The HammerHere's Charles Krauthammer's most recent analysis of the "debate" on Social
Security. As mentioned before, he seems to believe that the Democrats' strategy
of criticizing Bush and offering no substantive proposal of their own may work
in the short term (meaning
2006):
"This is about as fair and progressive a plan as you can find. Even the inveterately, reflexively, often apoplectically anti-Bush Michael Kinsley expressed admiration -- and indeed puzzlement that the president would offer it without any prospect of short-term political advantage. Leave the quest for short-term political advantage to the Democrats. They have finally gotten a Republican president to openly propose "cuts" in Social Security and they intend to win seats in 2006 running all-out against them." The Democrats seem so confident in their agenda of criticizing anything Bush (whether it's social security, taxes, the war or judges), that they have honed their political arguments to a single word. Posted: Sat - May 7, 2005 at 12:07 PM |
Quick Links
Our Mission
![]() This weblog contains random musings from Mazurs North. Original thought is not guaranteed, but adopting the bulk of the tastes and opinions professed on these pages should serve one well in this chaotic world. Calendar
Archives
Favorite Links
New! Mazurland Blog! Blogs4God Drudge Report Hugh Hewitt Little Green Footballs Michelle Malkin National Review Online Power Line Real Clear Politics Rush Limbaugh Weekly Standard Mandatory Blogs
Visitors Since Jan 8, 2005
Spend Money
Webrings
XML/RSS Feed
Comments Powered By
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category: Published On: May 25, 2005 08:20 PM |
||||||||||||||