'The affliction known as adolescence'


When Canada adopted the Charter of Rights and Freedoms back in the 1980s there was some debate about whether the voting age should be lowered to 14. There was talk about a charter challenge in the courts, but if it ever happened not much came of it. Today there seems to be a strong opinion to the contrary – young people can't be trusted to make mature decisions until around age 30.

Psychologist Robert Epstein has written a book challenging this view. The Case Against Adolescence: Rediscovering the Adult in Every Teen. Even though I think he's got the right idea I'm afraid it's too late to deschool society, and it's schools that are primarily responsible for creating immature adults.

The Globe and Mail (curses, I'm tempted to re-subscribe) looked at Epstein's argument with two articles in recent weeks.

Margeret Wente in her column It's our fault they can't grow up says "The infantilization of our children has reached ridiculous extremes."

We've been brainwashed to believe that succeeding in the information age demands more education (i.e. credentials) than ever before. These days, a BA is simply what a high-school diploma used to be. And a period of extended dependency is the price you've got to pay to become a functional adult in the information age.

But is the price too high? Maybe the postponement of adulthood is a spectacular waste of human potential. A lot of those 20-somethings, trapped in the ever-longer twilight zone between adolescence and adulthood, are aimless, frustrated, a little angry, and mildly depressed. They're not in control of their lives. Instead of plunging into the world of productive work, they spend years piling up more "credentials" as they try to figure out what they really want to do and waiting for just the right self-actualizing opportunity to come along.


And Tralee Pearce in Adolescence is obsolete looks more specifically at the teen years and Epstein's prescription of more responsibility and less restriction as an antidote to the immaturity epidemic.

“We've trapped all of our young people in this idiotic world of teen culture,” he says. “All their models are imbeciles – you don't have to look far to find exemplars that support the belief that teens are incompetent and irresponsible. But none of this tells you what teen competence is. It goes beyond what you see. It's about what's possible.”

In fact, with the help of other experts in adult development, Dr. Epstein and his colleague Diane Dumas developed a test to measure 14 skill sets that distinguish adults from non-adults – and on questions covering everything from knowledge of sex to citizenship to math proficiency, differences between teen and adult scores were negligible.


Rather than setting arbitrary ages for adulthood status Epstein wants to see competency tests.

So, let's imagine for a moment what happens when scores of competent young people actually pass tests allowing them to vote, drink, own property and work at meaningful jobs instead of attending high school (which Dr. Epstein characterizes as more like a prison than a place of true learning).

It would be what Dr. Epstein calls an ageless society. “In some ways, it will look like society used to look,” he says. “There was a time when it was very common for a 12-year-old to go into a bar. If the 12-year-old behaved irresponsibly, the 12-year-old would be treated harshly – just like a 30-year-old.”


The 112 comments that followed showed some Globe readers are appalled and others intrigued by such proposals.

Perhaps there is some hope for the kids. With the shrinking population there's a silly idea going around that society should raise the retirement age and force us old folks to keep on working. Yah right, if you really want to see rebellion try that one. We've already got the vote remember, and we tend to use it. Work is for the young. We should return it to them.


Thanks to Zonk for drawing these stories to my attention.

Posted: Tue - August 28, 2007 at 10:09 AM          


©