Cabin Fever
This horror
film is horribly horrible
This
review is written a year or more after having seen the film
on DVD.
Mercifully, I have forgotten most of the film, but what I
do remember is just how much I hated it. That shouldn't
constitute a legitimate review, but I am not inclined to
waste another hour and a half of my life rewatching the
film just to get the pointless details needed to properly
give the film the evisceration it deserves.
It's just bad.
I probably have only spent the time I have on this film
because it irks me that director Eli Roth — based on
the image he presented in the DVD extras — seems to
think that in this film he has tapped in to some dark
unpleasant truths about "Human Nature." Additionally, there
is also an unspoken assertion that if anyone responds with
an "Oh, piffle!" it can only be laid down to the fact that
they are not deep enough to admit to the "truth."
I want to discourage him, as gently as possible, from
continuing to think this way, for he is just so very wrong.
I say to him, "Oh, piffle!" and raise him a "stuff and
nonsense." If there was any truth to be found here, I'd be
the first to trumpet the fact. I like to seem like I'm
smart that way.
Here is the story of the film, to the best of my
recollection:
A hermit in the woods gets some kind of killer flesh-eating
virus from his dog, meanwhile some college students are
preparing to head to the woods where they hope to have sex
and stuff, and they drive to the woods, where they will be
staying in an isolated cabin, and they stop at a roadside
store where a bunch of weird backwoods types live, though
the point of their weirdness will forever be a mystery; and
the kids get to the "isolated cabin" and the hermit shows
up and gives everyone the virus, though they don’t
know it yet, and then one of the students starts to get
sick, and the others turn on that person instantly and with
extreme viciousness, even the guy who has been desperately
looking for a way to prove his love, and certainly this
would be the perfect opportunity to prove it by sticking up
for her, but he doesn't do anything; and the students race
around the isolated lake looking for help, and they come
upon other "isolated cabins" but nothing ever comes of any
of it, and... and... and a bunch of other stuff happens,
and at the end everyone is dead, and we go back to the
weird guys, and what the heck is the point anyway? The
entire thing is just a jumbled up mess, swelling with
exploding pustules.
I suppose Roth is trying to say that the veneer of
civilization is thin to the point of being non-existent,
that when the pustules break out, the "truth" of humans
will be revealed in a snapping flash of snarled teeth. That
view of humanity is grossly disgusting and insulting and
dishonors all those who routinely put their life on the
line to help others. Even as I write this, the 11 p.m. news
is on and I just watched a report about a young man who
died attempting, with other friends, to rescue some women
who were in trouble in a swift moving river.
The other theory about "Cabin Fever" is that it is a comedy
or a spoof of such movies. Well, I don't know about that.
All I know is that when the film is not choking and
retching on its dull cliches, it seems to believe it is
daringly original. Yawn.
And so, summing up, the theme of "Cabin Fever" would seem
to be that humans are just no good at all, that when a test
of loyalty comes, humans will not be able to turn on their
friends soon enough.
Well, I’m truly sorry if Roth’s view of his
friends is that they would abandon him — and he would
abandon them — at the first sign of
trouble, but his poor choice of friends does not a doomed
species make.