Quick Links
Calendar
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
Categories
Archives
Cool stuff I'm reading, watching, playing, and listening to!
Mailing List
 |
 |
Links to cool sites!
Search
PROMOS
Web Ring
XML/RSS Feed
Web Counter
Innnn-coming!!
Commenting system provided by
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Oct 29, 2003 10:25 PM
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Oct 29, 2003 10:25 PM
Quark XPress
What do you get when you combine two tops, two
bottoms, and one anti-strange?
A Subatomic Discovery Emerges From
Experiments in Japan
lamming high-energy particles of light
into carbon atoms, physicists have unexpectedly produced a new type of subatomic
particle.
Protons and neutrons, the building blocks of atoms, are made of smaller particles known as quarks, which come in six varieties. A proton, for example, consists of three quarks — two so-called up quarks and one down quark. Physicists know of slews of particles containing two or three quarks.
Now they believe they know of a particle containing five quarks that perhaps could have been common in the very early universe. (No one has yet conclusively found particles with four or six or more quarks.)
The experiments, performed at the Spring-8 laboratory in Osaka, Japan, three years ago, were intended to examine two-quark particles known as mesons. At a conference in Australia, a Russian theoretical physicist, Dr. Dimitri Diakonov, approached the director of the experiments, Dr. Takashi Nakano, of the Research Center for Nuclear Physics at Osaka University, and told Dr. Nakano that he should look through the data for signs of five-quark particles.
"Dimitri Diakonov was very confident of that," Dr. Nakano said. Dr. Nakano and his collaborators looked, and they found a peak in their graphs corresponding to the mass of the five-quark particle that Dr. Diakonov had predicted. "He was right," Dr. Nakano said. "Actually, I was very surprised."
Dr. Kenneth H. Hicks, a professor of physics at Ohio University and another member of the Spring-8 collaboration, said that even with the data matching the prediction, he did not believe it.
"There's been a general bias in the community against this particle existing," Dr. Hicks said.
When months of checking the apparatus produced no alternative explanation, the scientists concluded that they had indeed found a five-quark particle. The particle would consist of two up quarks, two down quarks and one known as an anti-strange quark.
The findings will be reported Friday in the journal Physical Review Letters.
Dr. Hicks and other researchers then reviewed data from similar experiments at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility in Newport News, Va., and again found the same signs of a five-quark particle. Physicists in Russia have also found similar evidence.
The basic theory of how quarks behave, known as quantum chromodynamics, or Q.C.D., does not prohibit five-quark particles, but no one had seen any in three decades of searching, so physicists wondered if their theory was incomplete.
"It immediately removes a worry that there might be something missing from Q.C.D. that forbids things," said Dr. Andrew Sandorfi of the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, who was not involved in any of the experiments. "It's not overwhelming proof yet, but it's highly suggestive."
Future experiments are needed to determine other properties of the particle and to rule out the possibility that the data resulted from some other effect.
Dr. Hicks said the new particles could potentially affect theories of the very early universe or even exist in the cores of some stars. "Does that have any dramatic effect?" he said. "I don't know. No one's paid any attention, because in 30 years, no one's seen them."
Protons and neutrons, the building blocks of atoms, are made of smaller particles known as quarks, which come in six varieties. A proton, for example, consists of three quarks — two so-called up quarks and one down quark. Physicists know of slews of particles containing two or three quarks.
Now they believe they know of a particle containing five quarks that perhaps could have been common in the very early universe. (No one has yet conclusively found particles with four or six or more quarks.)
The experiments, performed at the Spring-8 laboratory in Osaka, Japan, three years ago, were intended to examine two-quark particles known as mesons. At a conference in Australia, a Russian theoretical physicist, Dr. Dimitri Diakonov, approached the director of the experiments, Dr. Takashi Nakano, of the Research Center for Nuclear Physics at Osaka University, and told Dr. Nakano that he should look through the data for signs of five-quark particles.
"Dimitri Diakonov was very confident of that," Dr. Nakano said. Dr. Nakano and his collaborators looked, and they found a peak in their graphs corresponding to the mass of the five-quark particle that Dr. Diakonov had predicted. "He was right," Dr. Nakano said. "Actually, I was very surprised."
Dr. Kenneth H. Hicks, a professor of physics at Ohio University and another member of the Spring-8 collaboration, said that even with the data matching the prediction, he did not believe it.
"There's been a general bias in the community against this particle existing," Dr. Hicks said.
When months of checking the apparatus produced no alternative explanation, the scientists concluded that they had indeed found a five-quark particle. The particle would consist of two up quarks, two down quarks and one known as an anti-strange quark.
The findings will be reported Friday in the journal Physical Review Letters.
Dr. Hicks and other researchers then reviewed data from similar experiments at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility in Newport News, Va., and again found the same signs of a five-quark particle. Physicists in Russia have also found similar evidence.
The basic theory of how quarks behave, known as quantum chromodynamics, or Q.C.D., does not prohibit five-quark particles, but no one had seen any in three decades of searching, so physicists wondered if their theory was incomplete.
"It immediately removes a worry that there might be something missing from Q.C.D. that forbids things," said Dr. Andrew Sandorfi of the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, who was not involved in any of the experiments. "It's not overwhelming proof yet, but it's highly suggestive."
Future experiments are needed to determine other properties of the particle and to rule out the possibility that the data resulted from some other effect.
Dr. Hicks said the new particles could potentially affect theories of the very early universe or even exist in the cores of some stars. "Does that have any dramatic effect?" he said. "I don't know. No one's paid any attention, because in 30 years, no one's seen them."
Posted: Tue - July 1, 2003 at 05:48 PM