Quick Links
Calendar
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
Stupid Mission Statement
Click here for your introduction to the Museum of Stupidity Stupid Links
Links to really stupid sites. Please feel free to visit these sites and torment the nitwits who run them. It's fun, and let's face it, it's why they were put on Earth in the first place
Bill O'Reilly's pageAnn Coulter's page
Free Republic
The truly moronic Mickey Kaus
Jen Martinez
Megga Ditto Dipshit
Non-Stupid Links
Links to sites that we love, even though they aren't stupid
Brian Flemming's WeblogAltercation
Daily Kos
Tom Tomorrow
Oliver Willis
The Daily Howler
Incredible site about Ninjas
despair.com
The Apologist
Surplus Culture
Low Culture
Archives
XML/RSS Feed
Site Meter
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Apr 22, 2004 04:07 PM
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Apr 22, 2004 04:07 PM
Us VS Them
From today's AP wire.
Seriously:
Bush: U.S. hard to defend against terror
April 21, 2004 | WASHINGTON (AP) -- It's tough to protect the United States against terrorism, President Bush said Wednesday, adding that he understands why two-thirds of Americans in an Associated Press poll think terrorists are likely to strike the nation again before the November election.
"This is a hard country to defend,'' Bush told executives of more than 1,500 Associated Press-member newspapers at the cooperative's annual meeting.
Questioned about an AP poll showing that two of three Americans believe another attack is at least "somewhat likely'' before the election, Bush said: "I can understand why they think they're going to get hit again.'' [Emphasis courtesy The Museum Of Stupidity]
----
Well, shit now. Set aside the fact that, as usual, when the chips are down, Bush and his creeps resort to terrorizing us (Which makes them what, exactly?) into supporting their lame asses. That's a given, and enough has been said about that to last a lifetime. It's the particular wording of this one that's interesting. I know it's a sucker's game parsing George W. Bush's alleged "sentences" for meaning - he is, after all, virtually illiterate - but don't you think it's particularly telling than when it comes to the subject of terrorist attacks on American soil, the pronoun Bush uses to describe the United States of America isn't "us" but "them"?
I guess it makes it a lot easier to ignore piles of evidence that show a terrorist attack is coming, or to fabricate evidence to start a war that will result in the deaths of hundreds - soon to be thousands - of Americans if you don't actually consider yourself part of the community. I mean, it's not like any of US are gonna be hurt, right? Just THEM.
Really, is there anyone left out there - aside, of course, from the brain damaged, the evil, or the just plain perverse - who still supports this useless, evil prick?
PS: This country spent significantly more money investigating Bill Clinton's blowjobs than it did trying to capture Osama bin Laden. That fact alone warrants jail sentences for pretty much the entire GOP, and a few Democrats as well.
Bush: U.S. hard to defend against terror
April 21, 2004 | WASHINGTON (AP) -- It's tough to protect the United States against terrorism, President Bush said Wednesday, adding that he understands why two-thirds of Americans in an Associated Press poll think terrorists are likely to strike the nation again before the November election.
"This is a hard country to defend,'' Bush told executives of more than 1,500 Associated Press-member newspapers at the cooperative's annual meeting.
Questioned about an AP poll showing that two of three Americans believe another attack is at least "somewhat likely'' before the election, Bush said: "I can understand why they think they're going to get hit again.'' [Emphasis courtesy The Museum Of Stupidity]
----
Well, shit now. Set aside the fact that, as usual, when the chips are down, Bush and his creeps resort to terrorizing us (Which makes them what, exactly?) into supporting their lame asses. That's a given, and enough has been said about that to last a lifetime. It's the particular wording of this one that's interesting. I know it's a sucker's game parsing George W. Bush's alleged "sentences" for meaning - he is, after all, virtually illiterate - but don't you think it's particularly telling than when it comes to the subject of terrorist attacks on American soil, the pronoun Bush uses to describe the United States of America isn't "us" but "them"?
I guess it makes it a lot easier to ignore piles of evidence that show a terrorist attack is coming, or to fabricate evidence to start a war that will result in the deaths of hundreds - soon to be thousands - of Americans if you don't actually consider yourself part of the community. I mean, it's not like any of US are gonna be hurt, right? Just THEM.
Really, is there anyone left out there - aside, of course, from the brain damaged, the evil, or the just plain perverse - who still supports this useless, evil prick?
PS: This country spent significantly more money investigating Bill Clinton's blowjobs than it did trying to capture Osama bin Laden. That fact alone warrants jail sentences for pretty much the entire GOP, and a few Democrats as well.
Posted: Thu - April 22, 2004 at 04:01 PM