PLAGIARISM IS ILLEGAL!
Please don't take any pictures, sounds, text or other content from this site without my EXPRESS, WRITTEN PERMISSION!

I must confess that I was pretty skeptical that a Spider-Man theatrical movie would ever make it to the big screen. Since the early 1980s, there have been discussions about making a Spider-Man movie but red tape dragged the project down for fifteen years. According to primetime legend, there was initially discussion in the early 1980s of bringing Nicholas Hammond back in a new live-action Spidey TV movie which would also feature Bill Bixby and Lou Ferrigno in a Spider-Man/Incredible Hulk live-action crossover. Apparently Lou Ferrigno (who was then starring in Hercules) wasn't quite ready to jump into the green makeup again and the project was shelved. It's a shame, because an adventure like that would have really caught MY interest. :-)

In the mid-1980s, Cannon films announced plans to release a live-action Spider-Man movie as well as a live-action Captain America movie. In 1985, Stan Lee told "Comics Scene" magazine that the film was coming along nicely and that he expected the film to be in theatres by Christmas 1986. The movie never made it. Unfortunately for Marvel Comics, the big-budget adaptation of "HOWARD THE DUCK" ended up failing miserably at the box office and casting a dark cloud over live-action Super-hero movies. The next year, DC Comics' Super-Man franchise came crashing down when "Super-Man IV: the Quest for Peace" failed to earn even a fraction of what its three predecessors did at the box office. The sudden box-office unpopularity was only part of Spider-Man's troubles.

First, Cannon Films was in financial trouble and changed ovwnership. In retrospect, this was a good thing. Their original plan was to film Spider-Man on a shoe-string $5.5 million dollar budget (Cannon specialized in making cheapie movies includinfg a number starring Chuck Norris, pre-Walker-Texas-Ranger). Something that cheap would have barely been above the level of the original 70s TV show starring Nicholas Hammond. Marvel Comics apparently wasn't keen on the script that was written for the Cannon treatment and it was reportedly reworked a couple of times.

In 1989, the Super-Hero film genre breathed again when BAT-MAN (starring Jack Nicholson, Michael Keaton and Kim Bassinger) was a smash box-office hit. Unfortunately for Marvel, their comic adaptations weren't lucky. THE PUNISHER (starring Dolph "Rocky IV" Lungran) was panned and only saw theatrical release overseas. CAPTAIN AMERICA starring Matt Salinger was also panned and didn't make the theatres, instead seeing release on home video. THE FANTASTIC FOUR, a cheap $2 million dollar feature by Roger "BLACK SCORPION" Corman was purchased by a bigger studio and buried before it could even hit the theatres and is only available on bootleg videos. MARVEL movies seemed cursed.

Unfortunately,. for Spider-Man, legal issues, conflicting schedules and brankruptcy made the web even more tangled. The producer of the original Cannon project left the company when it was absorbed into Pathe Communications. Taking the film ights to Spider-Man with him, he started a new company called 21st Century Entertainment and struck a deal with Carolco films to produce a big budget adaptation of Spider-Man. Caroloco set about hiring James "Titantic" Cameron to prepare a treatment of the film and wooed him to produce and direct the project. Then legal hell-broke loose. The original producer and his company, 21st Century Entertainment, filed suit against Caroloco. Caroloco counter-filed. Marvel Comics also sued, claiming that the film rights to Spider-Man had long expired and needed to be re-negotiated. . Viacom and Columbia-TriStar also filed suits, claiming that they had old deals with 21st Century which gave them television broadcast and home video rights to the movie. Confused? So was I. Let's just say that the outcome was pretty devestating for many of the companies involved in lawsuits: Caroloco, 21st Century and Marvel Comics all went bankrupt. Unfortunately for some Spidey fans, Cameron left the project when the legal battles were going on.

Ultimately, things worked themselves out. Sony Pictures acquired the rights to Spider-Man, Marvel emerged from the ashes, and Marvel's movie curse seemed to finally disappear when big-screen adaptations of BLADE and X-MEN did brisk business at the box office. Spider-Man moved out of legal hell and moved ahead full steam. With Cameron gone, Sony hired Sam Raimi to healm the picture. Raimi had earned cult status initially producing movies such as THE EVIL DEAD trilogy, DARK MAN and (more recently) television series such as "HERCULES" and "XENA: Warrior Princess". For those who are worried that the camp-style of these movies will rub off on Spider-Man, it's important to remember that Raimi has also received critical acclaim for movies like A SIMPLE PLAN and THE GIFT.

SPIDER-MAN began filming in January 2000. A number of actors and actresses were apparently considered for the key roles in the film. Leonardo "TITANIC" DiCaprio apparently expressed interest in the role, as did Freddy "She's All That" Prinze Jr. and Nicholas "Buffy The Vampire Slayer" Brendan. John "Being John Malcovich" Malcovich was apparently considered for the role of the Green Goblin and it was rumoured that Jim "I make $20 million a picture for acting like a stupid numbskull" Carrey vied for the part1\. The part of Peter's love interest, Mary Jane, was reportedly tried for by Alicia ("Mr. Holland's Opus") Witt and Kate ("Almost Famous") Hudson.

Raimi reportedly had very particular preferences on who should play Peter Parker. By some accounts, he wanted the role to, without question, fall to Tobey Maguire ("The Cider House Rules", "Wonderboys", "Pleasentville") - an up-and-coming actor who had received critical acclaim for his previous roles. Maguire pumped up for the role tremendously and worked with trainers to enhance his balance, flexibility and agility for the role.

The part if Peter's love interest fell to Kirsten Dunst, a young actress who first won considerable acclaim at age 11, in the movie adaptation of Ann Rice's novel, AN INTERVIEW WITH A VAMPIRE. Dunst has since starred in a range of movies, including JUMANGI, 15 AND PREGNANT, SMALL SOLDIERS, BRING IT ON, CRAZY/BEAUTIFUL, LITTLE WOMEN, DICK, WAG THE DOG, and DROP DEAD GORGEOUS. More recently, Dunst appeared in Sophia Coppola's acclaimed filme, THE VIRGIN SUICIDES. The blond actress paid homage to loyal Spider-Man readers by wearing a red wig for the role.

Unlike the original live-action TV series, the new SPIDER-MAN movie will also feature a super-villain from the comic book. There was some speculation as to who that villain would be: it was originally thought by some that Dr. Octopus or the Scorpion would appear to cause Spider-Man angst but Raimi soon revealed that the Green Goblin was the be the antagonist. The role went to Willem Defoe (AMERICAN PSYCHO, SHADOW OF THE VAMPIRE, MISSISSIPPI BURNING, BORN ON THE FOURTH OF JULY).

SPIDER-MAN's production is now well underway and is scheduled for release on May 3rd, 2002 - two weeks before STAR WARS: Episode II. The production itself looks impressive, despite a number of setbacks. A crew member was killed on the set early in production and Raimi had to pull an initial teaser trailer featuring the WORLD TRADE CENTER when the towers were destroyed on September 11th, 2001. Raimi has since released a spectacular new trailer which can be downloaded from Spider-Man Hype.

What about Nicholas Hammond? There's no word on if he'll appear in the movie but he's apparently given his blessing to Tobey Macquire. So have a lot of skeptical Spider-Man fans who've seen the new trailer. Now all we have to do is be patient until May 3, 2002.

These screen-captures taken from the Spider-Man trailer at the official Spider-Man site.

 THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN and PETER PARKER are trademarks of the Marvel Comics Group. THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN live action television series is owned by Charles Fries Productions. THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN live action television series page is an unofficial site created and maintained by MARK RATHWELL  that is not endorsed by either of these parties.