|
Another colorized version of the woodcut,
courtesy of Science Graphics in Tucson, AZ, was
included in a NASA publication called Exobiology
in Earth Orbit.
It appears with the following interesting
caption:
"A famous early 20th century engraving
(1911) erroneously thought to be a 17th century
woodcut of a Medieval astronomer passing through
the sphere of the stars to see the mechanisms of
the Ptolemaic universe beyond."
Now the theme of this image has been
transformed; it is not so much a flat earth as a
common quest of discovery and exploration: the
challenge of boldly
going where no one has gone before. This seems
to be the rhetorically durable theme, the appeal of
the woodcut which makes it so attractive to the
myriad who have reprinted or adapted it in the late
twentieth century (including us and NASA's
APOD).
Even Bernal's caption
bears a resemblance to this quest theme of breaking
through the cosmic spheres to view the unknown
beyond, although Bernal's illustrator fell victim
to the flat-earth myth, and did not grasp the
thought experiment in medieval physics that the
woodcut might represent. Yet as we have seen, the
possibility of an extracosmic void, and what would
happen if you could go there, was indeed a major
topic of debate among medieval cosmologists.
The cosmic quest theme is anticipated in an
early passage (circa fourth century AD), where the
thrice-great Hermes (once believed by many early
modern Europeans to be Moses), proclaimed:
"Learning well the essence [of the
heavens] and sharing in their nature, the
man wished to break through the circumference of
the circles [heavenly spheres] to
observe the rule of the one given power over the
fire. Having all authority over the cosmos of
mortals and unreasoning animals, the man broke
through the vault and stooped to look through
the cosmic framework, thus displaying to lower
nature the fair form of god."
(Translated by Brian
P. Copenhaver, Hermetica:
The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the
Latin Asclepius in a New English
Translation,
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992),
Hermetic treatise I, page 3.)
This passage from the Hermetic corpus might
stand as the best earliest caption for the woodcut
(in the same tradition as Adam
McLean's colorization), although I know of no
evidence that it had any direct influence on the
origin of the illustration. (I have not (yet) found
it in any of the 16th or 17th-century
astrological/hermetic works held in the University
of Oklahoma History of Science Collections even
though the woodcut appears in occasional late
19th-century reprints of these works.)
|