Emergency Human Rights Delegation to Chiapas
September 16-21, 1999
Update: 4/25/00; Acting President of Cocopa Calls for Review of Militarization

Original Delegation Pages

9/21/99 press release
9/21/99 boletin de prensa
Traps in Amador Hernandez




Followup Stories

Fires are pretext 5/5/00
Another trip planned 5/4/00
Critical time 5/2/00
Forest fires 5/2/00
Wind of war 5/2/00
Paramilitary pincer 5/1/00
Rights Abuse rpt 4/25/00
Cocopa Pres. 4/25/00
Military Fortress 4/25/00
Paramilitaries gain 4/23/00
Army encirclement 4/23/00
Ethnocide charges 4/21/00
Legislators 4/20/00
Encircling EZLN 4/17/00
Amador blockade 4/15/00
Presentation to UN 4/14/00
IED/HLP to press 4/14/00
Caravan harrassed 4/12/00 Malnutrition 4/10/00
Army in the Selva 4/9/00
UN Realtor 4/8/00
Marcos letter 3/21/00
Las Abejas 3/19/00
Raul Vera 3/13/00
Sen Hayden 2/25/00
Sen Hayden 2/17/00 #2
Sen Hayden 2/17/00 #1
Moises Ghandi  2/13/00
UN- HR abuses 11/26/99
Radio interview 11/24/99

SOA protest 11/21/99
Amador   11/12/99
SOA - CIEPAC rpt 11/5/99
Marcos to Robinson 11/99
PRODH attack 10/28/99
Moises Ghandi 10/25/99
Acteal background 1999


Fray Bartolomé de Las Casas Human Rights Center

 

Higinio Martinez Warns of Comatose State of Cocopa, Calls for Review of Militarization in Chiapas

La Jornada Tuesday, April 25, 2000.
Andrea Becerril.

The Commission for Concordance and Peace (Cocopa) should move out of its immobility and review the "dangerous" situation prevailing in the chiapaneco conflict zone, due to the military advance and to paramilitary groups, according to the acting president of that body, Higinio Marti'nez Miranda.

The PRD member said that it is important that the information gathered by legislators and members of civil society, who recently visited the Selva and the Northern region of Chiapas, be discussed by the Cocopa, since they verified the increased military presence in the area of zapatista influence, including the decision to build a training center for the Army and Air Force in the community of Maravilla Tenejapa.

"I believe that, if Senator Carlos Paya'n and Deputy Gilberto Lo'pez y Rivas, who are members of the Cocopa, proposed it, the issue could be brought before the full commission, since the information they obtained is truly worrisome."

The scene which this group found in Chiapas "is very different from the one the government always paints. Now we have concrete facts that demonstrate that, instead of decreasing, militarization is advancing around the EZLN, for the obvious purpose of encircling them," Marti'nez Miranda noted.

He noted, however, that the Cocopa is, "regrettably," going through a difficult period, since the PRI senators and deputies who are members of it have closed off any possibilities of it fulfilling its obligations. "The commission is in a virtual comatose state, since the PRI companeros are more interested in how to construct the archives or the memories of their term."

It is within this context, he insisted, that the tricolor legislators had shut down the possibility of holding an international seminar on peace processes and prevented an agreement on travelling to Chiapas and visiting the new bishop of San Cristo'bal de Las Casas, Felipe Arizmendi. "They don't want to talk to the President of the Republic, they don't want anything to be done, and since in the Cocopa all decisions are made by consensus, their vote against stopped any initiatives by those of us who wanted to carry out our mission."

The PRD senator denied that there was the risk of the Cocopa's disappearance. "We would not allow it, because it is the body which guarantees that dialogue will not be declared to be broken. What we can do is to declare a recess, so that the government and civil society will understand that we don't want to be accomplices to a lazy attitude towards Chiapas."

The Acting President of the Cocopa said that a proposal to that effect had already been formulated, but PRI deputies and senators were opposed. "They don't want there to be any activity, but neither do they want to assume a position that could be a call to attention to the parties in conflict, in the sense that we want to do something during the remainder of the legislative period in order to make progress in a solution to the conflict."