Popular PROPAGANDA

'Because the herds of feral horses, an intrusive species, is overpopulating and severely damaging range lands and threatening the survival of true wildlife species, their numbers need to be reduced ...' 

(A typical news media report excerpt)

THE ABOVE SENTENCE CONTAINS SIX STATEMENTS OF TOTALLY FALSE AND INACCURATE SPECIAL INTEREST AND POLITICAL PROPAGANDA.  Yet, these parts of its contents have been repeated so often, out of malice, ignorance or journalistic carelessness, that probably a majority of Americans believe at least most of it to be true. 


The origins of much of the misleading and inaccurate propaganda type of statements that keep being made about America's wild horses can be traced to various special interest groups, seeking to benefit financially and/or politically from the removal of these horses from public lands.

The careless use of such propaganda connected material by those who are recognized as scientists raises serious questions about such things as their actual motives and whether their scientific studies and findings, likewise, have been conducted in a very careless manner.''

A prime example of this, appears in the very first sentence of the propaganda example displayed in the right hand column at the very top of this page, alongside of the 'Popular PROPAGANDA' page title, where the horses are described as being FERAL.  And, this may be a good example of how some people have manipulated and distorted what actually are some fairly simple issues concerning wild horses, making them falsely appear to be so complex as to require a train load of intellectual giants to understand and solve the problem.  It is the editorial opinion of this web site's ecology project group that, if we look closely and carefully, we discover that some of the generally respected scientists, in an effort to validate their self proclaimed status as wild horse experts by showing off how smart they are, actually are revealing how careless and unreliable they are in the conclusions they draw and the findings they publish.

WILD HORSES ARE FERAL ??

You don't need to have a Ph. D. designation attached to your name to be able to use a dictionary.  Ours gives three definitions of 'feral' which are as follows:

     1.  "having reverted from domestication back to the original wild or untamed state."

     2.  "wild; untamed; uncultivated."

     3.  "characteristic of wild beasts; brutal; savage."

Considering the third one first, this may be the reason why the word is used for propaganda purposes so often.  Many cattle ranchers, their family members and friends, use the word feral all the time, because it has this kind of nasty connotation in the minds of so many people.  In reality, anyone who really knows anything about wild horses will tell you that their nature is to be the exact opposite of anything like brutal and/or savage.  Why in the world, then, would any wild horse type of scientist even want to suggest such a thing?  So, the use of this part of the definition in regard to wild horses is absolutely inappropriate and ludicrous.

Considering the second definition, this (were it considered exclusively of the other two definitions) could be used to pretty accurately describe ALL wildlife animals. Yet, the wielders of 'anti wild horse natural preservation propaganda' selectively have chosen to apply it only to the equids, not to such animals as wolves, bears and mountain lions, whose table manners often seem to indicate that they're far more "uncultivated".  

This leaves only a consideration of the first defination, above, which may be explained more sufficiently by considering the word "domestication". which my dictionary says is a form of the verb, "domesticate", which is defined as follows:

     v.t.   1. to change (animals, savages, or plants) from a wild to a tame or cultivated state; tame.
            2. (Figurative.) to make fond of home and family life.
            3. (Figurative.) to cause to be or feel at home; naturalize.

     v.i.   to live much at home; become domestic.

To try and address this as briefly as possible, whatever issues actually may be of any true significance have been applied mainly to wild horse ANCESTORS, either those who historically have been reported to have been brought to North America by Spanish conquistadores and domesticated horses that repotedly were used for riding by western ranchers, later to be abandoned by these humans, who simply set them free onto the range lands.  To varying degrees, the same sort of thing has happened with man's encroachment upon all kinds of other wildlife creatures all around the planet.  From elephants to raccoons, to snakes, to mice, even to killer whales of the seas and birds of the air, such as hawks and the American bald eagle, man methodically has taken various wild creatures into custody, sometimes ridden on them or trained them to pull heavy objects or to assist in hunting for other animals or simply to perform tricks for the amusement of other people, finally to turn their unfortunate, often spiritually, instinctively and physically abused and weakened victims back to their freedom in the wild, where they may interbreed either with individuals of their species who never had been taken into captivity, or breed exclusively among themselves.  So, whenever I begin to hear or read something from a person who calls wild horses feral, I immediately conclude that this is a deliberately malicious individual and/or someone who is too stupid to even bother to check in a dictionary and recognize which of the two animal groups, wild horses or dumb humans, actually is the most feral (i.e.: "uncultivated") !

A further note seems appropriate, to point out that comprehensive historic records basically are non existent for really accurate determination of such things as how many horses escaped from or were turned loose my conquistadores in Mexico, to migrate onto what now are U.S. rangelands.  And, how can we know to what degree, if any, such particular horses may have been trained, or "domesticated"?  It also is not known whether they may have mixed in with already free roaming wild horses whose native ancestors may have survived the ice age event while remaining in North America, if such survivals did, in fact, take place.  So much of all this continues to be unknown and simply a number of different theories that may be more or less scientific.

More infomation about the biological evolution of wild horses, can be found on this site's Wild Horse ORIGINS page.

 
Contruction on this page is not yet complete, pending planned entries of articles about other types of malicious wild horse propaganda.  Please excuse the temporary inconvenience.
 

(Discussion of other items of commonly used false propaganda statements about wild horses will be posted, as our development of this site continues.)