George Rochberg, RIP
Few months ago, Saul Bellow, America's greatest
living novelist, passed away at age 89. This week the man who may very well have
been America's greatest living composer has now left us. Rochberg was
86.
Rochberg's importance as a composer goes well
beyond the quality of his works. He, more than any other American composer,
helped regain respectability for tonal and neo-romantic art music. Rochberg had
begun his compositional career as a member of the serial avant-garde. By 1960,
he was considered in many circles as the foremost serial composer in America.
But Rochberg's "atonal" serial music was somewhat different than that of other
more belligerent serial composers like Roger Sessions, for instance. Rochberg
tried very hard to make his serial music accessible. He was always seeking to
communicate with the general classical music public. His
Second
Symphony is remarkable listenable, considering
its rigorous twelve-tone composition. In the sixties, however, he found it
increasingly difficult to express himself within the narrow boundaries of
serialism. He complained that Schoenberg's twelve-tone method of composition
inevitably led to "expressionism"—i.e., dark, foreboding, sinister and
even neurotic music. After the loss of his son, who died after a long illness,
he couldn't compose exclusively under the Schoenbergian method any more. His
compositions gradually became more and more tonal, until, in the slow movement
of his massive Third
Quartet, he composed unabashedly diatonic
music, beautiful and consoling.
This
slow movement caused something of a scandal among the avant-garde establishment.
It was one thing to move toward tonality, but to write music of traditional
tonal harmony was to go beyond the pale. Although Rochberg continued to write
music that contained difficult "modern" harmony, his willingness to also use
traditional harmony—in other words, to make use of the harmonies most
suitable for what he wished to express—made him something of a pioneer
among the musical fraternity. But by the eighties, the music world began to turn
in Rochberg's direction. Tonality and "neo-romanticism" became fashionable once
again.
Rochberg, like nearly all
composers of the second half of the twentieth century, was not a particularly
inspired melodist. Yet his music, which exemplifies what he called "hard
romanticism," or a romanticism that shows great ingenuity and integrity, never
fails to make its point. His Violin
Concerto, recently recorded by Naxos, is in
many ways an extraordinary work. When it was premiered by Isaac Stern at
Carneige Hall in New York, ticket goers lined up for blocks. The work runs the
gamut of harmonic devices, from the opening violin melody—a harsh, angular
theme—to the hauntingly beautiful
conclusion.
Although there are several
talented composers of younger generations out there (most notably, Jay Aaron
Kernis and Jennifer Higdon), no one can quite match the stature of Rochberg. He
will be missed.
Posted: Tue - June 7, 2005 at 10:19 AM