If it Sounds Science-y, is it?


In my last post, I sounded loud the trumpet call for the scientific method, while in an earlier post, I decried pseudo-science.

What's tricky is that not all purveyors of pseudo-science are obvious nit-wits. Some pseudo-scientific charlatans come across as reasonable, likable, and apparently conversant in a wide range of official-sounding facts. Even those with open eyes can be fooled into accepting pseudo-science and propaganda as real if deceit is applied craftily enough.

Take for instance, Michael Chrichton. He is fast earning himself a reputation as a a master of half-truths, logical errors, and straw-men to persuade others to his pseudo-science-supported point of view.

Unfortunately, he's a very persuasive man; I imagine many scientists wish they could come across half as smoothly. Being right is hardly a consolation when the vapid media sound-bites reality to conform to the will of the most charismatic.


Posted: Sat - June 9, 2007 at 09:15 PM          

©