Cover Story


The Outfoxed gals, lying about what Fox covers? Shocking! With J$P Video!

It's one of the dogmas that Fox haters invoke, over and over. FNC "didn't cover" this. Or that. And who are the principal floggers of this chestnut? None other than the newshounds (another fine product of the Outfoxed syndicate). Whenever they pull this ancient trick , they are almost always wildly, ridiculously wrong, but for some reason that doesn't stop them. Perhaps because they are suffering from doggie projection.

Example: their old, tired mantra about the stock market. The curs insist that when the markets go up, it leads the hour on Your World. But when they do down, Fox hides the news, and Your World will do any number of stories before reporting on the decline. Only it's another hound lie. Proof: the markets go down, and the story dominates the first block of Your World:



And the newspoodles? Do they tell their readers how their shopworn theory has been torpedoed once again? Um, no. Look how their write-up of this broadcast begins:
The third segment today (July 20, ,2007) on Your World w/Neil Cavuto (an alleged "business news" program), began...

Yes, their recap of the program neatly avoids any mention of this coverage by beginning with the third segment! All the better to perpetuate their smear. Not too different from the multiple complaints they filed because Bill O'Reilly dared to criticize DailyKos. You see, he's just attacking Kos because he "hates the left". If it was really about hate speech, why doesn't he call out right wing sites? And yet, when Mr Bill does just that, exposing some hateful comments on Free Republic, what do the mutts do? Their write up talks about his Talking Points Memo and nothing else! Not a word about Free Republic or O'Reilly's condemnation of the comments there!

That's why their "Fox didn't cover" tricks are so transparent and hypocritical. And there is no better example of that than Donna's latest demagoguery. How dare Fox run a promo claiming the "best political coverage", she whines, when they never covered Tuesday's Democratic debate?
Fox Claims It Has The Best Political Coverage - Then Doesn't Cover Democratic Debate...
there was no coverage at all of the Democratic Debate last night. Typical Fox - claiming something that isn't true.
Actually, this is typical newshounds: claiming something that isn't true. But the kennel-dwellers eagerly swallow the tripe as if it were fact:
  • Unfortunately for Fox, the main dissident party has decided to stop participating in their own demonising. So the only option is not to cover them at all.
  • if you claim to be "fair and balanced" and provide unbiased coverage to ALL americans regardless of politics, then ignoring one political party is NOT "good" coverage.
  • in order to have the best POLITICAL coverage, it is customary to cover ALL things POLITICAL...like, you know, POLITICAL DEBATES

We tried to set them straight:



Sadly, the one thing that is not permitted in the echo chamber is truth, and our comment was, of course, deleted. And while the biased bassets prefer to spew slanders and falsehoods, we will simply offer the plain, incontrovertible truth [QuickTime video]:



Special bonus YouTube edition:


posted: Thu - August 9, 2007 at 12:30 PM       j$p  send 
|