Democrats can pretend that there are "independents" watching Fox News, but the data is clear -- it is the most reliably Republican outlet in the nation.

• FNC: 39% Republican, 33% Democratic, 22% Independent
  
• CNN: 18% Republican, 51% Democratic, 23% Independent
  
• MSNBC: 18% Republican, 45% Democratic, 27% Independent
  

• FNC: 2,198,000 viewers
  
• CNN: 1,342,000 viewers
  
• MSNBC: 867,000 viewers
  

• FNC: 857,000 Republicans
• CNN: 242,000 Republicans
• MSNBC: 156,000 Republicans
  

• FNC: 725,000 Democrats
• CNN: 684,000 Democrats
• MSNBC: 390,000 Democrats
  

• FNC: 484,000 Independents
• CNN: 309,000 Independents
• MSNBC: 234,000 Independents
  

• FNC: 438,000 Republicans
• CNN: 128,000 Republicans
• MSNBC: 85,000 Republicans
  

• FNC: 371,000 Democrats
• CNN: 364,000 Democrats
• MSNBC: 213,000 Democrats

• FNC: 247,000 Independents
• CNN: 164,000 Independents
• MSNBC: 128,000 Independents
  

From: Kimberly Gutierrez
Subject: Bill o'reilly
Date: October 1, 2008 12:46:48 PM EDT
To: johnnydollar
Your video on Bill O'Reilly is a fraud.
You should remove it... Liar.

Huh? --J$

From: Kimberly Gutierrez
Date: October 1, 2008 3:11:08 PM EDT
The Bill O'Reilly "voice" where he is yelling about the dems and republicans, it's a fraud. You should remove it...

Right, it's really Rich Little. Even the full-hour podcast sitting on the foxnews.com site that the excerpt was taken from is Rich Little. Thank you for your insightful comment. --J$

From: Kimberly Gutierrez
Date: October 1, 2008 7:14:56 PM EDT
Then why is the heading, "O'Reilly erupts against talk radio, calls Barney Frank a 'fat toad'"
Says nothing about Rich Little...
http://homepage.mac.com/mkoldys/blog/pvd244055131.html
You presented this with malicious intent.
The people that responded to this on your blog, don't seem to think this Rich Little.
And yes my comment was insightful, your post wasn't though, was it?

Oh man, do I have to spell it out for you? "It's really Rich Little" = sarcasm. Sarcasm for an argument so brainless that it deserves nothing more in response. Of course it says nothing about Rich Little. Of course nobody seems to think it's Rich Little. BECAUSE IT ISN'T RICH LITTLE. "Sarcasm", remember?

I'm surprised that I have to explain this. Thank you for giving me the most stupefyingly dense series of emails I've received in years. It's definitely going into the archives for my upcoming post on idiotic emails.

PS: Why don't you write to O'Reilly to expose this "malicious fraud" you've uncovered? Of course that would mean you'd have to explain to him how the same audio also sits on billoreilly.com. Oh wait, maybe O'Reilly's in on the 'malicious fraud' too! I guess I'd better label this part too: SARCASM! --J$

From: Kimberly Gutierrez
Date: October 1, 2008 7:26:42 PM EDT
Here is the link for the comments page...
http://www.haloscan.com/comments/johnnydollar/pvd244055131/
Liar.

OK, I'm convinced nobody can be this stupid. This is a put-on. Is this you, Jocko? It sounds like something you might pull. You had me going there for a bit! Nice job!! --J$

UPDATE: Complete audio (minus commercials) of the entire hour here.