper & Row, 2003.A Book
Review by Paul HinsonWhat does
it mean to define oneself as a “Christian?” Does being a Christian
require assent to a particular set of beliefs or doctrines? Is it a way of
living characterized by certain behaviors? Is it doing certain things in this
life as a reward for some future life or reward after death? Does being a
Christian require a particular way of reading or understanding the Bible? And
exactly how do we characterize God – is God a being “up there”
somewhere, or is God among us, infused throughout creation yet distinct from
creation? In “The Heart
of Christianity” Marcus Borg addresses these issues mostly for the benefit
of the vast numbers of people who find themselves disaffected with Christianity.
These individuals were likely raised in one of the various flavors of
Christianity community, but seem to be unable to align their present day
knowledge and sensibilities with what they
believe
to be traditional Christian belief and doctrine. Among these Christians
disaffected with traditional belief and doctrine you might even find many of us
who are highly active in mainline churches today.
In this highly readable book,
“Jesus Seminar” scholar Marcus Borg explores what it means to be a
Christian. “The Heart of Christianity” seems to have little to do
with Borg’s “historical Jesus” research for which he is widely
known in scholarly circles, but rather is much more lay-oriented and broad in
its vision and scope.
In the opening chapters of
“The Heart of Christianity” Borg distinguishes between what he
refers to as the “emerging” and “traditional” paradigms
of Christianity, and this distinction provides the focus for the remainder of
the book. The emerging paradigm seems to emphasize grace, mystery, inclusion,
and envisions a God whose primary action in history is to seek a relationship of
unconditional love with us, while the traditional paradigm seems to emphasize
belief, doctrine and envisions God as a god of divine authority with the
authority and will to offer God’s love as well as God’s punishment.
Borg’s “emerging paradigm” seeks an understanding of scripture
as a human product, not a divine product, yet this understanding, in
Borg’s estimation, in no way diminishes scripture. Borg proposes an
understanding of the Bible as a culturally conditioned historical product
and
sacred scripture and asserts that such
an understanding can open
up scripture. In this way, certain
stories of scripture taken on a more expansive meaning when understood in a
historic context and then applied metaphorically to our own lives. Many
disaffected Christians who have dropped away from the Church have difficulty in
understanding any meaning that can be mined from scripture because they’ve
been led to believe that scripture is to always be read
proscriptively.
Much of scripture simply
can’t
be read proscriptively and make sense. Borg claims furthermore that whether the
events described in a certain text actually happened in a historical past is
beside the point; the point, rather is to understand what the text meant in the
context in which it was written, and what it might mean for us. To focus on -
or argue over - whether an event happened becomes a red herring which could
possibly result in our missing the meaning of the text. We simply never arrive
at a significant discussion of what the event means because we’re stuck
discussing whether it could have happened, did happen, had to have happened,
etc. And some of us believe others when they tell us we aren’t entitled
to the meaning if we don’t assent to an event’s historical
occurrence, so we never discuss
either.Many
of the ideas explored from the perspective of the emerging paradigm are
revolutionary I suspect only to lay people. While clergy may have been exposed
to many of the ideas of the emerging paradigm, my guess is that large segments
of the church’s lay community are reluctant to embrace some of the ideas
associated with the emerging paradigm. Robert Farrar Capon has observed when
faced with idea of universalism and a God who eternally offers reconciliation to
all
human life, many churchgoers will insist on having their hell, and they want it
to be the same hell that their mama believed in, and their mama’s mama.
The point Borg makes is that he doesn’t seek eradication of the
traditional paradigm but seeks only to enlarge and enliven the universe of
possibilities. Borg also
explores at length how we discern the
character
of God, and how that discernment of the character of God shapes how each of us
comes to our own understanding of what a Godly life or a life in Christ means
for us. As you might expect, Borg embraces a radical understanding of the
social gospel of Jesus’ life and ministry. The Kingdom of God becomes a
metaphor for what this eternal life we find ourselves in the midst of could be
if that life were lived with Jesus’ utter compassion for humankind.
However its also clear that Borg believes Jesus’ life reaches beyond the
social gospel. Jesus is offered as a sacrament to us, as a revelation of the
depth of God’s love for us, and as a revelation of the way of spiritual
transformation to which we’re called. Borg doesn’t shy away from
the political implications of Jesus’ ministry with regard to the
world’s social and economic structures but he also doesn’t become
righteously indignant over humankind’s failure to live up to our calling.
Above all, Borg offers a
different understanding of the heart of Christianity and seeks to move us away
from a one-dimensional and rigidly doctrinal assent to factual statements about
the revelation of God through Christ into a
relationship
with God leading to personal
transformation.
We are invited to see faith as a radical trust in the faithfulness of God,
rather than a belief in certain assertions.
Borg has taken great pains to
be generous with regard to his analysis of the traditional paradigm
(particularly since as he acknowledges, he is himself a product of the
traditional paradigm and there are many aspects of the traditional paradigm
which continue to serve him well). Borg’s rather nonjudgmental
presentation lays out possible perspectives and seeks to stimulate readers to
develop their own opinions. Nevertheless, some readers will be tempted to see
Borg’s message as critical of the “traditional paradigm” and
as one advocating the “emerging paradigm.” To summarize the book
in such a dualistic way misses the point of the book altogether. This is a book
that manages be both accessible and intelligent, passionate and
compassionate
all at the same time. It was a revelation for me and I heartily recommend
it.
Posted: Wed - September 28, 2005 at 11:58 PM
|
Quick Links
About this Blog
Information and recent audio and video recordings compiled by Paul Hinson from events and classes on the spiritual journey.
Calendar
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
|
Archives
XML/RSS Feed
Categories
Comments powered by
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Jan 09, 2006 07:57 PM
|