What Washington said


I've been following the American presidential election with the same level of interest most of my family is paying to the Stanley Cup Playoffs. They like the Detroit Red Wings, who so far are doing very well. I like McCain, but suspect the Republican is going to lose to Obama in November. In that event my hope is that Obama follows the familiar pattern of successful politicians, adopting the policies of their opponents after defeating them, at least in regards to Iraq.

There is one other reason I favour McCain, besides his positions on foreign affairs. And that is I expect, and look forward to, a large Democratic majority in both Houses of Congress. The American constitution, with its checks and balances, is more democratic than the Westminster style parliament we have in Canada. The American voters may only have two choices when it comes to parties, but they also have the option of putting both in power, pitting one against the other, forcing compromise. On our side of the border we're stuck with an elected monarch, the Prime Minister, who even in a minority parliament has way too much power, over not only the government, but also the legislature and the courts, and his own party as well.

Most Americans have a very low regard for both the Democrats and the Republicans. That's true even of those who register as one or the other. The parties are seen as necessary evils. On the other hand, this year the three remaining candidates for the presidency have run inspirational campaigns and raised expectations about the coming change of leadership.

I ran across a post on a blog recently that captures the optimistic spirit of the current election along with the American suspicion of party politics. The blog is Now That's What I'm Talkin' About!!!! with Theo Johnson, "a perspective on society and other topics affecting Black America."

Do Political Parties Do More Harm Than Good?

By: darrell.holmes

....In my humble opinion, all of the candidates are more than capable of serving as Commander-In-Chief and getting some major issues we face today turned around and likely with similar modes of execution. No matter what anyone SAYS to get elected it may be a different story once in office (ie George Bush and “No new taxes!”). In addition, we’ve seen too many times how confusing, divisive, and elitist political party affiliations can be. Truthfully, they can operate to serve some good, but the evidence shows that the bad far outweighs the good. My hope is that every American who makes the trip back to the polls in November goes with a sense of voting for the candidate that we each individually believe will best address the issues we face today; the economy/housing market, gas prices, the war, health care, etc. When we learn to vote for the good of our national community we will learn that it will ultimately benefit us all as individuals. I’ll end with this quote from George Washington during his farewell address as President:

On party politics:

They serve to Organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force–to put in the place of the delegated will of the Nation, the will of a party; often a small but artful and enterprizing minority of the Community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public Administration the Mirror of the ill concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the Organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common councils and modefied by mutual interests. However combinations or Associations of the above description may now & then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the Power of the People, & to usurp for themselves the reins of Government; destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.


Posted: Tue - May 13, 2008 at 01:13 PM          


©