Non-negotiables
by Martin E. Marty, Sightings,
1/5/09
This is a great post from Marty
demonstrating the difference in thought and understanding about the separation
of Church (maybe we should say religion) and State.
Long-time subscribers know that Monday
Sightings does not "do" U.S. Presidents or presidential candidates, but this
twilight moment after an election and before an inauguration provides me with
another category, "President-Elect," which today's column will notice for an
important reason. That reason? The approach to religion-and-politics
proposed by President-Elect Obama in his "Call to Renewal" address on May 28,
2006. I may print it out and use my new Christmas-gift magnets to affix it
to a refrigerator door as a text for morning meditations.
Here is an
excerpt:"Democracy demands that the
religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than
religion-specific, values. Democracy requires that their proposals be
subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion
for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I
cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God's will. I
have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to
people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all...Politics depends on
our ability to persuade each other of common aims based on a common
reality. It involves the compromise, the art of what's possible. At
some fundamental level, religion does not allow for compromise. It's the
art of the impossible. If God has spoken, then followers are expected to
live up to God's edicts, regardless of the consequences. To base one's
life on such uncompromising commitments may be sublime, but to base our
policy-making on such commitments would be a dangerous
thing."Now, contrast this with a message
posted by the Reverend Pastor Richard Duane Warren, with whom I have no motive
to pick a fight. But I wish he would engage in dialogue with his friend,
the President-elect, before and after Inauguration Day.
Warren:"As
church leaders, we know our congregations are not allowed to endorse specific
candidates, and it's important for us to recognize that there can be multiple
opinions among Bible-believing Christians when it comes to debatable issues such
as the economy, social programs, Social Security, and the war in Iraq. But
for those of us who accept the Bible as God's Word and know that God has a
unique, sovereign purpose for every life, I believe there are five issues that
are non-negotiable. To me, they're not even debatable because God's Word
is clear on these issues."These have to
do with abortion, stem-cell harvesting, homosexual "marriage," human cloning,
and euthanasia. He chose these five, about which the printed Bible
displays only a few inches of text that can even be used as inferences to
support them, as "non-negotiable" themes. He shelves as negotiable the multiple
yards of printed biblical texts on some social issues which to him seem
negotiable. With the President-Elect I affirm that Pastor Warren's
"uncompromising commitments may be sublime," but I do see that "to base our
policy-making on such commitments would be a dangerous
thing."We Bible-believing Christians are
offended when some Muslims base social and political policy on the Qur'an, or
ruling parties in India, on texts from their holy books, since we do not accept
such texts as "God's Word." What Pastor Warren and millions in his camp
advocate works only in a theocracy, where the whole population accepts or is
forced to accept one faith's "God's Word." I really, really would like to
eavesdrop if the President-Elect and the Pastor were to converse about this
question.Reference:Read
Obama's "Call to Renewal" address at http://obama.senate.gov/speech/060628-call_to_renewal/Martin
E. Marty's biography, current projects, upcoming events, publications, and
contact information can be found at www.illuminos.com.Sightings
comes from the Martin
Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity
School.
Filed Mon - January 5, 2009, 12:47 PM in
Return to: |