|
If this engraving depicts anything about
medieval science, it would have to be not the
shape of the earth, but
the common medieval thought experiment, derived
from Aristotle via Stoic commentators, regarding
concepts of place and finitude:
"If
you thrust your hand beyond the outermost
sphere, would your hand be in a place?"
Consider a related question:
"What is outside of the
universe?"
Is this a scientific question? Is it asked by
scientists today?
Here is Aristotle's answer, at the conclusion of
a long and careful exploration of time, place,
space, motion, and the finitude of the
universe:
"It is therefore evident that there is
no place or void or time outside the heaven
[i.e., the outermost sphere of fixed
stars]. For in every place, body can be
present; and void is said to be that in which
the presence of body, though not actual, is
possible; and time is the number of movement.
But in the absence of natural body there is no
movement, and outside the heaven, as we have
shown, body neither exists nor can come to
exist. It is clear then that there is neither
place, nor void, nor time, outside the heaven.
Hence whatever is there, is of such a nature as
not to occupy any place, nor does time age it;
nor is there any change in any of the things
which lie beyond the outermost motion...." On
the Heavens, Bk. I, ch. 9.
For Aristotle, then, the universe is finite, and
is not surrounded by matter or even by void space.
Whatever is beyond the universe does not occupy
space and is not subject to time.
Medieval scholastics subjected Aristotle's basic
concepts like place and time to searching analysis
and modification. As part of this process, thought
experiments like the following were often employed:
If a man could travel to the outermost sphere of
the heavens, what would happen if that man tried to
extend his arm or push a lance beyond the outermost
sphere? This popular question was first raised by
the Stoics, and became widely known through the 6th
century commentator on Aristotle, Simplikios of
Athens.
Some medievals, such as Albert of Saxony, argued
in the spirit of Aristotle that no one could extend
anything beyond the outermost sphere, because there
would be no place or space there to receive it.
Others disagreed, citing divine omnipresence and
omnipotence. This rejoinder comes from Jean
Buridan, an arts master at the University of Paris
in the early 14th century:
"It would not be valid to say that he
could not place or raise his arm there simply
because no space exists into which he could
extend his hand. For I say that place is nothing
but a dimension of body and your place the
dimension of your body. And before you raise
your arm outside this last sphere nothing would
be there; but after your arm has been raised, a
place would be there, namely the dimension of
your arm."
"What lies beyond the outermost sphere of the
universe?" If the universe has a limit, an
outermost sphere (as they believed), then what lies
beyond? Is it nothing, not even empty space? Or is
it an extra-cosmic void, in which God is
omnipresent? Could one stick one's hand into it? If
so, would one's hand exist in any place? Or is
place confined to the cosmos?
Perhaps those 14th-century questions sound like
the ultrafine hair-splitting the middle ages is
renowned for. To the contrary, they were questions
explored with logical rigor which led to drastic
revisions in the fundamental definitions and
postulates of Aristotelian physics. They're just
thought experiments, of course, but they played a
significant role in the transformation of the
concept of "place" into the quite different
infinite-in-all-directions "space" of Euclidean
geometry and Newtonian physics. Indeed, they remain
of interest to many cosmologists of our own century
who speak of the universe being "finite yet without
boundary."
For a magisterial study of medieval concepts of
"place," see Edward Grant, Much Ado About
Nothing (Cambridge University Press, 1981).
|