Eastleigh Berrys
Also known as, or recorded in historical
documents as; East Leigh Berrys
In the civil parish of Launcells.
In the historic county of Cornwall (Modern Authority of Cornwall, 1974 county of Cornwall).
Multivallate defensive enclosure consisting of three enclosures joined and communicating with each other. E and W enclosures each 204' by 144', the centre being 126' by 108' (VCH). "East Leigh Berrys" comprises three contiguous univallate enclosures, situated at 91 m Ordnance datum on a low southwest spur, from which Stratton is visible along the valley. Since 1953 the area has been reclaimed from woodland and scrub, ploughed and put under pasture with the result that the features have been smoothed. The largest, north east enclosure is of irregular plan and internally of about 0.3ha. It is encompassed by a flattened bank 7.0m wide and 0.7m high, an outer ditch 8.0m wide and 0.3m deep, and, on the northwest side, a counterscarp bank. The central enclosure, of 0.14ha is also irregular in plan with a bank 5.0m wide and 0.4m high. The accompanying ditch 6.0m wide and 0.5m deep is not only cut up to 0.3 m deeper and apparently into the preceeding work but continues around the third enclosure to the south west. Thus second and third seem constructed as a whole and although there may have been a cross ditch they are now separated only by a scarp 0.5 m high. The south west enclosure is roughly circular, 50.0m in diameter.It has a flattened dome profile up to 1.7m high on the south west with perimeter scarping, 1.0m high, which fades on the SW leaving a staggered gap 20.0m wide. There is an outer ditch 8.0m wide and 0.5m deep on the north west and a faint almost terrace-like ditch on the south east. There is now no evidence of a ditch around the sout west beyond which the spur ends with a moderately steep slope. There is no entrance to any of the earthworks and the inturning in the south west enclosure appears to have resulted from later mutilation. The earthwork appears to be an adulterine motte (which could never have been very high) with two baileys to the north east. It is not in a good defensive situation being overlooked, at a distance, on all sides but the south west. It does, however control the Medieval route into north Cornwall. The poor state of the earthworks cannot be solely due to clearance but suggests that it was either unfinished or thoroughly slighted. Immediately to the north east 4.0ha of cleared ground exhibit irregularities and possible hollow ways but these are so fragmentary that no conclusion can be drawn as to their date or purpose (Field Investigators Comments-F1 NVQ 07-NOV-77). (PastScape)
Isolated from settlement but is the cleared land to the NE a possible area of deserted or planed settlement. There are a couple of 'park' placenames close by. The strategic place for defence or administration is Stratton 1 mile to the west. Clearly placed to be highly visible from the road, and usually suggested as an adulterine castle of the Anarchy, but I suspect may be a hunting lodge built in a modest castle style.
This site is a scheduled
monument protected by law.
The Ordnance Survey Map Grid Reference is SS24450673
This site's English Heritage (PastScape) Defra or Monument number is
31876
Further information may be available from the holder of the county Historic Environment Record. In particular 'grey' literature, such as watching brief reports, held by H.E.R.s
is often poorly referenced and is unlikely to be recorded in this website, or elsewhere.
- Web site links
- Books
- Higham, Robert A., 1999, 'Castles, Fortified Houses and Fortified Towns in the Middle Ages' in Kain, R. and Ravenhill, W., Historical Atlas of South-West England (University of Exeter Press) p136-43
Salter, Mike, 1999, The Castles of Devon and Cornwall (Malvern) p47 [slight]
Cornish, J.B., 1906, 'Ancient Earthworks' in Page, Wm (ed), VCH Cornwall Vol1 p466 http://www.archive.org/stream/victoriahistoryo00pageuoft#page/n569/mode/2up
- Journal Articles
Most of the sites or buildings
recorded in this web site are NOT open to the public
and permission to visit a site must always be sought from the landowner
or tenant. |
The information on this web page
may be derived from information compiled by and/or copyright of English
Heritage and other individuals and organisations. All the sources
given should be consulted to identify the original copyright holder
and permission obtained from them before use of the information
on this site for commercial purposes. I do
not receive any income from this site and I fund it myself.
The bibliography owes much to various bibliographies produced by
John Kenyon for the Council
for British Archaeology, the Castle Studies Group and others.
Suggestions for finding online and/or hard copies of bibliographical sources can be seen at this link. |
It is an offence to disturb a
Scheduled Monument without consent. It is a destruction of
everyone's heritage to remove archaeological evidence from any site
without proper recording and reporting. Don't use metal detectors on historic sites without authorisation. |
Please help me to make this as
useful a resource as possible by contacting
me if you see errors
or if you can add information.
I do acknowledge the help I get with
this site. |
¤¤¤¤¤