When the Outfoxed gals smear someone, the last thing they want to hear is the truth.

When you want the stories that reputable news media won't report, one place to turn is the newshounds (another fine product of the Outfoxed mob). Their track record is impressive. They brought us the exclusive report that Sandy Berger was innocent: cleared of all charges. The anti-Fox terriers told us how George Bush had a criminal conviction for cocaine, another story that the responsible media have been shamelessly covering up. And of course the hounds were way ahead of the mainstream media when they broke the news that Karl Rove has been indicted in the Valerie Plame case.

Now these intrepid journalists have done it again. In another scoop for the biased bassets, they have more breaking news. Bill O'Reilly is "implicated" in a libel case, and what's more, he's been found "guilty" by the judge!



All of this stems from the newspoodles chortling over a Keith Olbermann smear job that aired last night. Olbermann used all the propaganda techniques at his disposal to lie to his viewers. The tricks KO used to defame Bill are detailed here, but the most egregious thing he did was to edit a clip of O'Reilly so that viewers wouldn't realize that Mr Bill was giving both sides of the controversy (did a judge really tell a 14-year rape victim to "get over it"?). Olbermann ran the part where O'Reilly interviewed a writer who claimed the judge said it, but snipped out the part where Mr Bill read a statement from the judge denying he said any such thing.

And because Olbermann left it out, so did newsmutt Deborah. Instead, she followed Olby's lead in smearing O'Reilly as a character assassin, and of course the credulous kennel-dwellers swallowed it whole:

• The judge didn't say what O'Reilly said he did, yet O'Reilly, little bitch that he is, won't own up and apologize.
• BORe will never apologize for all the smearing he does.
• If he fully plans on destroying a man's life, he has even extra charge to make sure what he says is true.
• the only way to give a "fair and balanced" report... give the judge a chance to prove he had not made the statement, and that Wedge was libeling him.

Note that last comment. That is exactly what O'Reilly did:

O'REILLY: Judge Murphy turned down our request for an interview, but he did tell "The Boston Globe," which competes against "The Herald," that he never said any such thing, and that he's the victim of intimidation.

But that part of the clip ended up on Olbermann's cutting room floor. And deceitful Debbie, who also kept that information out of her report, actively removed it every time we offered it in the comments:



Comments deleted.



Comment deleted.



Comment deleted.

If there were any doubt that the curs print lies just to smear Fox, there's the proof, as they systematically delete every attempt to correct their falsehoods. Instead, they claim a judge "found" Bill O'Reilly "guilty of republishing"! The truth: the judge made no such finding in the case. Even Olbermann's report didn't make this absurd allegation, so where did it come from? Deb made it up! It is impossible to be found "guilty of republishing" because there is no such crime. ("Republishing" means you are not committing libel or slander as you are just reporting someone else's words. So the claim that he was found "guilty of republishing" is equivalent to saying he was "guilty of free speech".) On top of all this, O'Reilly was not even a defendant in the case! By the way, we posted this information too and, like Pavlov's dogs, the canines promptly deleted it:



Comment deleted.



Comment deleted.

The lies began with the infamous Keith Olbermann, and were eagerly embellished with Debbie's fanciful drivel and iron-handed censorship of the truth. It's how things work in the Fox haters' echo-chamber.