The Non-Denial Denial
The Washington Post reported that the Joint Chiefs of Staff are
unanimously opposed to increasing troop numbers in
Iraq:"The Bush
administration is split over the idea of a surge in troops to Iraq, with White
House officials aggressively promoting the concept over the unanimous
disagreement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to U.S. officials familiar
with the intense
debate."When asked about
that, Tony Snow issued a classic non-denial
denial:"Q
Finally, can you address this story about a possible split between the White
House and the Joint Chiefs in the decision about surging troops to
Iraq?MR. SNOW:
Well, number one, there is no
decision about the next step
forward in Iraq. So the idea
that there is a decision and a squabble would be
wrong. I've also cautioned
people that
tonally,
it is incorrect to say that the President is in any sort of
contretemps
with the Joint Chiefs of Staff. They work together. The President has a great
deal of respect for the chain of command -- in fact, the chain of command,
starting with the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs, the combatant
commanders, all the way down to the people who are doing the fighting on the
ground in Iraq, Afghanistan, and that are serving the nation in uniform. And
he's made it very clear, and I think the respect also is shared up the chain of
command.So
without commenting on any specific ideas that may be discussed -- and I won't do
that -- I can tell you that the notion that somehow there is some sort of
feud
between the President and the Joint Chiefs would be
wrong."So, what Snow is saying
is that there is no decision yet for the Joint Chiefs to disagree with. And
whatever you do, don't characterize that fundamental disagreement as a feud or a
contretemp -- that would be getting the tone wrong.
Posted: Wed - December
20, 2006 at 10:15 PM