Movie Review: King Kong
Peter Jackson plus big gorilla = Lord of the
Borings
And three hours of
it.
Wow. I can't describe how
uninteresting this was. It used to be that I could say, "Well, it was shorter
than
Waterworld."
I'm not sure I can say that about King
Kong. Oooo, no I can't. Even the Director's
Cut of
Waterworld
is shorter than this monstrosity. So, from now on, it's "Well, at least it was
shorter than King
Kong."
Wow.
Almost as many virtual characters as
Sky Captain and the World of
Tomorrow. And all of them about as believable.
A fabulous job done on the gorilla, but the same issues evolve throughout the
film, mostly one of scale. Sometimes, Kong is 25' tall, sometimes 50' tall,
sometimes just plain gigantic!
The
acting on the part of the real actors seems flat. Jack Black's character is
incredibly focused on his objective, but that's all he's focused on,
unbelievably so. The best performance is given by Naomi Watts, picking up the
part originally played by Faye Wray (who was cast because she could scream
well).
I would love to say that the
settings and location shots are extraordinary, that the movie is as big as its
simian star. It isn't.
The final word?
One paw print out of five. Not even a DVD rental. Skip it entirely.
Posted: Thu - December
22, 2005 at 11:55 PM