Personalities and leadership

When it comes to leadership, how relevant is personality? Leadership development workshops often allocate time to explore this question. The Harvard program does not. However, one of the students in the class happens to be trained in Myers-Briggs personality analysis. He volunteered to take us through it—and almost half the class participated. I joined in because I am one of those people who can’t resist self-discovery exercises, even though the skeptic in me questions the science. The results: I am an intuitive, judging introvert. My score on the “life-style orientation” came in half way between “J” (judging) and “P” (perceiving). This means I am either an INTJ (“everything has room for improvement”) or an INTP (“a love for problem solving”). Those of you know me are probably thinking you could have told me this without having me fill in a questionnaire.
These kinds of personality exercises give people in a group an opportunity to recognize and discuss their individual differences and to signal their particular needs. Almost all groups are made up of individuals who see and experience the world differently. Many people assume that fearless, outspoken extraverts make the best leaders. In fact, good leadership has less to do with having a specific personality as it does with understanding the personalities of others. Good union leaders—and good union educators—appreciate that the individuals who make up the membership respond to things in a variety of ways. Some look to a leader for logical arguments and indications of competence, whereas others might respond better when a leader can tap into their emotions. Some members do better receiving information visually, so leaders have to paint a picture of a problem for it to be understood.

Good leaders also understand that a group works best and is most powerful if it is inclusive of different personality types. Differences within a group can make it stronger and more dynamic—but only if the differences are managed and facilitated. And that’s the job of leaders.

There are lots of tools—many more straightforward than Myers-Briggs—that can help a group identify and better understand the personalities that are contained within it. This understanding is key to building positive group dynamics.
Training for Change, for example, offers a "team types" discussion tool that invites members of a group to stand in either the North, South, East or West positions according to how they see themselves. I’ve done the exercise as part of leadership training workshops, and in bargaining preparation workshops, and found it to be a useful device to make people more sensitive to the personality factors that conribute to group dynamics.

If you are curious about your own personality type, and can’t wait until one of these workshops to come along to find out, you can google Myers-Briggs to get pages of information, or complete an on-line questionnaire. Even if you think it is hocus pocus, it can be useful in leadership development.



|