Some stirred-up Moslems?
http://prorev.com/2006/11/gates-and-zbiggy-get-taliban-going.htmQuestion:
The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the
Shadows"], that American
intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before
the Soviet intervention. In this period you
were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a
role in this affair. Is that
correct? Brzezinski: Yes.
According to the official version
of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after
the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly
guarded until now, is completely otherwise
Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for
secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very
day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my
opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military
intervention.Q: Despite this risk,
you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired
this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke
it?B: It isn't quite that.
We didn't push the Russians to
intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they
would.Q:
When the Soviets justified their
intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret
involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe
them. However, there was a basis of truth. You
don't regret anything today?B:
Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of
drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day
that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We
now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for
almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a
conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the
Soviet empire.Q: And neither do you
regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice
to future terrorists?B:
What is most important to the
history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some
stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold
war? Q Some stirred-up
Moslems? But it has been said and repeated Islamic fundamentalism represents a
world menace today. B:
Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That
is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and
without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5
billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian
fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or
Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian
countries. Translated from the
French by Bill Blum
Posted: Sun - November 12, 2006 at 04:08 PM