The pro-democracy movement wins againNot everyone is pleased
The official
count in the Ukrainian election was announced today. Yushchenko beat
Yanukovych by a 52-44 margin.
You would have thought that support for the pro-democracy forces in the Ukraine would be a no-brainer across the political spectrum in the West. According to blogger Marc Cooper this is not the case, at least in the pages of that preeminent journal of the left, The Nation.The tens of thousands of protesters who braved frigid weather and the fear of military reprisals to challenge last month's fraudulent first vote were apparently dupes of the US state department. As were last year's demonstrators in Georgia. This meddling it seems has been going on for quite some time, ever since crowds in the Philippines took to the streets in 1986 to overthrow dictator Ferdinand Marcos when he attempted to pad the results in his last election. It is true that several American and European organizations are working around the world with opposition politicians to monitor election results and communicate vote crimes to the public. I'm not sure why this is a bad thing simply because some of the supporting funds come from Republicans who support Bush. George Soros has also poured a significant part of his personal fortune into such efforts, and the left seemed quite happy to accept his money in the American election. Cooper is participating in the search for intelligent life in the anti-war left and offers as a sign of hope an article by Stephen Zunes: Why Progressives Must Embrace the Ukrainian Pro-Democracy Movement. rather than embracing this inspiring triumph of the human spirit against authoritarianism and repression, much of the left media has focused instead upon the opposition’s shortcomings and on the double standards and questionable motivations of the Bush administration’s support for the movement. Although these concerns are not without merit, they miss the fact that we are witnessing one of the most notable popular democratic uprisings in history. Furthermore, the left’s lukewarm response has given both the right and the mainstream media an opportunity to brand the entire progressive community with allegations that we oppose freedom and democracy. Ironically Zunes points out that the US administration's support for new elections came despite Yushchenko's campaign promise to pull the Ukraine's troops out of Iraq. Update: The current administration in the Ukraine announced on Wednesday that the defence ministry will conclude a pullout of forces from Iraq by the end 2005. The withdrawal was supported during the campaign by both Yushchenko and Yanukovych. Update II: From the Neocon Leftist a link to Max Boot in the LA Times: Exporting the Ukraine Miracle. The triumph of the Orange Revolution should dispel the quaint notion still prevalent in many Western universities and foreign ministries that democracy is a luxury good suitable only for rich countries with a tradition of liberalism stretching back centuries. Ukraine fits no one's criteria of a promising democracy: Its per capita income of $5,400 a year is lower than Algeria's or Turkmenistan's; it has a history of despotism and corruption and a short history of independence. The only less-likely democracy is Afghanistan. Yet Ukraine, like Afghanistan, held free elections this year. Boot would like to see pro-democracy groups like the National Endowment for Democracy increase their efforts in Iran. Posted: Tue - December 28, 2004 at 12:44 PM |
Quick Links
A blog by Jim Monk
XML/RSS Feed
Archives
Calendar
Categories
My Favourite Blogs
My Favourite Sites
Subscriptions
Windsor - Essex Blogs
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category: Published On: Sep 12, 2007 03:13 PM |
||||||||||||||