> >

A little commentary from a college football fan...


This is quoted from a college football message board. As you may know I feel the same way as this person does.

More ND questions...

"After last nights game with Stanford where ND barely beat a 5-5 (now 5-6) team full of injuries, I decided to review their season's body of work.

After 11 games, where they were 9-2...
+ They played only 3 bowl eligible teams (yes, only 3 teams with winning records)
+ The 3 bowl eligible teams consist of:
1. Michigan, a win. But in that game Michigan was fairly depleted, with an ailing Hart (yes, the ND defense did knock him out), and I heard (correct me if I am wrong) Michigan was missing a few other key players.
2. USC, a loss. ND gave its best showing of the year nearly pulling the huge upset to the 2 time defending NC and current #1, but it was still a loss. Note that if ND and PSU had both gotten lucky breaks that day, PSU would also be playing for the National Championship this season for sure.
3. BYU, a win. BYU, yes BYU, was the other bowl eligible team. Hardly a powerhouse.

+ Their second loss came to Michigan State. A team that is 5-6 and NOT bowl eligible.

+ Granted, it is hard to punish a team because their opponents had such bad seasons. Especially considering, on paper, the season looked fairly tough to start the season.

+ However, why is it acceptable to REWARD a team for having a poor schedule?

PSU is still picked on for having a patsy non-conference schedule. However, 2 of the 3 "patsies" are bowl eligible, one of which would have been playing for a BCS game if not for blowing it against UConn yesterday. By the way, PSU played 7 bowl eligible teams, beating 6 of them. One of these teams has an outstanding chance of being a BCS team (we won that game).

I know I'm beating a dead horse and really have no point besides stating again how much it annoys me, but man, this annoys me."


Posted: Sun - November 27, 2005 at 08:40 PM            


©