Sun - July 8, 2007
Movie Review: Transformers
More entertaining... and shorter... than
King
Kong.
Yep. More entertaining and shorter than the giant
gorilla. And, suffered form the same lack of scale. Sometimes, the robots were
appropriately scaled. Other times, they were just far too
big.
But, I enjoyed it. Two and a half
hours went by, and the holes in the plot weren't spectacularly horrible. I mean,
OK, boy meets girl. Boy buys car. Boy gives girl a ride home. Car takes over,
winds up at Lovers' Point. Car pretends to be broken. Girl gets out to walk
home. Car starts up again. Car turns into robot to protect boy. It's an old
story... probably left over from some Romanian legend about bloodsucking
half-demons.
Newton's laws of physics
don;t apply to computer animated objects. And that is a good thing. Conservation
of mass and energy? Who needs it? Way too much metal on the robots than the mass
and density of the vehicles they pretend to be can
have.
And, except for Bumble Bee, none
of the good guys
look
like good guys.
But, it's worth the
ticket price. I'll give it 7 gallons of Premium in a 10 gallon
tank.
Posted at 10:46 PM
Read More
Movie Review: Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
Oh my dear god...
Don't even bother renting this one. I actually saw
this film, paid money to do so, one night during vacation on the
island.
Spoilers!
Galactus
is a big cloud of dust. Doom was not killed at the end of the first movie, just
frozen.
Geez. No. I can't say anything
good about it.
On th eBig Kahuna scale,
this one ranks a lousy no breakers. Don't even rent it. Go watch it at somebody
else's house when they are stupid enough to rent it.
Posted at 10:40 PM
Read More
Sat
- May 26, 2007
Movie Review: Spider-Man 3
Three times the villains! Three times the romance!
Three times the mediocrity!
So, the night Pirates 3 came out, I went to see
Spider-Man 3, because I knew there would be no crowds. I was right. Four other
people shared the theatre with me.
So,
what can I say? Kirsten Dunst has grown up... and gives us less of a performance
than she did last time. I can imagine the director telling her, "This movie is
all about Mary Jane Watson, and this Peter Parker guy just doesn't get it. Cry
over it."
Parker's submission to the
alien symbiote reminds me of little Anakin Skywalker's submission to the dark
said of the... wait... I've said this before... well, it's true. Of course, the
storytellers only have 140 minutes to tell a Marvel story arc that covered more
than two years.
What else don't I like?
They killed off Harry Osbourne, who is supposed to become the Hobgoblin.
Instead, Osbourne becomes a hero in the end, and then dies. Venom gets sonically
removed from Eddie Brock, and then blown up. The Sandman is forgiven and blows
away in a cloud of... sand. And, in the end, we don;t know if Peter and MJ are
getting married or not.
Venom might not
be dead. Sandman might come back. Bleh. It will be out on
DVD.
The bottom line? Rent it, if you
just have to see it. Sure, that might be December, but, I promise, you'll get
more out of it being at home than you will on the big
screen.
3 Spidey tokens out of
10.
Posted at 06:52 PM
Read More
Mon - February 26, 2007
Movie Review: Ghost Rider
Nicholas Cage and Special Effects
My friend, Joey, said that there was an inverse
relationship between a movie's plot and the movie's special effects. I've held a
similar relationship between Nicholas Cage and
plot.
I really liked
National
Treasure. You can probably find a review of
that somewhere on this site. If not, I need to write one. And there were some
special effects in National
Treasure. And Nicholas Cage was in
National
Treasure.
Then
came Ghost
Rider. Well, it wasn't really a "Then came..."
situation. But, you get the idea.
I
used to like the comic book. I didn't subscribe to it or anything, nor did I buy
every single issue when I saw it, but I was drawn, occasionally, to the angst
of young stunt man, Johnny Blaze, in his fight against demons and the Great
Evil. And that is the catch. The young stunt man. Not the forty-something
Nicholas Cage Evil Knievel wannabe. And the five seconds it took for Blaze to
"control the fire within" was amazingly reminiscent of little Anakin
Skywalker's pathetic turn to the dark
side.
But the special effects!
Brilliant skull effects! Amazing! The Hell Cycle is awesome! But I got tired of
watching him sling that damned chain twice over his
shoulder.
Should you see it? Nah.
Should you rent it? Only if you share the cost of the rental with at least three
other people. I give it two flaming skulls out of seven, just to be
weird.
Posted at 08:24 PM
Read More
Sun - January 28, 2007
Poetry Post: Leonard Cohen
Beneath My Hands
I don't typically post others' works here, but
I've been asked to keep this one safe, and it is so beautiful, so like something
I would have said if I could write like that, I might as well share it,
too.
-----
Beneath
My Hands Leonard
Cohen
Beneath my hands
your small
breasts are the upturned
bellies of breathing fallen
sparrows.
Wherever you
move I hear the sounds of closing
wings of falling
wings.
I am
speechless because you have fallen beside
me because your
eyelashes are the spines of tiny fragile
animals.
I dread the
time when your
mouth begins to call me
hunter.
When you call me
close to tell
me your body is not beautiful
I want to
summon the eyes and hidden
mouths of stone and light and
water to testify against
you.
I want
them to surrender before
you the trembling rhyme of your
face from their deep caskets.
When you call me
close to tell
me your body is not
beautiful I want my body and my
hands to be
pools for your looking and
laughing.
Posted at 08:46 PM
Read More
Sat
- July 1, 2006
Movie Review: Superman Returns
Amazing effects!
Production personnel went to a lot of trouble to
insure that Brandon Routh moved and posed like Christopher Reeves. Camera angles
and music were phenomenally similar to those used in that first Christopher
Reeves movie, and I couldn't help but wonder if he would have come to one of the
showings here on the island if he were still alive. He had a home here in
Edgartown.
Something else I noticed,
completely off topic, is that, had the theatre not renovated their interior
several years ago, I would have been sitting in the same seat (third row,
center) I was in when I first saw Star Wars in the summer of 1977. Same theatre,
same seating location.
So, back to
Superman Returns. The story opens with Superman having left Earth to find the
crumbled, ruined remains of his home planet, Krypton. And he is gone for five
years. A lot has changed since he left. Terrorism, violence, natural disasters,
all on the rise, and no savior for the Earth. There is a brief retelling of the
origin of our Man of Steel, and it is done very well. I commend the writers and
director on their use of the origin story to get Superman, the grown Superman,
back to Earth.
Something else that has
happened over the past five years... Lex Luthor, serving a double life sentence,
has somehow gotten out on parole due to his grieving and dying and very rich
widow. Yes, widow. An old crone named Gertrude, for whom Luthor's large private
yacht is named. And she leaves everything to Luthor at the last minute. A fun
quote... Luthor walks out of her bedroom where she has just died. He looks to
all the relatives (all wanting a slice of the money pie). There is a young girl
there. He pulls off his wig, tosses it to the girl, and says, "You can keep
that. The rest is mine."
Off to the
Arctic Circle and the Fortress of Solitude, which still looks nothing like it
does in the comic books. It is still all Kryptonian crystal. And Luthor steals
all of the crystals for his own purposes. He wants to be Prometheus, giving the
world the fire of Kryptonian technology. His girlfriend says, "Yeah, Lex, but
you're not a god." Lex replies, "Gods are selfish beings who fly around in
little red capes and don't share their power with mankind.
"
Lois Lane. She's not married, not
yet, but has a child, and has been engaged to the Editor's nephew for five
years, since before the child's birth. She has won a Pulitzer Prize for her
feature article entitled, Why the World
Doesn't Need
Superman.
Then
Clark Kent shows back up at the Daily PLanet after a five-year leave of absence,
during which he saw a lot of
llamas.
And, I think that is enough of
the plot to give you an idea of what is going to
happen.
Technically, the film is
beautiful. the effects are definitely top shelf. No more blue screening. The
digital version of a man flying through the air, of hovering suspended in space,
are breathtaking. The miniatures are amazing! The composite shots are the
cleanest I've ever seen, and I have seen some really good composite shots. On a
side note, Industrial Light and Magic had nothing to do with the special
effects, but seven other companies did. Spanning at least two continents (much
of the content of the film was shot in Australia), many small production
companies got in on the Big Blue action. The movie is worth the price just for
the effects!
But the story is well
written and the acting is better than average for a super hero action film.
Superman
versus X Men
3? Hands down,
Superman
Returns is by far the better! Better writing,
better story, better effects, better acting, better cast. Frank Langella as
Perry White, the editor in chief of the Daily Planet! That made my
day!
The final word? Five sightings of
Great Caesar's Ghost and a few chunks of Kryptonite thrown in for good measure!
See it on the screen if you can. See it I-Max if you can. I would love to see it
I-Max.
Posted at 03:00 PM
Read More
Tue - June 27, 2006
Movie Review: An Inconvenient Truth
Al Gore's mass media approach to a slideshow
presentation done on a Mac.
The issue is global warming. The production values
are pretty good. I like the low-key approach to Mr. Gore's political career. The
emphasis is on the issues, not his career or future agenda. I can respect
that.
Humans are the cause of global
warming. OK. Given. And there is evidence to support that conjecture. Since man
hit the scene, from the beginning of Eden in Mesopotamia, man has caused the
global warming gases to increase. I agree! We destroy the plants that can
convert our carbon dioxide back into oxygen. We pollute our air freely, and have
done so since the discovery of fire, though I attribute most of that to the era
since the industrial revolution of the 19th century. Given. And he even touches
on my explanation for it all: since 1950, the population of the earth has
tripled, from two billion people to six billion. Wait. that is a lot of
zeroes... let me show you.
From:
2,000,000,000 people
to 6,000,000,000
people.
OK... Again. Let's pretend you
play the lottery and won six hundred million dollars. You could then turn around
and give every person on the planet a grand total of ten cents! Each! If you
only won sixty million dollars, you could only give each person one cent. One
lousy penny! He couldn't even buy a piece of
gum!
This planet was designed to
comfortably hold half a billion, tops. After that, things happen. Plague,
famine, weather cycles go haywire. Wait.. that sounds like what's happening to
us right now! well, you know what? The planet fights back. And I think it's
going to fight back until we are back down to our half a billion. If global
warming doesn't do it, then diseases will, or famine. All my life, I've heard of
children starving in Africa and India and China because these continents and
countries are too overpopulated to support that kind of body mass. They survive
through the efforts of other countries. We can do that now, send food to the
hungry. But are we supposed to? We overthrow the balance. And I'm not saying we
should stop. But there is more to global warming than just humans cleaning up
their waste and environment. We have to stop breathing! And the planet will make
us.
What happens when we become too
populous? We go to war over this or that piece of land. Thousands die and the
winning country expands a little to accommodate the survivors. We go to war, us,
humans. And, in doing so, we spread even more disease and pollution. It is
inevitable. It's how the French fought the Indigenous Americans when they first
came to the New World, selling them infected blankets so that they would catch
diseases, die or become to ill to fight, then send in soldiers to kill the
survivors. It is our history!
How do we
change this? I'm not sure we can. I think the earth will fight back until our
numbers are back where they belong. Can we change our thinking and fix some
problems? Sure! We can change our thinking, radically, to include a global
society and a global marketplace. A single race of people, humans, instead of
nationalities and the color of our skin. But that is exactly what it's going to
take, a change in attitude so drastic that some peoples, some ways of living,
will not survive, thus bringing the numbers down. The planet wins!
Twice!
It's not as simple as "green
energy." It's not as simple as a hybrid or alternative fuel vehicle. It's a
matter of reconstructing our world society. And that is not simple at
all.
Final word: See it. If you enjoyed
F9/11, this will catch your eye, without the blood and violence of a movie about
a concurrent war. If You didn't like F9/11 because of the shots of the war, you
might like this; there are lots of pretty charts and some humorous points to be
made with them. "It's off the chart!" If you didn't like F9/11 because you are a
staunch Republican Party Reptile and feel that the Republican Congress and
Presidency can do no wrong, don't see this film. You will not like the fact that
it is honest. At all.
Posted at 12:32 AM
Read More
Tue - March 28, 2006
Movie Review: V for Vendetta
I never read the graphic novel.
Wow!
This
show was amazing! I liked that the almost not super human hero never removed his
mask. Unlike The Phantom of the Opera
where the unmasking is a huge deal and
requires that the make up become more and more intricate and unique,V keeps his
mask on for the entire movie, using only his voice and body language to convey
the emotions he cannot do facially.
My
favorite quote is as relevant in contemporary America as it was in the fictional
England of the movie: "The people should never be afraid of the government; the
government should be afraid of the people." Another one, V's introduction, is
astonishingly good: "This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is the vestige of
the vox populi, now vacant, vanished, as the once vital voice of the
verisimilitude now venerates what they once vilified. However, this valorous
visitation of a by-gone vexation stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish
these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently
vicious and voracious violation of volition. The only verdict is vengeance; a
vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such
shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise
of verbiage veers most verbose vis-à-vis an introduction, and so it is my
very good honor to meet you, and you may call me V." I only wish I could have
heard it better
Effects were brilliant.
the fight sequences were astonishing in their brevity. The violence was horrific
when it was visible due to the monstrosity of
it.
It is said that Alan Moore, the
creative genius behind the graphic novel, walked off the set and had his name
removed form the credits, even though the IMDb has him listed as creating the
characters. This makes the third (?) Alan Moore movie that Alan has walked out
on: From
Hell,
The League of Extraordinary
Gentlemen, and
V for
Vendetta. No wonder the
Watchmen
movie keeps appearing and disappearing. I wish I had the money to produce
The
Watchmen... I would turn all creative
decisions over to Alan. His stories deserve that much and
more!
Hands down... see this film! In
the theatre if possible, on a big screen with a really good sound system
otherwise... or, on a computer with headphones. But see
it!
Five stilettos out of five, and an
extra one just because V keeps a six pack of them around his belt.
Posted at 06:25 PM
Read More
Fri - February 24, 2006
Series Review: Battlestar Galactica (2006)
Wow!
I've not written about Battlestar Galactica in a
while because, well, quite frankly, it seemed to be in a rut. And, maybe it
was... and maybe that was intentional to make this episode seem much better than
it really was. The problem there is that I'm not easily fooled by such ploys.
And this episode was
awesome!
I might even have to download it from the iTunes store tomorrow. It is
that
amazing!
Spoilers:
Good
to know that 6 is as effected by Baltar as he is by her. And he is going to be
so much better at his manipulations of her than she ever could be of him!
Because he is Baltar!
Cool resolution
to Sharon's demise... resurrected with the memories and desires. And a burning
passion.
And Lucy Lawless... again! It
just doesn't get any better than
that!
Viva la Battlestar!
Posted at 11:09 PM
Read More
Mon - January 2, 2006
Movie Review: The Producers
Not bad for a musical on film.
Despite the fact that this is a musical, and I
really don;t like musicals, I enjoyed this movie thoroughly. It was good to see
Matthew Broderick back on screen, though he really doesn't have a singing voice.
As the whimpering Leo Bloom, he was
perfect.
The production values on the
stage pieces was like all other stage productions on film- largely overdone and
never focused where I wanted to see, but that's OK.
This
musical is by Mel Brooks- it's supposed to be over the top and
farcical.
And how much more farcical
can you get than the production of a Broadway musical designed to
flop?
First, the play- Springtime for
Hitler Second, the director- Keep it
gay Third, the actors- The worst
possible Fourth, the money- From rich old
ladies Fifth... I forget what fifth was..
probably a fifth of liquor.
Final word?
Not sure how it stands up to the original movie (1968, Gene Wilder). I love Gene
Wilder. I might have to rent the original and see. Worth a babysitter? No.
Definitely worth a DVD rental with a good stereo system. I give it four chorus
girls out of five. I'll keep one girl for myself.
Posted at 09:12 PM
Read More
Tue - December
27, 2005
Movie Review: Minority Report
Not terribly bad.
A cop set up by his boss because he found out about
the origins of his boss' pet
project.
That was a
spoiler.
Not a bad movie. Lots of
special effects. Not real sure about the eye doctor sequence- if the doc really
held that much of a grudge, why not just tranq him and kill him? And what about
the whole 12 hour thing?
Shut up,
Howard- it's just a movie.
The bottom
line: 4 out of 5 eyeballs.
Posted at 11:34 PM
Read More
Movie Review: I, Robot
Starship
Troopers:Heinlein::I,
Robot: Asimov
A few years ago, someone produced a film called
Starship
Troopers, ostensibly based on the novel by
Robert Heinlein. Like many other films based on books,
Starship
Troopers had little to do with the book. I
discovered yesterday that someone made a sequel to that movie. The four words,
"Oh, my dear god," come to mind, probably followed by an exclamation point.
Before vomiting in the aisle at Blockbuster, I spun to find
I,
Robot, starring Will Smith. I saw the
I, Robot
bike episodes of
American
Chopper and wanted to see the movie because of
the bike Paulie built for Will Smith and the debut of the
film.
OK, it's not bad. It has nothing
to do with the book, but it's not bad. Ignore the familiar names, ignore the
familiar look of the robots; just watch the movie and it's not
bad.
But not bad is by no means
awesome. The robot effects are incredible! Perhaps because they did not have to
look perfectly human, the CGI works for them. Maybe it's because there were so
many of them. Maybe it was the voice. For whatever reason, the robots were good.
Will Smith, as the angsty, racist (against robots) cop? Not quite as believable.
And, US Robotics as the bad guy? Talk about appropriate product placement! But
all very much over the top, all of it very...
obvious.
The bottom line? It's
entertaining, it's got a good beat, I can dance to it, I give it a 7 out of 10.
Just don't ask me to believe that Asimov had anything to do with it (which is
actually stated in the credits, and I quote: "Suggested by the story by Isaac
Asimov").
Posted at 12:17 PM
Read More
Movie Review: Hero
Hero, shmero, cable fu hoopla
Perhaps, if viewed as a modern folk tale, told in
the old style of flashing swords and amazing feats of superhuman powers,
Hero
makes sense. Perhaps, as I am amazingly Caucasian, I just can't get it at a
fundamental level. It entertained me, but by no means was it the huge,
meaningful story I was told to
expect.
Rubber swords, spears made from
1" PVC (so it would waggle appropriately), post-production arrows, blood that
isn't blood, and the same stories told four different times for the sake of four
different fight sequences, and lots of hidden
wires.
The moral of the story?
Sometimes, the bad guy has to win in order to become the good guy. Sometimes, a
dictator is a good thing, because a single man can unite a warring country. But,
does it have to take 99 minutes of my life? Is it beautifully photographed? Yes,
as much of it that is real is wonderful, but I can't admire a beautiful CGI
setting, because, in theory, I can do that. And, if I can do it, it's not
art.
The bottom line? One karate chop
out of five. Rent it if you like cable fu folk tales, but not if you have any
lick of sense without them.
Posted at 12:06 PM
Read More
Thu - December
22, 2005
Movie Review: King Kong
Peter Jackson plus big gorilla = Lord of the
Borings
And three hours of
it.
Wow. I can't describe how
uninteresting this was. It used to be that I could say, "Well, it was shorter
than
Waterworld."
I'm not sure I can say that about King
Kong. Oooo, no I can't. Even the Director's
Cut of
Waterworld
is shorter than this monstrosity. So, from now on, it's "Well, at least it was
shorter than King
Kong."
Wow.
Almost as many virtual characters as
Sky Captain and the World of
Tomorrow. And all of them about as believable.
A fabulous job done on the gorilla, but the same issues evolve throughout the
film, mostly one of scale. Sometimes, Kong is 25' tall, sometimes 50' tall,
sometimes just plain gigantic!
The
acting on the part of the real actors seems flat. Jack Black's character is
incredibly focused on his objective, but that's all he's focused on,
unbelievably so. The best performance is given by Naomi Watts, picking up the
part originally played by Faye Wray (who was cast because she could scream
well).
I would love to say that the
settings and location shots are extraordinary, that the movie is as big as its
simian star. It isn't.
The final word?
One paw print out of five. Not even a DVD rental. Skip it entirely.
Posted at 11:55 PM
Read More
Sat
- December
10, 2005
Movie Review: Aeon Flux
Another MTV movie... not a fiasco.
Yes. After the
Napoleon
Dynamite debacle I was wary of another MTC
movie venture, but I was a big fan of Liquid Television way back when, back when
MTV played videos, though I guess I should also say that Liquid Television was
the beginning of the end- technically, LTV was not music videos. Ah,
well.
So, Aeon Flux. Charlize in tight
spandex. And leather. And nothing. OK... already better than
Tomb
Raider. Sci Fi world where a disease killed
off 99% of the population. This is new to the Aeon Flux story. In the LTV
series, we never knew why the assassin (she never had a name) was trying to kill
her target, just that she always tried, and she always
died.
The old series started every
episode with her waking up. I always assumed it was designed to show yet another
attempt to get it right, either a clone or android or some other device that
looked like that same person.
Here, we
get the signature fly-in-the-eyelashes opening sequence. Awesome
effect.
So, in brief, the final word is
this: I went in with low expectations (as opposed to the no expectations of
XXX)- I was surprised, but not by much. The story, what there is of it, suffers
from the disorienting cuts and the lack of a continuous setting- you can never
tell where the action is taking place, because there are no references. The only
real constant is the giant zeppelin circling the city, and, as I said, it is
circling.
3 fluxes out of 5 with an
extra capacitor for MTV finally making a movie almost anyone can sit through
once.
Posted at 08:23 PM
Read More
Movie Review: The Chronicles of Narnia- The Lion, the Witch, and the
Wardrobe
Everyone must see this!
Movie Review: Legend of Zorro
Website
Performance Review: MGYB
Movie Review: The Brothers Grimm
Product Review: Optomo Ep719
Movie Review: Sin City
Movie Review: Wedding Crashers
Series Review: Remington Steele, Season One on DVD
Series Review: Dr. Who (2005)
Movie Review: Sky High
Movie Review: War of the Worlds (2005)
Movie Review: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Movie Review: Fantastic Four
|
Quick Links
Calendar
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
|
Categories
Archives
XML/RSS Feed
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Jul 08, 2007 10:46 PM
|