26 Caesar Essay The Task: Using the process below, write an Opinion essay comparing and contrasting characteristics of Brutus and Cassius, focusing on which of the two characters is the more suitable to lead the assassination plot and to lead in the civil war which follows the assassination of Julius Caesar. The Process: While reading the play, make notes along the way of characteristics of Brutus and Cassius. Note what each character counsels is the best course of action for the conspiracy and the reason(s) each gives. Note these recommendations in chronological order, the order in which events actually occur in each act. Identify acts and scenes of the play by sub-headings. Record only those strategy recommendations which are translated into action. Recognize that each action leads to another decision on the part of Brutus and Cassius. Note which character's game plans are followed. Consider what might have happened if the other character's advice had been followed. Then decide which character would have been best suited to lead the conspiracy to assassinate Julius Caesar and to lead the army in the civil war which results from the assassination. Your composition might open with the line, "------ is the more suitable of the conspirators to lead in the assassination of Julius Caesar and in the resulting civil war." You might continue by citing the argument each character makes in moments when decisions are made and expressing your opinion as to which character's argument shows greater political and military skill. End your composition with a strong closing statement. The following references may assist you to understand what drives Brutus and Cassius to think and act as they do: Brutus Of Noble Heritage Brutus is a Roman nobleman, as was his father (Act 1, Sc. 2, lines 169-171). Sincere: Brutus truly believes that his role in the assassination is for the good of Rome ( Act 2, Sc. 1, lines 10-34). Honest: He refuses to take bribes (Act 4, Sc. 3, lines 72-89). Naive: He believes in the essential goodness of those around him (Act 3, Sc. 1, lines 178-190); (Act 5, Sc. 5, lines 38-42). Philosophical: His philosophies guide his actions and decisions. His decisions--allowing Marc Antony to speak at Caesar's funeral and to speak last (Act 3, Sc. 1, lines 254-261), and deciding to risk all in one battle at Philippi (Act 4, Sc. 3, lines 228-237)--are based on philosphic principles rather than practical, political or military necessity. Cassius Envious: Cassius has contempt for Caesar and envies Caesar's position (Act 1, Sc. 2). Fearful: Cassius is afraid that Caesar has ambitions to be king. He fears what might become of Rome in such an instance (Act 1, Sc. 2). Politically Astute: He advises Brutus not to allow Antony to speak. He understands what can happen (Act 1, Sc. 3, lines 325-330); (Act 3, Sc. 1, lines 250-253). Corrupt: Prior to the battle at Philippi, he is accused by Brutus of taking bribes (Act 4, Sc. 3, lines 9-12). Military Strategist: His battle plan for Philippi is well thought out and based on sound military principles (Act 4, Sc. 3, lines 219-227). Resources: If you don't have a print copy of Julius Caesar handy, here's the complete text of the play. Julius Caesar. Other sites you may find useful: Links to websites concerning Julius Caesar Julius Caesar: The Last Dictator by Suzanne Cross Dictionary of Literary Terms. How You Will Be Graded: Read your composition. Your opinion essay should: begin with a strong opening statement which identifies the characters under discussion; compare and contrast the political and military skills of Brutus and Cassius; include all the important decisions; follow the standard conventions of English regarding spelling, punctuation, and grammar.