• Neptunus Lex
    You're in "". Best place to start is Home.
    arg, there be space here
     >

    Thu - February 3, 2005
    More sharing. Because you're worth it.

    First comes an article in Welt am Sonntag, by one Matthias Dapfner, CEO of Axel Springer, AG, and provided by correspondent Mark H.

    And I hope you don't mind, Mark, but I had to run this one down to primary sources before I'd put it out there. But it played out:

    EUROPE - THY NAME IS COWARDICE
    (Commentary by Mathias Dapfner CEO, Axel Springer, AG)

    A few days ago Henry Broder wrote in Welt am Sonntag, "Europe - your family name is appeasement."
    It's a phrase you can't get out of your head because it's so terribly true.

    Appeasement cost millions of Jews and non-Jews their lives as England and France, allies at the time,
    negotiated and hesitated too long before they noticed that Hitler had to be fought, not bound to
    toothless agreements.

    Appeasement legitimized and stabilized Communism in the Soviet Union, then East Germany,
    then all the rest of Eastern Europe where for decades, inhuman, suppressive, murderous
    governments were glorified as the ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities.

    Appeasement crippled Europe when genocide ran rampant in Kosovo, and even though we had
    absolute proof of ongoing mass-murder, we Europeans debated and debated and debated,
    and were still debating when finally the Americans had to come from halfway around the world,
    into Europe - yet again, and do our work for us.

    Rather than protecting democracy in the Middle East, European appeasement, camouflaged
    behind the fuzzy word "equidistance," now countenances suicide bombings in Israel by
    fundamentalist Palestinians.

    Appeasement generates a mentality that allows Europe to ignore nearly 500,000 victims of
    Saddam's torture and murder machinery and, motivated by the self-righteousness of the
    peace-movement, has the gall to issue bad grades to George Bush... Even as it is uncovered that
    the loudest critics of the American action in Iraq made illicit billions, no, TENS of billions,
    in the corrupt U.N. Oil-for-Food program.

    And now we are faced with a particularly grotesque form of appeasement... How is Germany
    reacting to the escalating violence by Islamic fundamentalists in Holland and elsewhere?
    By suggesting that we really should have a "Muslim Holiday" in Germany.

    I wish I were joking, but I am not. A substantial fraction of our (German) Government, and if
    the polls are to be believed, the German people, actually believe that creating an Official State
    "Muslim Holiday" will somehow spare us from the wrath of the fanatical Islamists.

    One cannot help but recall Britain's Neville Chamberlain waving the laughable treaty signed
    by Adolf Hitler, and declaring European "Peace in our time".

    What else has to happen before the European public and its political leadership get it?
    There is a sort of crusade underway, an especially perfidious crusade consisting of systematic
    attacks by fanatic Muslims, focused on civilians, directed against our free, open Western societies,
    and intent upon Western Civilization's utter destruction.

    It is a conflict that will most likely last longer than any of the great military conflicts of the
    last century - a conflict conducted by an enemy that cannot be tamed by "tolerance" and "accommodation"
    but is actually spurred on by such gestures, which have proven to be, and will always be taken
    by the Islamists for signs of weakness.

    Only two recent American Presidents had the courage needed for anti-appeasement: Reagan and Bush.

    His American critics may quibble over the details, but we Europeans know the truth.
    We saw it first hand: Ronald Reagan ended the Cold War, freeing half of the German people from
    nearly 50 years of terror and virtual slavery. And Bush, supported only by the Social Democrat Blair,
    acting on moral conviction, recognized the danger in the Islamic War against democracy. His place
    in history will have to be evaluated after a number of years have passed.

    In the meantime, Europe sits back with charismatic self-confidence in the multicultural corner,
    instead of defending liberal society's values and being an attractive center of power on the same
    playing field as the true great powers, America and China.

    On the contrary - we Europeans present ourselves, in contrast to those "arrogant Americans",
    as the World Champions of "tolerance", which even (Germany's Interior Minister) Otto Schily justifiably
    criticizes. Why? Because we're so moral? I fear it's more because we're so materialistic, so devoid
    of a moral compass.

    For his policies, Bush risks the fall of the dollar, huge amounts of additional national debt, and a
    massive and persistent burden on the American economy - because unlike almost all of Europe,
    Bush realizes what is at stake - literally everything.

    While we criticize the "capitalistic robber barons" of America because they seem too sure of
    their priorities, we timidly defend our Social Welfare systems. Stay out of it! It could get expensive!
    We'd rather discuss reducing our 35-hour workweek, or our dental coverage, or our 4 weeks of paid
    vacation... Or listen to TV pastors preach about the need to "reach out to terrorists.
    To understand and forgive".

    These days, Europe reminds me of an old woman who, with shaking hands, frantically hides her
    last pieces of jewelry when she notices a robber breaking into a neighbor's house.

    Appeasement? Europe, thy name is Cowardice!

    -----------

    Strong stuff. Which I think we'd all have to agree is admirably direct and to the point.

    All by itself.

    But then, by strange fortuitousness, I chanced across this link today.

    From Vaclav Havel. The former playwright, and president of the Czech Republic - and a figure of immense moral authority.

    Havel asks some hard questions of Europe, and makes some hard observations, especially with respect to Cuba - observations like:

    One of the strongest and most powerful democratic institutions in the world -- the European Union -- has no qualms in making a public promise to the Cuban dictatorship that it will re-institute diplomatic Apartheid. The EU's embassies in Havana will now craft their guest lists in accordance with the Cuban government's wishes. The shortsightedness of socialist Prime Minister José Zapatero of Spain has prevailed.

    Try to imagine what will happen: At each European embassy, someone will be appointed to screen the list, name by name, and assess whether and to what extent the persons in question behave freely or speak out freely in public, to what extent they criticize the regime, or even whether they are former political prisoners. Lists will be shortened and deletions made, and this will frequently entail eliminating even good personal friends of the diplomats in charge of the screening, people whom they have given various forms of intellectual, political or material assistance. It will be even worse if the EU countries try to mask their screening activities by inviting only diplomats to embassy celebrations in Cuba.

    I can hardly think of a better way for the EU to dishonor the noble ideals of freedom, equality and human rights that the Union espouses -- indeed, principles that it reiterates in its constitutional agreement. To protect European corporations' profits from their Havana hotels, the Union will cease inviting open-minded people to EU embassies, and we will deduce who they are from the expression on the face of the dictator and his associates. It is hard to imagine a more shameful deal.

    Cuba's dissidents will, of course, happily do without Western cocktail parties and polite conversation at receptions. This persecution will admittedly aggravate their difficult struggle, but they will naturally survive it. The question is whether the EU will survive it.

    Today, the EU is dancing to Fidel Castro's tune. That means that tomorrow it could bid for contracts to build missile bases on the coast of the People's Republic of China. The following day it could allow its decisions on Chechnya to be dictated by Russian President Vladimir Putin's advisors. Then, for some unknown reason, it could make its assistance to Africa conditional on fraternal ties with the worst African dictators.

    Where will it end? The release of Milosevic? Denying a visa to Russian human-rights activist Sergey Kovalyov? An apology to Saddam Hussein? The opening of peace talks with al Qaeda?

    Remind me again: Why do we care what Europe thinks?



    Credo

    "Sign on, young man, and sail with me. The stature of our homeland is no more than the measure of ourselves. Our job is to keep her free. Our will is to keep the torch of freedom burning for all. To this solemn purpose we call on the young, the brave, the strong, and the free. Heed my call, Come to the sea. Come Sail with me." - John Paul Jones

    "Pardon him, Theodotus; he is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe and island are the laws of nature" --George Bernard Shaw, "Ceasar and Cleopatra"

    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."--Friederich Nietzsche

    "Blogito Ergo Sum" - Neptunus Lex

    About Me

    Email me:

    Solidarity
    Soldier's Angels
    Free Speech - From those who make it possible.

    Prev | List | Random | Next
    Powered by RingSurf!
    For the Effort
    Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
    Archives
    XML/RSS Feed
    Greatest Hits
    Customers who like this blog also read...

    Categories
    Blogroll
    Site Meter Web Counter
    © 2005 All rights reserved.. My weblog is proudly powered by iBlog.
    Entries (RSS). Designed by Callum Alden.