The Outfoxed gals allow the most repellent personal atatcks on their own website. Are they also harboring a criminal? Updated!

The Fox haters do not like sunlight. When Bill O'Reilly read hateful comments posted on sites like the DailyKos, and more recently started showing some of their graphics (that have been described as "vile" or worse), there was an immediate counterattack. Blue bloggers scoured the O'Reilly site and came up with several extreme comments. Kos even claimed that the Secret Service was investigating one of them for a threat on Hillary Clinton's life! For his part, O'Reilly believes it was planted, and there are new developments on that front.

Naturally, no smear of Fox can proceed without the participation of the newshounds (another fine product of the Outfoxed mob). Their part in this was to urge all the kennel-dwellers to boycott Mr Bill's advertisers and bombard them with emails. If that sounds familiar, it's because they've tried this ploy before. And before that. And before that. In fact, it seems to be an annual event, sort of like celebrating the solstice. And yet it seems oddly inconsistent. After all, it was the newspoodles who railed against Fox for trying to "destroy everything that stands in their way"--because they listed advertisers on a CBS program. On another occasion, the curs insisted this practice was an attack on free speech and a "new low". Yet all that is forgotten as the bowsers launch their latest attempt at boycotting advertisers. Hypocrisy is coin of the realm in the Fox haters' echo chamber.

The biased bassets don't exactly come to this issue with clean paws. They seem to have no problem with vile personal attacks appearing on their own website. Case in point: Michelle Malkin, whose recent guest host appearances on The Factor inspired these intellectual responses from the denizens of the dog pound [profanity deleted]:



Yes, this is the level of discourse in the Fox haters' noise machine. But the most stunning post of the past few weeks may well be from one who calls himself "Marco", a prolific regular at the pound with a long record of Fox bashing. Regarding the Hilary Clinton "death threat" that appeared on O'Reilly's website, Marco discusses what blue blogs have found on Mr Bill's site. But first he makes what could be an astounding admission: "I posted the one [comment] turned over to the SS [Secret Service]"! It appears Mr O'Reilly may not have been wrong when he claimed the comment was planted. We don't know how long the anti-Fox terriers will allow this message to stand unaltered, so we've preserved the record:



All of this raises several questions. Did "Marco" mean what he said, and is he telling the truth? Is there an organized effort to plant phony "threats" on targeted websites? Who is referring these to the Secret Service? How many federal crimes are committed when the Secret Service is sent off to investigate concocted, nonexistent threats? Could someone end up in the house of many doors, and for how many years?

As for the mutts, their rank hypocrisy is exposed once again. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Update: Welcome DailyKos readers. We wish you the best of luck in finding what DailyKos says is posted here:

He claims to have 'proof' that someone at Newshounds 'planted' the comment on Bill's website...

A great use of the straw man, with the gratuitous quotes around the word "proof" a particularly deceptive touch. That description of this article is laughably tendentious and untrue. But then, if you've read this far, you already know that. If you're disappointed that DailyKos misled you, you might enjoy this instead.