Although this document has been considered by some as a licence to crenellate the current opinion rejects this as a licence to crenellate.
King writes "Dugdale, Mon., iv, 14; habuerunt licenciam communes Norwici includendi eandem villam cum fossis. The Chronicle quoted here dates this to 37 Hen. III (i.e. 1252-3) and also to A.D. 1209, but as we are also told told that this occured 60 years after an event in 1194, it is likely that the regnal year gives the correct reading, more or less." This is not a licence to crenellate, although a royal licence to enclose the town with a ditch has a similar quality (some ditches, possible originally of saxon date, may have alreaddy existed.)
Original source is
(In fact, the original source given is usually a transcription/translation of what are precious medieval documents not readily availably. It should be noted that these transcription/translations often date to the nineteenth or early twentieth centuries and that unwitting bias of transcribers may affect the translation. Care should also be taken to avoid giving modern meaning to the medieval use of certain stock words and terms.)
Significant later source are;
More details about licences to crenellate can be found here.
Please let me know if you see any errors, can add information or can otherwise help to improve this resource. Contact me