Go Further
A
thousand-mile bike ride to peddle sustainability
"Go
Further," a travelogue/environmental odyssey down the
Pacific Coast, is almost too laid back for its own good.
Then again, that's sort of the point of it all: reduce
stress, experience life, find out what's around the next
bend when you get to that bend.
Documenting actor Woody Harrelson's 2001 environmentally
friendly tour along 1,000-plus miles of the U.S. coastline,
the film unfolds with an agenda so low key that it at times
seems to forget what set Woody and his friends out on the
journey in the first place.
Traveling mostly by bicycle, with a biodiesel powered bus
trailing in support, Woody and his band of "Merry
Hempsters" encounter a series of adventures both
interesting and not. The Hempsters consist of a a
yoga-teacher, a raw food chef, a hemp-activist, and a
self-professed junk-food addict, Steve Clark, who takes
over the role of chief convert and jester. Along the way,
they pick up an English exchange student at one of Woody's
university stops who joins the Hempsters for part of the
journey.
How you will enjoy the film, I think, depends entirely on,
like, where your head is at, man. The film does seem to
meander mercilessly at times. Watching the film while
simultaneously trying to meet Entertainer deadlines, I was
in a much more goal-oriented frame of mind. I could have
used a lot less of Clark's "Whoa, Dude!" tomfoolery and
more of the people the group meets on the way who were
finding pragmatic ways to put the good vibes to use: A
woman selling hemp paper to businesses; a man with plans to
feed the world's growing pile of garbage to worms, who in
return supply a rich source of natural fertilizer; another
man working on ways of generating energy through
sustainable, small-scale solutions — every house its
own solar powered entity.
One plus of the approach that "Go Further" takes is that,
considering how passionate we know Harrelson is, the film
keeps stridency to a minimum. As he says late in the film,
Harrelson sees the solution to the problems he talks about
as a "one person at a time" venture. His goal is not to
change the world, just one person, if possible, and more if
he can. His lectures in the film are, for the most part,
thoughtful and reasoned, with a minimum of berating. He
— and to a lesser extent, the film — tries to
get the message across by living example; but I think the
movie is much less focused than Harrelson is. With steady
resolve, Harrelson peddles his bike, exuding a sense of
calm that the others in the group find it easy to rally
around. However, it would be a mistake to assume that
behind that calm is a lack of a clear agenda.
I think the film could have borrowed more of Harrelson's
goal-oriented but laid back energy, and spent a little less
on Clark and the baffling bypaths to nowhere. But your
bio-fueled diesel mileage may vary.