Anatomy of a SmearHow Media Matters helped Keith Olbermann smear Bill O'Reilly. With
J$P Video!
There are two ways to smear someone. You can be covert: publish facts,
but not the whole truth; let careful wording lead readers to the desired
conclusion. Or you can be overt: a full-on personal attack, drenched in
hyperbole, preferably culminating in high-decibel name-calling. Media Matters
and Keith Olbermann take different approaches, but they exemplify symbiosis.
They feed off each other. On his radio program Thursday, Bill O'Reilly was talking to Col Ralph Peters about VietNam. During the conversation, Mr O'Reilly recalled how, when Saddam's statue was brought down, he had criticized the Bush administration for not having a plan to deal with the rampant law breaking and looting in Iraq. Media Matters dutifully dug out the transcript for the day in question (April 9, 2003), and sure enough, O'Reilly had said nothing like any of this. Their phrasing ("O'Reilly falsely claimed... in fact O'Reilly made no mention of looting") left precisely the desired impression: O'Reilly was making it all up. Enter Keith Olbermann, host of MSNBC's Countdown. He does not research the nightly hit pieces he directs at his perceived enemies. Rather, he uncritically lifts them from Media Matters, Think Progress, and other blue blogs. Then he gussies them up with extravagant ridicule and personal attacks, taking them to the next level. Invariably, Media Matters will post video of Mr Olbermann's over-the-top rants, allowing them to benefit from his philippics while claiming clean hands: Media Matters, after all, hasn't indulged in name-calling. Symbiosis. In the case at hand, Mr Olbermann took their O'Reilly article and ran with it in his usual style: "This is a lulu... He didn't say anything like that", culminating in a coda of audacious name-calling [QuickTime video]: |