You've read all about it on the blue blogs. Now, revealed before your own eyes, the Fox News Channel's secret agenda.

In case you didn't notice, the War on Fox is on in earnest. The Fox haters' echo chamber on the internet is cranking into high gear:

• Fox News has been a source of propoganda and lies for the Republican Party for years now
• Fox News is little more than a fount of conservative propaganda.
• Fox's Republican Misinformation noise machine
• Fox News is the Republican idiot box
• the unashamed pro-Bush bias that exists on America's Fox News.
• only complete morons think Fox News is "fair and balanced
• FOX News, the GOP's propaganda arm

That last is from the premier Fox haters, the newshounds (another fine product of the Outfoxed gang). While most of the Fox-hating cabal don't watch what they condemn, the newsmutts do claim to monitor the channel. But when the aim is propaganda, it's not so much what you say as what you don't say. The hounds, like other smear sites, can lie without working up a sweat, simply by cherry-picking what they say, and what they don't say.

So once again we thought it was time to reveal the rampant GOP propaganda on Fox for all to see. We revved up our tivo and started with Fox & Friends this morning, straight through to Studio-B with Shep. Prepare yourself for an onslaught of conservative "misinformation".



On Fox & Friends we find a Democrat Congresswoman talking about vote fraud. Newspup Judy supposedly writes on this show, as when she howled when they interviewed a Republican but did not "invite any Democrat to respond". Yet here we had a Democrat without any Republican to respond. What did Judy say about that? Um, well, she neglected to report it at all.



That would be a former employee of President Bill Clinton. By an amazing coincidence, his appearance was also not reported by the mongrels.



Mr Roehmer was interviewed on Fox News Live. Doggie Donna once complained when FNL interviewed a Republican: "Where is the fair and balanced they are always claiming? There was no one to answer for the Democrats." So today, a Democrat was interviewed, with no one to answer for the Republicans. What did Donna have to say about that? Oh, wait, nothing.



Another Democrat? What kind of GOP propaganda channel is this anyhow? Needless to say, the tail-waggers carefully refrained from mentioning Rep Cooper.



There's a familiar face. This is another one of those "conservatives" on Fox. When Bill Frist appeared on Fox News Live Donna wailed that "there was no Democratic Senator to speak up". So what did she say when there was no Republican Senator to counter Durbin? Another dog that did not bark.



It was just yesterday that Donna was blasting Bill Hemmer for talking to a Republican Senator "with no counterpart". Today, fair and balanced, he had a Democrat Senator with no counterpart. What did Donna say to that? Well, nothing. She ignored it completely!



Who's this? A liberal speaking out against the Iraq War and calling for Rumsfeld to resign? On the GOP propaganda channel? When Ms MacCallum talked to Dan Bartlett yesterday, Judy fumed, even though top Democrats had been asked to appear and refused. So how did she report on Batiste's appearance today, with no one to rebut his viewpoint? The usual way: she didn't.



Another prime purveyor of GOP propaganda! Judy complained when FNL interviewed Kay Bailey Hutchinson but "offered Democrats no chance to rebut". What was her reaction today when FNL featured Boxer and no Republicans to rebut? "Shhhhh. Quiet. We can't let the readers know that Fox has these Democrats on the air. We just won't tell them."



Is there a more authentic liberal than one from the CAP? Surely the newspups, who complain when Studio B talks to a Republican and "there was no Democrat" present, will admit when the opposite happens? Um, no. Their report on today's program just happens to omit any mention of Crowley.

These are just some of the Dems we spotted, but you get the point. There they are: the faces of Fox propaganda. The newshounds, who watch Fox "so you don't have to", put up article after article. And yet not one of these appearances got so much as a mention by the biased bowsers. They have refined cherry-picking and lying by omission into an art form.