The Huckster
One of the things that most startled me in recent
months is the screeching two-wheels-off-the-ground turn committed by Our Beloved
Media towards John McCain. Mike Huckabee wins the Iowa caucuses--and suddenly
half the pundit-talk is about the guy who came in fourth, whom they'd smilingly
ignored up until the word came vibrating in on their
Blackberrys.
It's way too late and way too
obvious to execute an Immelmann like that, and even casual observers are going
to notice it. All that Giuliani/Romney bluster is going to be hard to be
consigned to the Never-Was, and MCain is no master of the skies to fly in out of
the sun to the dismay of his rivals. Still less can it be given to
him.
And all because of Mike Huckabee,
my, my.
One might play dumb and ask
what the fuss is about: after all--isn't our previous president a born-again
Christian from the south, not too knowledgeable about stuff, but friendly as all
get-out, and a regular guy you'd lie to have a beer
with?
Actually, no. And that's purty darn
interesting.
George W. Bush is the
wastrel Yale legacy of a wealthy aristocratic New England line, educated at
Andover Yale and Harvard. He's a Christian who doesn't go to church. His 'common
touch' is that of the petulant trustafarian who's all smiles as long as
everything goes his way and the light of adoration is trained upon him.
But Mike Huckabee really is a born
again Christian, from the South, and not terribly bright. It must be really
disconcerting to see a cover story suddenly leap out of the playbook and into
real life, and start gaining popularity just the way his cartoon predecessor
did. Pretty scary, come to think of
it.
Huckabee points out just how
massive the GWB fiction was. The Republican Party chose W to run:his desire to
run came out of nowhere; he rapidly became (amazingly!) the top fund-raiser. He
was as convincing as one of the aliens from V. Why, of course he's a born-again
Christian, and not an opportunist willing to say anything as long as it doesn't
involve any of that actual church-going or service! Listen to all these powerful
televangelists! They'll tell you! And no, no, no, he's a Texan and a good ol'
boy who went to public school and loves working on his ranch, and not somebody
who set up a fake movie set of a Wild West existence! No no no! And all his
malapropisms and fumblings just make him all that endearing! Really! And the ay
his lower jaw unhinges to eat the hamsters--lies! We come in
peace!
But the way they meticulously
engineered that empty suit, from the Dan Quayle prototype to the massively
managed press coverage--all that makes the 2008 election all the more
interesting.
The religious right would
dearly love to be on board with the Republican Party--which, I think, is why
they reacted with dismay and anger at the crop of candidates offered them. Where
was the synthetic candidate tailor made for them? Where was the perfect
candidate custom tailored to be just who they wanted him to be? And when they
didn't get one from the leadership, good ol' Mike, who was a real guy who
faintly resembled that old holygram, rose up and stood, blinking and wiping the
confetti off his face.
Of course,
that's a very good question: where were the guys in the really nice suits when
it came to the 2008 election. You know, the guys who paid a visit to GWB and
laid it out for him? The guys who went to his dad and said your running mate
will be Dan Quayle? The guys who paid a visit to Newt Gingrich and said you're
going to resign the Speakership for reasons of health, if you know what we mean?
Who paid an election night visit to Georgie and said you're firing Rumsfeld, and
we're going to sit here and wait while you do it? Yeah, those guys. What are
they thinking?
One distinct possibility
is that they're sitting out 2008. They know it's going to be a disaster, and
there's no sense trotting out Dan Quayle 3.0 and running the full court press
this time. They're paying visits to Hastert and Lott, saying you don't want yo
be around for this election, and prepping a whole bunch of pasty young
Republicans without ties to Bush/Cheney to run in 2012 . Fronted by a young
handsome guy with an aw-shucks manner and born-again halo round his head,
decrying the sins of the Democrat [sic] Administration and promising to bring
honor and integrity back to the White
House.
Then why not let the Huckster
run, if 2008 is to be a forfeit? Why did they spit-take over Huckabee while
letting an embarrassment like Giuliani be the face of the Republican
party?
THe best reason (in this
scenario that I'm not absolutely sure is the case) is that They were ready
willing and able to let Giuliani flame out in the election if they had to lose
it--the loss could be blamed squarely on him, and the career of this problematic
Republican would be fortunately over. And pretty much the same thing could be
said for Romney or McCain.
But Mike
Huckabee--ah, that's another story. Sure, he's stupid. Sure, he's running a
clumsy campaign. Sure he has Wayne Dumond in his closet and a family that make
the Bush Twins look like the Brontë Sisters. But they know full well that
none of that matters.
Mike Huckabee is
the only one of these sorry clowns that could come away from a 2008 defeat
stronger. He's the only one who will be stronger in 2012 than he was in 2008.
And Huckabee will queer the franchise, the magic formula. How can they run
another Muppet in overalls withe the Huckster endearingly tripping over his
clodhoppers next to him?
But deeper
than that, Mike Huckabee is not a placebo administered with a pat on the head to
the poor crackers--he's the actual codeine. He's not Dobson's Choice, or any
sort of exemplar put forth by the born-again College of Cardinals: at present,
he's still 'anybody--even Huckabee!' But the religious right has been getting
more and more restless with their country-club allies--especially with the six
years where the evil libruls were no longer an excuse. They re-elected Georgie
in 2004 as the Republicans beat the drum on gay marriage--and what did they get
after the victory? Privatizing Social Security! Why, Bill Clinton was more
responsive to them when it came to defense of marriage! Like the sullen gunman
who actually shot the bank guard, they started bouncing on the balls of their
feet, wondering when they were going to get their cut. Then the 2006 election,
and suddenly the slick bastards were moaning about the obstruction of the Dems
again.
It was only their common hatred for
the liberals that kept them from bolting--but that could all change if they had
their own candidate...
And on top of
everything else, Mike Huckabee is the kind of guy you'd invite to your picnic.
He'd remember to bring the bat and ball. Unlike Pat Robertson, who manages to
seem both greasy and crazy, and who would make your guests uncomfortable with
his perpetual smile and squint. . And unlike President Quayle 2.0, who would
laugh real loud but never listen to anything anybody said. The Huckster
actually has a conflict between outer dogma and inner charity, outer xenophobia
and inner friendliness. His contradiction, in short, are the contradictions of
the religious right--and not just the hard core base. Huckabee is clumsy enough
to let those contradictions flap loose in front of God and everybody, and he
comes off as out of his league.
But
that's 2008. That can change.
Ron Paul
is not a danger to the Republicans--not if, as I think, this is an election they
are wiling to lose. Once again, they could blame the loss on him. Thus the
tactics of the Republican leaders are ignore and exclude.
But Huckabee is being treated
differently. There's far more desperation, and far more of a feverish effort to
make people believe he never even existed. A Huckabee run in 2012 could peel off
the religious right--but even if it's not Huckabee, he''s teaching a dangerous
lesson about a religious right candidate. So it's McCain, McCain, McCain,
McCain.
It's a strange and desperate
move. And all I can say with certainty is that we should make a whole bunch of
popcorn.
And wish Mike Huckabee
well.
Posted: Monday - January 07, 2008 at 01:20 PM